| Election Name: | 1998 United States Senate elections |
| Country: | United States |
| Type: | legislative |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1996 United States Senate elections |
| Previous Year: | 1996 |
| Next Election: | 2000 United States Senate elections |
| Next Year: | 2000 |
| Majority Seats: | 51 |
| Election Date: | November 3, 1998 |
| 1Blank: | Seats up |
| 2Blank: | Races won |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Image1: | Trent Lott official portrait (cropped).jpg |
| Leader Since1: | June 12, 1996 |
| Seats Before1: | 55 |
| Seats After1: | 55 |
| Popular Vote1: | 25,346,613 |
| Percentage1: | 46.8% |
| Swing1: | 2.7% |
| 1Data1: | 16 |
| 2Data1: | 16 |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Leader Since2: | January 3, 1995 |
| Seats Before2: | 45 |
| Seats After2: | 45 |
| Popular Vote2: | 26,768,699 |
| Percentage2: | 49.5% |
| Swing2: | 1.6% |
| 1Data2: | 18 |
| 2Data2: | 18 |
| Map Size: | 320px |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
The 1998 United States Senate elections were held on November 3, 1998, with the 34 seats of Class 3 contested in regular elections. This was seen as an even contest between the Republican Party and Democratic Party. While the Democrats had to defend more seats up for election, Republican attacks on the morality of President Bill Clinton failed to connect with voters and anticipated Republican gains did not materialize. The Republicans picked open seats up in Ohio and Kentucky and narrowly defeated Democratic incumbent Carol Moseley Braun (Illinois), but these were cancelled out by the Democrats' gain of an open seat in Indiana and defeats of Republican Senators Al D'Amato (New York) and Lauch Faircloth (North Carolina). The balance of the Senate remained unchanged at 55–45 in favor of the Republicans.
With Democrats gaining five seats in the House of Representatives, this marked the first time since 1934 that the party not in control of the White House failed to gain congressional seats in mid-term election cycles, which would also happen in 2002. These are the last Senate elections that resulted in no net change in the balance of power. This is the last time Democrats won a U.S. Senate race in South Carolina.
| 45 | 55 | |
| Democratic | Republican |
| Parties | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Republican | Libertarian | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last elections (1996) Before the elections | 45 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Not up | 27 | 39 | — | — | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Up | 18 | 16 | — | — | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| < | -- Gap for "Up"--> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Incumbent retired | 3 | 2 | — | — | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 Republican replaced by 1 Democrat< | --IN--> 2 Democrats replaced by 2 Republicans | — | — | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Result | 2 | 3 | — | — | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Incumbent ran | 15 | 14 | — | — | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | 12 | — | — | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 Republicans replaced by 2 Democrats< | --NY, NC--> 1 Democrat replaced by 1 Republican | — | — | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Result | 16 | 13 | — | — | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total elected | 18 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gain/loss | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nationwide vote | 26,768,699 | 25,346,613 | 419,452 | 1,580,287 | 54,115,051 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share | 49.47% | 46.84% | 0.78% | 2.92% | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Result | 45 | 55 | — | — | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source: Office of the Clerk
Two Republicans and three Democrats retired instead of seeking re-election.
One Democrat and two Republicans sought re-election but lost in the general election.
Two Republicans died during the 106th Congress, and initially were all replaced by appointees.
| D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
| width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | |
| D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
| D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
| D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| Majority → | ||||||||||||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
| width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | width=10% | D | |
| D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
| D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
| D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| Majority → | ||||||||||||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Key |
|
|---|
There were no special elections in 1998.
In these general elections, the winners were elected for the term beginning January 3, 1999; ordered by state.
