Dirac delta function explained

In mathematical analysis, the Dirac delta function (or distribution), also known as the unit impulse, is a generalized function on the real numbers, whose value is zero everywhere except at zero, and whose integral over the entire real line is equal to one. Since there is no function having this property, modelling the delta "function" rigorously involves the use of limits or, as is common in mathematics, measure theory and the theory of distributions.

The delta function was introduced by physicist Paul Dirac, and has since been applied routinely in physics and engineering to model point masses and instantaneous impulses. It is called the delta function because it is a continuous analogue of the Kronecker delta function, which is usually defined on a discrete domain and takes values 0 and 1. The mathematical rigor of the delta function was disputed until Laurent Schwartz developed the theory of distributions, where it is defined as a linear form acting on functions.

Motivation and overview

The graph of the Dirac delta is usually thought of as following the whole x-axis and the positive y-axis.^[1] The Dirac delta is used to model a tall narrow spike function (an impulse), and other similar abstractions such as a point charge, point mass or electron point. For example, to calculate the dynamics of a billiard ball being struck, one can approximate the force of the impact by a Dirac delta. In doing so, one not only simplifies the equations, but one also is able to calculate the motion of the ball, by only considering the total impulse of the collision, without a detailed model of all of the elastic energy transfer at subatomic levels (for instance).

To be specific, suppose that a billiard ball is at rest. At time

t =0 it is struck by another ball, imparting it with a momentum, with units kg⋅m⋅s^-1. The exchange of momentum is not actually instantaneous, being mediated by elastic processes at the molecular and subatomic level, but for practical purposes it is convenient to consider that energy transfer as effectively instantaneous. The force therefore is ; the units of are s^-1.

To model this situation more rigorously, suppose that the force instead is uniformly distributed over a small time interval That is,

Then the momentum at any time is found by integration:

Now, the model situation of an instantaneous transfer of momentum requires taking the limit as, giving a result everywhere except at :

Here the functions

F _{\Delta} are thought of as useful approximations to the idea of instantaneous transfer of momentum.

The delta function allows us to construct an idealized limit of these approximations. Unfortunately, the actual limit of the functions (in the sense of pointwise convergence) $\backslash lim\_F\_$ is zero everywhere but a single point, where it is infinite. To make proper sense of the Dirac delta, we should instead insist that the property

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; F\_(t)\backslash ,dt\; =\; P,$$

which holds for all should continue to hold in the limit. So, in the equation it is understood that the limit is always taken .

In applied mathematics, as we have done here, the delta function is often manipulated as a kind of limit (a weak limit) of a sequence of functions, each member of which has a tall spike at the origin: for example, a sequence of Gaussian distributions centered at the origin with variance tending to zero.

The Dirac delta is not truly a function, at least not a usual one with domain and range in real numbers. For example, the objects and are equal everywhere except at yet have integrals that are different. According to Lebesgue integration theory, if and are functions such that almost everywhere, then is integrable if and only if is integrable and the integrals of and are identical. A rigorous approach to regarding the Dirac delta function as a mathematical object in its own right requires measure theory or the theory of distributions.

History

Joseph Fourier presented what is now called the Fourier integral theorem in his treatise Théorie analytique de la chaleur in the form:^[2]

$$f(x)=\backslash frac\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\backslash \; \backslash \; d\backslash alpha\; \backslash ,\; f(\backslash alpha)\; \backslash \; \backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; dp\backslash \; \backslash cos\; (px-p\backslash alpha)\backslash ,$$

which is tantamount to the introduction of the -function in the form:^[3]

$$\backslash delta(x-\backslash alpha)=\backslash frac\; \backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; dp\backslash \; \backslash cos\; (px-p\backslash alpha)\; \backslash \; .$$

Later, Augustin Cauchy expressed the theorem using exponentials:^{[4] [5]}

$$f(x)=\backslash frac\; \backslash int\_\; ^\; \backslash infty\; \backslash \; e^\backslash left(\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; e^f(\backslash alpha)\backslash ,d\; \backslash alpha\; \backslash right)\; \backslash ,dp.$$

Cauchy pointed out that in some circumstances the order of integration is significant in this result (contrast Fubini's theorem).^{[6] [7]}

As justified using the theory of distributions, the Cauchy equation can be rearranged to resemble Fourier's original formulation and expose the δ-function as

where the δ-function is expressed as

$$\backslash delta(x-\backslash alpha)=\backslash frac\; \backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; e^\backslash ,dp\; \backslash \; .$$

A rigorous interpretation of the exponential form and the various limitations upon the function f necessary for its application extended over several centuries. The problems with a classical interpretation are explained as follows:^[8]

The greatest drawback of the classical Fourier transformation is a rather narrow class of functions (originals) for which it can be effectively computed. Namely, it is necessary that these functions decrease sufficiently rapidly to zero (in the neighborhood of infinity) to ensure the existence of the Fourier integral. For example, the Fourier transform of such simple functions as polynomials does not exist in the classical sense. The extension of the classical Fourier transformation to distributions considerably enlarged the class of functions that could be transformed and this removed many obstacles.

