Weichselian glaciation explained

The Weichselian glaciation is the regional name for the Last Glacial Period in the northern parts of Europe. In the Alpine region it corresponds to the Würm glaciation. It was characterized by a large ice sheet (the Fenno-Scandian ice sheet) that spread out from the Scandinavian Mountains and extended as far as the east coast of Schleswig-Holstein, northern Poland and Northwest Russia. This glaciation is also known as the Weichselian ice age (German: Weichsel-Eiszeit), Vistulian glaciation, Weichsel[1] or, less commonly, the Weichsel glaciation, Weichselian cold period (Weichsel-Kaltzeit), Weichselian glacial (Weichsel-Glazial), Weichselian Stage or, rarely, the Weichselian complex (Weichsel-Komplex).

In Northern Europe it was the youngest of the glacials of the Pleistocene ice age. The preceding warm period in this region was the Eemian interglacial. The last cold period began about 115,000 years ago and ended 11,700 years ago. Its end corresponds with the end of the Pleistocene epoch and the start of the Holocene. The German geologist (1858–1944) named it using the German name (Weichsel) of the Vistula (Polish: Wisła) in present-day Poland.

Naming in other parts of the world

In other regions Major Glacial 4 of the Pleistocene is given a local name. In the Alpine region it is the Würm glaciation, in Great Britain the Devensian glaciation, in Ireland the Midlandian glaciation and in North America, the Wisconsin glaciation.[2] [3]

Development of the glaciation

Early and Middle Weichselian

The Fennoscandian Ice Sheet of the Weichselian glaciation most likely grew out of a mountain glaciation of small ice fields and ice caps in the Scandinavian Mountains. The initial glaciation of the Scandinavian Mountains would have been enabled by moisture coming from the Atlantic Ocean and the mountains high altitude. Perhaps the best modern analogues to this early glaciation are the ice fields of Andean Patagonia.[4] Since the proximity to the temperate North Atlantic typically precludes ice growth in Scandinavia, changes in the North Atlantic are thought to be required for glaciation to develop in Scandinavia. The freezing and glaciation of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago could effect this by causing "relatively fresher" water from the Arctic and the North Pacific to flow east of Greenland disrupting the convection of North Atlantic Deep Water.[5] According to this view any closing of the Bering Strait that blockades the entering of North Pacific water to the Arctic Ocean would have been detrimental for the inception of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet.[5]

Jan Mangerud posits that parts of the Norwegian coast were likely free from glacier ice during most of the Weichselian prior to the Last Glacial Maximum.[6]

Between 38 and 28 ka BP there was a relatively warm period in Fennoscandia called the Ålesund interstadial. The interstadial receives its name from the Ålesund municipality in Norway where its existence was first established based on the local fossil record of shells.[7]

Last Glacial Maximum

The growth of the ice sheet to its Last Glacial Maximum extent began after the Ålesund interstadial.[8]

By circa 26 ka BP, the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet reached the mid-Norwegian continental shelf break.[9] The growth of the ice sheet was accompanied by an eastward migration of the ice divide from the Scandinavian Mountains eastwards into Sweden and the Baltic Sea. As the ice sheets in northern Europe grew prior to the Last Glacial Maximum, the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet coalesced with the ice sheet that was growing in the Barents Sea 24 ka BP (kiloannī or one thousand years Before Present) and with the ice sheet of the British Isles at about thousand years later. At this point the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet formed part of a larger Eurasian ice sheet complex—a contiguous glacial ice mass which spanned an area from Ireland to Novaya Zemlya.[10]

The central parts of the Weichsel ice sheet had cold-based conditions during the times of maximum extent. This means that in areas like north-east Sweden and northern Finland pre-existing landforms and deposits escaped glacier erosion and are particularly well preserved at present.[11] Also during times of maximum extent the ice sheet terminated to the east in a gently uphill terrain meaning that rivers drained into the glacier front and large proglacial lakes built up.[8]

The Last Glacial Maximum extent was first reached 22 ka BP in the southern boundary of the ice sheet in Denmark, Germany and Western Poland (Sławskie Lake District and Leszczyńskie Lake District). In Eastern Poland, Lithuania, Belarus and Pskov Oblast in Russia the ice sheet reached its maximum extent about 19 ka BP. In the remainder of northwestern Russia the largest glacier advance occurred 17 ka BP.

