Vaporizer (inhalation device) explained

A vaporizer or vaporiser, colloquially known as a vape, is a device used to vaporize substances for inhalation. Plant substances can be used, commonly cannabis, tobacco, or other herbs or blends of essential oil.[1] However, they are most commonly filled with a combination propylene glycol, glycerin, and drugs such as nicotine (e.g. extract from tobacco) or tetrahydrocannabinol as a liquid solution.[2]

Vaporizers contain various forms of extraction chambers including straight bore, venturi, or sequential venturi, and are made of materials such as metal or glass. The extracted vapor may be collected in an inflatable bag, or inhaled directly through a hose or pipe. When used properly, cooler temperatures due to lack of combustion[3] result in significantly more efficient extraction of the ingredients. Hence, the irritating and harmful effects of smoking are heavily reduced,[4] [5] [6] [7] [8] as is its secondhand smoke.

Cannabis vaporizers

Cannabis flower is commonly consumed using a dry herb vaporizer. The cannabis may be heated in a chamber via indirect flame exposure or an electrical heating element, allowing users to inhale the resulting vapor. The temperatures reached are cooler than the combustion temperature of cannabis, which is around 230–315 °C (445–600 °F).

Vaporizing is more efficient than smoking, because approximately 30% of THC in cannabis or hashish cigarettes is destroyed by pyrolysis during smoking.

Cannabis is also consumed via the vaporization of cannabis concentrates or oils that have been extracted from the plant, commonly referred to as "dabbing". Users typically employ a torch to heat a small cup shaped quartz or titanium attachment on a bong before dabbing the oil onto the heated surface and inhaling the vapors through the bong.[9] This route of consumption is generally much more potent than smoking or vaporizing marijuana flower due to the increased concentration of cannabinoids. Users typically report that the effects of dabbing are much more intense than regular cannabis, while also being shorter lived.[10]

Cannabis concentrate is also commonly used in e-cigarette style vaporizer pens in the form of liquid containers known as cartridges. A battery connected to the atomizer is used to heat the cannabis oil, creating a vapor that is inhaled by the user. Cartridges typically contain different preparations of cannabis oil mixed with cannabinoids, terpenes, solvents (primarily Propylene glycol and Glycerol) used for thinning, fatty acids, and flavonoids. Natural or artificial terpenes are frequently added by manufacturers to enhance flavor, often using blends that mimic popular cannabis strains or sugary foods such as candy or pastries.[11]

Of the studies that have investigated cannabis vaporization, few have addressed the quality of the vapor extracted and delivered; instead, studies usually focus on the mode of usage of the vaporizers. However, those that have addressed vapor quality have demonstrated promising results. Such studies suggest that the absence of combustion results in an aerosol that contains significantly lower amounts of harmful substances found in smoke, such as tar, carbon monoxide, and carcinogenic compounds known as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).[12] One study found that cannabis smoke contains 111 compounds (including several carcinogenic PAHs) in addition to the cannabinoids, whereas only 3 additional compounds were identified in cannabis vapor, other than the cannabinoids. This suggests that the vaporization of cannabis may be a safer alternative to combusted cannabis.[13] On the other hand, a study in the UK (where cannabis is illegal) found that some illicitly distributed cannabis vaporizers contained harmful levels of xylazine, an animal sedative which can lead to overdose.[14]

E-cigarette vaporizers

See main article: Electronic cigarette. An electronic cigarette is a handheld battery-powered vaporizer that simulates smoking by providing some of the behavioral aspects of smoking, including the hand-to-mouth action of smoking, but without combusting tobacco.[15] Using an e-cigarette is known as "vaping" and the user is referred to as a "vaper."[16] Instead of cigarette smoke, the user inhales an aerosol, commonly called vapor.[17] E-cigarettes typically have a heating element that atomizes a liquid solution called e-liquid.[18] E-cigarettes may be automatically activated by taking a puff;[19] others turn on manually by pressing a button.[16] Some e-cigarettes look like traditional cigarettes,[20] but they come in many variations.[16] Most versions are reusable, though some are disposable.[21] There are first-generation,[22] second-generation,[23] third-generation,[24] and fourth-generation devices.[25] E-liquids usually contain propylene glycol, glycerin, nicotine, flavorings, additives, and differing amounts of contaminants.[26] E-liquids are also sold without propylene glycol,[27] nicotine,[28] or flavors.