All of the elections involved the Class 3 seats.
| State | Incumbent | Results | Candidates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senator | Party | Electoral history | |||||||
| Alabama | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Alaska | data-sort-value=1980 | 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Arizona | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Arkansas | data-sort-value=1974 | 1974 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=-1 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Democratic hold. | nowrap | ||||
| California | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Colorado | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Connecticut | data-sort-value=1980 | 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Florida | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Georgia | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Hawaii | data-sort-value=1962 | 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Idaho | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=1 | Incumbent retired to run for Governor of Idaho. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | ||||
| Illinois | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=2 | Incumbent lost re-election. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap | ||||
| Indiana | data-sort-value=1989 | 1989 1990 1992 | data-sort-value=-2 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Democratic gain. | nowrap | ||||
| Iowa | data-sort-value=1980 | 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Kansas | data-sort-value=1996 | 1996 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Kentucky | data-sort-value=1974 | 1974 1974 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=2 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap | ||||
| Louisiana | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Maryland | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Missouri | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Nevada | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| New Hampshire | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| New York | data-sort-value=1980 | 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=-2 | Incumbent lost re-election. New senator elected. Democratic gain. | nowrap | ||||
| North Carolina | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=-2 | Incumbent lost re-election. New senator elected. Democratic gain. | nowrap | ||||
| North Dakota | Democratic-NPL | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||
| Ohio | data-sort-value=1974 | 1974 1974 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=2 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap | ||||
| Oklahoma | data-sort-value=1980 | 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Oregon | data-sort-value=1996 | 1996 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Pennsylvania | data-sort-value=1980 | 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| South Carolina | data-sort-value=1966 | 1966 (special) 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| South Dakota | data-sort-value=1986 | 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Utah | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Vermont | data-sort-value=1974 | 1974 1980 1986 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Washington | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
| Wisconsin | data-sort-value=1992 | 1992 | data-sort-value=0 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | ||||
Eight races had a margin of less than 10%:
| State | Party of winner | Margin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | data-sort-value=-1 | Democratic | 0.09% | |
| Kentucky | data-sort-value=.5 | Republican (flip) | 0.59% | |
| Wisconsin | data-sort-value=-1 | Democratic | 2.1% | |
| Illinois | data-sort-value=.5 | Republican (flip) | 2.9% | |
| North Carolina | data-sort-value=-0.5 | Democratic (flip) | 4.1% | |
| South Carolina | data-sort-value=-1 | Democratic | 7.0% | |
| Georgia | data-sort-value=1 | Republican | 7.2% | |
| Missouri | data-sort-value=1 | Republican | 8.9% |
Ohio was the tipping point state with a margin of 13%.
| Election Name: | Alabama election |
| Country: | Alabama |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Alabama |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Alabama |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Richard Shelby official portrait.JPG |
| Nominee1: | Richard Shelby |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 817,973 |
| Percentage1: | 63.2% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 474,568 |
| Percentage2: | 36.7% |
| Map Size: | 225px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Alabama.
See also: List of United States senators from Alabama. Incumbent Republican Richard Shelby won re-election to a third term. Shelby had been elected in 1986 and 1992 as a Democrat, but switched to the Republican party in 1994, making this the first election he competed in as a Republican. He beat Democrat Clayton Suddith, an army veteran and former Franklin County Commissioner.[1]
| Election Name: | Alaska election |
| Country: | Alaska |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Alaska |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Alaska |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Frank Murkowski, 105th Congress photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Frank Murkowski |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 165,227 |
| Percentage1: | 74.5% |
| Nominee2: | Joseph Sonneman |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 43,743 |
| Percentage2: | 19.7% |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Election: | Frank Murkowski |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Election: | Frank Murkowski |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| Map Size: | 300px |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Alaska.
See also: List of United States senators from Alaska. Incumbent Republican Frank Murkowski easily won re-election to a fourth term against Democratic nominee Joseph Sonneman, a perennial candidate, earning nearly 75% of the vote.
| Election Name: | Arizona election |
| Country: | Arizona |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Arizona |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Arizona |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | John McCain Official Other Version.jpg |
| Nominee1: | John McCain |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 696,577 |
| Percentage1: | 68.7% |
| Nominee2: | Ed Ranger |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 275,224 |
| Percentage2: | 27.2% |
| Map Size: | 220px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Arizona.