Deglaciation up to Younger Dryas

As the ice margin started to recede 22–17 ka BP Denmark (except Bornholm), Germany, Poland and Belarus were ice-free 16 ka BP. The ice margin then retreated until the Younger Dryas when the ice sheet stabilized. By this time, most of Götaland, Gotland, all of the Baltic states and the southeastern coast of Finland had been added to the ice-free regions. In Russia, Lake Ladoga, Lake Onega, the bulk of Kola Peninsula and the White Sea were free from ice during the Younger Dryas. Before the Younger Dryas, deglaciation had not been uniform and small ice sheet re-advances had occurred forming a series of end-moraine systems, notably those in Götaland.

During deglaciation, meltwater formed numerous eskers and sandurs. In north-central Småland and southern Östergötland part of the meltwater was routed through a series of canyons.[12]

It is speculated that during the Younger Dryas a small glacier readvance in Sweden created a natural lock system that brought freshwater taxa such as Mysis and Salvelinus to lakes like Sommen that were never connected to the Baltic Ice Lake. The survival of these cold-water taxa into the present-day means they are glacial relicts.[13]

Final deglaciation

When ice margin retreat resumed the ice sheet became increasingly concentrated in the Scandinavian Mountains (it had left Russia 10.6 ka BP and Finland 10.1 ka BP). Further retreat of the ice margin led the ice sheet to concentrate in two parts of the Scandinavian Mountains, one part in Southern Norway and another in Northern Sweden and Norway. These two centres were linked for a time. The linkage constituted a major drainage barrier that formed various large and ephemeral ice-dammed lakes. About 10.1 ka BP the linkage had disappeared and so did the Southern Norway centre of the ice sheet about a thousand years later. The northern centre remained a few hundred years more so that by 9.7 ka BP the eastern Sarek Mountains hosted the last remnant of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet.[14] As the ice sheet retreated to the Scandinavian Mountains this was not a return to its former mountain centred glaciation from which the ice sheet grew out; it was dissimilar in that the ice divide lagged behind as the ice mass concentrated in the west.[4]

It is not known if the ice sheet disintegrated into scattered remains before vanishing or if it shrank while maintaining its coherence as a single ice mass.[15] It is possible that while some ice remained east of Sarek Mountains parts of the ice sheet survived temporarily in the high mountains.[15] Remnants east of the Sarek Mountains formed various ephemeral ice-dammed lakes that caused numerous glacial lake outburst floods down the rivers of northernmost Sweden.[15]

Isostatic adjustment

Isostatic adjustment bought by deglaciation is reflected in the shoreline changes of the Baltic Sea and other nearby bodies of water. In the Baltic Sea uplift has been greatest at the High Coast in the western Bothnian Sea. Within the High Coast the relict shoreline at 286 m in Skuleberget is at present the highest known point on Earth to have been uplifted by postglacial isostatic rebound.[16] North of the High Coast at Furuögrund off the coast of Skellefteå lies the area with the highest uplift rates at present with values of about 9 mm/yr.[16] [17] [18] Ongoing post-glacial rebound is thought to result in splitting of the Gulf of Bothnia into a southern gulf and a northern lake across Norra Kvarken no earlier than in about 2,000 years.[19] Isostatic rebound exposed a submarine joint valley landscape as Stockholm archipelago.[20] [21]

Since deglaciation the rate of post-glacial rebound in the Kandalaksha Gulf has varied. Since the White Sea connected to the world's oceans uplift along the southern coast of the gulf has totaled 90 m. In the interval from 9,500–5,000 years ago the uplift rate was of 9–13 mm/yr. Prior to the Atlantic period the uplift rate had decreased to 5–5.5 mm/yr, to then rise briefly before arriving at the present uplift rate of 4 mm/yr.[22]

Emergence above sea level is thought to have resulted in the triggering of a series of landslides in western Sweden as pore pressure increased when the groundwater recharge zone came above sea level.[23]

Sequence and subdivisions of the Weichselian

About 115,000 years ago average temperatures dropped markedly and warmth-loving woodland species were displaced. This significant turning point in average temperatures marked the end of the Eemian interglacial and start of the Weichselian glacial stage. It is divided into three sections, based on the temperature variation: the Weichselian Early Glacial,[24] the Weichselian High Glacial[25] (also Weichselian Pleniglacial[24]) and the Weichselian Late Glacial.[24] During the Weichselian, there were frequent major variations in climate in the northern hemisphere, the so-called Dansgaard–Oeschger events.

