United Shoe Machinery Corporation Explained

United Shoe Machinery Corporation (USMC) was a U.S.-based manufacturer of various industrial machinery, particularly for the shoe manufacturing industry and monopolized the American shoe machinery business.[1] It was an important federal government's defense contractor during the World War I, Interbellum years, World War II and the Cold war era, which developed and manufactured various land and aircraft armaments, as well as components for the military hardware made by other manufacturers. Founded in Beverly, Massachusetts, its corporate headquarters were eventually relocated to Boston, with key production facilities scattered around Massachusetts. It had subsidiaries in other countries including British United Shoe Machinery in England.

History

The Smithsonian National Museum of American History provides the following account of the history of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation.

The United Shoe Machinery Company was formed in 1899 by the consolidation of three shoe machinery firms in the industry: Goodyear Shoe Machinery Company; Consolidated McKay Lasting Machine Company; and McKay Shoe Machinery Company. The new company continued the practice previously followed by its constituent firms of renting machinery that it manufactured instead of selling it. After the 1899 merger, United grew quite rapidly. In 1903, it began construction of a new factory in Beverly, Massachusetts about thirty-five miles from Boston. At its peak, this company employed 9,000 workers and produced eighty-five percent of all shoemaking machines in the United States. By 1910, it had an eighty percent share of the shoe machinery market with assets reaching forty million dollars, and it had acquired control of branch companies in foreign countries. In 1917, the United Shoe Machinery Corporation, incorporated in 1905, absorbed the United Shoe Machinery Company. The United Shoe Machinery Corporation had its headquarters in Boston and its main manufacturing plant in Beverly, Massachusetts. In 1968, the United Shoe Machinery Corporation changed its name to USM Corporation. In 1976, United Shoe Machinery Company merged with Emhart Industries and produced the modern-day Emhart Corporation. In 1989, in order to resist a two billion dollar takeover attempt by a New York investment group (which included oil heir Gordon P. Getty), Emhart merged with Black & Decker Corporation. The merged company operates from Black & Decker's headquarters in Towson, Maryland. The company headquarters in Farmington, Connecticut, were closed in June 1989.[2]

Since its founding, the United Shoe Machinery Company was embroiled in legal disputes and controversial business practices.[3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

In December 1947 the US government brought proceedings against USM alleging a breach of the Sherman Antitrust Act in that the company had been a monopoly since 1912.[8] A "trial of prodigious length" followed, with the verdict going against USM, but the corporation wasn't broken up and the judgement and remedy was confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1954.

The government renewed its complaint in 1967 but although the District Court ruled nothing had changed, this time the Supreme Court ordered USM to be broken up. It was required to divest a substantial part of its business and change its leasing strategy over a 10-year period, with the sell-off raising $400 million. It continued to innovate within the shoe manufacturing industry, but it also developed such modern inventions as the hot glue gun, the soda can pop-top, the drive mechanism for the Lunar Roving, and pop rivets for the Concorde. However, the attempts at diversification failed to generate enough money and in 1976 the company, heavily in debt, was bought by Emhart Corporation, now Stanley Engineered Fastening,[9] an organisation half its size.

In 1987 a management buyout led by the management of British United Shoe Machinery (BUSM) bought the shoe machinery operations, including USM, from Emhart Industries and control of USM then passed to the U.K. as part of the newly created United Machinery Group (UMG).[10] Subsequently, the USM headquarters moved into a new high-tech factory outside Boston. In 1995 UMG was acquired by Venture Capitalists Apax Partners Corporate Finance Limited, but after financial difficulties UMG went into administration in 2000.

The anti-trust case against the United Shoe Machinery Company have drawn comparisons to subsequent anti-trust cases against IBM[11] [12] and Microsoft.[13]

Research and development

The corporation pioneered the development and production of a synthetic leather materials.[14]

During the Interbellum era corporate Research Division designed and developed gun mounts, gun turrets, fire control equipment, automatic guns, automatic fuse setting, bomb release equipment, automatic conveying equipment, and automatic rocket projectors, as well as many other things of military interest.[15]

During the postwar years, the corporate engineers experimented intensively with armoured fighting vehicles of modular design, kindred by common chassis, common armor elements, interchangeable armament, automatic loading for weapons, and low weight in order to attain high speeds, coupled with various comfort add-ons provided for the housed crew.

Production items

Armoured fighting vehicles
Gun turrets and armament
Infantry weapons and artillery pieces
Weapon systems
Aerospace equipment
Industrial machinery

Structure

The corporation had several divisions, subsidiaries and affiliates, which were located mainly in Massachusetts.

See also

Books

Notes and References

  1. United Shoe Machinery Co., Information: A Monthly Digest of Current Events and World Progress Covering Jan. 1915 – May 1917, v. 3, p. 307.
  2. https://www.si.edu/object/siris_arc_140355 United Shoe Machinery Corporation Records, 1898–1987
  3. Roe . Richard . 1913 . The United Shoe Machinery Company . Journal of Political Economy . en . 21 . 10 . 938–953 . 10.1086/252358 . 0022-3808.
  4. Roe . Richard . 1914 . The United Shoe Machinery Company . Journal of Political Economy . en . 22 . 1 . 43–63 . 10.1086/252374 . 0022-3808.
  5. News: 1915-12-21 . SUSPEND ANTI-TRUST ORDER; Court Grants Leeway to United Shoe Machinery Company. . 2024-07-27 . The New York Times . en-US . 0362-4331.
  6. Blair . Roger D. . Herndon . Jill Boylston . 2000 . United Shoe Machinery and the Antitrust Significance of "Free" Service . Review of Industrial Organization . 17 . 3 . 301–311 . 0889-938X.
  7. Masten . Scott E. . Snyder . Edward A. . 1993 . United States versus United Shoe Machinery Corporation: On the Merits . The Journal of Law & Economics . 36 . 1 . 33–70 . 0022-2186.
  8. Web site: United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation, District Ct. of the U.S., District of Mass., 1949–1952 Finding Aid . Harvard Law School . July 2004 . 8 July 2020 . https://archive.today/20121210113006/http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~law00160 . 10 December 2012 . dead .
  9. Web site: The STANLEY Engineered Fastening Group - STANLEY® Engineered Fastening.
  10. Book: Howie , Iain . USM Serving the Shoemaker for 100 years . Shoe Trades Publishing . 0-9536531-0-2 . 1999 . 115.
  11. News: Smith . William D. . 1975-05-18 . Curtain Time for the I. B. M. Case . 2024-07-27 . The New York Times . en-US . 0362-4331.
  12. News: Smith . William D. . 1972-02-13 . How Big Is Too Big?; Size of I.B. M. Raises Problems For Trust Busters . 2024-07-27 . The New York Times . en-US . 0362-4331.
  13. News: Harmon . Amy . 2001-06-29 . U.S. VS. MICROSOFT: THE REMEDY; Some Possible Carrots and Sticks . 2024-07-27 . The New York Times . en-US . 0362-4331.
  14. Ward, A. G. Substitutes for Leather, New Scientist, 5 September 1963, no. 355, p. 502.
  15. His Brogue Livens Field Test of Gun, The Exponent, January 1949, v. 61, no. 1, p. 29.
  16. United Shoe Builds Guns For and Against Tanks, Iron Age, October 30, 1941, v. 148, no. 18, p. 95.
  17. Contracts, Iron Age, October 9, 1941, v. 148, no. 15, p. 95.
  18. Holley, Irving B. Development of Aircraft Turrets in the AAF, 1917–1944, Defense Technical Information Center, 1947, p. 128.