1928 United States presidential election in New York explained

See main article: 1928 United States presidential election.

Election Name:1928 United States presidential election in New York
Country:New York
Flag Image:Flag of New York (1909–2020).svg
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1924 United States presidential election in New York
Previous Year:1924
Next Election:1932 United States presidential election in New York
Next Year:1932
Turnout:68.3%[1] 12.0 pp
Election Date:November 6, 1928
Image1:Herbert Hoover - NARA - 532049.jpg
Nominee1:Herbert Hoover
Party1:Republican Party (United States)
Home State1:California
Running Mate1:Charles Curtis
Electoral Vote1:45
Popular Vote1:2,193,344
Percentage1:49.79%
Nominee2:Al Smith
Party2:Democratic Party (United States)
Home State2:New York
Running Mate2:Joseph T. Robinson
Electoral Vote2:0
Popular Vote2:2,089,863
Percentage2:47.44%
Map Size:440px
Map2 Image:New York City U.S. President results 1928.png
Map2 Caption:Results in New York City by assembly district. The colors are the same as above with the following additions:
President
Before Election:Calvin Coolidge
Before Party:Republican Party (United States)
After Election:Herbert Hoover
After Party:Republican Party (United States)

The 1928 United States presidential election in New York took place on November 6, 1928. All contemporary 48 states were part of the 1928 United States presidential election. State voters chose 45 electors to the Electoral College, which selected the president and vice president.

New York was won by Republican former Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover of California, who was running against Democratic Governor of New York Alfred E. Smith. Hoover's running mate was Senate Majority Leader Charles Curtis of Kansas, while Smith's running mate was Senator Joseph Taylor Robinson of Arkansas.

Hoover won with a plurality of 49.79 percent of the vote to Smith's 47.44 percent, a margin of 2.35 points. Socialist candidate Norman Thomas finished a distant third, with 2.44 percent. Although New York was Al Smith's home state and he had been elected governor there, the 1920s were a fiercely Republican decade in American politics, and New York during the Fourth Party System was a fiercely Republican state in presidential elections. In 1928, Herbert Hoover was winning the third consecutive nationwide Republican landslide, and the economic boom and social good feelings of the Roaring Twenties under popular Republican leadership proved too much for Smith to overcome both nationally and in his home state.

However, Smith's performance in New York was still impressive in the context of the 1920s, and highly significant in shaping the state's political development. In the elections preceding 1928, New York had been more Republican than the nation as a whole, even in the nationwide Republican landslides of 1920 and 1924. Smith's narrow 2-point defeat in the midst of the nationwide Republican landslide of 1928 made New York State 15% more Democratic than the national average. Smith's 47.44 percent was also the highest vote share a Democratic presidential candidate had received in New York State since former New York Governor Grover Cleveland won the state in 1892, as Woodrow Wilson only won the state with 41% in 1912 when the Republican vote was split.

Smith dramatically improved upon how Democrats before him had done and laid the groundwork for turning the state Democratic in 1932 and beyond. In 1920 and 1924, Republicans had swept every county in New York State and Democrats had received less than 30% of the vote. In 1928, Smith came within 2 points of winning the state by sweeping all five boroughs of heavily populated New York City, winning Albany County, home to the state capital of Albany, along with neighboring Rensselaer County, and winning two counties in northern New York along the Saint Lawrence River, Clinton County and Franklin County.

Results

1928 United States presidential election in New York[2]
PartyCandidateVotesPercentageElectoral votes
RepublicanHerbert Hoover2,193,34449.79%45
DemocraticAlfred E. Smith2,089,86347.44%0
SocialistNorman Thomas107,332 2.44%0
CommunistWilliam Z. Foster10,876 0.25%0
Socialist LaborVerne L. Reynolds4,211 0.10%0
Totals4,405,626100.0%45

New York City results

1928 Presidential Election in New York CityManhattanThe BronxBrooklynQueensStaten IslandTotal
DemocraticAl Smith317,227232,766404,393184,64028,9451,167,97160.04%
60.82%67.67%59.48%53.43%53.37%
RepublicanHerbert Hoover186,39698,636245,622158,50524,995714,15436.71%
35.74%28.68%36.13%45.87%46.09%
SocialistNorman Thomas15,0768,90424,8881,88625251,0062.62%
2.89%2.59%3.66%0.55%0.46%
CommunistWilliam Z. Foster2,1453,2973,362396329,2320.47%
0.41%0.96%0.49%0.11%0.06%
Socialist LaborVerne L. Reynolds7143441,572129102,7690.14%
0.14%0.15%0.23%0.04%0.02%
TOTAL521,558343,947679,837345,55654,2341,945,132100.00%