The benefits and the health risks of e-cigarettes are uncertain.[29] [30] [31] There is tentative evidence they may help people quit smoking,[32] although they have not been proven to be more effective than smoking cessation medicine.[33] There is concern with the possibility that non-smokers and children may start nicotine use with e-cigarettes at a rate higher than anticipated than if they were never created. Following the possibility of nicotine addiction from e-cigarette use, there is concern children may start smoking cigarettes. Youth who use e-cigarettes are more likely to go on to smoke cigarettes.[34] Their part in tobacco harm reduction is unclear,[35] while another review found they appear to have the potential to lower tobacco-related death and disease.[36] Regulated US Food and Drug Administration nicotine replacement products may be safer than e-cigarettes,[35] but e-cigarettes are generally seen as safer than combusted tobacco products.[37] [38] It is estimated their safety risk to users is similar to that of smokeless tobacco.[39] The long-term effects of e-cigarette use are unknown.[40] [41] [42] The risk from serious adverse events was reported in 2016 to be low.[43] Less serious adverse effects include abdominal pain, headache, blurry vision,[44] throat and mouth irritation, vomiting, nausea, and coughing.[45] Nicotine itself is associated with some health harms.[46] In 2019 and 2020, an outbreak of severe lung illness throughout the US has been linked to the use of contaminated black market THC vape cartridges.[47]

Other drug

Vaporizers can be used to inhale other recreational drugs as well. A wide variety can be consumed this way, either dissolved in e-liquid or vaporized directly.[48] The use of e-cigarettes to inhale the psychedelic drug DMT has been reported.[49]

Medical vaporizers

Studies have shown that vaporizing cannabis exposes the user to lower levels of harmful substances than smoking cannabis.[50] [51] [52] [53] These findings are important for it is estimated that 10–20% of patients with chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and HIV/AIDS have admitted to smoking cannabis for therapeutic purposes. For patients, a study found that smoking cannabis sativa reduced daily pain by 34%, a statistically significant amount.[54]

In a study published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology in May 2008, it was stated that vaporizers were a "suitable method for the administration of THC".[55] A 2007 study by the University of California, San Francisco, published in the Journal of the American Academy of Neurology, found that "there was virtually no exposure to harmful combustion products using the vaporizing device". A 2006 study performed by researchers at Leiden University found that vaporizers were "safe and effective cannabinoid delivery system(s)". The study stated that the amount of THC delivered by vaporizers were equivalent to the amount delivered by smoking.[53] Because of those studies and other studies, vaporizers are considered medically sound devices for delivering THC.[56]

Efficiency

The proposed factors affecting output include:[50] [53]

Not all those have been scientifically tested. Research using vaporizers found the delivery efficiency highest at around 226C, falling to about half efficiency at 150C180C depending on material.[53] The purest preparations produced the highest efficiencies, about 56% for pure THC versus 29% for plant material (female flower tops) with 12% THCA content. Besides THC, several other cannabinoids as well as a range of other plant components including terpenoids were detected in the plant material. Using pure THC in the vaporizer, no degradation products (delta-8-THC (D8-THC), cannabinol (CBN), or unknown compounds) were detected by HPLC analysis. The longer vapor is stored, the more THC is lost as it condenses on the surface of the vaporizer or the balloon. This loss may be negligible over a few minutes but may exceed 50% after 90 minutes.[53] The Leiden University study found that as much as 30–40% of inhaled THC was not absorbed by the lungs but simply exhaled. However, they did not find large individual differences in the amounts exhaled.[53]

