| Litigants: | United States v. American Tobacco Co. |
| Arguedatea: | January 3 |
| Arguedateb: | 6 |
| Argueyear: | 1910 |
| Rearguedatea: | January 9 |
| Rearguedateb: | 12 |
| Reargueyear: | 1911 |
| Decidedate: | May 29 |
| Decideyear: | 1911 |
| Fullname: | United States v. American Tobacco Company |
| Usvol: | 221 |
| Uspage: | 106 |
| Parallelcitations: | 31 S. Ct. 632; 55 L. Ed. 663 |
| Prior: | Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York |
| Holding: | The combination in this case is one in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize the business of tobacco in interstate commerce within the prohibitions of the Sherman Antitrust Act. |
| Majority: | White |
| Joinmajority: | McKenna, Holmes, Day, Lurton, Hughes, Van Devanter, Lamar |
| Concurrence/Dissent: | Harlan |
| Lawsapplied: | Sherman Antitrust Act |
United States v. American Tobacco Company,, was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the combination in this case is one in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize the business of tobacco in interstate commerce within the prohibitions of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. As a result, the American Tobacco Company was split into four competitors.
The Sherman Antitrust Act was created in 1890, and in 1907 the American Tobacco Company was indicted in violation of it.[1] In 1908 when the Department of Justice filed suit against the company, sixty-five companies and twenty-nine individuals were named in the suit. The Supreme Court ordered the company to dissolve in 1911 on the same day that it ordered the Standard Oil Trust to dissolve.[1] The ruling in United States v. American Tobacco Co. stated that the combination of the tobacco companies "in and of itself, as well as each and all of the elements composing it whether corporate or individual, whether considered collectively or separately [was] in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize, and a monopolization within the first and second sections of the Anti-Trust Act."[2]
In order to promote market competition, four firms were created from the American Tobacco Company's assets: American Tobacco Company, R. J. Reynolds, Liggett & Myers, and Lorillard. The monopoly became an oligopoly.[3]
In 1938 Thurman Arnold in the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division began hosting hearings in the Temporary National Economic Committee to determine whether the four companies were further engaged together in monopolistic practices.[4] That committee found that 3 of the 4 companies were guilty of the charges presented to the court.[4]