Weitzenböck identity should not be confused with Weitzenböck's inequality.
In mathematics, in particular in differential geometry, mathematical physics, and representation theory, a Weitzenböck identity, named after Roland Weitzenböck, expresses a relationship between two second-order elliptic operators on a manifold with the same principal symbol. Usually Weitzenböck formulae are implemented for G-invariant self-adjoint operators between vector bundles associated to some principal G-bundle, although the precise conditions under which such a formula exists are difficult to formulate. This article focuses on three examples of Weitzenböck identities: from Riemannian geometry, spin geometry, and complex analysis.
In Riemannian geometry there are two notions of the Laplacian on differential forms over an oriented compact Riemannian manifold M. The first definition uses the divergence operator δ defined as the formal adjoint of the de Rham operator d:where α is any p-form and β is any -form, and
\langle ⋅ , ⋅ \rangle
On the other hand, the Levi-Civita connection supplies a differential operatorwhere ΩpM is the bundle of p-forms. The Bochner Laplacian is given bywhere
\nabla*
\nabla
The Weitzenböck formula then asserts thatwhere A is a linear operator of order zero involving only the curvature.
The precise form of A is given, up to an overall sign depending on curvature conventions, bywhere
\theta:T*M ⊗ \OmegapM → \Omegap+1M
\#:\Omegap+1M → T*M ⊗ \OmegapM
If M is an oriented spin manifold with Dirac operator ð, then one may form the spin Laplacian Δ = ð2 on the spin bundle. On the other hand, the Levi-Civita connection extends to the spin bundle to yield a differential operatorAs in the case of Riemannian manifolds, let
\Delta'=\nabla*\nabla
If M is a compact Kähler manifold, there is a Weitzenböck formula relating the
\bar{\partial}
According to the Weitzenböck formula, if
\alpha\in\Omega(p,q)M
A