Results by county

CountyHerbert Clark Hoover
Republican
Alfred Emmanuel Smith
Democratic
Normal Mattoon Thomas
Socialist
Various candidates
Other parties
MarginTotal votes cast[3]
%%%%%
Albany48,76242.99%62,38054.99%2,2231.96%720.06%-13,618-12.00%113,437
Allegany15,30678.90%3,49118.00%5883.03%140.07%11,81560.91%19,399
Bronx98,63628.68%232,76667.67%8,9042.59%3,6411.06%-134,130-39.00%343,947
Broome39,86065.25%19,56332.02%1,5522.54%1170.19%20,29733.22%61,092
Cattaraugus22,13567.07%10,22931.00%6021.82%350.11%11,90636.08%33,001
Cayuga20,20262.11%11,78736.24%5121.57%240.07%8,41525.87%32,525
Chautauqua38,22072.68%13,22325.15%1,0021.91%1390.26%24,99747.54%52,584
Chemung25,02967.00%12,18932.63%1090.29%270.07%12,84034.37%37,354
Chenango13,95577.21%3,98622.05%1220.68%100.06%9,96955.16%18,073
Clinton7,82441.68%10,88858.00%570.30%20.01%-3,064-16.32%18,771
Columbia14,00067.92%6,40331.06%1860.90%230.11%7,59736.86%20,612
Cortland11,96075.37%3,66223.08%2341.47%130.08%8,29852.29%15,869
Delaware16,22578.59%4,36221.13%460.22%120.06%11,86357.46%20,645
Dutchess28,68761.30%16,74835.79%1,3002.78%660.14%11,93925.51%46,801
Erie144,72651.36%126,44944.87%10,1183.59%4960.18%18,2776.49%281,789
Essex10,46266.34%5,29133.55%170.11%00.00%5,17132.79%15,770
Franklin9,49549.86%9,50149.89%470.25%20.01%-6-0.03%19,045
Fulton15,04371.16%5,72827.10%3341.58%340.16%9,31544.07%21,139
Genesee13,25169.03%5,18126.99%7393.85%240.13%8,07042.04%19,195
Greene9,52966.71%4,44031.08%3082.16%80.06%5,08935.62%14,285
Hamilton1,39959.51%95240.49%00.00%00.00%44719.01%2,351
Herkimer18,62462.69%10,65435.86%4121.39%190.06%7,97026.83%29,709
Jefferson26,36166.41%12,90832.52%4021.01%240.06%13,45333.89%39,695
Kings245,62236.13%404,39359.48%24,8883.66%4,9340.73%-158,771-23.35%679,837
Lewis7,17563.25%4,16136.68%40.04%40.04%3,01426.57%11,344
Livingston11,63264.05%5,54530.53%9685.33%150.08%6,08733.52%18,160
Madison14,33372.20%5,21726.28%2801.41%210.11%9,11645.92%19,851
Monroe99,80355.73%73,75941.19%5,1802.89%3360.19%26,04414.54%179,078
Montgomery15,25760.28%9,84538.90%1780.70%290.11%5,41221.38%25,309
Nassau71,01562.77%40,07935.42%1,9011.68%1450.13%30,93627.34%113,140
New York186,39635.74%317,22760.82%15,0762.89%2,8590.55%-130,831-25.08%521,558
Niagara33,22963.35%16,88132.18%2,3024.39%410.08%16,34831.17%52,453
Oneida44,78252.82%38,23145.09%1,6841.99%890.10%6,5517.73%84,786
Onondaga76,27857.04%54,70640.91%2,5591.91%1730.13%21,57216.13%133,716
Ontario17,76965.27%8,49131.19%9553.51%100.04%9,27834.08%27,225
Orange37,33464.10%19,04732.70%1,8173.12%420.07%18,28731.40%58,240
Orleans9,82868.77%3,79226.53%6524.56%200.14%6,03642.23%14,292
Oswego21,84964.39%11,63934.30%4181.23%240.07%10,21030.09%33,930
Otsego18,28674.32%6,00624.41%2981.21%160.07%12,28049.91%24,606
Putnam4,53464.95%2,27832.63%1612.31%80.11%2,25632.32%6,981
Queens158,50545.87%184,64053.43%1,8860.55%5250.15%-26,135-7.56%345,556
Rensselaer32,37048.90%33,09450.00%6380.96%890.13%-724-1.09%66,191
Richmond24,99546.09%28,94553.37%2520.46%420.08%-3,950-7.28%54,234
Rockland15,73260.34%9,76937.47%5131.97%580.22%5,96322.87%26,072
Saratoga19,18359.60%12,24738.05%7222.24%350.11%6,93621.55%32,187
Schenectady29,42856.58%21,27740.91%1,1832.27%1210.23%8,15115.67%52,009
Schoharie6,90667.65%2,92628.66%3573.50%200.20%3,98038.99%10,209
Schuyler4,74972.10%1,73126.28%1031.56%40.06%3,01845.82%6,587
Seneca7,91166.27%3,87332.44%1471.23%70.06%4,03833.82%11,938
St. Lawrence25,80466.23%12,56732.26%5621.44%270.07%13,23733.98%38,960
Steuben28,02869.26%10,69926.44%1,6944.19%450.11%17,32942.82%40,466
Suffolk41,19965.07%19,49730.79%2,5444.02%750.12%21,70234.28%63,315
Sullivan10,33161.27%6,20736.81%2841.68%390.23%4,12424.46%16,861
Tioga9,96376.89%2,77921.45%1981.53%180.14%7,18455.44%12,958
Tompkins14,47172.84%5,11425.74%2441.23%370.19%9,35747.10%19,866
Ulster25,41862.46%14,20034.89%1,0242.52%530.13%11,21827.57%40,695
Warren11,69763.16%6,79336.68%290.16%00.00%4,90426.48%18,519
Washington15,49966.91%7,22131.17%4281.85%150.06%8,27835.74%23,163
Wayne18,18775.29%5,33822.10%6032.50%270.11%12,84953.19%24,155
Westchester109,93956.22%80,92641.39%4,4082.25%2710.14%29,01314.84%195,544
Wyoming10,83071.48%3,99226.35%3262.15%40.03%6,83845.13%15,152
Yates7,38678.62%1,95020.76%520.55%70.07%5,43657.86%9,395
Totals2,193,34449.79%2,089,86347.44%107,3322.44%15,0870.34%103,4812.35%4,405,626