The Weichsel Early Glacial (115,000–60,000 BC) is in turn divided into four stages:

In the Weichselian High Glacial (57,000 – c. 15,000 BC) the ice sheet advanced into North Germany. In this period, however, several interstadials have been documented.

The short "Weichselian Late Glacial" (12,500 – c. 10,000 BC) was the period of slow warming after the Weichselian High Glacial. It was however again interrupted by some colder episodes.thumb|Weichselian Late Glacial with mid-European culture groups

Following the last of these cold periods, the Younger Dryas, the Weichselian Glacial ended with an abrupt climb in temperature around 9,660 ± 40 BC. This was the start of our present interglacial, the Holocene.

In addition to the above subdivisions the depositions of the Weichselian Late Glacial following the retreat of the ice sheet are divided into four stages: the Germanic Glacial (Germaniglazial) (Germany becomes ice-free), the Danish Glacial (Daniglazial) (Denmark becomes ice-free), The Gotland Glacial (Gotiglazial) (Gotland becomes ice-free) and the Finnish Glacial (Finiglazial) (Finland and Norway become ice-free).

See also

Literature

Notes and References

  1. Whittow, John (1984). Dictionary of Physical Geography. London: Penguin, 1984, p. 580. .
  2. F.J. Monkhouse Principles of Physical Geography, London: University of London Press, 1970 (7th edn.), p. 254. SBN 340 09022 7
  3. Whittow, John (1984). Dictionary of Physical Geography. London: Penguin, 1984, p. 265. .
  4. Fredin. Ola. 2002. Glacial inception and Quaternary mountain glaciations in Fennoscandia . Quaternary International. 95–96 . 99–112 . 10.1016/s1040-6182(02)00031-9. 2002QuInt..95...99F.
  5. The importance of Canadian Arctic Archipelago gateways for glacial expansion in Scandinavia . . Lofverstrom . Marcus . 2022-06-09 . 15 . 482–488 . Thompson . Diane M. . 10.1038/s41561-022-00956-9 . Otto-Bliesner . Bette L. . Brady . Esther C.. 6 . 2022NatGe..15..482L . 249524145 .
  6. Mangerud . Jan . Jan Mangerud . 1981 . The Early and Middle Weichselian in Norway: a review . . 10 . 4 . 447–462 . 10.1111/j.1502-3885.1981.tb00508.x .
  7. Mangerud . Jan . Gulliksen . Steinar. Larsen . Eiliv. Oddvar . Longva. Miller . Gifford H.. Sejrup . Hans-Petter. Sønstegaard . Eivind. Jan Mangerud . 1981 . A Middle Weichselain ice-free period in Western Norway: the Ålesund Interstadial . . 10 . 4 . 381–393 . 10.1111/j.1502-3885.1981.tb00500.x .
  8. Larsen . Eiliv . Fredin . Ola . Lyså . Astrid. Amantov . Aleksey. Feldskaar . Willy. Ottesen . Dag . 2016 . Causes of time-transgressive glacial maxima positions of the last Scandinavian Ice Sheet . . 96 . 2 . 159–170 . January 20, 2018.
  9. Rørvik . K.-L. . Laberd . J. S. . Hald . M. . Ravna . E. K. . Vorren . T. O. . August 2010 . Behavior of the northwestern part of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum – a response to external forcing . . 29 . 17–18 . 2224–2237 . 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.022 . 2010QSRv...29.2224R . 25 November 2022.
  10. Patton . Henry . Hubbard . Alun. Andreasen . Karin. Auriac . Amandine. Whitehouse . Pippa L.. Stroeven . Arjen P.. Shackleton . Calvin. Winsborrow . Monica. Heyman . Jakob. Hall . Adrian M. . 2017 . Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex . . 169 . 148–172 . 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019. 2017QSRv..169..148P. free . 10037/11970 . free .
