1924 United Kingdom general election explained

Election Name:1924 United Kingdom general election
Country:United Kingdom
Type:parliamentary
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1923 United Kingdom general election
Previous Year:1923
Outgoing Members:List of MPs elected in the 1923 United Kingdom general election
Next Election:1929 United Kingdom general election
Next Year:1929
Elected Members:List of MPs elected in the 1924 United Kingdom general election
Seats For Election:All 615 seats in the House of Commons
Majority Seats:308
Elected Mps:Members elected
Election Date:29 October 1924
Turnout:77.0%, 5.9%
Leader1:Stanley Baldwin
Leader Since1:23 May 1923
Party1:Conservative Party (UK)
Leaders Seat1:Bewdley
Last Election1:258 seats, 38.0%
Seats1:412
Seat Change1:154
Popular Vote1:7,418,983
Percentage1:46.8%
Swing1:8.8%
Leader2:Ramsay MacDonald
Leader Since2:21 November 1922
Party2:Labour Party (UK)
Leaders Seat2:Aberavon
Last Election2:191 seats, 30.7%
Seats2:151
Seat Change2:40
Popular Vote2:5,281,626
Percentage2:33.3%
Swing2:2.6%
Leader3:H. H. Asquith
Leader Since3:30 April 1908
Party3:Liberal Party (UK)
Leaders Seat3:Paisley (defeated)
Last Election3:158 seats, 29.7%
Seats3:40
Seat Change3:118
Popular Vote3:2,818,717
Percentage3:17.8%
Swing3:11.9%
Map Size:380px
Prime Minister
Posttitle:Prime Minister after election
Before Election:Ramsay MacDonald
Before Party:Labour Party (UK)
After Election:Stanley Baldwin
After Party:Conservative Party (UK)
Map2 Image:File:1924 UK GE composition diagram.svg
Map2 Caption:Diagram showing the composition of the House of Commons following the election

The 1924 United Kingdom general election was held on Wednesday 29 October 1924, as a result of the defeat of the Labour minority government, led by Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald, in the House of Commons on a motion of no confidence.[1] It was the third general election to be held in less than two years. Parliament was dissolved on 9 October.[2]

The Conservatives, led by Stanley Baldwin, performed better, in electoral terms, than in the 1923 general election and obtained a large parliamentary majority of 209. Labour, led by MacDonald, lost 40 seats. The election also saw the Liberal Party, led by H. H. Asquith, lose 118 of their 158 seats which helped to polarise British politics between the Labour Party and the Conservative Party.

The Conservative landslide victory and the Labour defeat in this general election have been, in part, attributed to the Zinoviev letter, a forged document that was published as if it were genuine and sensationalised in the Daily Mail four days before the election. The Labour vote increased by around one million in comparison to the 1923 general election, but this was largely due to the party putting up 87 more candidates than it had in the previous election.

The Conservatives had called the previous 1923 election early to get a mandate for moving to a protectionist trade policy of imperial preference, but had lost their majority. In 1924, they reverted to free trade and regained power. They would propose protectionism at the next general election in 1929, again losing.

Overview

After the previous general election, the Labour Party had finished as the second-largest party, but formed their first-ever government with the support of the Liberal Party, after the ruling Conservative Party's shock loss of their majority made it untenable for Baldwin to continue as Prime Minister. However, relations between Labour and the Liberals proved stormy, eventually resulting in Liberal M.P. Sir John Simon calling a motion of no confidence in MacDonald's government, which was carried by a large majority. Asquith had gambled that neither Baldwin nor MacDonald would want to put the country through a third general election in two years, and that one of them would be forced to enter into a formal coalition with the Liberals. However, the gambit backfired when MacDonald instead called an election, knowing full well that a Conservative landslide was the only likely outcome, but himself gambling that it would be primarily at the expense of the Liberals. MacDonald's judgement proved correct, as the Liberals, who were still mostly dependent on former Prime Minister David Lloyd George for funds, ended up financially crippled from the very start of the campaign, while Labour were actually able to expand the scope of their own campaign thanks to increasing support from the workers' unions.

It is speculated that the combination of Labour forming its first government in January 1924 and the Zinoviev letter helped to stir up anti-socialist fears in Britain among many traditional anti-socialist Liberal voters, who then switched their support to the Conservative Party. This partly helps to explain the poor performance of the Liberal Party in the general election. The party also had financial difficulties which allowed it to contest only 339 seats, a lack of distinctive policies after the Conservative Party dropped their support for protected trade, and poor leadership under Asquith, who lost his own seat for the second time in six years. It would be the final election for Asquith, who was subsequently forced to lead the party from the House of Lords after being elevated to the Earldom of Oxford and Asquith the following year, with Lloyd George as Liberal chairman in the House of Commons. Declining health saw Asquith replaced as party leader by Lloyd George in 1926.

