Election Name: | 2010 United States Senate elections |
Country: | United States |
Type: | legislative |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2008 United States Senate elections |
Previous Year: | 2008 |
Next Election: | 2012 United States Senate elections |
Next Year: | 2012 |
Majority Seats: | 51 |
Election Date: | November 2, 2010 |
1Blank: | Seats up |
2Blank: | Races won |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Image1: | Harry Reid official portrait 2009 (3x4b).jpg |
Seats Before1: | 57 |
Seats After1: | 51 |
Seat Change1: | 6 |
Popular Vote1: | 32,405,787 |
Percentage1: | 45.1% |
1Data1: | 19 |
2Data1: | 13 |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Seats Before2: | 41 |
Seats After2: | 47 |
Seat Change2: | 6 |
Popular Vote2: | 34,616,463 |
Percentage2: | 48.2% |
1Data2: | 18 |
2Data2: | 24 |
Party4: | Independent |
Seats Before4: | 2 |
Seats After4: | 2 |
Popular Vote4: | 155,846 |
Percentage4: | 0.2% |
1Data4: | 0 |
2Data4: | 0 |
Map Size: | 320px |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
The 2010 United States Senate elections were held on November 2, 2010, from among the United States Senate's 100 seats. A special election was held on January 19, 2010, for a mid-term vacancy in Massachusetts. 34 of the November elections were for 6-year terms to the Senate's Class 3, while other 3 were special elections to finish incomplete terms. Those 37 November elections featured 19 incumbent Democrats (7 of whom retired or were defeated in the primary) and 18 incumbent Republicans (8 of whom retired or were defeated in the primary).
After the 2008 elections, the Senate was composed of 58 Democrats, 40 Republicans, and 2 independents who caucused with the Democrats. However, in a January 2010 special election, Republicans picked up a seat in Massachusetts thereby reducing Democrats' majority to 57 seats.
Republicans won 4 seats held by retiring Democrats and also defeated 2 incumbent Democrats, for a Republican net gain of 6 seats. This was the first time since 1994 that Republicans successfully defended all of their own seats. This was also the fourth consecutive election of Class 3 senators where Democrats failed to gain seats. Despite the Republican gains, the Democrats retained a majority of the Senate with 51 seats plus the 2 Independents who caucused with them, compared to the 47 Republican seats., this was the last time Republicans won U.S. Senate seats in Illinois and New Hampshire.
51 | 2 | 47 |
Democratic | Independent | Republican |
Shading indicates party with largest share of that line. Does not include the January 2010 special election in Massachusetts.
Parties | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
class=small | Democratic | class=small | Republican | class=small | Independent | class=small | Libertarian | class=small | Green | class=small | Constitution | class=small | Others | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last elections (2008) Before the November elections | 57 | 41 | 2 | — | — | — | — | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not Up | Total | 38 | 23 | 2 | — | — | — | — | 63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 10 | 2 | — | — | — | — | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Up | Total | 19 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | 37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incumbent retired | Total before | 6 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Democrats replaced by 3 Republicans< | --IL, IN, ND--> | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Result after | 3 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incumbent ran | Total before | 13 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 Democrats replaced by 2 Republicans< | --AR, WI--> | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Democrat replaced by 1 Republican< | --PA--> | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Result after | 10 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total elected | 13 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain/loss | 6 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nationwide vote< | --National tally on Page 57, combined with DE --> | Votes | 32,405,787 | 34,616,463 | 155,846 | 776,327 | 552,006 | 178,860 | 3,100,833 | 71,786,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share | 45.14% | 48.22% | 0.22% | 1.08% | 0.77% | 0.25% | 4.32% | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Result | 51 | 47 | 2 | — | — | — | — | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of this Congress | 56 | 42 | 2 | — | — | — | — | 100 |
Source: Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives[1]
width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | |
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
Majority → | D | |||||||||||||||||||
R | I | I | D | D | D | D | D | D | ||||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | |
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
Majority → | D | |||||||||||||||||||
R | I | I | D | D | D | D | D | D | ||||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | width=50px | D | |
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |||||||||||
Majority → | D | |||||||||||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | I | I | ||||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||
R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Key: |
|
---|
Several sites and individuals publish predictions of competitive seats. These predictions look at factors such as the strength of the incumbent (if the incumbent is running for reelection) and the other candidates, and the state's partisan lean (reflected in part by the state's Cook Partisan Voting Index rating). The predictions assign ratings to each seat, indicating the predicted advantage that a party has in winning that seat.
Most election predictors used:
Where a site gives a percentage probability as its primary indicator of expected outcome, the chart below classifies a race as follows:
Constituency | Incumbent | 2010 election ratings | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Senator | data-sort-type="number" | Last election | Cook[2] | Rothenberg[3] | RCP[4] | Sabato[5] | CQ Politics[6] | Result | ||
Alabama | data-sort-value="67.5" | 67.5% R | data-sort-value="65.2" | Shelby 65.2% R | |||||||
Alaska | data-sort-value= "48.6" | 48.6% R | data-sort-value="39.5" | Murkowski 39.5% R | |||||||
Arizona | data-sort-value="76.7" | 76.7% R | data-sort-value="59.2" | McCain 59.2% R | |||||||
Arkansas | data-sort-value="-55.9" | 55.9% D | data-sort-value="57.9" | Boozman 57.9% R | |||||||
California | data-sort-value="-57.7" | 57.7% D | data-sort-value="-52.2" | Boxer 52.2% D | |||||||
Colorado | data-sort-value="none" | Appointed | data-sort-value="-48.1" | Bennet 48.1% D | |||||||
Connecticut | data-sort-value="-66.4" | 66.4% D | data-sort-value="-55.2" | Blumenthal 55.2% D | |||||||
Delaware (special) | data-sort-value="none" | Appointed | data-sort-value="-56.6" | Coons 56.6% D | |||||||
Florida | data-sort-value="none" | Appointed | data-sort-value="48.9" | Rubio 48.9% R | |||||||
Georgia | data-sort-value="57.9" | 57.9% R | data-sort-value="58.3" | Isakson 58.3% R | |||||||
Hawaii | data-sort-value="-75.5" | 75.5% D | data-sort-value="-74.8" | Inouye 74.8% D | |||||||
Idaho | data-sort-value="99.2" | 99.2% R | data-sort-value="71.2" | Crapo 71.2% R | |||||||
Illinois | data-sort-value="none" | Appointed | data-sort-value="48.0" | Kirk 48.0% R | |||||||
Indiana | data-sort-value="-61.7" | 61.7% D | data-sort-value="54.6" | Coats 54.6% R | |||||||
Iowa | data-sort-value="70.2" | 70.2% R | data-sort-value="64.4" | Grassley 64.4% R | |||||||
Kansas | data-sort-value="69.9" | 69.9% R | data-sort-value="70.1" | Moran 70.1% R | |||||||
Kentucky | data-sort-value="50.7" | 50.7% R | data-sort-value="55.7" | Paul 55.7% R | |||||||
Louisiana | data-sort-value="51.0" | 51.0% R | data-sort-value="56.6" | Vitter 56.6% R | |||||||
Massachusetts (special) | data-sort-value="none" | Appointed | data-sort-value="51.6" | Brown 51.6% R | |||||||
Maryland | data-sort-value="-64.8" | 64.8% D | data-sort-value="-62.2" | Mikulski 62.2% D | |||||||
Missouri | data-sort-value="56.1" | 56.1% R | data-sort-value="54.2" | Blunt 54.2% R | |||||||
