Upper Egypt Explained

Native Name:ⲙⲁⲣⲏⲥ (Coptic)
ta shemaw[1] (Egyptian)
Άνω Αίγυπτος (Greek)
صعيد مصر (Arabic)
الصعيد (Egyptian Arabic)
Aegyptus superior (Latin)
Conventional Long Name:Upper Egypt
Common Name:Upper Egypt
Government Type:Monarchy
Year Start: 
Year End: c. 3150 BC
P1:Prehistoric Egypt
S1:Early Dynastic Period (Egypt)
Capital:Thinis
Common Languages:Ancient Egyptian
Religion:Ancient Egyptian religion
Leader1:Scorpion I (first)
Leader2:Narmer (last)
Year Leader2:c. 3150 BC
Title Leader:King
Today:Egypt

Upper Egypt (Arabic: صعيد مصر , shortened to Arabic: الصعيد, pronounced as /es.sˤe.ˈʕiːd/, locally: pronounced as /[es.sˤɑ.ˈʕiːd]/;) is the southern portion of Egypt and is composed of the Nile River valley south of the delta and the 30th parallel N. It thus consists of the entire Nile River valley from Cairo south to Lake Nasser (formed by the Aswan High Dam).[2]

Name

In ancient Egypt, Upper Egypt was known as tꜣ šmꜣw, literally "the Land of Reeds" or "the Sedgeland", named for the sedges that grow there.

In Arabic, the region is called Sa'id or Sahid, from صعيد meaning "uplands", from the root صعد meaning to go up, ascend, or rise. Inhabitants of Upper Egypt are known as Sa'idis and they generally speak Sa'idi Egyptian Arabic.

Geography

Upper Egypt is between the Cataracts of the Nile beyond modern-day Aswan, downriver (northward) to the area of El-Ayait,[3] which places modern-day Cairo in Lower Egypt. The northern (downriver) part of Upper Egypt, between Sohag and El-Ayait, is also known as Middle Egypt.

History

It is believed to have been united by the rulers of the supposed Thinite Confederacy who absorbed their rival city states during the Naqada III period (c. 3200–3000 BC), and its subsequent unification with Lower Egypt ushered in the Early Dynastic period.[4] Upper and Lower Egypt became intertwined in the symbolism of pharaonic sovereignty such as the Pschent double crown.[5] Upper Egypt remained as a historical region even after the classical period.

Predynastic Egypt

The main city of prehistoric Upper Egypt was Nekhen. The patron deity was the goddess Nekhbet, depicted as a vulture.

By approximately 3600 BC, Neolithic Egyptian societies along the Nile based their culture on the raising of crops and the domestication of animals. Shortly thereafter, Egypt began to grow and increase in complexity. A new and distinctive pottery appeared, related to the Levantine ceramics, and copper implements and ornaments became common. Mesopotamian building techniques became popular, using sun-dried adobe bricks in arches and decorative recessed walls.

In Upper Egypt, the predynastic Badari culture was followed by the Naqada culture (Amratian),[6] closely related to the Lower Nubian;[7] [8] [9] [10] other northeast African populations[11] and some tropical African groups.[12] [13] Also, the proto-dynastic kings emerged from the Naqada region.[14] Excavations at Hierakonpolis (Upper Egypt) found archaeological evidence of ritual masks similar to those used further south of Egypt, and obsidian linked to Ethiopian quarry sites.[15]

Frank Yurco stated that depictions of pharonic iconography such as the royal crowns, Horus falcons and victory scenes were concentrated in the Upper Egyptian Naqada culture and A-Group Lower Nubia. He further elaborated that "Egyptian writing arose in Naqadan Upper Egypt and A-Group Lower Nubia, and not in the Delta cultures, where the direct Western Asian contact was made, further vititates the Mesopotamian-influence argument".[16]

Similarly, Christopher Ehret, historian and linguist, stated that the cultural practice of sacral chiefship and kingship which emerged in Upper Egypt in the fourth millennium had originated centuries earlier in Nubia and the Middle Nile south of Egypt. He based this judgement on supporting, archaeological and comparative ethnographic evidence.[17]

According to bioarchaeologist Nancy Lovell, the morphology of ancient Egyptian skeletons gives strong evidence that "In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas" but exhibited local variation in an African context.[18]

S. O. Y. Keita, a biological anthropologist also reviewed studies on the biological affinities of the Ancient Egyptian population and characterised the skeletal morphologies of predynastic southern Egyptians as a "Saharo-tropical African variant". Keita had also added that whilst Egyptian society became more socially complex and biologically varied, the "ethnicity of the Niloto-Saharo-Sudanese origins did not change".[19]

These cultural advances paralleled the political unification of towns of the upper Nile River, or Upper Egypt, while the same occurred in the societies of the Nile Delta, or Lower Egypt. This led to warfare between the two new kingdoms. During his reign in Upper Egypt, King Narmer defeated his enemies on the delta and became sole ruler of the two lands of Upper and Lower Egypt, a sovereignty which endured throughout Dynastic Egypt.

