Weil–Brezin Map Explained

In mathematics, the Weil–Brezin map, named after André Weil[1] and Jonathan Brezin,[2] is a unitary transformation that maps a Schwartz function on the real line to a smooth function on the Heisenberg manifold. The Weil–Brezin map gives a geometric interpretation of the Fourier transform, the Plancherel theorem and the Poisson summation formula.[3] [4] [5] The image of Gaussian functions under the Weil–Brezin map are nil-theta functions, which are related to theta functions. The Weil–Brezin map is sometimes referred to as the Zak transform,[6] which is widely applied in the field of physics and signal processing; however, the Weil–Brezin Map is defined via Heisenberg group geometrically, whereas there is no direct geometric or group theoretic interpretation from the Zak transform.

Heisenberg manifold

N

is the 3-dimensional Lie group that can be represented by triples of real numbers with multiplication rule

\langlex,y,t\rangle\langlea,b,c\rangle=\langlex+a,y+b,t+c+xb\rangle.

The discrete Heisenberg group

\Gamma

is the discrete subgroup of

N

whose elements are represented by the triples of integers. Considering

\Gamma

acts on

N

on the left, the quotient manifold

\Gamma\backslashN

is called the Heisenberg manifold. The Heisenberg group acts on the Heisenberg manifold on the right. The Haar measure

\mu=dx\wedgedy\wedgedt

on the Heisenberg group induces a right-translation-invariant measure on the Heisenberg manifold. The space of complex-valued square-integrable functions on the Heisenberg manifold has a right-translation-invariant orthogonal decomposition:

L2(\Gamma\backslashN)=nHn

where

Hn=\{f\inL2(\Gamma\backslashN)\midf(\Gamma\langlex,y,t+s\rangle)=\exp(2\piins)f(\Gamma\langlex,y,t\rangle)\}

.

Definition

The Weil–Brezin map

W:L2(R)\toH1

is the unitary transformation given by

W(\psi)(\Gamma\langlex,y,t\rangle)=\suml\in\psi(x+l)e2e2\pi

for every Schwartz function

\psi

, where convergence is pointwise.

The inverse of the Weil–Brezin map

W-1:H1\toL2(R)

is given by

(W-1f)(x)=

1
\int
0

f(\Gamma\langlex,y,0\rangle)dy

for every smooth function

f

on the Heisenberg manifold that is in

H1

.

Fundamental unitary representation of the Heisenberg group

For each real number

λ\ne0

, the fundamental unitary representation

Uλ

of the Heisenberg group is an irreducible unitary representation of

N

on

L2(R)

defined by

(Uλ(\langlea,b,c\rangle)\psi)(x)=e2\psi(x+a)

. By Stone–von Neumann theorem, this is the unique irreducible representation up to unitary equivalence satisfying the canonical commutation relation

Uλ(\langlea,0,0\rangle)Uλ(\langle0,b,0\rangle)=e2\piUλ(\langle0,b,0\rangle)Uλ(\langlea,0,0\rangle)

.The fundamental representation

U=U1

of

N

on

L2(R)

and the right translation

R

of

N

on

H1\subsetL2(\Gamma\backslashN)

are intertwined by the Weil–Brezin map

WU(\langlea,b,c\rangle)=R(\langlea,b,c\rangle)W

.In other words, the fundamental representation

U

on

L2(R)

is unitarily equivalent to the right translation

R

on

H1

through the Wei-Brezin map.

Relation to Fourier transform

Let

J:N\toN

be the automorphism on the Heisenberg group given by

lF=W-1J*W

as a unitary operator on

L2(R)

.

Plancherel theorem

The norm-preserving property of

W

and

J*

, which is easily seen, yields the norm-preserving property of the Fourier transform, which is referred to as the Plancherel theorem.

Poisson summation formula

For any Schwartz function

\psi

,

\suml\psi(l)=W(\psi)(\Gamma\langle0,0,0)\rangle)=(J*W(\psi))(\Gamma\langle0,0,0)\rangle)=W(\hat{\psi})(\Gamma\langle0,0,0)\rangle)=\suml\hat{\psi}(l)

.This is just the Poisson summation formula.

Relation to the finite Fourier transform

For each

n\ne0

, the subspace

Hn\subsetL2(\Gamma\backslashN)

can further be decomposed into right-translation-invariant orthogonal subspaces

Hn=

|n|-1
m=0

Hn,m

where

Hn,m=\{f\inHn\midf(\Gamma\langlex,y+{1\overn},t\rangle)=e2\pif(\Gamma\langlex,y,t\rangle)\}

.The left translation

L(\langle0,1/n,0\rangle)

is well-defined on

Hn

, and

Hn,0,...,Hn,

are its eigenspaces.

The left translation

L(\langlem/n,0,0\rangle)

is well-defined on

Hn

, and the map

L(\langlem/n,0,0\rangle):Hn,0\toHn,m

is a unitary transformation.

For each

n\ne0

, and

m=0,...,|n|-1

, define the map

Wn,:L2(R)\toHn,

by

Wn,m(\psi)(\Gamma\langlex,y,t\rangle)=\suml\in\psi(x+l+{m\overn})e2e2\pi

for every Schwartz function

\psi

, where convergence is pointwise.

Wn,m=L(\langlem/n,0,0\rangle)\circWn,0.