See also: List of United States senators from Arizona. Incumbent Republican John McCain won re-election to a third term over Democratic attorney Ed Ranger.[2]
| Election Name: | Arkansas election |
| Country: | Arkansas |
| Flag Year: | 1924 |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Arkansas |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Arkansas |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Blanche Lincoln official portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Blanche Lincoln |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 385,878 |
| Percentage1: | 55.1% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 295,870 |
| Percentage2: | 42.4% |
| Map Size: | 200px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Arkansas.
See also: List of United States senators from Arkansas. Incumbent Dale Bumpers retired. U.S. Representative Blanche Lincoln won the open seat.
| Election Name: | California election |
| Country: | California |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in California |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in California |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | BarbaraBoxer.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Barbara Boxer |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 4,411,705 |
| Percentage1: | 53.1% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 3,576,351 |
| Percentage2: | 43.0% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in California.
See also: List of United States senators from California. Incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer won re-election to a second term.
Although the race was predicted to be fairly close, Boxer still defeated Fong by a ten-point margin. Boxer as expected did very well in Los Angeles County, and the San Francisco Bay Area.
| Election Name: | Colorado election |
| Country: | Colorado |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Colorado |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Colorado |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | BenNCampbell.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Ben Nighthorse Campbell |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 829,370 |
| Percentage1: | 62.5% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 464,754 |
| Percentage2: | 35.0% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Colorado.
See also: List of United States senators from Colorado. Incumbent Republican Ben Nighthorse Campbell won re-election to a second term.
Campbell, who was elected in 1992 as a Democrat, switched parties after the 1994 Republican Revolution. He faced a primary challenger, but won with over 70% of the vote. In the general election, Democratic nominee Dottie Lamm criticized Campbell of flip flopping from being a moderate liberal to moderate conservative.[3] [4] In fact, throughout the entire campaign, Lamm mostly sent out negative attack advertisements about Campbell.[5]
| Election Name: | Connecticut election |
| Country: | Connecticut |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Connecticut |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Connecticut |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Christopher Dodd official portrait 2-cropped.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Chris Dodd |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 628,306 |
| Percentage1: | 65.2% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 312,177 |
| Percentage2: | 32.4% |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Connecticut.
See also: List of United States senators from Connecticut. Incumbent Democrat Chris Dodd won re-election for a fourth term against former Republican U.S. Congressman Gary A. Franks.
| Election Name: | Florida election |
| Country: | Florida |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Florida |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Florida |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Bob Graham, official Senate photo portrait, color.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Bob Graham |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 2,436,407 |
| Percentage1: | 62.5% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 1,463,755 |
| Percentage2: | 37.5% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Florida.
See also: List of United States senators from Florida. Incumbent Democrat Bob Graham won re-election to a third term.
Graham defeated Crist in a landslide, as Crist won just four counties in the state. There were no third party or independent candidates.
| Election Name: | Georgia election |
| Country: | Georgia (U.S. state) |
| Flag Year: | 1956 |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Georgia |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2000 United States Senate special election in Georgia |
| Next Year: | 2000 (special) |
| Image1: | Paul Coverdell.PNG |
| Nominee1: | Paul Coverdell |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 918,540 |
| Percentage1: | 52.37% |
| Nominee2: | Michael Coles |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 791,904 |
| Percentage2: | 45.15% |
| Map Size: | 200px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Georgia.
See also: List of United States senators from Georgia. Incumbent Republican Paul Coverdell won re-election to a second term.
| Election Name: | Hawaii election |
| Country: | Hawaii |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Hawaii |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Hawaii |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Daniel Inouye official photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Daniel Inouye |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 315,252 |
| Percentage1: | 79.2% |
| Nominee2: | Crystal Young |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 70,964 |
| Percentage2: | 17.8% |
| Map Size: | 200px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Hawaii.
See also: List of United States senators from Hawaii. Incumbent Democrat Daniel Inouye won re-election to a seventh term over Republican legislative aide Crystal Young.[6]
| Election Name: | Idaho election |
| Country: | Idaho |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Idaho |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Idaho |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Mike Crapo official photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Mike Crapo |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 262,966 |
| Percentage1: | 69.5% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 107,375 |
| Percentage2: | 28.4% |
| Map Size: | 225px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Idaho.