Culinary application

Vaporizers are sometimes used by chefs as a method of applying controlled heat to herbs and spices to release flavors that are otherwise difficult to titrate or apply, or that might be spoiled by overheating during cooking.[57] [58] [59] Grant Achatz, chef-proprietor of Alinea in Chicago, "uses the aroma-filled bags as place-mats, punctured when plates are placed in front of the customer".[57]

See also

Bibliography

Notes and References

  1. Stefaniak . Aleksandr B. . LeBouf . Ryan F. . Ranpara . Anand C. . Leonard . Stephen S. . 2021 . Toxicology of flavoring- and cannabis-containing e-liquids used in electronic delivery systems . Pharmacology & Therapeutics . 224 . 107838 . 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107838 . 0163-7258 . 8251682 . 33746051.
  2. Li . Liqiao . Lee . Eon S. . Nguyen . Charlene . Zhu . Yifang . 2020 . Effects of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, and nicotine on emissions and dynamics of electronic cigarette aerosols . Aerosol Science and Technology: The Journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research . 54 . 11 . 1270–1281 . 10.1080/02786826.2020.1771270 . 0278-6826 . 7590927 . 33116348. 2020AerST..54.1270L .
  3. Book: Veterinary Anesthesia and Pain Management Secrets . Elsevier Health Sciences . Stephen A. Greene . 2002 . 978-1560534426.
  4. Earleywine M, Barnwell SS . Decreased respiratory symptoms in cannabis users who vaporize . Harm Reduction Journal . 4 . 11 . 2007 . 17437626 . 1853086 . 10.1186/1477-7517-4-11 . free .
  5. Web site: Vaporizers for Medical Marijuana. https://web.archive.org/web/20100718043235/http://www.aids.org/atn/a-327-02.html. 2010-07-18. www.aids.org. 2008-07-28.
  6. 10.1300/J175v01n03_09 . Harm Reduction Associated with Inhalation and Oral Administration of Cannabis and THC . June 2001 . Grotenhermen F . Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics . 1 . 3 & 4 . 133–152.
  7. Abrams DI, Vizoso HP, Shade SB, Jay C, Kelly ME, Benowitz NL . Vaporization as a smokeless cannabis delivery system: a pilot study . Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics . 82 . 5 . 572–578 . November 2007 . 17429350 . 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100200 . 14629288 . 2011-02-23 . 2007-06-06 . https://web.archive.org/web/20070606015513/http://www.maps.org/media/vaporizer_epub.pdf . dead .
  8. The Centennial Celebration – Washington, D.C. September 13–17, 1948 . Science . 108 . 2800 . 205–206 . August 1948 . 17821306 . 10.1126/science.108.2800.205. free .
  9. Web site: 2020 . Vaping & Marijuana Concentrates . 2023-10-28 . Drug Enforcement Administration.
  10. Chaiton . Michael . Kundu . Anasua . Rueda . Sergio . Di Ciano . Patricia . 2021-08-26 . Are vaporizers a lower-risk alternative to smoking cannabis? . Canadian Journal of Public Health . 113 . 2 . 293–296 . 10.17269/s41997-021-00565-w . 0008-4263 . 8975973 . 34448130.
  11. Guo . Weihong . Vrdoljak . Gordon . Liao . Ven-Chi . Moezzi . Bahman . Major Constituents of Cannabis Vape Oil Liquid, Vapor and Aerosol in California Vape Oil Cartridge Samples . Frontiers in Chemistry . Front Chem. . 21 June 2021. 9 . 694905 . 10.3389/fchem.2021.694905 . 34368078 . 8333608 . free .
  12. Abrams. D. I.. Vizoso. H. P.. Shade. S. B.. Jay. C.. Kelly. M. E.. Benowitz. N. L.. 2007. Vaporization as a Smokeless Cannabis Delivery System: A Pilot Study. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. en. 82. 5. 572–578. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100200. 17429350. 14629288. 1532-6535.
  13. Loflin . Mallory . Earleywine . Mitch . 2015 . No smoke, no fire: What the initial literature suggests regarding vapourized cannabis and respiratory risk . Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy . 51 . 1 . 7–9 . 1205-9838 . 4456813 . 26078621.