Nevada | data-sort-value="-61.0" | 61.0% D | data-sort-value="-50.3" | Reid 50.3% D | |||||||
New Hampshire | data-sort-value="66.2" | 66.2% R | data-sort-value="60.1" | Ayotte 60.1% R | |||||||
New York (regular) | data-sort-value="-71.2" | 71.2% D | data-sort-value="-66.3" | Schumer 66.3% D | |||||||
New York (special) | data-sort-value="none" | Appointed | data-sort-value="-63.0" | Gillibrand 63.0% D | |||||||
North Carolina | data-sort-value="51.6" | 51.6% R | data-sort-value="54.8" | Burr 54.8% R | |||||||
North Dakota | data-sort-value="-68.3" | 68.3% D | data-sort-value="76.1" | Hoeven 76.1% R | |||||||
Ohio | data-sort-value="63.9" | 63.9% R | data-sort-value="56.8" | Portman 56.8% R | |||||||
Oklahoma | data-sort-value="52.8" | 52.8% R | data-sort-value="70.6" | Coburn 70.6% R | |||||||
Oregon | data-sort-value="-63.4" | 63.4% D | data-sort-value="-57.2" | Wyden 57.2% D | |||||||
Pennsylvania | data-sort-value="52.6" | 52.6% R | data-sort-value="51.0" | Toomey 51.0% R | |||||||
South Carolina | data-sort-value="53.7" | 53.7% R | data-sort-value="61.5" | DeMint 61.5% R | |||||||
South Dakota | data-sort-value="50.6" | 60.6% R | data-sort-value="100.0" | Thune 100.0% R | |||||||
Utah | data-sort-value="68.6" | 68.6% R | data-sort-value="61.6" | Lee 61.6% R | |||||||
Vermont | data-sort-value="-70.6" | 70.6% D | data-sort-value="-64.4" | Leahy 64.4% D | |||||||
Washington | data-sort-value="-55.0" | 55.0% D | data-sort-value="-52.1" | Murray 52.1% | |||||||
West Virginia (special) | data-sort-value="none" | Appointed | data-sort-value="-53.5" | Manchin 53.5% | |||||||
Wisconsin | data-sort-value="-55.3" | 55.3% D | data-sort-value="51.6" | Johnson 51.6% R | |||||||
Three Democrats and six Republicans retired rather than seek re-election. Three Democrats retired rather than seek election to finish the unexpired term and one Democrat retired rather than seek election to finish the unexpired term and election to a full term.
Three Democrats and one Republican sought re-election but lost in either the primary or general election.
One Republican resigned on May 3, 2011, and was replaced by an appointee.
In these special elections, the winner was seated in the fall of 2010 (excluding Massachusetts), once they qualified and their elections were certified. Sorted by election date, then state, then class.
State | Incumbent | Results | Candidates | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senator | Party | Electoral history | ||||||
Massachusetts (Class 1) | data-sort-value="2009-09-24" | 2009 | Interim appointee retired. New senator elected January 19, 2010. Republican gain. Winner seated February 4, 2010. | nowrap | ||||
Delaware (Class 2) | data-sort-value="2009-01-15" | 2009 | Interim appointee retired. New senator elected November 2, 2010. Democratic hold. Winner seated November 15, 2010. | nowrap | ||||
Illinois (Class 3) | data-sort-value="2009-01-12" | 2009 | Interim appointee retired. New senator elected November 2, 2010. Winner also elected to next term, see below. Republican gain. Winner seated November 29, 2010. | nowrap | ||||
New York (Class 1) | data-sort-value="2009-01-26" | 2009 | Interim appointee elected November 2, 2010. | nowrap | ||||
West Virginia (Class 1) | 2010 | Interim appointee retired. New senator elected November 2, 2010. Democratic hold. Winner seated November 15, 2010. | nowrap |
Source: News: Election 2010 . The New York Times . December 12, 2017.
In these regular elections, the winners were elected for the term beginning January 3, 2011; ordered by state.
All of the elections involved the Class 3 seats.
State | Incumbent | Results | Candidates | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senator | Party | Electoral history | |||||||
Alabama | nowrap | 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Alaska | nowrap | 2004 | Incumbent lost renomination, but was re-elected as a write-in candidate. | nowrap | |||||
Arizona | nowrap | 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Arkansas | nowrap | 1998 2004 | Incumbent lost re-election. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap | |||||
California | nowrap | 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Colorado | nowrap | Interim appointee elected. | nowrap | ||||||
Connecticut | nowrap | 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Democratic hold. | nowrap | |||||
Florida | Interim appointee retired. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | |||||||
Georgia | nowrap | 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Hawaii | nowrap | 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Idaho | nowrap | 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Illinois | Interim appointee retired. New senator elected. Winner also elected to finish term ending January 3, 2011, see above. Republican gain. Winner seated November 29, 2010. | nowrap | |||||||
Indiana | nowrap | 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap | |||||
Iowa | nowrap | 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Kansas | nowrap | 1996 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired to run for Governor of Kansas. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | |||||
Kentucky | nowrap | 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | |||||
Louisiana | nowrap | 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Maryland | nowrap | 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Missouri | nowrap | 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | |||||
Nevada | nowrap | 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
New Hampshire | nowrap | 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | |||||
New York | nowrap | 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
North Carolina | nowrap | 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
North Dakota | Democratic-NPL | nowrap | 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap | ||||
Ohio | nowrap | 1998 2004 | Incumbent retired. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | |||||
Oklahoma | nowrap | 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Oregon | nowrap | 1996 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Pennsylvania | nowrap | 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent lost renomination. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap | |||||
South Carolina | nowrap | 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
South Dakota | nowrap | 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Utah | nowrap | 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent lost renomination. New senator elected. Republican hold. | nowrap | |||||
Vermont | nowrap | 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Washington | nowrap | 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | |||||
Wisconsin | nowrap | 1992 1998 2004 | Incumbent lost re-election. New senator elected. Republican gain. | nowrap |
Seven November races, as well as the Massachusetts special election in January, had margins less than 10%:
District | Winner | Margin | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Illinois | data-sort-value=1 | Republican (flip) | 1.6% | |
Colorado | data-sort-value=-0.5 | Democratic | 1.7% | |
Pennsylvania | data-sort-value=1 | Republican (flip) | 2.0% | |
Alaska | data-sort-value=0.5 | Republican | 4.0% | |
Washington | data-sort-value=-0.5 | Democratic | 4.7% | |
Massachusetts | data-sort-value=1 | Republican (flip) | 4.8% | |
Wisconsin | data-sort-value=1 | Republican (flip) | 4.8% | |
Nevada | data-sort-value=-0.5 | Democratic | 5.7% |
California was the tipping point state, where Barbara Boxer (D) defeated Carly Fiorina (R) by a margin of 10.0%.
Election Name: | Alabama election |
Country: | Alabama |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Alabama |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Alabama |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Richard Shelby, official portrait, 112th Congress (cropped).jpg |
Nominee1: | Richard Shelby |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 967,861 |
Percentage1: | 65.3% |
Nominee2: | William G. Barnes |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 515,049 |
Percentage2: | 34.7% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Richard Shelby |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Richard Shelby |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Alabama.