Analysis

Key to Smith's strength in New York State was his sweep of the five massively populated boroughs of New York City. A New York City native, Smith took over 60% of the vote in Manhattan and the Bronx, and also won majorities in Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island. Up to this point, 1928 was the strongest victory ever for a Democrat in the city. Smith, a Roman Catholic of Irish, Italian, and German immigrant heritage, held special appeal to Catholic and ethnic immigrant communities that populated cities like New York and Boston. The first Catholic to be nominated on a major-party ticket, Smith's Catholicism would severely weaken his candidacy in many rural parts of the country, especially in the South,[4] but would prove an asset in appealing to voters in New York.[5] The urban, ethnic coalition that delivered New York City to Al Smith would prove to be a harbinger of long-term realignment of both the city and the state toward the Democratic Party.[5] 1928 began a Democratic winning streak in New York City that has never been broken since, as New York City would be solidified as one of the most Democratic cities in the United States,[6] and a major obstacle to overcome for any Republican seeking to compete in New York State. 1928 also turned the state capital of Albany, which had previously been a Republican city, into a Democratic bastion in upstate New York. This was the first time Democrats swept all five boroughs of New York City, which would also occur in 1932 and 1936.

Hoover, for his part, was able to hold on to New York State's electoral votes in 1928 by sweeping much of traditionally staunchly Republican upstate New York and Long Island, where efforts from Hoover's future successor Franklin D. Roosevelt could not swing dry, Protestant Yankee voters to Smith.[7] In addition, the turnout and vote number margins were not yet there in New York City in 1928 to overcome Republican dominance in the rest of the state. In 1932, Franklin D. Roosevelt would build on Smith's coalition to flip New York State into the Democratic column, winning the state with virtually the same county map as Smith, but with stronger vote number margins and turnout. After 1928, New York state would not vote Republican again until 1948.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Bicentennial Edition: Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, part 2, p. 1072.
  2. Web site: 1928 Presidential Election Results – New York. 2013-07-27 . Dave Leip's U.S. Election Atlas.
  3. New York State Department of State, ‘Presidential Vote, New York State By Counties, November 6, 1928,’ Manual for the Use of the Legislature of the State of New York, 1929 (Albany, 1929)
  4. Gould, Lewis L.; The Republicans: A History of the Grand Old Party, p. 180
  5. Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 14, 40-41
  6. Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
  7. McElvaine, Robert S. ; Encyclopedia of the Great Depression: A-K, pp. 229, 276