  14. News: Hall . Rachel . 2024-04-10 . Animal tranquilliser found in cannabis vapes and illicit sedatives in UK . 2024-04-10 . The Guardian . en-GB . 0261-3077.
  15. Caponnetto. Pasquale. Campagna. Davide. Papale. Gabriella. Russo. Cristina. Polosa. Riccardo. The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 6. 1. 2012. 63–74. 1747-6348. 10.1586/ers.11.92. 22283580. 207223131.
  16. Orellana-Barrios. Menfil A.. Payne. Drew. Mulkey. Zachary. Nugent. Kenneth. Electronic cigarettes-a narrative review for clinicians. The American Journal of Medicine. 2015. 0002-9343. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.033. 25731134. 128. 7. 674–81. free.
  17. Cheng. T.. Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control. 23. Supplement 2. 2014. ii11–ii17. 0964-4563. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051482. 3995255. 24732157.
  18. Weaver. Michael. Breland. Alison. Spindle. Tory. Eissenberg. Thomas. Electronic Cigarettes. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 8. 4. 2014. 234–240. 1932-0620. 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000043. 4123220. 25089953.
  19. Rahman. Muhammad. Hann. Nicholas. Wilson. Andrew. Worrall-Carter. Linda. Electronic cigarettes: patterns of use, health effects, use in smoking cessation and regulatory issues. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 12. 1. 2014. 21. 10.1186/1617-9625-12-21. 4350653. 25745382 . free .
  20. Pepper. J. K.. Brewer. N. T.. Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review. Tobacco Control. 23. 5. 2013. 375–384. 0964-4563. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051122. 24259045. 4520227.
  21. Drope. Jeffrey. Cahn. Zachary. Kennedy. Rosemary. Liber. Alex C.. Stoklosa. Michal. Henson. Rosemarie. Douglas. Clifford E.. Drope. Jacqui. Key issues surrounding the health impacts of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and other sources of nicotine. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 67. 6. 449–471. 2017. 0007-9235. 10.3322/caac.21413. 28961314. free.
  22. Bhatnagar. A.. Whitsel. L. P.. Ribisl. K. M.. Bullen. C.. Chaloupka. F.. Piano. M. R.. Robertson. R. M.. McAuley. T.. Goff. D.. Benowitz. N.. Electronic Cigarettes: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 24 August 2014. 130. 16. 1418–1436. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000107. 25156991. 7643636. free.
  23. Web site: Electronic cigarettes . Hayden McRobbie . 1–16 . National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training . 2014 . 2015-11-06 . 2022-04-23 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220423185420/https://www.ncsct.co.uk/usr/pub/e-cigarette_briefing.pdf . dead .
  24. Farsalinos KE, Spyrou A, Tsimopoulou K, Stefopoulos C, Romagna G, Voudris V . Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: Comparison between first and new-generation devices . Scientific Reports . 4 . 4133 . 2014 . 10.1038/srep04133 . 3935206 . 24569565. 2014NatSR...4E4133F .
  25. Web site: Konstantinos Farsalinos. Electronic cigarette evolution from the first to fourth generation and beyond. gfn.net.co. Global Forum on Nicotine. 23 September 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150708172614/http://gfn.net.co/downloads/2015/Plenary%203/Konstantinos%20Farsalinos.pdf. 8 July 2015. dead.
  26. England. Lucinda J.. Bunnell. Rebecca E.. Pechacek. Terry F.. Tong. Van T.. McAfee. Tim A.. Nicotine and the Developing Human. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015. 49. 2. 286–93. 0749-3797. 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.015. 4594223. 25794473.