  11. Sarala . Pertti. 2005 . Weichselian stratigraphy, geomorphology and glacial dynamics in southern Finnish Lapland . . 77 . 2. 71–104 . 10.17741/bgsf/77.2.001. free .
  12. Olvmo . M. . 1992 . Glaciofluvial canyons and their relation to the Late Weiochselian deglaciation in Fennoscandia . . 36 . 3 . 343–363 . 10.1127/zfg/36/1992/343 . 1992ZGm....36..343O .
  13. Kinsten, Björn . 2010 . De glacialrelikta kräftdjurens utbredning i södra Sverige (Götaland och Svealand) . 2010/7. Länsstyrelsen Blekinge län . 1–19 . April 19, 2019 . sv .
  14. 2016. Deglaciation of Fennoscandia. Quaternary Science Reviews . 147. 91–121 . 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.016. 2016QSRv..147...91S. Stroeven . Arjen P . Hättestrand . Clas . Kleman . Johan . Heyman . Jakob . Fabel . Derek . Fredin . Ola . Goodfellow . Bradley W . Harbor . Jonathan M . Jansen . John D . Olsen . Lars . Caffee . Marc W . Fink . David . Lundqvist . Jan . Rosqvist . Gunhild C . Strömberg . Bo . Jansson . Krister N . free . 1956/11701 . free .
  15. Tracing the last remnants of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet: Ice-dammed lakes and a catastrophic outburst flood in northern Sweden. Quaternary Science Reviews. 221. 105862. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105862. Jan Mangerud. 2019. Regnéll. Carl. Mangerud. Jan. Svendsen. John Inge. 2019QSRv..22105862R. free. 1956/21672. free.
  16. Berglund . M. . 2012 . The highest postglacial shore levels and glacio-isostatic uplift pattern in northern Sweden . . 94. 3. 321–337. 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2011.00443.x . 128972883 .
  17. Ågren, J. and Svensson, R., 2006. Land uplift model and system definitions used for the RH 2000 adjustment of the Baltic levelling ring. The 15th General Meeting of the Nordic Geodetic Commission, Copenhagen, 29 May–2 June 2006, 1–9
  18. Davis . J.L. . Mitrovica . J.X.. Scherneck . H.-G.. Fan . H. . 1999 . Investigations of Fennoscandian glacial isostatic adjustment using modern sealevel records . . 104 . B2 . 2733–2747 . 10.1029/1998jb900057. 1999JGR...104.2733D. free .
  19. Tikkanen . Matti . Oksanen . Juha . 2002 . Late Weichselian and Holocene shore displacement history of the Baltic Sea in Finland . . 180 . 1–2 . December 22, 2017 .
  20. Lidmar-Bergströrm . Karna . Karna Lidmar-Bergström. 1995 . Relief and saprolites through time on the Baltic Shield . . 12 . 1. 45–61 . 10.1016/0169-555X(94)00076-4. 1995Geomo..12...45L .
  21. Book: Sporrong, Ulf . The Scandinavian landscape and its resources . Helle . Knut. 2003 . The Cambridge History of Scandinavia . limited . Cambridge University Press . 1 . 37 . 9780521472999 .
  22. Romanenko . F.A. . Shilova . O.S. . 2011 . The Postglacial Uplift of the Karelian Coast of the White Sea according to Radiocarbon and Diatom Analyses of LacustrineBoggy Deposits of Kindo Peninsula . Doklady Earth Sciences . 442 . 2 . 544–548 . 10.1134/S1028334X12020079 . 2012DokES.442..242R . 129656482 .
  23. Smith . Colby A. . Larsson . Olof . Engdahl . Mats . 2017 . Early Holocene coastal landslides linked to land uplift in western Sweden . . 99 . 3 . 288–311 . 10.1080/04353676.2017.1329624 . 133775764 .
  24. John Dodson (ed.), Earth Systems and Society, New York, London, etc., Springer, 2010 p. 173.
  25. Wolfgang Schirmer, Quaternary field trips in central Europe, Volume 1, Pfeil, 1995, p. 375.