| Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras | |
| Court: | Inter-American Court of Human Rights |
| Date Decided: | July 29, 1988 |
| Full Name: | Case of Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras |
| Judge: | Rafael Nieto-Navia, President Héctor Gros Espiell, Vice President Rodolfo E. Piza E., Judge Thomas Buergenthal, Judge Pedro Nikken, Judge Héctor Fix-Zamudio, Judge Rigoberto Espinal Irías, Judge ad hoc |
| Number Of Judges: | 7 |
| Chiefjudge: | Rafael Nieto-Navia |
Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras is a case that was decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) in 1988.[1] It is a seminal case in the realm of international human rights law that is known for its analysis of state responsibility for enforced disappearances.[2] Its reasoning has influenced other international human rights tribunals, including the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights[3] and the European Court of Human Rights.
Angel Manfredo Velásquez Rodríguez was a student at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras during the Policarpo Paz García administration. He was involved in student activism against the government. On September 12, 1981, between 4:30 and 5:00 PM, Velásquez Rodríguez was abducted in Tegucigalpa. Eyewitnesses to the abduction said several armed men pushed him into a car with tinted windows and without a license plate.[4]
Velásquez Rodríguez was never seen or heard from again, and the Honduran government denied any knowledge of his whereabouts.
In 1988, the IACHR determined that Honduras was liable for the disappearance of Velásquez Rodríguez. The Court reasoned that the state violated its duties under the American Convention on Human Rights by not conducting an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding Velásquez Rodríguez's disappearance.[5] Honduras fully complied with the order to pay restitution to Velásquez Rodríguez's family, and the case was closed on September 10, 1996.[6]