See also: List of United States senators from Idaho. Incumbent Republican Dirk Kempthorne decided to retire after one term to run for governor. Republican nominee Mike Crapo won the open seat.
| Election Name: | Illinois election |
| Country: | Illinois |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Illinois |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Illinois |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Peter Fitzgerald cropped.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Peter Fitzgerald |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 1,709,042 |
| Percentage1: | 50.4% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 1,610,496 |
| Percentage2: | 47.4% |
| Map Size: | 250x250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Illinois.
See also: List of United States senators from Illinois. Incumbent Democrat Carol Moseley Braun decided to run for re-election, despite the number of controversies that she had in her first term. Republican State Senator Peter Fitzgerald won his party's primary with a slim margin of victory.
He ended up defeating the incumbent, with a margin of victory of approximately 3%. Peter Fitzgerald won all but five counties.
During Moseley Braun's term as U.S. Senator, she was plagued by several major controversies. Moseley Braun was the subject of a 1993 Federal Elections Commission investigation over $249,000 in unaccounted-for campaign funds. The agency found some small violations, but took no action against Moseley Braun, citing a lack of resources. Moseley Braun only admitted to bookkeeping errors. The Justice Department turned down two requests for investigations from the IRS.[7]
In 1996, Moseley Braun made a private trip to Nigeria, where she met with dictator Sani Abacha. Despite U.S. sanctions against that country, due to Abacha's actions, the Senator did not notify, nor register her trip with, the State Department. She subsequently defended Abacha's human rights records in Congress.[8]
Peter Fitzgerald, a State Senator, won the Republican primary, defeating Illinois Comptroller Loleta Didrickson with 51.8% of the vote, to Didrickson's 48.2%.[9] Fitzgerald spent nearly $7 million in the Republican primary.[10] He had a major financial advantage, as he was a multimillionaire. He ended up spending $12 million in his election victory.[11]
In September, Moseley Braun created controversy again by using the word "nigger" to describe how she claims to be a victim of racism.[11]
Most polls over the first few months showed Moseley Braun trailing badly. However, after she was helped in the final month by notable Democrats such as First Lady Hillary Clinton and U.S. Congressman Luis V. Gutierrez, three polls published in the last week showed her within the margin of error, and, in one poll, running even with Fitzgerald.[12]
Moseley Braun was narrowly defeated by Republican Peter Fitzgerald. Moseley Braun only won five of Illinois's 102 counties. Despite this, the race was kept close by Moseley running up massive margins in Cook County, home of Chicago. However, it was not quite enough to win.
| Election Name: | Indiana election |
| Country: | Indiana |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Indiana |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Indiana |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Evan Bayh official portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Evan Bayh |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 1,012,244 |
| Percentage1: | 63.7% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 552,732 |
| Percentage2: | 34.8% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Indiana.
See also: List of United States senators from Indiana. Incumbent Republican Dan Coats decided to retire instead of seeking a second full term. Democratic nominee, former Governor Evan Bayh won the open seat his father once held.
| Election Name: | Iowa election |
| Country: | Iowa |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Iowa |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Iowa |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Chuck Grassley official photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Chuck Grassley |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 648,480 |
| Percentage1: | 68.41% |
| Nominee2: | David Osterberg |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 289,049 |
| Percentage2: | 30.49% |
| Map Size: | 230px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Iowa.
See also: List of United States senators from Iowa. Incumbent Republican Chuck Grassley sought re-election to a fourth term in the United States Senate, facing off against former State Representative David Osterberg, who won the Democratic nomination unopposed. Grassley had not faced a competitive election since 1980; this year proved no different, and Grassley crushed Osterberg to win a fourth term.
| Election Name: | Kansas election |
| Country: | Kansas |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1996 United States Senate special election in Kansas |
| Previous Year: | 1996 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Kansas |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Sam Brownback official portrait 3.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Sam Brownback |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 474,639 |
| Percentage1: | 65.3% |
| Nominee2: | Paul Feleciano |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 229,718 |
| Percentage2: | 31.6% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Kansas.
