generally means one who is learned, wise[1] and is derived from the word which means 'excited, enthusiastic or inspired, seer; learned, wise, poet or a learned theologian or theologist'.The word विप्र vipra has been derived from the root-sound विप् vip which means ‘to tremble, shake, shiver, quiver, vibrate’Vipra means ""vidyayā yāti vipratvam"".[2] [3] In the context of Hindu philosophy, this term occurs very significantly in the second (verse) of Sri Shankara’s Vivekachudamani which reads as follows:
According to Sri Aurobindo the विप्र vipra is the most illumined one. In the Vedas सूर्य sūrya or sun is called विप्र vipra. Sri Aurobindo says: “Surya enlightens the mind and the thoughts with the illuminations of the Truth. He is vipra, the illumined. It is he who delivers the individual human mind from the circumscribed consciousness of self and environment and enlarges the limited movement which is imposed on it by its preoccupation with its own individuality. Therefore he is brihat, the Large. But his illumination is not a vague light, nor does his large come by a confused and dissolved view of self and object; it holds in itself a clear discernment of things in their totality, their parts and their relations. Therefore he is vipashcit…” (Vol. 15, CWSA, The Secret of the Veda, Page: 289) [4]
Attaining the status of – that of being a Vipra– is very rare. The person is a Brāhmana, because it is not intended for enjoying sense-pleasures, must be subjected to strict disciplines in preparation of enjoying eternal joy in store after death, the ultimate which is the dharma only of Brāhmaņas.[5] Through a Sanskrit inscription, written in late Brahmi script, found on the Talagunda Stone-pillar in Shimoga district dated 455-470 A.D; it became known that a Kadamba king named Śāntivarman had saved the Brahmanahood in the Kali Yuga.[6] In his commentary on the Aitareya Upanishad (Sloka III.ii.3), Shankara states that the Atman is expanded only in human beings who are therefore endowed with intelligence; who see what is known, give expression to what is known and know what is to come; they know the visible and the invisible and perceive the immortal through the mortal. Thus, according to Shankara, the individual self is conscious living entity that makes the individual body eligible for action and knowledge. Accordingly, the term, here, refers to the inwardly inspired or awakened body and mind; it does not refer to persons born in the families of Brahmins as has been erroneously interpreted by the most interpreters.[7]
Śrī Candraśekhara Bhāratī of Śringeri in his commentary explains that the phrase in the afore-cited verse refers to him who is inclined to the path of dharma prescribed in the Vedas; and he alone who is an, the one who believes in the existence of the atman apart from the body, is qualified to study the . And, this means that mere (birth as a brahmin) by itself will not help to attain what is to be attained, and vide Jaimini Dharma, which is super-sensuous and the very foundation of universe, is what is commanded by the Vedas. The phrase refers to the discrimination between the Atman and whatever is not the Atman, that is, to the Anatman, which reflection produces firm conviction of the truth of the śrutis supported by reasoning.[8]
by Sanātana Goswami states that can be gained by being properly initiated.[9] In this context, Kāne states that:
""
a person becomes a Dikshita with the aid of a guru, after which gain there remains no difference of identity, then and, both, cease to exist.[10] [11]