The inverse map

-1
W
n,m

:Hn,m\toL2(R)

is given by
-1
(W
n,m

f)(x)=

1
\int
0

e-2\pif(\Gamma\langlex-{m\overn},y,0\rangle)dy

for every smooth function

f

on the Heisenberg manifold that is in

Hn,m

.

Similarly, the fundamental unitary representation

Un

of the Heisenberg group is unitarily equivalent to the right translation on

Hn,m

through

Wn,m

:

Wn,mUn(\langlea,b,c\rangle)=R(\langlea,b,c\rangle)Wn,m

.For any

m,m'

,
-1
(W
n,m'

J*Wn,m\psi)(x)=e2\pi\hat{\psi}(nx)

.

For each

n>0

, let

\phin(x)=(2n)1/4

-\pinx2
e
. Consider the finite dimensional subspace

Kn

of

Hn

generated by

\{\boldsymbol{e}n,0,...,\boldsymbol{e}n,n-1\}

where

\boldsymbol{e}n,m=Wn,m(\phin)\inHn,m.

Then the left translations

L(\langle1/n,0,0\rangle)

and

L(\langle0,1/n,0\rangle)

act on

Kn

and give rise to the irreducible representation of the finite Heisenberg group. The map

J*

acts on

Kn

and gives rise to the finite Fourier transform

J*\boldsymbol{e}n,m={1\over\sqrt{n}}\summ'e2\pi\boldsymbol{e}n,m'.

Nil-theta functions

Nil-theta functions are functions on the Heisenberg manifold that are analogous to the theta functions on the complex plane. The image of Gaussian functions under the Weil–Brezin Map are nil-theta functions. There is a model[7] of the finite Fourier transform defined with nil-theta functions, and the nice property of the model is that the finite Fourier transform is compatible with the algebra structure of the space of nil-theta functions.

Definition of nil-theta functions

Let

ak{n}

be the complexified Lie algebra of the Heisenberg group

N

. A basis of

ak{n}

is given by the left-invariant vector fields

X,Y,T

on

N

:

X(x,y,t)={\partial\over\partialx},

Y(x,y,t)={\partial\over\partialy}+x{\partial\over\partialt},

T(x,y,t)={\partial\over\partialt}.

These vector fields are well-defined on the Heisenberg manifold

\Gamma\backslashN

.

Introduce the notation

V-i=X-iY

. For each

n>0

, the vector field

V-i

on the Heisenberg manifold can be thought of as a differential operator on

Cinfty(\Gamma\backslashN)\capHn,m

with the kernel generated by

\boldsymbol{e}n,m

.

We call

\ker(V-i:Cinfty(\Gamma\backslashN)\capHn\toHn)=\left\{\begin{array}{lr}Kn,&n>0\C,&n=0\end{array}\right.

the space of nil-theta functions of degree

n

.

Algebra structure of nil-theta functions

The nil-theta functions with pointwise multiplication on

\Gamma\backslashN

form a graded algebra

n\geKn

(here

K0=C

).

Auslander and Tolimieri showed that this graded algebra is isomorphic to

C[x1,

2,
x
2
6
x
3

+

4
x
1
2
x
2

+

6)
x
2
,and that the finite Fourier transform (see the preceding section
  1. Relation to the finite Fourier transform
) is an automorphism of the graded algebra.

Relation to Jacobi theta functions

Let

\vartheta(z;\tau)=

infty
\sum
l=-infty

\exp(\piil2\tau+2\piilz)

be the Jacobi theta function. Then

\vartheta(n(x+iy);ni)=(2n)-1/4

\piny2
e

\boldsymbol{e}n,0(\Gamma\langley,x,0\rangle)

.

Higher order theta functions with characteristics

f

on

C

is called a theta function of order

n

, period

\tau

(

Im(\tau)>0

) and characteristic
a
[
b]
if it satisfies the following equations:

f(z+1)=\exp(\piia)f(z)

,

f(z+\tau)=\exp(\piib)\exp(-\piin(2z+\tau))f(z)

.The space of theta functions of order

n

, period

\tau

and characteristic
a
[
b]
is denoted by
a
\Theta
b](\tau,

A)

.

\dim

a
\Theta
b](\tau,

A)=n

. A basis of
0
\Theta
0](i,

A)

is

\thetan,m(z)=\suml\in\exp[-\pin(l+{m\overn})2+2\pii(ln+m)z)]

.These higher order theta functions are related to the nil-theta functions by

\thetan,m(x+iy)=(2n)-1/4

\piny2
e

\boldsymbol{e}n,m(\Gamma\langley,x,0\rangle)

.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Weil, André. "Sur certains groupes d'opérateurs unitaires." Acta mathematica 111.1 (1964): 143-211.
  2. Brezin, Jonathan. "Harmonic analysis on nilmanifolds." Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 150.2 (1970): 611-618.
  3. Auslander, Louis, and Richard Tolimieri. Abelian harmonic analysis, theta functions and function algebras on a nilmanifold. Springer, 1975.
  4. Auslander, Louis. "Lecture notes on nil-theta functions." Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, 1977.
  5. Zhang, D. "Integer Linear Canonical Transforms, Their Discretization, and Poisson Summation Formulae"
  6. Web site: Zak Transform.
  7. Auslander, L., and R. Tolimieri. "Algebraic structures for⨁Σ _ 2 (/) compatible with the finite Fourier transform." Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 244 (1978): 263-272.