See also: List of United States senators from Kansas. Incumbent Republican Sam Brownback won re-election to his first full term. Brownback was first elected in a special election held in 1996, when then-Senator Bob Dole resigned to campaign for U.S. President, after 27 years in the Senate. This would've been Dole's seventh term in office had he remained in his seat.
| Election Name: | Kentucky election |
| Country: | Kentucky |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Kentucky |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Kentucky |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Jim-Bunning-108th.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Jim Bunning |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 569,817 |
| Percentage1: | 49.8% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 563,051 |
| Percentage2: | 49.2% |
| Map Size: | 300px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Kentucky.
See also: List of United States senators from Kentucky. Incumbent Democratic U.S Senator Wendell Ford decided to retire, instead of seeking a fifth term. Republican Representative Jim Bunning won the open seat.
| Election Name: | Louisiana election |
| Country: | Louisiana |
| Flag Year: | 1912 |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Louisiana |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Louisiana |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | John Breaux, official photo portrait, standing (cropped).jpg |
| Nominee1: | John Breaux |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 620,502 |
| Percentage1: | 64.0% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 306,616 |
| Percentage2: | 31.6% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Louisiana.
See also: List of United States senators from Louisiana. Incumbent Democrat John Breaux won re-election to a third term. As of 2022, this is the last time the Democrats have won the Class 3 Senate Seat from Louisiana.
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Maryland.
See also: List of United States senators from Maryland.
| Election Name: | Maryland election |
| Country: | Maryland |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Maryland |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Maryland |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Barbara Mikulski.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Barbara Mikulski |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 1,062,810 |
| Percentage1: | 70.5% |
| Nominee2: | Ross Pierpont |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 444,637 |
| Percentage2: | 29.5% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
Incumbent Democrat Barbara Mikulski won re-election to a third term.
| Election Name: | Missouri election |
| Country: | Missouri |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Missouri |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Missouri |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | File:Kit Bond portrait (1).jpg |
| Nominee1: | Kit Bond |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 830,625 |
| Percentage1: | 52.7% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 690,208 |
| Percentage2: | 43.8% |
| Map Size: | 255px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Missouri.
See also: List of United States senators from Missouri. Incumbent Republican Kit Bond won re-election to a third term.
| Election Name: | Nevada election |
| Country: | Nevada |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Nevada |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Nevada |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Harry Reid official portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Harry Reid |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 208,621 |
| Percentage1: | 47.9% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 208,220 |
| Percentage2: | 47.8% |
| Map Size: | 200px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Nevada.
See also: List of United States senators from Nevada. Incumbent Democrat Harry Reid won re-election to a third term.
Reid won in a close election by 401 votes—even closer than Tim Johnson's Senate run in South Dakota in 2002, when he narrowly defeated Congressman John Thune by 524 votes. Ensign did not contest the results, and Reid won the race.
| Election Name: | New Hampshire election |
| Country: | New Hampshire |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in New Hampshire |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in New Hampshire |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Judd Gregg.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Judd Gregg |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 213,477 |
| Percentage1: | 67.8% |
| Nominee2: | George Condodemetraky |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 88,883 |
| Percentage2: | 28.2% |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in New Hampshire.
See also: List of United States senators from New Hampshire. Incumbent Republican Judd Gregg won re-election to his second term.
| Election Name: | New York election |
| Country: | New York |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in New York |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in New York |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Charles Schumer official portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Chuck Schumer |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 2,551,065 |
| Percentage1: | 54.6% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 2,058,988 |
| Percentage2: | 44.1% |
| Map Size: | 300px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in New York.
See also: List of United States senators from New York. Incumbent Republican Al D'Amato was running for re-election to a fourth term, but lost to Chuck Schumer in what was considered by many to be the "high[est] profile and nastiest" contest of the year.[13]
Geraldine Ferraro, former U.S. Representative and nominee for Vice President in 1984, was well known for having been the 1984 Democratic vice presidential nominee and had also run but lost in the Democratic primary in the 1992 U.S. Senate election in New York. Mark Green, New York City Public Advocate, had been the Democratic nominee in the 1986 election, but lost in the general election to D'Amato.
