The Van Herick technique is an eye examination method used to determine the size of the anterior chamber angle of the eye.
Glaucoma is currently the principal cause of irreversible blindness in the world.[1] Therefore, The Van Herick technique is pertinent to the interests of all eye care practitioners as it permits for a quick and simple screening alternative to the conventional Gonioscopy examination.[2] It should not however, be used as a replacement for the gonioscopy examination but rather be used as a means of refuting or confirming the results of a gonioscopy examination.[3] The Van Herick's technique has become the most commonly used qualitative method of assessing the size of the anterior chamber angle (ACA). Whereby, it involves comparing the depth of the peripheral anterior chamber to the thickness of the cornea, when a narrow beam is shone within the limbus at a 60°angle.[4] The anterior chamber drainage angle is then graded as a ratio between the peripheral anterior chamber depth and corneal thickness (AC : C ratio) [5] or expressed traditionally as a fraction [6] to provide the Van Herick's result. Grading can also be obtained by distinguishing the structures visible upon observation. Each visible structure correlates to a Van Herick grade which can then be expressed a fraction.
The technique was initially designed by Van Herich, performed with the utilization of a slit lamp without the requirement of any additional aids. It facilitates a simple and quick assessment of the lateral chamber angle. The method involves a narrow slit of light from a slit lamp being projected onto the peripheral cornea at an angle of 60⁰ as near as possible to the limbus. The resulting image is a slit that is projected onto the surface of the cornea, the width is then used as a reference for the grading of the angle. The width of the angle is graded by the distance between the corneal slit image and the slit image on the iris.[7]
The test should be performed in a dim lit room with the patient directed to fixate on a distance target to minimize any fluctuations of accommodation and pupil size.
The Van Herick's technique compares the depth of the peripheral anterior chamber with the cornea thickness, usually written as a fraction however, it can also be expressed as a ratio (see table 3). By grading the angle using the Van Herick technique it also allows an estimation of the probability of closure and an estimated angle in degrees (see table 2).
| Chamber Depth in Corneal Thickness | Angle Grade | |
|---|---|---|
| ≥cornea | 4 | |
| 1/4 to 1/2 | 3 | |
| 1/4 | 2 | |
| <1/4 | 1 | |
| Slit | Dangerously Narrow |
| Grade | Estimated Angle | Probability of Closure | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 0 | 0° | Closed | |
| Grade 1 | ≈10° | Very likely | |
| Grade 2 | ≈20° | Possible | |
| Grade 3 | ≈30° | Unlikely | |
| Grade 4 | ≥45° | Impossible |
| Ratio | Angle Closure | Angle Grade | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1:1 | Open Angle | VH grade 4 | |
| 1:1/2 | Open angle | VH grade 3 | |
| 1:1/4 | Narrow angle | VH grade 2 | |
| 1: <1/4 | Angle Closure likely | VH grade 1 |
Unfortunately, although the Van Herick offers a quick and simple alternative to gonioscopy examinations, it also comes with limitations to its results. Principally, it has been deduced that measurements performed at the nasal limbus tend to overestimate the angle width.[10] Moreover, although the technique relies on the subjective assessment of the observed structures, it has been found that the results are not easily replicated and there was a high level of variability depending on the perception of the examiner. The technique also may be considered of inadequate scope, as it only provides an estimate of the anterior chamber angle (ACA) at the temporal limbus, in contrast with gonioscopy, which allows for a 360 degree view of the anterior chamber. Furthermore, the Van Herick technique has been found to be exceedingly sensitive to the positioning of the direct slit-lamp beam whereby a 10 degrees deviation from the perpendicular direction was found to be critical to the results and measurements.
In addition, the ACA (anterior chamber angle) ratio was found to be highly dependent on the corneal thickness as a thin cornea would result in a larger ratio than that of a thicker cornea.[11] In conclusion, although the Van Herick technique for anterior chamber angle assessment offers many benefits including being non-invasive, quick, a comparatively accessible technique, with satisfactory specificity and sensitivity values, for the detection of angle closure; it is nonetheless not devoid of limitations. Most of the sources of variability may be simply overcome with the direct measurement of the depth of the anterior chamber through utilisation of equipment such as the Pentacam or imaging digital image analysis, rather than by merely grading the fraction between the anterior chamber depth and the corneal thickness.