See also: List of United States senators from Alabama. Incumbent Republican Richard Shelby won re-election to a fifth term. On November 9, 1994, Shelby switched his party affiliation from Democratic to Republican, one day after the Republicans won control of both houses in the midterm elections, giving the Republicans a 53–47 majority in the Senate. He won his first full term as a Republican in 1998 by a large margin, and faced no significant opposition in 2004 and 2010.
Shelby had over $17 million in the bank, one of the highest of any candidate in the country. He had become even more popular in his opposition to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee.
In May, Shelby told reporters "I don't even know who my opponent is."[7]
Election Name: | Alaska election |
Country: | Alaska |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Alaska |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Alaska |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Lisa Murkowski 1 (cropped).jpg |
Candidate1: | Lisa Murkowski |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 101,091 |
Percentage1: | 39.5% |
Candidate2: | Joe Miller |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 90,839 |
Percentage2: | 35.5% |
Image3: | Scott McAdams of Alaska.jpg |
Candidate3: | Scott McAdams |
Party3: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote3: | 60,045 |
Percentage3: | 23.5% |
Map Size: | 300px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Lisa Murkowski |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Lisa Murkowski |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Alaska.
See also: List of United States senators from Alaska. The November general election in Alaska was preceded by primary elections which were held August 24, 2010. Scott McAdams, the Mayor of Sitka, became the Democratic nominee and Joe Miller, an attorney and former federal magistrate, became the Republican nominee after defeating incumbent Senator Lisa Murkowski[8] in the Republican primary.[9]
Murkowski garnered more than 100,000 write-in votes in the general election, many of which were challenged by Miller for various errors including minor misspellings. The appeal was denied[10] Even if all the challenged votes were thrown out, Murkowski would have still had a lead of over 2,100 votes.[11]
Election Name: | Arizona election |
Country: | Arizona |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Arizona |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Arizona |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | John McCain official portrait 2009.jpg |
Nominee1: | John McCain |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,005,615 |
Percentage1: | 58.7% |
Nominee2: | Rodney Glassman |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 592,011 |
Percentage2: | 34.5% |
Map Size: | 200px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | John McCain |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | John McCain |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Arizona.
See also: List of United States senators from Arizona. Incumbent Republican John McCain, who returned to the Senate after losing the presidency to Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election, ran for re-election to a fifth term and won.[12]
After spending over $20 million during the primaries, McCain still had more than $1million cash on hand after the primary election. Glassman criticized McCain on women's issues.[13] In August 2010, Glassman released a TV advertisement called "Arizona First."[14]
Election Name: | Arkansas election |
Country: | Arkansas |
Flag Year: | 1924 |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Arkansas |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Arkansas |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | John Boozman, official portrait, 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | John Boozman |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 451,617 |
Percentage1: | 57.90% |
Nominee2: | Blanche Lincoln |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 288,156 |
Percentage2: | 36.95% |
Map Size: | 200px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Blanche Lincoln |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | John Boozman |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Arkansas.
See also: List of United States senators from Arkansas. Incumbent Democrat Blanche Lincoln ran for re-election to a third term, but lost to Republican nominee John Boozman. Boozman became the first Republican in 138 years to win the seat. Arkansas had previously only elected one Republican senator since the Reconstruction, who was defeated after his first term in 2002 by Mark Pryor.
The Republican primary was held May 18, 2010, with early voting from May 3–17.
Election Name: | California election |
Country: | California |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in California |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in California |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Barbara Boxer, Official Portrait, 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Barbara Boxer |
Party1: | Democratic Party (California) |
Popular Vote1: | 5,218,441 |
Percentage1: | 52.2% |
Nominee2: | Carly Fiorina |
Party2: | Republican Party (California) |
Popular Vote2: | 4,217,366 |
Percentage2: | 42.2% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Barbara Boxer |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (California) |
After Election: | Barbara Boxer |
After Party: | Democratic Party (California) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in California.
See also: List of United States senators from California. Incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer won re-election to a fourth term.
In 2009, Boxer was criticized for correcting a general who called her "ma'am". Brigadier General Michael Walsh was testifying on the Louisiana coastal restoration process in the wake of Hurricane Katrina and answered Boxer's query with "ma'am" when Boxer interrupted him. "Do me a favor," Boxer said. "can you say 'senator' instead of 'ma'am?'" "Yes, ma'am," Walsh interjected. "It's just a thing, I worked so hard to get that title, so I'd appreciate it. Thank you," she said. The Army's guide to protocol instructs service members to call members of the U.S. Senate "sir", "ma'am" or "senator".[15] [16] Fiorina used this incident prominently in campaign ads, as did David Zucker, who directed a humorous commercial for RightChange.com titled 'Call Me Senator.' In February 2010, Carly Fiorina put out a campaign ad attacking Republican rival Tom Campbell featuring a "demon sheep", creating international, mostly negative, publicity.[17]
Election Name: | Colorado election |
Country: | Colorado |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Colorado |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Colorado |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | MichaelBennetofficialphoto.jpg |
Nominee1: | Michael Bennet |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 851,590 |
Percentage1: | 48.1% |
Nominee2: | Ken Buck |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 822,731 |
Percentage2: | 46.4% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Michael Bennet |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Michael Bennet |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Colorado.
See also: List of United States senators from Colorado. In December 2008, President-elect Barack Obama selected incumbent U.S. Senator Ken Salazar to become U.S. Secretary of the Interior.[18] After Salazar resigned from his seat,[19] Democratic Governor Bill Ritter appointed Denver Public Schools Superintendent Michael Bennet to fill the seat, who won re-election to his first full term.[20] [21]
This was one of the most expensive elections in the 2010 cycle, with more than $50 million spent total, including over $35 million in outside spending.[22] Conservative third party groups hammered Bennet for voting 92% of the time with the Democratic leadership, including voting for healthcare reform and the stimulus package.[23] Liberal third party groups called Buck extremist. Bennet focused on attacking Buck's views on abortion, which he believed should be banned including those of cases of rape and incest. He was also attacked for wanting to eliminate the Seventeenth Amendment[24] and refusing to prosecute an alleged rapist as Weld County district attorney. Planned Parenthood mounted a mail campaign, targeting women voters with the warning that "Colorado women can't trust Ken Buck." Bennet won the women vote by 17 points according to exit polls. After the election, Buck conceded to the Denver Post that the main reason why he lost is because of social issues.[25]
Election Name: | Connecticut election |
Country: | Connecticut |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Connecticut |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Connecticut |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Turnout: | 45.9% (voting eligible) |
Image1: | Richard Blumenthal portrait.jpg |
Nominee1: | Richard Blumenthal |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 636,040 |
Percentage1: | 55.2% |
Nominee2: | Linda McMahon |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 498,341 |
Percentage2: | 43.2% |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Chris Dodd |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Richard Blumenthal |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Connecticut.