At the start of 1998, Ferraro had done no fundraising, out of fear of conflict of interest with her job hosting the CNN program Crossfire, but was nonetheless perceived as the front-runner by virtue of her name recognition;[14] indeed, December and January polls had her 25 percentage points ahead of Green in the race and even further ahead of Schumer.[15] [16] Unlike her previous campaigns, Ferraro's family finances never became an issue in 1998.[15] However, she lost ground during the summer, with Schumer catching her in the polls by early August and then soon passing her.[17] Schumer, a tireless fundraiser, outspent her by a five-to-one margin, and Ferraro failed to establish a political image current with the times.[15] [18] In the September 15, 1998, primary, she was beaten soundly by Schumer with a 51 percent to 26 percent margin.[15] Unlike the bitter 1992 Democratic senatorial primary, this contest was not divisive, and Ferraro and third-place finisher Green endorsed Schumer at a unity breakfast the following day.[19]
The primaries were held on September 15, 1998.During the general campaign, D'Amato attempted to brand Schumer as a diehard liberal, while Schumer accused D'Amato of being a liar. When D'Amato's first strategy failed, D'Amato attacked his opponent's attendance record as a member of Congress, which Schumer refuted.[20] [21]
Late in the campaign, D'Amato called Schumer a "putzhead" in a private meeting with Jewish supporters ("putz" is Yiddish for penis, and can be slang for "fool"). The senator later apologized.[13]
In the last days of the campaign, D'Amato campaigned with popular Governor George Pataki, who was also running for re-election, and was also supported by New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Mayor Ed Koch (a Democrat)[22] Vice President Al Gore and First Lady Hillary Clinton personally campaigned for Schumer, as D'Amato was a prominent critic of President Bill Clinton[20] who led the investigation into Whitewater. Though the Republican party was well organized, the Democratic party benefited from robocalls from President Clinton and mobilization from two big unions, United Federation of Teachers and 1199.[20]
Though D'Amato was effective in obtaining federal government funds for New York State projects during his Senate career, he failed to capitalize on this in the election.[20] Also, Schumer was a tenacious fund-raiser and was aggressive in his attacks.[23] The candidates spent $30 million during the race.[20]
The race was not close with Schumer defeating the incumbent D'Amato by just over 10%. D'Amato did win a majority of New York's counties, but his wins were in less populated areas. Schumer's win is attributed to strong performance in New York City. Schumer also performed well in heavily populated upstate cities, like Buffalo, Syracuse, Rochester, and Albany.
Per New York State law, Schumer and D'Amato totals include minor party line votes: Independence Party and Liberal Party for Schumer, Right to Life Party for D'Amato.
| Election Name: | North Carolina election |
| Country: | North Carolina |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in North Carolina |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in North Carolina |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | John Edwards, official Senate photo portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | John Edwards |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 1,029,237 |
| Percentage1: | 51.15% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 945,943 |
| Percentage2: | 47.01% |
| Map Size: | 325px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in North Carolina.
See also: List of United States senators from North Carolina. Incumbent Republican Lauch Faircloth decided to seek re-election to a second term, but was unseated by Democrat John Edwards.
In the Democratic primary, Edwards defeated D. G. Martin, Ella Scarborough, and several minor candidates. In the Republican primary, Faircloth easily defeated two minor candidates.[24]
| Election Name: | North Dakota election |
| Country: | North Dakota |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in North Dakota |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in North Dakota |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Byron Dorgan official photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Byron Dorgan |
| Party1: | North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party |
| Popular Vote1: | 134,747 |
| Percentage1: | 63.2% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 75,013 |
| Percentage2: | 35.2% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party |
| After Party: | North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in North Dakota.
See also: List of United States senators from North Dakota. Incumbent NPL–Democrat Byron Dorgan won re-election to a second term.[25]
Republican Donna Nalewaja, State Senator's campaign focused on the suggestion that Dorgan had served in the United States Congress for nearly 20 years, and had accomplished relatively little. Dorgan and Nalewaja won the primary elections for their respective parties. McLain had previously run for North Dakota's other Senate seat in 1980 against Mark Andrews.
| Election Name: | Ohio election |
| Country: | Ohio |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Ohio |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Ohio |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | George Voinovich, official photo portrait, 2006.jpg |
| Nominee1: | George Voinovich |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 1,922,087 |
| Percentage1: | 56.5% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 1,482,054 |
| Percentage2: | 43.5% |
| Map Size: | 200px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Ohio.