Dynastic Egypt

In royal symbolism, Upper Egypt was represented by the tall White Crown Hedjet, the flowering lotus, and the sedge. Its patron deity, Nekhbet, was depicted by the vulture. After unification, the patron deities of Upper and Lower Egypt were represented together as the Two Ladies, to protect all of the ancient Egyptians, just as the two crowns were combined into a single pharaonic diadem.

Several dynasties of southern or Upper Egyptian origin, which included the 11th, 12th, 17th, 18th and 25th dynasties, reunified and reinvigorated pharaonic Egypt after periods of fragmentation.[20]

For most of Egypt's ancient history, Thebes was the administrative center of Upper Egypt. After its devastation by the Assyrians, the importance of Egypt declined. Under the dynasty of the Ptolemies, Ptolemais Hermiou took over the role of the capital city of Upper Egypt.

A 2005 study on Theban nobles had found that the mummified remains had a histology which "indicated notably dark skin".[21]

Medieval Egypt

In the eleventh century, large numbers of pastoralists, known as Hilalians, fled Upper Egypt and moved westward into Libya and as far as Tunis. It is believed that degraded grazing conditions in Upper Egypt, associated with the beginning of the Medieval Warm Period, were the root cause of the migration.

20th-century Egypt

In the twentieth-century Egypt, the title Prince of the Sa'id (meaning Prince of Upper Egypt) was used by the heir apparent to the Egyptian throne.

Although the Kingdom of Egypt was abolished after the Egyptian revolution of 1952, the title continues to be used by Muhammad Ali, Prince of the Sa'id.

List of rulers of prehistoric Upper Egypt

The following list may not be complete (there are many more of uncertain existence):

NameImageCommentsDates
ElephantEnd of 4th millennium BC
Bull4th millennium BC
Scorpion IOldest tomb at Umm el-Qa'ab had scorpion insigniac. 3200 BC?
Iry-HorPossibly the immediate predecessor of Ka.c. 3150 BC?
KaMay be read Sekhen rather than Ka. Possibly the immediate predecessor of Narmer.c. 3100 BC
Scorpion IIPotentially read Serqet; possibly the same person as Narmer.c. 3150 BC
NarmerThe king who combined Upper and Lower Egypt.c. 3150 BC

List of nomes

Number Ancient Name Capital Modern Capital Translation God
1 Abu / Yebu (Elephantine) The Frontier/Land of the Bow Khnemu
2 Djeba (Apollonopolis Magna) Horus-Behdety
3 Nekhen (Hierakonpolis) al-Kab Shrine Nekhebet
4 Niwt-rst / Waset (Thebes) Sceptre Amun-Ra
5 Gebtu (Coptos) Two Falcons Min
6 Iunet / Tantere (Tentyra) Crocodile Hathor
7 Seshesh (Diospolis Parva) Hathor
8 Ta-werTjenu / Abjdu (Thinis / Abydos) al-Birba Great Land Onuris
9 Apu / Khen-min (Panopolis) Min
10 Djew-qa / Tjebu (Antaeopolis) Qaw al-KebirCobra Hathor
11 Shashotep (Hypselis) Shutb Khnemu
12 Per-Nemty (Hieracon) At-AtawlaViper Mountain Horus
13 Zawty (Lycopolis) Upper Sycamore and Viper Apuat
14 Qesy (Cusae) al-Qusiya Lower Sycamore and Viper Hathor
15 Khemenu (Hermopolis) Thoth
16 Herwer? Hur? Horus
17 Saka (Cynopolis) Anubis
18 Teudjoi / Hutnesut (Alabastronopolis) Anubis
19 Per-Medjed (Oxyrhynchus) el-Bahnasa Two Sceptres Set
20 Henen-nesut (Heracleopolis Magna) Ihnasiyyah al-Madinah Southern Sycamore Heryshaf
21 Shenakhen / Semenuhor (Crocodilopolis, Arsinoë) Northern Sycamore Khnemu
22 Tepihu (Aphroditopolis) Knife Hathor

Governorates and large cities

Nowadays, Upper Egypt forms part of these 7 governorates:

Large cities located in Upper Egypt:

See also

References

General and cited references

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Ermann & Grapow, op.cit. Wb 5, 227.4-14
  2. Encyclopedia: Upper Egypt . Encyclopædia Britannica . 5 January 2023.
  3. See list of nomes. Maten (Knife land) is the northernmost nome in Upper Egypt on the right bank, while Atef-Pehu (Northern Sycamore land) is the northernmost on the left bank. Book: Brugsch, Heinrich Karl . 2015 . A History of Egypt under the Pharaohs . 1 . Cambridge, England . Cambridge University Press . 487 ., originally published in 1876 in German.
  4. Brink, Edwin C. M. van den (1992). "The Nile Delta in Transition: 4th.-3rd. Millennium B.C." Proceedings of the Seminar Held in Cairo, 21.-24. October 1990, at the Netherlands Institute of Archaeology and Arabic Studies. E.C.M. van den Brink. .
  5. Griffith, Francis Llewellyn, A Collection of Hieroglyphs: A Contribution to the History of Egyptian Writing, the Egypt Exploration Fund 1898, p. 56
  6. Brace, 1993. Clines and clusters
  7. Zakrzewski . Sonia R. . Population continuity or population change: Formation of the ancient Egyptian state . American Journal of Physical Anthropology . April 2007 . 132 . 4 . 501–509 . 10.1002/ajpa.20569 . 17295300 . en . When Mahalanobis D2 was used, the Naqadan and Badarian Predynastic samples exhibited more similarity to Nubian, Tigrean, and some more southern series than to some mid- to late Dynasticseries from northern Egypt (Mukherjee et al., 1955). The Badarian have been found to be very similar to a Kerma sample (Kushite Sudanese), using both the Penrose statistic (Nutter, 1958) and DFA of males alone (Keita,1990). Furthermore, Keita considered that Badarian males had a southern modal phenotype, and that together with a Naqada sample, they formed a southern Egyptian cluster as tropical variants together with a sample from Kerma.
  8. Tracy L. Prowse, Nancy C. Lovell. "Concordance of cranial and dental morphological traits and evidence for endogamy in ancient Egypt", American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 101, Issue 2, October 1996, pp. 237-246
  9. Web site: Godde . Kane . A biological perspective of the relationship between Egypt, Nubia, and the Near East during the Predynastic period (2020) . 16 March 2022.
  10. Book: Mokhtar . Gamal . Ancient Civilizations of Africa . 1981 . UNESCO International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa; Heinemann Educational Books; University of California Press . 978-0-520-03913-1 . 20–21, 148 . en . The difference in behaviour between two populations of similar ethnic composition throws significant light on an apparently abnormal fact: one of them adopted and perhaps even invented, a system of writing, while the other, which was aware of that writing, disdained it.
  11. Book: Ehret . Christopher . Ancient Africa: A Global History, to 300 CE . 20 June 2023 . Princeton University Press . Princeton . 978-0-691-24409-9 . 84–85 . en.
  12. Keita . S. O. Y. . Early Nile Valley Farmers From El-Badari: Aboriginals or 'European' AgroNostratic Immigrants? Craniometric Affinities Considered with Other Data . Journal of Black Studies . November 2005 . 36 . 2 . 191–208 . 10.1177/0021934704265912 . 144482802 . en . 0021-9347.
  13. Keita . S. O. Y. . Studies of ancient crania from northern Africa . American Journal of Physical Anthropology . September 1990 . 83 . 1 . 35–48 . 10.1002/ajpa.1330830105 . 2221029 . en . 0002-9483.
  14. Book: The Cambridge history of Africa . 1975–1986 . Cambridge University Press . Cambridge . 9780521222150 . 500–509.
  15. Book: Davies . W. V. . Egypt uncovered . 1998 . Stewart, Tabori & Chang . New York . 1556708181 . 5–87.
  16. Book: Yurco, Frank J. . 1996 . The Origin and Development of Ancient Nile Valley Writing . Theodore Celenko . Egypt in Africa . Indianapolis Museum of Art . Indianapolis . 0-936260-64-5 . 34–35.
  17. Book: Ehret . Christopher . Ancient Africa: A Global History, to 300 CE . 20 June 2023 . Princeton University Press . 978-0-691-24410-5 . 141 . en.
  18. Encyclopedia: Lovell . Nancy C. . Egyptians, physical anthropology of . Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt . Bard . Kathryn A. . Shubert . Steven Blake . 1999 . London . Routledge . 0415185890 . 328–331 . There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa. The distribution of population characteristics seems to follow a clinal pattern from south to north, which may be explained by natural selection as well as gene flow between neighboring populations. In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas.
  19. Keita . S. O. Y. . Studies and Comments on Ancient Egyptian Biological Relationships . History in Africa . 1993 . 20 . 129–154 . 10.2307/3171969 . 3171969 . 162330365 . 0361-5413.
  20. "It is important to note that historically not only was Upper Egypt the source of the core identifiable Egyptian culture, but that it was primarily southerners of the Eleventh/Twelfth, Seventeenth/Eighteenth, and Twenty-fifth Dynasties who politically reunited Egypt and reinvigorated its culture"Web site: Keita . S. O. Y. . Ideas about "Race" in Nile Valley Histories: A Consideration of "Racial" Paradigms in Recent Presentations on Nile Valley Africa, from "Black Pharaohs" to Mummy Genomest . Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections. September 2022 .
  21. Book: Keita Shomarka.. "Ancient Egyptian "Origins and "Identity" In Ancient Egyptian society : challenging assumptions, exploring approaches . 2022 . Abingdon, Oxon . 978-0367434632 . 111–122.