See also: List of United States senators from Connecticut. Incumbent Democrat Christopher Dodd suffered from dropping approval ratings in the past few years due to major controversies, leading him to announce in January 2010 that he would retire, instead of seeking a sixth term.[26] As Dodd was a Democrat, Richard Blumenthal, incumbent State Attorney General, announced on the same day that he would run for Dodd's seat.[27] The Connecticut Democratic Party nominated Blumenthal on May 21. Businesswoman Linda McMahon won the state party's nominating convention and the August 10 Republican primary to become the Republican candidate.[28]
Election Name: | Delaware special election |
Country: | Delaware |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | No |
Previous Election: | 2008 United States Senate election in Delaware |
Previous Year: | 2008 |
Next Election: | 2014 United States Senate election in Delaware |
Next Year: | 2014 |
Image1: | Chris Coons, official portrait, 112th Congress (cropped).jpg |
Nominee1: | Chris Coons |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 174,012 |
Percentage1: | 56.6% |
Nominee2: | Christine O'Donnell |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 123,053 |
Percentage2: | 40.0% |
Map Size: | 200px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Ted Kaufman |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Chris Coons |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate special election in Delaware.
See also: List of United States senators from Delaware. This was a special election to fill Delaware's Class 2 Senate seat, then held by Ted Kaufman, an appointee. The seat had been previously held by long-time Senator Joe Biden, who vacated it when he became Vice President of the United States in 2009.
Election Name: | Florida election |
Country: | Florida |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Florida |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Florida |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | File:Marco Rubio, Official Portrait, 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Marco Rubio |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 2,645,743 |
Percentage1: | 48.9% |
Nominee2: | Charlie Crist |
Party2: | Independent |
Popular Vote2: | 1,607,549 |
Percentage2: | 29.7% |
Image3: | Kendrick Meek official portrait (cropped).jpg |
Nominee3: | Kendrick Meek |
Party3: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote3: | 1,092,936 |
Percentage3: | 20.2% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | George LeMieux |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Marco Rubio |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Florida.
See also: List of United States senators from Florida. Incumbent Republican Senator Mel Martínez, who was elected in a very close race against Democrat Betty Castor with 49% of the vote in 2004, announced on December 2, 2008, that he would not run for re-election to a second term,[29] then announcing on August 7, 2009, that he would resign prior to the end of his term.[30] The Governor of Florida, Republican Charlie Crist, was required to appoint a successor and he chose his former Chief of Staff, George LeMieux. LeMieux, a placeholder who did not run in the election, replaced Martínez in the Senate on September 10, 2009.
Crist publicly announced he was running for the seat in mid-2009. When he declared his candidacy, he received many Republican endorsements, including the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Martínez, and 2008 Republican presidential nominee John McCain. However, his support of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 hurt his popularity among conservatives, and Tea Party candidate Marco Rubio, the former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, surged in the polls. In April 2010, Crist announced he would drop out of the Republican primary and run as an Independent. The National Republican Senatorial Committee withdrew its endorsement of Crist and demanded a refund of its campaign funds that it provided for the Crist campaign.[31] [32] [33] Rubio went on to win the Republican primary against only token opposition.
Polling initially showed Crist neck and neck with Rubio, but by the end of August Rubio opened up a solid and consistent lead. He was supported by Republican and some Independent voters whereas Democratic and other Independents were split between Crist and Meek. Rubio went on to win the election with 49% of the vote to Crist's 30% and Meek's 20%.
Election Name: | Georgia election |
Country: | Georgia (U.S. state) |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Georgia |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Georgia |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Johnny Isakson, official portrait, 112th Congress (cropped).jpg |
Nominee1: | Johnny Isakson |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,489,904 |
Percentage1: | 58.3% |
Nominee2: | Mike Thurmond |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 996,516 |
Percentage2: | 39.0% |
Map Size: | 200px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Johnny Isakson |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Johnny Isakson |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Georgia.
See also: List of United States senators from Georgia. Incumbent Republican Johnny Isakson won re-election to a second term.[34]
Election Name: | Hawaii election |
Country: | Hawaii |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Hawaii |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2014 United States Senate special election in Hawaii |
Next Year: | 2014 (special) |
Image1: | Daniel Inouye, official Senate photo portrait, 2008.jpg |
Nominee1: | Daniel Inouye |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 277,228 |
Percentage1: | 74.8% |
Nominee2: | Cam Cavasso |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 79,939 |
Percentage2: | 21.6% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Daniel Inouye |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Daniel Inouye |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Hawaii.
See also: List of United States senators from Hawaii. Incumbent Democrat and President pro tempore Daniel Inouye won re-election to his ninth term.
Hawaii last elected a Republican Senator in 1970, and its current delegation to the United States Congress currently consists entirely of Democrats. Democrats have also won Hawaii's electoral votes in every presidential election since Ronald Reagan's landslide election in 1984. The exceptions at the time were then-Governor Linda Lingle (who was serving her second and final term) and then-U.S. Representative Charles Djou, both of whom were Republicans.
Election Name: | Idaho election |
Country: | Idaho |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Idaho |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Idaho |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Mike Crapo Official Photo 110th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Mike Crapo |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 319,953 |
Percentage1: | 71.2% |
Nominee2: | Tom Sullivan |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 112,057 |
Percentage2: | 24.9% |
Map Size: | 200px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Mike Crapo |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Mike Crapo |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Idaho.
See also: List of United States senators from Idaho. Incumbent Republican Mike Crapo won re-election to a third term.
Sullivan, a heavy underdog, criticized Crapo for being in Washington for too long saying "Senator Crapo has been in Congress for 18 years. The country is struggling, and I think it's time to make a change." Crapo emphasized his conservative record in Washington.[35]
See main article: 2010 United States Senate elections in Illinois.
See also: List of United States senators from Illinois.
Election Name: | Illinois election |
Country: | Illinois |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Illinois |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Illinois |
Next Year: | 2016 |
1Blank: | Special election |
2Blank: | Regular election |
Image1: | Senator Mark Kirk official portrait crop.jpg |
Nominee1: | Mark Kirk |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
1Data1: | 1,677,729 47.3% |
2Data1: | 1,778,698 48.0% |
Nominee2: | Alexi Giannoulias |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
1Data2: | 1,641,486 46.3% |
2Data2: | 1,719,478 46.4% |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Roland Burris |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Mark Kirk |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
Incumbent Democrat Roland Burris did not run in 2010.[36] He suffered from poor approval ratings[37] and was investigated by the Sangamon County, Illinois State's Attorney for perjury.[38] Although no criminal charges were filed against him, he faced an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee.[39]
There were two ballot items for the same seat: a regular election, to fill the Class 3 seat beginning with the 112th United States Congress beginning on January 3, 2011, and a special election, to fill that seat for the final weeks of the 111th Congress, replacing the temporary appointment of Roland Burris to the vacancy created by Barack Obama's election to the presidency.[40]
A federal court ruled that the candidates appearing on the ballot for the replacement election would be the ones of the regular election,[41] and that the special election would appear after the regular election on the ballot.
, this was the last Senate election in Illinois won by a Republican.
Election Name: | Indiana election |
Country: | Indiana |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Indiana |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Indiana |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Dan Coats, official portrait, 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Dan Coats |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 952,116 |
Percentage1: | 54.6% |
Nominee2: | Brad Ellsworth |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 697,775 |
Percentage2: | 40.0% |
Party4: | Libertarian Party (US) |
Popular Vote4: | 94,330 |
Percentage4: | 5.4% |
Map Size: | 170px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Evan Bayh |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Dan Coats[42] |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Indiana.
