1960 United States Senate election in Massachusetts explained

Election Name:1960 United States Senate election in Massachusetts
Country:Massachusetts
Flag Year:1908
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1954 United States Senate election in Massachusetts
Previous Year:1954
Next Election:1966 United States Senate election in Massachusetts
Next Year:1966
Election Date:November 8, 1960
Image1:LeverettSaltonstall.jpg
Nominee1:Leverett Saltonstall
Party1:Republican Party (US)
Popular Vote1:1,358,556
Percentage1:56.19%
Party2:Democratic Party (US)
Popular Vote2:1,050,725
Percentage2:43.46%
Map Size:250px
Senator
Before Party:Republican Party (US)
After Party:Republican Party (US)

The United States Senate election of 1960 in Massachusetts was held on November 8, 1960, with Republican Incumbent Leverett Saltonstall defeating his challengers.

Democratic primary

Candidates

Declared

Withdrew

Campaign

Governor Foster Furcolo, who lost to Saltonstall in 1954, decided to run against him again in 1960.

On June 15, 1960, Springfield Mayor Thomas J. O'Connor announced he would challenge Furcolo for the Democratic nomination.[1] O'Connor received support from Democrats who were opposed to Furcolo's effort to enact a state sales tax. Edmund Dinis, District Attorney for the southern district, was briefly in the race, but dropped at the party convention to support O'Connor.[2] In a show of unity, Furcolo was nominated at the convention by Massachusetts Senate President and political foe John E. Powers. Furcolo defeated O'Connor by a 3 to 1 margin at the Democratic State Convention, but O'Connor decided to remain in the race.[3] In the primary, O'Connor upset Furcolo 48% to 39% with Southern Middlesex County Register of Deeds Edmund C. Buckley received the remaining 13%. O'Connor was able to sweep the western part of the state and top Furcolo by 10,000 in Boston.[4]

Results

General election

Campaign

During the general election, O'Connor contrasted his youth to Saltonstall's age, calling him "yesterday's senator" and "The Late George Apley of Massachusetts politics".[5] O'Connor also attacked the senator for "fail[ing] to act for the working man" and for helping "big business brigands" destroy the state's textile industry.[6]

Saltonstall ran on his long record of public service. He criticized O'Connor for stating that he would consider continue serving as Springfield mayor if elected to the Senate, arguing that Americans need "not part-time leadership but full leadership".[7]

Saltonstall also criticized O'Connor's campaign for lacking substance. After refusing to debate O'Connor, Saltonstall stated "If my opponent would express his opinions of some of the vital national and international issues, I would then consider whether I would debate on these subjects or not".[8]

Results

Saltonstall defeated O'Connor 1,358,556 votes to 1,050,725 to hold on to his Senate seat.[9]

Notes and References

  1. News: Furcolo Challenged. The New York Times. June 16, 1960.
  2. News: Micciche, S.E.. Senator Powers Will Nominate Furcolo Today. The Boston Globe. June 18, 1960.
  3. News: Micciche, S.E.. Furcolo, Ward in Sweep. The Boston Globe. June 19, 1960.
  4. News: Harris, John. O'Connor Upsets Furcolo. The Boston Globe. September 14, 1960.
  5. News: Ainley, Leslie. O'Connor Places Accent on Youth. The Boston Globe. October 26, 1960.
  6. News: Leary, Robert. Saltonstall, O'Connor Exchange Sharp Blows. The Boston Globe. October 27, 1960.
  7. News: Leary, Robert. Salty Warns: No Pad-Time in Senate. The Boston Globe. November 1, 1960.
  8. News: Saltonstall Cites Record On Vital State, U.S. Issues. The Boston Globe. September 22, 1960.
  9. Book: Election Statistics 1960.