See also: List of United States senators from Ohio. Incumbent Democratic U.S Senator John Glenn decided to retire, instead of seeking a fifth term. Republican Governor George Voinovich won the open seat.
| Election Name: | Oklahoma election |
| Country: | Oklahoma |
| Flag Year: | 1988 |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Oklahoma |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Oklahoma |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Don Nickles.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Don Nickles |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 570,682 |
| Percentage1: | 66.4% |
| Nominee2: | Don Carroll |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 268,898 |
| Percentage2: | 31.3% |
| Map Size: | 300px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Oklahoma.
See also: List of United States senators from Oklahoma. Incumbent Republican Don Nickles won re-election to his fourth term.
| Election Name: | Oregon election |
| Country: | Oregon |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1996 United States Senate special election in Oregon |
| Previous Year: | 1996 (special) |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Oregon |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Ron Wyden official portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Ron Wyden |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 682,425 |
| Percentage1: | 61.1% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 377,739 |
| Percentage2: | 33.8% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Oregon.
See also: List of United States senators from Oregon. Incumbent Democratic Ron Wyden won re-election to his first full term, defeating Republican nominee John Lim, a state senator.
| Election Name: | Pennsylvania election |
| Country: | Pennsylvania |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Arlen Specter official portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Arlen Specter |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 1,814,180 |
| Percentage1: | 61.3% |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 1,028,839 |
| Percentage2: | 34.8% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania.
See also: List of United States senators from Pennsylvania. Incumbent Republican Arlen Specter won re-election to a fourth term.
Leading up to this campaign, the state Democratic Party was in dire straits, as it was plagued by prior corruption allegations of several key legislators and by a lack of fund-raising. Just as in the accompanying gubernatorial race, the party had difficulty in finding a credible candidate. State Representative Bill Lloyd, State Representative,[26] who was a well-respected party leader but who had almost zero statewide name recognition, was considered to be a sacrificial lamb candidate. Specter ran a straightforward campaign and attempted to avoid mistakes, while Lloyd's bid was so underfunded that he was unable to air a single commercial until two weeks before the election. Lloyd's strategy was to portray Republicans as hyper-partisan in wake of their attempt to impeach President Bill Clinton, but he was unable to gain any traction with his message. On Election Day, Specter's win was by the second-largest margin in the history of Senate elections in Pennsylvania. Lloyd won in two counties: almost uniformly Democratic Philadelphia and his home county, rural and typically Republican Somerset County.[27]
| Election Name: | South Carolina election |
| Country: | South Carolina |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in South Carolina |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in South Carolina |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | FritzHollings.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Ernest Hollings |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 563,377 |
| Percentage1: | 52.70% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 488,238 |
| Percentage2: | 45.67% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in South Carolina.
See also: List of United States senators from South Carolina. Incumbent Democrat Fritz Hollings won re-election to his sixth full term. As of 2023, this is the last time Democrats won a U.S. Senate election in South Carolina.
The race between Hollings and Bob Inglis, U.S. Representative gave the voters a choice of two very different visions of and for South Carolina. Hollings was from the Lowcountry, a face of the Old New South, and secured a large amount of federal funds for the state. On the other hand, Inglis came from the Upstate, was a face of the New South, and opposed to pork barrel spending. Hollings viciously attacked Inglis on the campaign trail as a "goddamn skunk" and when Inglis requested that Hollings sign a pledge for campaign courtesy, Hollings replied that Inglis could "kiss his fanny." Inglis tried to tie Hollings to President Clinton, who had been tainted by the Lewinsky scandal.
