United States-Puerto Rico Political Status Act Explained

The United States-Puerto Rico Political Status Act (1998) was a bill proposed in the United States Congress to help refine the political status of Puerto Rico.[1] The senior sponsor of the bill was Representative Don Young, Republican of Alaska. While a version was approved in the House, it failed to reach a vote in the Senate.

Definition

The bill offered Puerto Ricans four options for their political future: statehood, independence, associated republic, or the current commonwealth status. The project proposed to carry out a referendum in which the people of Puerto Rico could choose the option they preferred.

Controversy

The proposal was controversial in Puerto Rican politics for several reasons. Governor Pedro Rosselló and Resident Commissioner Carlos Romero Barceló, two avid supporters of statehood, were advocates of the legislation, and thus the bill was seen with suspicion by non-statehooders. Second, the legislation seemed to favor unchangeable status choices over commonwealth status, and the Commonwealth option in the bill defined Puerto Rico as a "territory subject to the supreme powers of the U.S. Congress." The Popular Democratic Party of Puerto Rico (PPD) disagreed with this definition, stating that it portrayed the island as a colony of the United States, and not as a true commonwealth or free associated state (estado libre associado) between two nations. The PPD opposed the bill.

The positions regarding Puerto Rican status within the U.S. National Parties are not monolithic. Overall, the national Democratic Party identifies mostly with Commonwealth supporters, with minorities favoring statehood or independence. The Republican Party are also conflicted. Nearly every presidential candidate for the Republican party has endorsed statehood; but many legislators worry about the potential for a Spanish-speaking majority state of Puerto Rico to tip the balance of power in congress. Some welcome the fiscal benefits of detaching the island from the U.S.

The travails of H.R. 856 in the House of Representatives exemplifies the hurdles from conservative and liberal members that any status choice by Puerto Rico will face in Congress.[2] The bill was introduced by conservative representative Gerald Solomon (Republican – New York or R-NY). The following amendments, many by liberal NY and IL congressman were debated:

Ultimately, Puerto Rico, while under the PNP leadership of Governor Rosselló, held a status referendum on December, 1998, using criteria from the Bill, despite the lack of a Bill's approval. The PPD opposed the referendum unless different wording was used for the Commonwealth option. The PNP pointed out that any such status change would require congressional approval, and at least the Bill's terminology had mustered House support. In response, the PPD urged Puerto Ricans to choose the None of the Above option, as a means to reject the offered status choices. The success of this option in the polls while expressing disapproval, does not express a preference among the Bill's options.

See also

Notes

  1. https://archive.today/20120717082015/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d105:HR00856:@@@L Thomas – The Library of Congress
  2. Web site: Washington Post – House Passes Puerto Rico Bill . 2007-09-30 . https://web.archive.org/web/20070930082657/http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/JWCRAWFORD/WPOST4.htm . 2007-09-30 . dead .
  3. Web site: Resources on the Puerto Rico Statehood Question . 2008-06-04 . https://web.archive.org/web/20080604015316/http://www.englishfirst.org/puerto/puerto.htm . 2008-06-04 . dead .
  4. Web site: Bill Summary & Status. 105th Congress (1997 - 1998). H.AMDT.512 . 2012-08-06 . 2016-07-04 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160704153733/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d105:HZ00512: . dead .