See also: List of United States senators from Indiana. Incumbent Democrat Evan Bayh decided in February 2010 to retire instead of seeking a third term shortly after former U.S. Senator Dan Coats announced his candidacy for Bayh's contested seat.[43] No Democratic candidate submitted enough signatures by the deadline to run, leading Democratic officials to choose U.S. Congressman Brad Ellsworth to be the nominee. Coats won the election.
After Coats's win in the Republican primary, Ellsworth began to heavily criticize Coats for his ties to lobbyists. He called for more disclosure of the meetings lawmakers have with lobbyists, banning congressional staff from lobbying for six years after their congressional jobs, requiring Congress members to put all their investments in blind trusts, more disclosure of Senate candidates' personal financial information, and changes to the U.S. Senate filibuster rules. He proposed lowering number of votes required to break a filibuster to 55 from the current 60.[44] In response to Ellsworth's charges, Coats published his lobbying record in an 815-page document.
Coats emphasized the individual issues rather than ethics reforms advocated by his opponent. He focused on Ellsworth's record of voting in support of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, cap-and-trade legislation, and health care bill. Coats opinion of the healthcare law was that "the only responsible solution ... is to repeal the Obama-Pelosi-Ellsworth health spending bill and quickly replace it with cost-effective, incremental pieces that will decrease costs, increase coverage and not break the bank."
Election Name: | Iowa election |
Country: | Iowa |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Iowa |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Iowa |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Sen Chuck Grassley official.jpg |
Nominee1: | Chuck Grassley |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 718,215 |
Percentage1: | 64.4% |
Nominee2: | Roxanne Conlin |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 371,686 |
Percentage2: | 33.3% |
Map Size: | 230px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Chuck Grassley |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Chuck Grassley |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Iowa.
See also: List of United States senators from Iowa. Incumbent Republican Chuck Grassley won re-election to a sixth term.
Incumbent Chuck Grassley started the campaign moderately popular, but his approval ratings dropped somewhat during the campaign.[45] However, the seat continued to be considered to be "Safe Republican" by many sources, with CQ Politics noting that Grassley is "one of Iowa's most durable politicians."
Conlin described herself as a "prairie progressive." She supported the recent landmark case of Varnum v. Brien, which legalized gay marriage in the state. She also supported repeal of "don't ask, don't tell."[46]
Before the election, former political advisor John Maxwell claimed that Grassley would have his toughest race since his first U.S. Senate election in 1980, where he defeated incumbent John Culver with 53% of the vote. Grassley won all of his four re-election bids with nearly 70% of the vote against unknown opponents.[47] Grassley won the election with 64.51% of the vote.
Election Name: | Kansas election |
Country: | Kansas |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Kansas |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Kansas |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Jerry Moran, official Congressional photo portrait.jpg |
Nominee1: | Jerry Moran |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 578,768 |
Percentage1: | 70.3% |
Nominee2: | Lisa Johnston |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 215,270 |
Percentage2: | 26.2% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Sam Brownback |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Jerry Moran |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Kansas.
See also: List of United States senators from Kansas. Incumbent Republican Sam Brownback retired to run for Governor of Kansas, instead of seeking a third term. Republican nominee Jerry Moran won the open seat. Kansas is one of the most Republican states in the nation;[48] no Democrat has been elected to either Senate seat since 1932.
The retirement of Brownback, a popular U.S. Senator, led to a heavily competitive primary election. Tiahrt, who was on the Committee of Appropriations, had been accused of excessive earmarking while he was in Congress. From 2006 to 2008, Tiahrt had requested and supported a total of 63 solo earmarks, costing $53.9 million. In the same period, Moran had requested and supported a total of 29 earmarks, with a pricetag of $13.4 million.[49] [50]
After the primaries, Moran chose not to release any more negative advertisements. Democrat Lisa Johnston ran a low-profile, quiet race. On election day, she won only two counties: Wyandotte County and Douglas County, while Moran won statewide by a landslide.[51]
Election Name: | Kentucky election |
Country: | Kentucky |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Kentucky |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Kentucky |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Rand Paul official portrait with flag edit.jpg |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Nominee1: | Rand Paul |
Popular Vote1: | 755,411 |
Percentage1: | 55.7% |
Nominee2: | Jack Conway |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 599,843 |
Percentage2: | 44.2% |
Map Size: | 300px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Jim Bunning |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Rand Paul |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Kentucky.
See also: List of United States senators from Kentucky. Incumbent Republican Jim Bunning retired instead of seeking a third term. Republican nominee Rand Paul won the open seat.[52]
On May 18, 2010, Paul won the Republican nomination. After conceding the election to Paul, Grayson said, "It's time to put all differences aside, unite behind Dr. Paul, he needs our help and I for one stand ready to serve".[53]
Grayson attacked Paul for his "strange ideas," such as his opposition of the PATRIOT Act, and what Grayson alleged to be his support of closing down Guantanamo Bay and saying that Iran was not a threat. He also attacked Paul for being a Duke University fan. He sent out another TV ad and web video that stirred controversy by making the case that Paul believes that foreign policy decisions made prior to September 11, 2001, are partially to blame for the attacks.[54] Paul immediately responded by launching a statewide television ad in which he expresses his "outrage at terrorists who killed 3,000 innocents" before accusing Grayson of a "lie" and a "shameful" tactic.[55] Grayson accused the Fox News Channel of favoring Paul over him.
Conway began the race trailing Paul, but as he attacked his opponent's positions on social-welfare and criminal-justice policies, the polls began to tighten. The campaign attracted $8.5 million in contributions from outside groups, of which $6 million was spent to help Rand Paul and $2.5 million to help Conway. This money influx was in addition to the money spent by the candidates themselves: $6 million by Paul and $4.7 million by Conway.[56] [57]
Election Name: | Louisiana election |
Country: | Louisiana |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Louisiana |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Louisiana |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | DVitterOfficial.jpg |
Nominee1: | David Vitter |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 715,304 |
Percentage1: | 56.6% |
Nominee2: | Charlie Melancon |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 476,423 |
Percentage2: | 37.7% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | David Vitter |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | David Vitter |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Louisiana.
See also: List of United States senators from Louisiana. Incumbent Republican David Vitter won re-election to a second term. Some speculated that Vitter's re-election might have become complicated, by the prostitution scandal revealed in 2007, but he continued to lead in aggregate polling against potential opponents.[58]
Melançon heavily criticized Vitter for prostitution sex scandal.[59] [60] Vitter released television advertising criticizing Melancon for his support for Obama's stimulus package and his support for amnesty for illegal immigrants.[61] Melancon claimed "In August, Melancon challenged Vitter to a series of five live, televised town hall-style debates across the state. In his 2004 campaign for Senate, Vitter committed to five live, televised debates. Since Melancon issued the challenge, Vitter and Melancon have been invited to a total of seven live, televised debates. Vitter only accepted invitations to debates hosted by WWL-TV and WDSU-TV, both in New Orleans."[62]
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Maryland.
See also: List of United States senators from Maryland.
Election Name: | Maryland election |
Country: | Maryland |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Maryland |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Maryland |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Barbara Mikulski official portrait c. 2011.jpg |
Nominee1: | Barbara Mikulski |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,140,531 |
Percentage1: | 62.2% |
Nominee2: | Eric Wargotz |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 655,666 |
Percentage2: | 35.8% |
Map Size: | 275px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Barbara Mikulski |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Barbara Mikulski |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
Incumbent Democrat Barbara Mikulski won re-election to a fifth term.
