Viking ring fortress explained

Whs:Viking-Age Ring Fortresses
Includes:Aggersborg, Fyrkat, Nonnebakken, Trelleborg, and Borgring
Criteria:Cultural: iii, iv
Id:1660
Year:2023
Area:51 ha
Buffer Zone:16,820.8 ha

A Viking ring fortress, Trelleborg-type fortress, or trelleborg (pl. trelleborgs), is a type of circular fort of a special design, built in Scandinavia during the Viking Age. These fortresses have a strictly circular shape, with roads and gates pointing in the four cardinal directions. Inside the fort, each quadrant has one, in a single case four, square blocks of longhouses, completing the geometric symmetry. There are a total of five confirmed Viking ring fortresses at present, located in Denmark (although sites in Sweden and across Northern Europe have similar construction).[1] They have been dated to the reign of Harold Bluetooth of Denmark, with an estimated near contemporary time of construction c. 980. Their exact historical context is subject to debate. In 2023, the five Danish forts were inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List because of their unique architecture and testimony to the military power of the Jelling Dynasty.

Etymology

This specific type of fortification was named after the first discovered example: Trelleborg near Slagelse, excavated in the years 1936-1941. Traditionally, the name trelleborg has been translated and explained as ″a fortress built by slaves″, since the Old Norse word for slave was thrall (The modern word is træl in Danish and in Swedish) and borg means fortress or city. The word trel (pl. trelle) is also a plausible explanation and relates to the wooden staves, covering both sides of the protective circular walls.[2]

History

At the end of the 10th century Harold Bluetooth vied with tribal Saxons, the Holy Roman Empire - at that time governed by the (integrated) Saxon Ottonian house - and the Slavic Abodrit and Veleti tribes for the control of the southern region of the Jutland peninsula, This area was also the very same region presumed to have been the ancient homelands of the Angles. Harald also had to contend with Norse people exercising coastal raids. At the Firth of Schlei lay Hedeby, known in the contemporary literary sources as Schleswig, where the Danevirke complex of fortifications streched across the foot of the peninsula, holding back the hostile hosts from entering the territory, as well as providing a safe trade route via Ejderen from the North Sea coastline into Hedeby and the Baltic Sea.

The entire complex of fortifications, bridges and roads, including Ravninge Bridge on the land route towards Jelling, are presumed to have been in the hands of Harold. The fortresses establish a string of strategic points stretching from Aggersborg at the north of Jutland southward across Funen to end in Borgring at the east coast of Zealand. They have been dated to the reign of Harold Bluetooth, who held sway until c. 985, where he was ousted by his son Sweyn Forkbeard, who eventually conquered the Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Æthelred the Unready some years later. This is the apex of the Jelling dynasty, its patristic line ending the year 1042 with Harthacnut, son of Cnut the Great, son of Sweyn.[3]

Fortifications of a similar shape and date have been found around other old towns in Scandinavia, including Borgeby, Trelleborgen, and Helsingborg in Skåne, Sweden, near Aarhus in Jutland, and Rygge, Norway[4] [5] Other, similar forts across Northern Europe include the Walcheren forts in Friesland (built in the outskirts of the Carolingian Empire, with a similar street orientation), and Warham Camp in England, but these are not considered Viking ring forts as they were likely built at different periods in time.[6] [7]

The precise purpose of the fortresses is unknown. Some historians argue that they functioned as military barracks or training grounds by Sweyn Forkbeard. However, it is more likely that they were intended as defensive strongholds along strategic trade points and/or administrative outposts of the budding state.[8] Søren Sindbæk has offered the hypothesis that the fortresses allowed local populations to seek shelter within the fortress walls against an enemy while waiting for assistance from friendly forces from afar; this means that the fortresses helped Harold Bluetooth to control vast territory and send his army to a particular part of his territory without worrying that the undefended parts would be conquered or plundered. Others have debated whether the fortresses were defensive structures, military strongholds, or primarily served as barracks, as well as the economic, religious, and symbolic significance of the fortresses.

The fortresses were soon abandoned and was never mentioned in the literary sources, effectively creating the enigma now known as trelleborge (Danish plural of 'trelleborg'). Nonnebakken was enveloped by the near contemporary municipal bishopric of Odense, while the rest receded into the landscape. The modern discovery of these sites began in the 1930s, with the excavation of Trelleborg in Denmark. Since then, a total of five sites have been officially accepted as Viking ring fortresses.