Ultimately, Hollings won the race for four crucial reasons. First, Inglis refused to accept PAC donations which allowed Hollings to enjoy a huge financial advantage and blanket the state with his television advertisements. Secondly, Inglis came from the Upstate which already provided GOP majorities whereas Hollings came from the Lowcountry which was a key tossup region in the state. Thirdly, the voters two years prior in the 1996 Senate election had rewarded Strom Thurmond for his long service to the state and it was unlikely that they would then deny re-election to Hollings. Finally, the 1998 South Carolina GOP ticket was dragged down with unpopular Governor David Beasley at the top of the ticket who would go on to lose his re-election campaign to Jim Hodges.
| Election Name: | South Dakota election |
| Country: | South Dakota |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in South Dakota |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in South Dakota |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Tom Daschle, official Senate photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Tom Daschle |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 162,884 |
| Percentage1: | 62.1% |
| Nominee2: | Ron Schmidt |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 95,431 |
| Percentage2: | 36.4% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in South Dakota.
See also: List of United States senators from South Dakota. Incumbent Democrat Tom Daschle won re-election to a third term., this was the last time the Democrats have won the Class 3 Senate Seat from South Dakota.
| Election Name: | Utah election |
| Country: | Utah |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Utah |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Utah |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Flag Year: | 1913 |
| Image1: | Robert Foster Bennett, US Senator.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Bob Bennett |
| Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 316,652 |
| Percentage1: | 64.0% |
| Nominee2: | Scott Leckman |
| Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 177,459 |
| Percentage2: | 33.0% |
| Map Size: | 200px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
| After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Utah.
See also: List of United States senators from Utah. Incumbent Republican Bob Bennett won re-election to a second term.
| Election Name: | Vermont election |
| Country: | Vermont |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Vermont |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Vermont |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Patrick Leahy official photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Patrick Leahy |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 154,567 |
| Percentage1: | 72.2% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 48,051 |
| Percentage2: | 22.5% |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Vermont.
See also: List of United States senators from Vermont. Incumbent Democrat Patrick Leahy won re-election to a fifth term.[28]
Notably, the Republican nominee, dairy farmer and actor Fred Tuttle, withdrew from the race and endorsed Leahy, asking Vermonters to vote for his Democratic opponent because he hated Washington DC and he was, as his wife had previously said publicly, unqualified to serve as a United States Senator. His campaign, which had been conducted primarily from his front porch in Tunbridge, VT, spent only $251 during the election season and featured the slogans "Spread Fred!" and "Why Not?" In spite of this, Tuttle still received 48,051 votes, or 22% of the total.[29]
| Election Name: | Washington election |
| Country: | Washington |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Washington |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Washington |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Patty Murray official portrait.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Patty Murray |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 1,103,184 |
| Percentage1: | 58.4% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 785,377 |
| Percentage2: | 41.6% |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Washington.
See also: List of United States senators from Washington. Incumbent Democrat Patty Murray won re-election to a second term.
| Election Name: | Wisconsin election |
| Country: | Wisconsin |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1992 United States Senate election in Wisconsin |
| Previous Year: | 1992 |
| Next Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin |
| Next Year: | 2004 |
| Image1: | Russ Feingold official photo.jpg |
| Nominee1: | Russ Feingold |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
| Popular Vote1: | 890,059 |
| Percentage1: | 50.5% |
| Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
| Popular Vote2: | 852,272 |
| Percentage2: | 48.4% |
| Map Size: | 225px |
| U.S. Senator | |
| Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 1998 United States Senate election in Wisconsin.
See also: List of United States senators from Wisconsin. Incumbent Democrat Russ Feingold won re-election to a second term. In September 1997, Mark Neumann, a Republican U.S. Representative, announced his candidacy for the United States Senate against Russell Feingold. Both candidates had similar views on the budget surplus, although Neumann was for banning partial-birth abortion while Feingold was against a ban. Both candidates limited themselves to $3.8 million in campaign spending ($1 for every citizen of Wisconsin), although outside groups spent more than $2 million on Neumann; Feingold refused to have outside groups spend their own 'soft money' on his behalf.[30] [31] Feingold defeated Neumann by a slim 2% margin in the election. According to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Neumann had a 30,000 vote margin outside Milwaukee County, but was overwhelmed by a 68,000 vote margin in Milwaukee County.[32]