Republican nominee Eric Wargotz, Queen Anne's County, Maryland Commission President and physician, compared Mikulski to a dinosaur by calling her a political "insidersaurus" for being in Washington for over thirty years[63] [64] [65] An ad showed a hammer hitting a brick wall, breaking it down and citing criticisms of Mikulski's record as a U.S. Senator. Mikulski released advertisements emphasizing education and job creation.[66] Despite Wargotz's limited campaign and resources he received the highest percentage of votes against Mikulski as an incumbent U.S. Senator
Election Name: | Massachusetts special election |
Country: | Massachusetts |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2006 United States Senate election in Massachusetts |
Previous Year: | 2006 |
Next Election: | 2012 United States Senate election in Massachusetts |
Next Year: | 2012 |
Election Date: | January 19, 2010 |
Image1: | Sbrownofficial.jpg |
Nominee1: | Scott Brown |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,168,178 |
Percentage1: | 51.9% |
Nominee2: | Martha Coakley |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,060,861 |
Percentage2: | 47.1% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. senator | |
Before Election: | Paul Kirk |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Scott Brown |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate special election in Massachusetts.
See also: List of United States senators from Massachusetts. A special election was held January 19, 2010 to fill the Class 1 seat for the remainder of the term ending January 3, 2013. It was won by Republican Scott Brown.
Incumbent Democrat Ted Kennedy had died on August 25, 2009. Governor of Massachusetts appointed Democrat Paul Kirk September 24, 2009, to continue the term pending this special election, in which Kirk was not a candidate.
The election was viewed by conservatives outside of Massachusetts as a referendum against President Barack Obama.[67] But Brown stated that he didn't believe that it was a referendum on Obama.[68] Although Democrats would retain control of both Houses of Congress until January 2011, Brown's victory greatly affected their political plans, most notably for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, though the legislation was signed into law two months later.[69] [70] Brown became the first Republican to win this seat since 1946, and as of, this is the last Senate election in Massachusetts won by a Republican.
Election Name: | Missouri election |
Country: | Missouri |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Missouri |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Missouri |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | File:Rep Roy Blunt (cropped).jpg |
Nominee1: | Roy Blunt |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,054,160 |
Percentage1: | 54.2% |
Nominee2: | Robin Carnahan |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 789,736 |
Percentage2: | 40.6% |
Map Size: | 255px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Kit Bond |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Roy Blunt |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Missouri.
See also: List of United States senators from Missouri. Incumbent Republican Kit Bond retired instead of seeking a fifth term. Republican nominee Roy Blunt won the open seat.[71]
Democrat Robin Carnahan and national Democrats heavily criticized Blunt for his support of bailouts, calling him "Bailout Blunt."[72] Blunt criticized her for supporting President Obama's stimulus package, the cap-and-trade energy bill, and the health care reform bill.[73]
Election Name: | Nevada election |
Country: | Nevada |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Nevada |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Nevada |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Harry Reid official portrait 2009 crop.jpg |
Nominee1: | Harry Reid |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 362,785 |
Percentage1: | 50.2% |
Nominee2: | Sharron Angle |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 321,361 |
Percentage2: | 44.5% |
Map Size: | 225px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Harry Reid |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Harry Reid |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Nevada.
See also: List of United States senators from Nevada. Incumbent Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid won re-election to a fifth term.[74]
Reid was initially considered vulnerable, with the non-partisan Cook Political Report rating the election as a toss-up[75] and the Rothenberg Political Report rating the state as toss-up.[76] A June 9, 2010, Rasmussen Reports post-primary poll showed Angle leading incumbent Senator Harry Reid by a margin of 50% to 39%.[77] However, a July 2010 poll showed Senator Reid leading Angle by 7 points, following nationwide attention to some of Angle's positions,[78] as well as the endorsement of Reid by prominent Republicans. The change of margin, 18% in less than a month, is the largest in Senate elections history. On July 28, 2010, Rasmussen Reports moved the race from toss-up to leans Democratic.[79] Later, it moved back to toss-up. Despite Angle leading by three points in the polls the days leading up to the election, Reid defeated her by 5.74%, even in her own county, Washoe County. Reid also secured huge numbers out of the Democratic stronghold of Clark County, which covers the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area. Angle's far right beliefs and positions were also widely cited as a reason for the failure of the Republican Party defeating Reid.[80]
Election Name: | New Hampshire election |
Country: | New Hampshire |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in New Hampshire |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in New Hampshire |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Kelly Ayotte portrait (cropped).jpg |
Nominee1: | Kelly Ayotte |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 272,703 |
Percentage1: | 60.2% |
Nominee2: | Paul Hodes |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 166,538 |
Percentage2: | 36.7% |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Judd Gregg |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Kelly Ayotte |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in New Hampshire.
See also: List of United States senators from New Hampshire. Incumbent Republican Judd Gregg retired instead of seeking a fourth term. Republican nominee Kelly Ayotte won the open seat by over 23 points, after winning a close party primary. New Hampshire trended Democratic in the 2006 and 2008 elections, with Republican incumbents losing both of the state's House seats and its other Senate seat to Democrats, but polling conducted in late December 2008 showed Gregg defeating both of the state's U.S. Representatives in a hypothetical match-up.
Democrat Paul Hodes called himself a fiscal conservative, which was mocked by Republican Kelly Ayotte in a TV ad. Hodes was criticized for supporting President Obama's Economic Recovery package, a carbon energy tax, and Affordable Care Act.[81] [82] [83] Hodes criticized Ayotte for numerous controversies. One ad was questioned Ayotte's honesty in dealing with the Lakes Region Ponzi scheme which defrauded investors of almost $80 million.[84]
There were two elections, due to the resignation of Hillary Clinton in January 2009 to become the U.S. Secretary of State. Both senate races, along with the New York gubernatorial election, one with a vulnerable Democratic incumbent and the other an open race, respectively,[85] was believed to lead major New York Republicans to gravitate towards them rather than challenge the popular Schumer.[86] [87] As it happened, however, New York Republicans had difficulty drawing top-tier candidates to any of the three races.
Election Name: | New York regular election |
Country: | New York |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in New York |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2014 United States Senate election in New York |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | File:Chuck Schumer official photo (cropped 2).jpg |
Nominee1: | Chuck Schumer |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 3,047,775 |
Percentage1: | 66.4% |
Nominee2: | Jay Townsend |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,480,337 |
Percentage2: | 33.0% |
Map Size: | 295px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Chuck Schumer |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Chuck Schumer |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in New York.
See also: List of United States senators from New York. Incumbent Democrat Chuck Schumer won re-election to a third term.[88]
Election Name: | New York special election |
Country: | New York |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2006 United States Senate election in New York |
Previous Year: | 2006 |
Next Election: | 2012 United States Senate election in New York |
Next Year: | 2012 |
Image1: | Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.jpg |
Nominee1: | Kirsten Gillibrand |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 2,837,684 |
Percentage1: | 59.6% |
Nominee2: | Joseph DioGuardi |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,582,693 |
Percentage2: | 33.3% |
Map Size: | 295px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Kirsten Gillibrand |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Kirsten Gillibrand[89] |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate special election in New York.
