| Litigants: | United States v. Davila |
| Arguedate: | April 15 |
| Argueyear: | 2013 |
| Decidedate: | June 13 |
| Decideyear: | 2013 |
| Fullname: | United States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila |
| Usvol: | 569 |
| Uspage: | 597 |
| Parallelcitations: | 133 S. Ct. 2139; 186 L. Ed. 2d 139; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4541; 81 U.S.L.W. 4394 |
| Docket: | 12-167 |
| Oralargument: | https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_12_167/argument |
| Prior: | 664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2011) |
| Majority: | Ginsburg |
| Joinmajority: | Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |
| Concurrence: | Scalia |
| Joinconcurrence: | Thomas |
United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h).[1]