Utica Shale Explained

Utica Shale
Type:Geological formation
Period:Mid Ordovician
Prilithology:Shale
Namedfor:Utica, New York
Namedby:Ebenezer Emmons, 1842
Region:Appalachian Basin
Country: Canada
United States
Coordinates:43.064°N -75.18°W
Underlies:Lorraine Shale, Martinsburg Formation, and Reedsville Formation
Overlies:Point Pleasant Formation, Trenton Group
Canajoharie shale
Thickness:up to 1000feet

The Utica Shale is a stratigraphical unit of Upper Ordovician age in the Appalachian Basin. It underlies much of the northeastern United States and adjacent parts of Canada.

It takes the name from the city of Utica, New York, as it was first described as an outcrop along the Starch Factory Creek east of the city by Ebenezer Emmons in 1842.[1]

Lithology

The Utica Shale is composed of calcareous, organic, and rich shale.

Oil and gas

The Utica shale is a major source of unconventional tight gas in Quebec, and is rapidly becoming so in Ohio.

Quebec

Drilling and producing from the Utica Shale began in 2006 in Quebec, focusing on an area south of the St. Lawrence River between Montreal and Quebec City. Interest has grown in the region since Denver-based Forest Oil Corp. announced a significant discovery there after testing two vertical wells. Forest Oil said its Quebec assets may hold as much as four trillion cubic feet of gas reserves,[2] and that the Utica shale has similar rock properties to the Barnett Shale in Texas.

Forest Oil, which has several junior partners in the region, has drilled both vertical and horizontal wells. Calgary-based Talisman Energy has drilled five vertical Utica wells, and began drilling two horizontal Utica wells in late 2009 with its partner Questerre Energy, which holds under lease more than 1 million gross acres of land in the region. Other companies in the play are Quebec-based Gastem and Calgary-based Canbriam Energy.

The Utica Shale in Quebec potentially holds 4Tcuft at production rates of 1e6cuft per day.[3] [4] From 2006 through 2009 24 wells, both vertical and horizontal, were drilled to test the Utica. Positive gas flow test results were reported, although none of the wells were producing at the end of 2009.[5] Gastem, one of the Utica shale producers, took its Utica Shale expertise to drill across the border in New York state.[6]

The province of Quebec imposed a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing in March 2012.[7]

Ohio

Utica Shale drilling and production began in Ohio in 2011. Ohio as of 2013 is becoming a major natural gas and oil producer from the Utica Shale in the eastern part of the state.[8] Map of Ohio Utica Shale drilling permits and activity by date.[9] [10] In 2011 drilling and permits for drilling in the Utica Shale in Ohio reached record highs.[11]

Pennsylvania

Companies like CNX Resources have had success expanding Utica Shale production in Pennsylvania, drilling its first Utica well in 2015 in Westmoreland County.[12] In 2022, CNX formed a partnership with the Pittsburgh International Airport in Allegheny County to develop Utica shale on airport property and convert it to LNG and CNG for use in fueling aviation and other machinery.[13]

New York

In 2009, the Canadian company Gastem, which had been drilling gas wells into the Utica Shale in Quebec, drilled the first of its three state-permitted Utica Shale wells in New York. The first well drilled was in Otsego County.[14]

New York imposed a moratorium on large-volume hydraulic fracturing in 2008.[15] This was renewed by Governor Andrew Cuomo in 2014, and continues as of December 2017.[16]

Resource size

The US Energy Information Administration estimated in 2012 that the Utica Shale in the US held 15.7 trillion cubic feet of unproved, technically recoverable gas. The average well was estimated to produce 1.13 billion cubic feet of gas.[17] The same year, the US Geological Survey estimated that the Utica Shale had 38.2 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered technically recoverable gas, 940 million barrels of oil, and 208 million barrels of natural gas liquids.[18]

In 2022, a team of researchers in a paper published in Energy Policy identified the Utica Shale as a "carbon bomb," a fossil fuel project that would result in more than one gigaton of carbon dioxide emissions if fully extracted and burnt.[19]

Distribution

The Utica Shale lies under most of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, and extends under adjacent parts of Ontario and Quebec in Canada and Kentucky, Maryland, Tennessee, and Virginia in the United States.