See also: List of United States senators from New York. Governor David Paterson had appointed Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand to serve as United States Senator this special election, replacing former Senator Hillary Clinton, who resigned to serve as U.S. Secretary of State in the Barack Obama administration. The winner of the special election would complete the term ending in January 2013. Due to this special election, this was the first time since the ratification of the 17th Amendment in 1913 that all of New York's six statewide offices were up for popular election on the same date.
Gillibrand claimed to be an independent thinker and takes a back seat to no one. She also released television advertising touting her experience as from upstate New York.[90] DioGuardi criticized Gillibrand's recent photos in Vogue magazine.[91] [92]
Election Name: | North Carolina election |
Country: | North Carolina |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in North Carolina |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in North Carolina |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Richard Burr official portrait crop.jpg |
Nominee1: | Richard Burr |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,458,046 |
Percentage1: | 54.81% |
Nominee2: | Elaine Marshall |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,145,074 |
Percentage2: | 43.05% |
Map Size: | 300px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Richard Burr |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Richard Burr |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in North Carolina.
See also: List of United States senators from North Carolina. Incumbent Republican Richard Burr won re-election to a second term. Burr was the first incumbent to win re-election for this seat since Sam Ervin's last re-election in 1968.[93] Burr's 54.8% also represented the highest vote share a North Carolina Republican received since the state began directly electing its senators.
This Senate seat was unfavorable to incumbents over the past several decades. No person elected to this seat was re-elected since Sam Ervin in 1968. His successor, Democrat Robert Burren Morgan, was defeated for re-election in 1980, along with many other incumbents from his party. His Republican successor, John Porter East, committed suicide in 1986. East's appointed successor, Jim Broyhill, served for just four months, resigning upon his November 1986 election loss to former Democratic Governor Terry Sanford. In 1992, the seat changed hands yet again, as Sanford was defeated by wealthy GOP businessman Lauch Faircloth, who himself lost in his bid for a second term six years later by John Edwards. In 2004, no incumbent was defeated, as Edwards was running for vice president and was not allowed to be on the ballot in both races. However, that year the seat did change parties for the fifth time in a row, with Richard Burr defeating Bill Clinton's onetime Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles.
Election Name: | North Dakota election |
Country: | North Dakota |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in North Dakota |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in North Dakota |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | John Hoeven, Official Senate Portrait, 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | John Hoeven |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 181,689 |
Percentage1: | 76.1% |
Nominee2: | Tracy Potter |
Party2: | North Dakota Democratic–Nonpartisan League Party |
Popular Vote2: | 52,955 |
Percentage2: | 22.2% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Byron Dorgan |
Before Party: | North Dakota Democratic–Nonpartisan League Party |
After Election: | John Hoeven |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in North Dakota.
See also: List of United States senators from North Dakota. Incumbent Democrat Byron Dorgan did not seek re-election. Republican Governor John Hoeven won the open seat. Incumbent Byron Dorgan never had a difficult time getting elected, as he obtained 59%, 63%, and 68% in his three senate election bids, respectively. However, in December 2009, Rasmussen Reports conducted a hypothetical matchup of Governor John Hoeven against the incumbent. Hoeven led by a large margin, 58% to Dorgan's 36%. 61% of the state still had a favorable view of Dorgan, and if pitted against State Senator Duane Sand, the incumbent led 52% to 37%.[95]
Hoeven was challenged in the race by North Dakota State Senator Tracy Potter of Bismarck. Potter received the endorsement of the North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party at its state convention on March 27, 2010. Governor Hoeven and Senator Potter advanced to the November 2, 2010 general election following balloting in North Dakota's primary election, which was held June 8, 2010. Neither candidate faced any significant opposition in the primary election.
Election Name: | Ohio election |
Country: | Ohio |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Ohio |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Ohio |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Rob Portman portrait.jpg |
Nominee1: | Rob Portman |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 2,125,810 |
Percentage1: | 56.8% |
Nominee2: | Lee Fisher |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,448,092 |
Percentage2: | 39.4% |
Map Size: | 200px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | George Voinovich |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Rob Portman[96] |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Ohio.
See also: List of United States senators from Ohio. Incumbent Republican George Voinovich retired instead of seeking a third term.[97] Republican former Director of the Office of Management and Budget, United States Trade Representative, and Congressman Rob Portman won the open seat.
Originally, the election was seen as a toss-up.[98] His experience as a former Bush official was considered to be a big problem for Portman. Both President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden campaigned for Fisher.[99] Television advertisements were very negative. Fisher attacked Portman for helping to ship jobs overseas during his entire political career, backing deals that shipped jobs overseas, and the trade deficit with China, which grew by over $41 billion.[100] Portman claimed in response that most jobs were being lost to other states, not countries.[101] Portman attacked Fisher for supporting Obama's stimulus and cap and trade.[102] [103]
Winning the election, Portman received the majority of votes in 82 of 88 counties and in 15 of 18 Congressional districts, including the district of liberal U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich.[104]
Election Name: | Oklahoma election |
Country: | Oklahoma |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Oklahoma |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2014 United States Senate special election in Oklahoma |
Next Year: | 2014 (special) |
Image1: | Tom Coburn official portrait 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Tom Coburn |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 718,482 |
Percentage1: | 70.6% |
Nominee2: | Jim Rogers |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 265,814 |
Percentage2: | 26.1% |
Map Size: | 300px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Tom Coburn |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Tom Coburn |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Oklahoma.
See also: List of United States senators from Oklahoma. Incumbent first-term Republican Tom Coburn won re-election to a second term. Coburn, a very popular incumbent, promised to limit himself to two terms. Despite his popularity, he did release television advertisements. In 2009, Coburn's approval rating in a PPP poll was 59%, including a 39% approval rating among Democrats.[105] His Democratic opponent is a perennial candidate[106] who did little campaigning.[107]
Election Name: | Oregon election |
Country: | Oregon |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Oregon |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Oregon |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Ron Wyden official portrait crop.jpg |
Nominee1: | Ron Wyden |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 825,507 |
Percentage1: | 57.2% |
Nominee2: | Jim Huffman |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 566,199 |
Percentage2: | 39.3% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Ron Wyden |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Ron Wyden |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Oregon.
See also: List of United States senators from Oregon. Incumbent Democrat Ron Wyden won re-election to a third full term. Wyden, a popular incumbent with a 52% approval rating in a July poll,[108] touted bipartisanship and promised to hold town-hall meetings annually in each of Oregon's 36 counties and to open offices outside of Portland and Salem.[109] A Survey USA poll taken a few days before the election showed that 23% of Republicans supported Wyden.[110]
Huffman, widely considered as an underdog, financed his own campaign. He defended bonuses for Wall Street executives and questioned global warming.[111]
Election Name: | Pennsylvania election |
Country: | Pennsylvania |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Pat Toomey Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Pat Toomey |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 2,028,945 |
Percentage1: | 51.0% |
Nominee2: | Joe Sestak |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,948,716 |
Percentage2: | 49.0% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Arlen Specter |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Pat Toomey |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania.
See also: List of United States senators from Pennsylvania. Incumbent Republican-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter ran for re-election to a sixth term,[112] but he lost in the Democratic primary to Joe Sestak. Republican nominee Pat Toomey then won the seat.