  27. Oh. Anne Y.. Kacker. Ashutosh. Do electronic cigarettes impart a lower potential disease burden than conventional tobacco cigarettes?: Review on e-cigarette vapor versus tobacco smoke. The Laryngoscope. December 2014. 124. 12. 2702–2706. 10.1002/lary.24750. 25302452. 10560264. free.
  28. Leduc. Charlotte. Quoix. Elisabeth. Is there a role for e-cigarettes in smoking cessation?. Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease. 10. 2. 2016. 130–135. 1753-4658. 10.1177/1753465815621233. 26668136. 5933562.
  29. Ebbert. Jon O.. Agunwamba. Amenah A.. Rutten. Lila J.. Counseling Patients on the Use of Electronic Cigarettes. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 90. 1. 2015. 128–134. 0025-6196. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.11.004. 25572196. free.
  30. Siu. AL. Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.. Annals of Internal Medicine. 22 September 2015. 26389730. 10.7326/M15-2023. 163. 8. 622–34.
  31. Harrell . PT. Simmons. VN. Correa. JB. Padhya. TA. Brandon. TH. Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ("E-cigarettes"): Review of Safety and Smoking Cessation Efficacy.. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 4 June 2014. 24898072. 10.1177/0194599814536847. 151. 3. 381–393. 4376316.
  32. McRobbie. Hayden. Bullen. Chris. Hartmann-Boyce. Jamie. Hajek. Peter. McRobbie. Hayden. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014. 12. 12. CD010216. 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub2. 25515689. 2292/27824. free.
  33. McDonough. Mike. Update on medicines for smoking cessation. Australian Prescriber. 38. 4. 2015. 106–111. 0312-8008. 10.18773/austprescr.2015.038. 4653977. 26648633.
  34. Web site: E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults A Report of the Surgeon General: Fact Sheet. Surgeon General of the United States. 2016.
  35. Drummond. MB. Upson. D. Electronic cigarettes. Potential harms and benefits.. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. February 2014. 11. 2. 236–42. 24575993. 10.1513/annalsats.201311-391fr. 5469426.
  36. M. . Z. . Siegel . Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: a step forward or a repeat of past mistakes? . Journal of Public Health Policy . February 2011 . 32 . 1 . 16–31 . 21150942 . 10.1057/jphp.2010.41 . M. free .
  37. Knorst. Marli Maria. Benedetto. Igor Gorski. Hoffmeister. Mariana Costa. Gazzana. Marcelo Basso. The electronic cigarette: the new cigarette of the 21st century?. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia. 40. 5. 2014. 564–572. 1806-3713. 10.1590/S1806-37132014000500013. 4263338. 25410845.
  38. Burstyn. Igor. Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks. BMC Public Health. 14. 1. 9 January 2014. 18. 1471-2458. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-18. 3937158. 24406205 . free .
  39. Electronic cigarette: a possible substitute for cigarette dependence.. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease. Mar 2013. Caponnetto P. Russo C. Bruno CM. Alamo A. Amaradio MD. Polosa R.. 79. 1. 12–19. 23741941. 10.4081/monaldi.2013.104. free.
  40. Hartmann-Boyce. Jamie. McRobbie. Hayden. Lindson. Nicola. Bullen. Chris. Begh. Rachna. Theodoulou. Annika. Notley. Caitlin. Rigotti. Nancy A.. Turner. Tari. Butler. Ailsa R.. Fanshawe. Thomas R.. 2021-04-29. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 4. 8 . CD010216. 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub5. 1469-493X. 8092424. 33913154.
  41. Brady. Benjamin R.. De La Rosa. Jennifer S.. Nair. Uma S.. Leischow. Scott J.. Electronic Cigarette Policy Recommendations: A Scoping Review. American Journal of Health Behavior. 43. 1. 2019. 88–104. 1087-3244. 10.5993/AJHB.43.1.8. 30522569. 54566712 .