The fourth party in terms of number of candidates, number of seats and number of votes were not a party but a group of former National Liberals standing under the Constitutionalist label, led by Winston Churchill. They favoured Conservative/Liberal co-operation and had intended to formally organize as a party, but the election was called before they had the opportunity to actually do so. Three of the seven Constitutionalists elected, including Churchill, had been opposed by official Liberal candidates, and sat as Conservatives after the election. The other four sat as Liberals.

The refounded Sinn Féin ran Westminster candidates for the first time since March 1919; none came close to winning, with six of the eight losing their deposits. Its next Westminster election was in 1950.

The election was the first in the United Kingdom to feature party political broadcasts, with the parties making short appeals to voters via BBC Radio.[3]

Results

|}

Seats summary

Transfers of seats

ToFromNo.class=unsortableSeats
1Battersea North
16Stirling and Falkirk, Paisley, Edinburgh East, Gateshead, Rochdale, Bermondsey West, Southwark Central, Newcastle upon Tyne East, Newcastle upon Tyne West, Burslem, Middlesbrough East, Elland, Keighley, Penistone, Bradford South, Dewsbury
7Motherwell, Barrow-in-Furness, Liverpool West Toxteth, Lincoln, Peckham, Wolverhampton Bilston, Birmingham King's Norton
Labour gains:23
8Walthamstow West, Bristol North, Hackney South, Norwich (one of two), Bradford East, Batley and Morley, Wrexham, Swansea West
1Cardiganshire *
Liberal gains:9
55Stirlingshire West, Renfrewshire East, Dunbartonshire, Lanark, Glasgow Partick, Lanarkshire North, Renfrewshire West, Glasgow Maryhill, Kilmarnock, Midlothian & Peebles North, Linlithgow, Berwick & Haddington, Reading, Birkenhead West, Crewe, Carlisle, Whitehaven, Derby (one of two), Barnard Castle, Leyton East, East Ham North, Essex SE, Maldon, Upton, Dartford, Gravesend, Bolton (one of two), Eccles, Oldham (one of two), Salford North, Salford South, Salford West, Warrington, Leicester East, Holland with Boston†, Greenwich, Kennington, Hammersmith North, St Pancras North, St Pancras South East, Norfolk South, Norwich (one of two), Kettering, Northampton, Enfield, Tottenham South, The Wrekin, Frome, Lichfield, Ipswich, Coventry, Wakefield, Bradford Central, Pontefract, Cardiff South
106Bodmin, Cornwall North, Penryn and Falmouth, St Ives, Banff, East Aberdeenshire & Kincardineshire, Aberdeen and Kincardine Central, Forfarshire, Perth, Fife East, Argyll, Edinburgh West, Edinburgh North, Dumfriesshire, Galloway, Bedfordshire Mid, Luton, Abingdon, Newbury, Aylesbury, Wycombe, Huntingdonshire, Isle of Ely, Altrincham, Birkenhead East, Stalybridge and Hyde, Stockport (one of two), Wirral, Barnstaple, South Molton, Tavistock, Tiverton, Torquay, Totnes, Dorset North, Stockton-on-Tees, The Hartlepools, Chelmsford, Harwich, Stroud, Thornbury, Basingstoke, Portsmouth Central, Isle of Wight, Hemel Hempstead, Kingston upon Hull South West, Sevenoaks, Blackpool, Darwen, Lancaster, Lonsdale, Preston (one of two), Manchester Blackley, Manchester Exchange, Manchester Moss Side, Manchester Rusholme, Manchester Withington, Royton, Bootle, Liverpool Wavertree, Liverpool West Derby, Southport, Bosworth, Harborough, Leicester South, Gainsborough, Horncastle, Louth, Hackney North, Brixton, Islington East, Camberwell North-West, Hackney Central, Stoke Newington, Great Yarmouth, King's Lynn, Norfolk East, Hexham, Nottingham Central, Nottingham East, Finchley, Willesden East, Oxford†, Shrewsbury, Bath, Bridgwater, Taunton, Wells, Weston-super-Mare, Walsall, Sudbury, Chichester, Nuneaton, Rugby, Chippenham, Westbury, Devizes, Salisbury, Cleveland, Bradford North, Sowerby, Flintshire, Pembrokeshire, Brecon and Radnor, Cardiff East
1Loughborough
1Harrow1
Conservative gains:163
5Accrington, Heywood and Radcliffe, Stretford, Stoke, Camborne
2Epping, Walthamstow East
2Fermanagh and Tyrone (both seats)

1 Previous MP had defected to Labour by the time of the 1924 election

See also

Further reading

External links

Manifestos

Notes and References

  1. Graper. Elmer D.. 1925. The British Election. American Political Science Review. en. 19. 1. 84–96. 10.2307/2938896. 2938896 . 145751193 . 0003-0554.
  2. Web site: Parliamentary Election Timetables . 3rd . . 25 March 1997 . 3 July 2022.
  3. Book: Evans . Jeff . The Political Compendium . 2022 . Zymurgy Publishing . Newcastle upon Tyne . 978-1-903506-49-3 . 55.