United States v. Navajo Nation (2003) explained

Litigants:United States v. Navajo Nation
Arguedate:December 2
Argueyear:2002
Decidedate:March 4
Decideyear:2003
Fullname:United States v. Navajo Nation
Docket:01-1375
Holding:The Indian Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 (IMLA) does not require the Secretary to manage the tribe's resources for the tribe's benefit.
Majority:Ginsburg
Joinmajority:Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer
Dissent:Souter
Joindissent:Stevens, O'Connor

United States v. Navajo Nation, 537 U.S. 488 (2003) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Navajo Nation initiated proceedings alleging that the Secretary of the Interior had breached their fiduciary duty to the Tribe by not acting in the Tribe's best interests.[1]

Conclusion

Citing Mitchell II the court found that "The IMLA and its implementing regulations impose no obligations resembling the detailed fiduciary responsibilities that Mitchell II found adequate to support a claim for money damages", reversing the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals and remanding the case.[2]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: United States v. Navajo Nation .
  2. Web site: Opinion of the Court .