  42. Bals. Robert. Boyd. Jeanette. Esposito. Susanna. Foronjy. Robert. Hiemstra. Pieter S.. Jiménez-Ruiz. Carlos A.. Katsaounou. Paraskevi. Lindberg. Anne. Metz. Carlos. Schober. Wolfgang. Spira. Avrum. Blasi. Francesco. Electronic cigarettes: a task force report from the European Respiratory Society. European Respiratory Journal. 53. 2. 2019. 1801151. 0903-1936. 10.1183/13993003.01151-2018. 30464018. free.
  43. Paley. Grace L.. Echalier. Elizabeth. Eck. Thomas W.. Hong. Augustine R.. Farooq. Asim V.. Gregory. Darren G.. Lubniewski. Anthony J.. Corneoscleral Laceration and Ocular Burns Caused by Electronic Cigarette Explosions. Cornea. 35. 7. 2016. 1015–1018. 0277-3740. 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000881. 4900417. 27191672.
  44. Breland. Alison B.. Spindle. Tory. Weaver. Michael. Eissenberg. Thomas. Science and Electronic Cigarettes. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 8. 4. 2014. 223–233. 1932-0620. 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000049. 4122311. 25089952.
  45. Grana. R. Benowitz, N . Glantz, SA . E-cigarettes: a scientific review.. Circulation. 13 May 2014. 129. 19. 1972–86. 24821826. 10.1161/circulationaha.114.007667. 4018182.
  46. Web site: E-Cigarettes: Expert Q&A With the CDC. Edgar. Julie. WebMD. 12 November 2013.
  47. Web site: Outbreak of Lung Illness Associated with Using E-cigarette Products. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 28 January 2020.
  48. Varlet V . Drug Vaping: From the Dangers of Misuse to New Therapeutic Devices . Toxics . 4 . 4 . 29. December 2016 . 29051432 . 5606648 . 10.3390/toxics4040029 . free .
  49. Web site: Power. Mike . vanc . 2020-06-05. I Sell DMT Vape Pens So People Can 'Break Through' at Their Own Speed. 2020-07-12. www.vice.com. en.
  50. Dale . Gieringer . Joseph . St. Laurent . Scott . Goodrich . Cannabis Vaporizer Combines Efficient Delivery of THC with Effective Suppression of Pyrolytic Compounds . Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics . June 20, 2010 . 4 . 1 . 7–27 . 9 February 2004 . 10.1300/J175v04n01_02.
  51. Web site: Marijuana Vaporizer Provides Same Level Of THC, Fewer Toxins, Study Shows", Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology (summarized by Science Daily) (2007-05-16) . Sciencedaily.com . 2007-05-16 . 2011-02-23.
  52. Web site: Cal NORML/MAPS Study Shows Vaporizer Can Drastically Reduce Toxins in Marijuana Smoke . Canorml.org . 2011-02-23.
  53. Hazekamp A, Ruhaak R, Zuurman L, van Gerven J, Verpoorte R . Evaluation of a vaporizing device (Volcano) for the pulmonary administration of tetrahydrocannabinol . Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 95 . 6 . 1308–17 . June 2006 . 16637053 . 10.1002/jps.20574.
  54. Book: Peripheral Neuropathies, An Issue of Neurologic Clinics . Elsevier . Barohn, Richard . 2013 . 978-1455771226.
  55. Zuurman L . Effect of intrapulmonary tetrahydrocannabinol administration in humans . . 22 . 7 . 707–16 . September 2008 . 18515447 . 10.1177/0269881108089581. Roy C . Schoemaker RC . 6094814 . etal .
  56. 10.1300/J175v01n03_10 . Cannabis 'Vaporization' . June 2001 . Gieringer DH . Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics . 1 . 3 & 4 . 153–170.
  57. Web site: Bob Gledhill . Alinea restaurant uses Volcano as flavorizer . 22 August 2007 . Caterersearch.com . 2011-02-23.
  58. Web site: Tools for creating aromatic flavors . Chow.com . 2007-01-18 . 2011-02-23.
  59. Web site: Volcano used to release nutmeg aroma . https://web.archive.org/web/20090124225055/http://www.rimag.com/article/CA6556364.html. 2009-01-24 . Rimag.com . 2011-02-23.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Vaporizer (inhalation device)".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.