It occurs in outcrops in the state of New York[20] and in the subsurface in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario.[21]

Parts of the Utica shale underlie the Island of Montreal, and its weakness relative to the Trenton and Chazy limestones under much of the rest of the island complicated the construction of the Montreal metro. Some stations had to be built cut-and-cover or with a narrow split platform profile to reduce the load on the bedrock. In particular, De l'Église station suffered a cave-in during construction and had to be hastily replanned.

In some regions of Pennsylvania, the Utica Shale reaches to almost two miles below sea level. However, the depth of the Utica Shale rock decreases to the west into Ohio and to the northwest towards Canada.[22]

It reaches a thickness of up to 1000feet[20] and can be as thin as 70feet towards the margins of the basin. 250feet are exposed in the type section.

Relationship to other units

The Utica Shale underlies the Lorraine Group and overlies the Trenton Group limestone and the Canajoharie shale in the Mohawk River valley.

The Utica Shale is divided into the Nowadaga Zone, Loyal Creek Zone and Holland Patent Zone.[20]

It lies a few thousand feet under the Marcellus Shale.

External links

Notes and References

  1. Emmons, Ebenezer, 1842, Geology of New York; Part II, Survey of the second geological district. New York State Museum, 437p.
  2. Web site: Forest Oil To Develop In Quebec. Hart Energy. May 10, 2024.
  3. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=92251&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1124217&highlight= Forest Oil Corporation – Press Releases and Notices
  4. Web site: Press release > Investors > Junex . 2016-05-14 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120302181642/http://cnrp.ccnmatthews.com/client/junex/release.jsp?actionFor=838978&releaseSeq=1&year=2008 . 2012-03-02 . dead .
  5. Susan R. Eaton, "Shale play extends to Canada," AAPG Explorer, January 2010, p.10-24.
  6. New York to get Utica shale exploration . . Oil & Gas Journal . 41 . 106 . 12 . 2008-03-24 . 2009-07-07.
  7. http://www.ibtimes.com/quebec-installs-outright-moratorium-hydraulic-fracturing-433930 Quebec installs outright moratorium on hydraulic fracturing
  8. Web site: John Funk . The Plain Dealer . 2013-05-17 . Utica shale gas production ramping up slowly, Ohio report shows . 2022-11-23 . cleveland . en.
  9. Web site: Map of Ohio Utica drilling permits and activity by date. uticashalemaps.com. 2012-05-05.
  10. Web site: Marcellus and Utica Shale Data. Ohio.gov Database. Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 2011-03-08.
  11. News: Gerino . Dan . 'Fracking' permits booming . Columbus Dispatch.
  12. Web site: Kerlik . Bob . 2022-05-23 . PIT, CNX Develop Fuel Strategy to Reduce Emissions, Costs for Aviation . 2022-11-23 . Blue Sky PIT News Site . en-US.
  13. Web site: CNX, Pittsburgh International Airport Form Partnership to Convert Natgas into Alternative Fuel Hart Energy . 2022-11-23 . www.hartenergy.com . en.
  14. Tom Grace, "Officials positive following gas-well tour," Oneonta Daily Star, 7 October 2009.
  15. http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2013/05/24/new-york-governor-says-hell-make-fracking-decision-before-2014-election/ New York governor says he'll make fracking decision before 2014 election
  16. News: Lombardi. Kristin. New York's heralded fracking ban isn't all it's cracked up to be. 16 January 2018. NPR. 8 December 2017.
  17. US Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy outlook 2012, accessed 14 Sept. 2013.
  18. US Geological Survey, Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Ordovician Utica Shale of the Appalachian Basin Province, 2012, Fact Sheet 2012-3116, Sept. 2012.
  19. Kühne . Kjell . Bartsch . Nils . Tate . Ryan Driskell . Higson . Julia . Habet . André . 2022 . "Carbon Bombs" - Mapping key fossil fuel projects . Energy Policy . en . 166 . 112950 . 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112950. 248756651 . free . 2022EnPol.16612950K .
  20. Web site: Utica Shale. USGS-GEOLOX Database. United States Geological Survey. 2010-02-01.
  21. Web site: Utica Shale . . 2010-02-01 . https://archive.today/20130221081406/http://cgkn1.cgkn.net/weblex/weblex_litho_detail_e.pl?00053:015717 . 2013-02-21 . dead.
  22. Web site: US Shale Oil. 2015-03-09.