Election Name: | South Carolina election |
Country: | South Carolina |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in South Carolina |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2014 United States Senate special election in South Carolina |
Next Year: | 2014 (special) |
Image1: | Jim DeMint headshot.jpg |
Nominee1: | Jim DeMint |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 810,771 |
Percentage1: | 61.5% |
Nominee2: | Alvin Greene |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 364,598 |
Percentage2: | 27.7% |
Nominee4: | Tom Clements |
Party4: | Green Party (US) |
Popular Vote4: | 121,472 |
Percentage4: | 9.2% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Jim DeMint |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Jim DeMint[113] |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in South Carolina.
See also: List of United States senators from South Carolina. Incumbent Republican Jim DeMint won re-election to a second term. Alvin Greene, the Democratic nominee, was the first major-party African-American U.S. Senate candidate in South Carolina since Reconstruction. Alvin Greene's Democratic primary election win and his margin of victory surprised pundits. As of the primary, he had held no public campaign events, raised no money, and did not have a campaign website. A review of the primary election showed that of the state's 46 counties, half had a significant gap between the absentee and primary day ballots. For example, in Lancaster County, Vic Rawl won the absentees with 84 percent, while Greene won primary day by a double-digit margin. Rawl's campaign manager also claimed, "In only two of 88 precincts, do the number of votes Greene got plus the number we got equal the total cast."[114]
Election Name: | South Dakota election |
Country: | South Dakota |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in South Dakota |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in South Dakota |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | John Thune, official portrait, 111th Congress (cropped1).jpg |
Nominee1: | John Thune |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 227,947 |
Percentage1: | 100.0% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | John Thune |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | John Thune |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in South Dakota.
See also: List of United States senators from South Dakota. Incumbent Republican John Thune won re-election to a second term unopposed.[115] [116]
Thune was narrowly elected to his first term over Democratic Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle with 51% of the vote in 2004. In spite of his lack of seniority, Thune rose to the position of chairman of the Republican Policy Committee in the United States Senate.
No members of the South Dakota Democratic Party (or any other party) filed to challenge Thune. Scott Heidepriem, the South Dakota Senate Minority Leader and a Democratic candidate for Governor of South Dakota, said, "We just concluded that John Thune is an extremely popular senator who is going to win another term in the Senate."[117]
Election Name: | Utah election |
Country: | Utah |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Utah |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Utah |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Mike Lee official portrait 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Mike Lee |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 390,179 |
Percentage1: | 61.6% |
Nominee2: | Sam Granato |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 207,685 |
Percentage2: | 32.8% |
Nominee4: | Scott Bradley |
Party4: | Constitution Party (US) |
Popular Vote4: | 35,937 |
Percentage4: | 5.7% |
Map Size: | 200px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Bob Bennett |
Before Party: | Republican Party (US) |
After Election: | Mike Lee |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Utah.
See also: List of United States senators from Utah. Incumbent Republican Bob Bennett was seeking re-election to a fourth term, but was eliminated in the GOP state convention. Republican Mike Lee, who won the Republican primary, won the open seat.
At the Republican convention, incumbent Senator Bob Bennett finished third in balloting among delegates and was eliminated from the race. Business owner Tim Bridgewater finished first and attorney Mike Lee finished second, but Bridgewater did not receive enough votes to avoid a primary election runoff against Lee.[118] At the Democratic convention, delegates nominated businessman Sam Granato, who received 77.5 percent of the vote.[119]
Election Name: | Vermont election |
Country: | Vermont |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Vermont |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Vermont |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Patrick Leahy 113th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Patrick Leahy |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 151,281 |
Percentage1: | 64.36% |
Nominee2: | Len Britton |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 72,699 |
Percentage2: | 30.93% |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Patrick Leahy |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Patrick Leahy[120] |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Vermont.
See also: List of United States senators from Vermont. Incumbent Democrat Patrick Leahy easily won re-election to a seventh term.
Election Name: | Washington election |
Country: | Washington |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Washington |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Washington |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Patty Murray, official portrait, 113th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Patty Murray |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,314,930 |
Percentage1: | 52.1% |
Nominee2: | Dino Rossi |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,196,164 |
Percentage2: | 47.4% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Patty Murray |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Patty Murray |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Washington.
See also: List of United States senators from Washington. Incumbent Democrat Patty Murray won re-election to a fourth term.
Republican Dino Rossi heavily criticized Murray for her support of the 2009 economic stimulus package; however, Rossi's economic promises are nearly identical to those of President Bush who asked for the stimulus.[121] Rossi supports repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. He also criticized Murray for her support for earmarks. In response, Murray said, "You bet that seniority and leadership has a big thing to do with it, but the other part of it is, I get up every day and I work hard and I believe in this and I am going to continue fighting for the community I represent."[122]
Election Name: | West Virginia special election |
Country: | West Virginia |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | no |
Previous Election: | 2006 United States Senate election in West Virginia |
Previous Year: | 2006 |
Next Election: | 2012 United States Senate election in West Virginia |
Next Year: | 2012 |
Image1: | Joe Manchin official portrait 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Joe Manchin |
Party1: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 283,358 |
Percentage1: | 53.5% |
Nominee2: | John Raese |
Party2: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 230,013 |
Percentage2: | 43.4% |
Map Size: | 250px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Carte Goodwin |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Joe Manchin |
After Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate special election in West Virginia.
See also: List of United States senators from West Virginia. Long-time Democratic Senator Robert Byrd died June 28, 2010, and Democratic Governor Joe Manchin appointed Carte Goodwin to temporarily fill the vacancy. Goodwin pledged to not run for election to the seat in exchange for the appointment. Manchin won the open seat and served out the remainder of Byrd's elected term, which ended on January 3, 2013.[123]
During the Republican primary campaign, only Raese and Warner released television advertisements.[124]
Election Name: | Wisconsin election |
Country: | Wisconsin |
Type: | presidential |
Ongoing: | Yes |
Previous Election: | 2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin |
Previous Year: | 2004 |
Next Election: | 2016 United States Senate election in Wisconsin |
Next Year: | 2016 |
Image1: | Ron Johnson, official portrait, 112th Congress.jpg |
Nominee1: | Ron Johnson |
Party1: | Republican Party (US) |
Popular Vote1: | 1,125,932 |
Percentage1: | 51.86% |
Nominee2: | Russ Feingold |
Party2: | Democratic Party (US) |
Popular Vote2: | 1,020,841 |
Percentage2: | 47.02% |
Map Size: | 220px |
U.S. Senator | |
Before Election: | Russ Feingold |
Before Party: | Democratic Party (US) |
After Election: | Ron Johnson |
After Party: | Republican Party (US) |
See main article: 2010 United States Senate election in Wisconsin.
See also: List of United States senators from Wisconsin. Incumbent Democrat Russ Feingold ran for re-election to a fourth term, but was defeated by political newcomer, Republican Ron Johnson. Johnson, a millionaire manufacturer and Tea Party movement favorite who was running for his first political office, was the front runner. In response to controversy over his ownership of stock in BP, Johnson said he would sell it when market conditions were favorable and possibly use the proceeds to help finance his Senate campaign. Feingold's first television ad was a positive ad released in March. In July 2010, Feingold's second 2010 television election ad attacked Johnson for alleged support for offshore drilling in the Great Lakes. Johnson quickly countered Feingold with a television ad of his own. Feingold's logo was Moving Forward. In one ad he emphasized independence and called himself a "Penny Pincher."[125] Johnson argued that his professions, manufacturer and accountant were underrepresented in the U.S. Senate, and there were too many lawyers (57 out of 100 members), including Feingold.[126]