During the royally funded research project Kongens Borge (The Kings Castles), in 2010, Denmark applied for the admission of Trelleborg, Fyrkat and Aggersborg as The Trelleborg Fortresses as a UNESCO World Heritage cultural property,[9] It is rumoured, that Denmark and Sweden, perhaps around that time, applied for admission of the Viking ring fortresses, but the records available at the World Heritage Centre cannot confirm any Swedish ring fortresses was ever mentioned.[10] The five trelleborge presently known became the Viking-Age Ring Fortresses World Heritage Site in 2023.

List of Viking ring fortresses

Suspected

Fortification typology

The trelleborgs had similar design,[11] "perfectly circular with gates opening to the four corners of the earth, and a courtyard divided into four areas which held large houses set in a square pattern", and differ clearly from other fortifications in that region, essentially because of the geometrical plan - though excepting the Frankish forts at Walcheren. A short exposé over early Viking camps in Scandinavia, by Arjen Heijnis, has turned the picture around, marking out these earlier camps "fundamentally different from later defensive structures (ie. the early castles)."

The fortresses are sometimes partially encircled by advanced ramparts, though not always circular.It has been said the trelleborgs were measured with the Roman foot and that the pointed bottom of the moats is a Roman trait.

Dating by dendrochronology has found the wood used for the construction of Trelleborg to have been felled in the autumn of 980 and thus being used for building presumably in the spring of 981. The findings indicate a short construction time with no signs of maintenance, leading to the interpretation of only a short use of the buildings, maybe five years but hardly more than twenty. Fyrkat may be a little older, Aggersborg somewhat younger. 2014 brought a corresponding date to Borgring (end of 10th century), and, in 2019, following the geo-radar survey and subsequent excavation, Nonnebakken also was dated to c. 980. In the 2021 application to UNESCO, all five Danish trelleborgs appear with dates between 970 and 980. Some say the material found at Nonnebakken, Borgring and the Scandian forts is not suffient for a precise dating,but still the layout of the trelleborgs in their local setting - at Trelleborg, Fyrkat, Aggersborg, Nonnebakken under Odense, Borgring and the forts at Trelleborg and Borgeby in Sweden - are so similar that it is probable that they were also functionally associated.

At the turn of the century much debate had passed under the bridge,[12] with much emphasis on adding or not adding an archaeological site to the list of trelleborgs; Nonnebakken was accepted as late as 2017, though at that time the archaeologist Mads Runge had to conclude there was no sign of any buildings inside the rampart. This knowledge status changed the following year, when geo-radar technology was applied.[13]

Notes and References

  1. cf. ;
  2. Book: Veje ind i arkæologien. da. 66. Janne Bøje Andersen. 2010. 978-87-993972-0-4. 7 September 2014.
  3. cf.
  4. Web site: The Vikings' Aros - The Ramparts. The Viking Museum. Moesgård Museum. da. 6 September 2014.
  5. Web site: Stylegar. Frans-Arne H.. En trelleborg i Rygge?. 29 March 2005. Arkeologi i nord. da. 29 July 2022.
  6. ; cf.
  7. News: Prickett . Katy . 2024-01-09 . Digging for Britain: Iron Age Warham Camp to feature on BBC show . 2024-03-15 . . en-GB.
  8. ;
  9. ;.
    , pages 6 & 10
  10. Cf. the nordic serial application Viking Monuments, pages 7,8,18,22, in
  11. cf.
  12. a couple of overview articles in Danish highlight this, for example and
  13. Name Inner
    diameter
    Rampart
    width
    Number of
    houses
    Length of
    houses
    Position Year of discovery Year of construction
    Aggersborg240 m11 m4832.0 m56.9956°N 9.255°W975–980
    Borgeby150 m15 m55.7514°N 13.0367°W1997
    Borgring122 m10–11 m55.4697°N 12.1219°W2014 (1875)
    Fyrkat120 m13 m1628.5 m56.6233°N 9.7706°W1950980
    Nonnebakken120 m55.3922°N 10.3881°W1953980–1000
    Trelleborg136 m19 m16 (30)29.4 m55.3942°N 11.2653°W1936981
    Trelleborgen112 m55.3762°N 13.1476°W1988c. 800

    See also

    External links

    Sources

    Supplement
    • Lund. Julie. Sindbæk. Søren M.. 2021-05-15. Crossing the Maelstrom: New Departures in Viking Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research. 30. 2. 169–229. 10.1007/s10814-021-09163-3. 1573-7756. free. 10852/89013. free.
    • . Ten Harkel. Letty. Aggersborg. The Viking-age settlement and fortress. Antiquity. 89. 345. June 2015. 759–760.
    • Mads. Runge. Revitalising the Danish Viking Age Ring Fortress Nonnebakken, Odense, Denmark. 2019-07-03. Landscapes. 20. 2. 98–119. 10.1080/14662035.2020.1861726. 232080910. 1466-2035.

    References