Further developments included generalization of the Fourier integral, "beginning with Plancherel's pathbreaking L²-theory (1910), continuing with Wiener's and Bochner's works (around 1930) and culminating with the amalgamation into L. Schwartz's theory of distributions (1945) ...",^[9] and leading to the formal development of the Dirac delta function.

An infinitesimal formula for an infinitely tall, unit impulse delta function (infinitesimal version of Cauchy distribution) explicitly appears in an 1827 text of Augustin-Louis Cauchy. Siméon Denis Poisson considered the issue in connection with the study of wave propagation as did Gustav Kirchhoff somewhat later. Kirchhoff and Hermann von Helmholtz also introduced the unit impulse as a limit of Gaussians, which also corresponded to Lord Kelvin's notion of a point heat source. At the end of the 19th century, Oliver Heaviside used formal Fourier series to manipulate the unit impulse.^[10] The Dirac delta function as such was introduced by Paul Dirac in his 1927 paper The Physical Interpretation of the Quantum Dynamics^[11] and used in his textbook The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. He called it the "delta function" since he used it as a continuous analogue of the discrete Kronecker delta.

Definitions

The Dirac delta function

\delta (x) can be loosely thought of as a function on the real line which is zero everywhere except at the origin, where it is infinite,

and which is also constrained to satisfy the identity

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta(x)\; \backslash ,\; dx\; =\; 1.$$

This is merely a heuristic characterization. The Dirac delta is not a function in the traditional sense as no extended real number valued function defined on the real numbers has these properties.

As a measure

One way to rigorously capture the notion of the Dirac delta function is to define a measure, called Dirac measure, which accepts a subset of the real line as an argument, and returns if, and otherwise. If the delta function is conceptualized as modeling an idealized point mass at 0, then represents the mass contained in the set . One may then define the integral against as the integral of a function against this mass distribution. Formally, the Lebesgue integral provides the necessary analytic device. The Lebesgue integral with respect to the measure satisfies

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; f(x)\; \backslash ,\; \backslash delta(dx)\; =\; f(0)$$

for all continuous compactly supported functions . The measure is not absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure—in fact, it is a singular measure. Consequently, the delta measure has no Radon–Nikodym derivative (with respect to Lebesgue measure)—no true function for which the property

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; f(x)\backslash ,\; \backslash delta(x)\backslash ,\; dx\; =\; f(0)$$

holds. As a result, the latter notation is a convenient abuse of notation, and not a standard (Riemann or Lebesgue) integral.

As a probability measure on, the delta measure is characterized by its cumulative distribution function, which is the unit step function.^[12]

This means that is the integral of the cumulative indicator function with respect to the measure ; to wit,

$$H(x)\; =\; \backslash int\_\backslash mathbf\_(t)\backslash ,\backslash delta(dt)\; =\; \backslash delta\backslash !\backslash left((-\backslash infty,x]\backslash right),$$

the latter being the measure of this interval. Thus in particular the integration of the delta function against a continuous function can be properly understood as a Riemann–Stieltjes integral:

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; f(x)\backslash ,\backslash delta(dx)\; =\; \backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; f(x)\; \backslash ,dH(x).$$

All higher moments of are zero. In particular, characteristic function and moment generating function are both equal to one.

As a distribution

In the theory of distributions, a generalized function is considered not a function in itself but only through how it affects other functions when "integrated" against them. In keeping with this philosophy, to define the delta function properly, it is enough to say what the "integral" of the delta function is against a sufficiently "good" test function . Test functions are also known as bump functions. If the delta function is already understood as a measure, then the Lebesgue integral of a test function against that measure supplies the necessary integral.

A typical space of test functions consists of all smooth functions on with compact support that have as many derivatives as required. As a distribution, the Dirac delta is a linear functional on the space of test functions and is defined by

for every test function .

For to be properly a distribution, it must be continuous in a suitable topology on the space of test functions. In general, for a linear functional on the space of test functions to define a distribution, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every positive integer there is an integer and a constant such that for every test function, one has the inequality

$$\backslash left|S[\backslash varphi]\backslash right|\; \backslash le\; C\_N\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash sup\_\; \backslash left|\backslash varphi^(x)\backslash right|$$

where represents the supremum. With the distribution, one has such an inequality (with with for all . Thus is a distribution of order zero. It is, furthermore, a distribution with compact support (the support being).

The delta distribution can also be defined in several equivalent ways. For instance, it is the distributional derivative of the Heaviside step function. This means that for every test function, one has

$$\backslash delta[\backslash varphi]\; =\; -\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi\text{'}(x)\backslash ,H(x)\backslash ,dx.$$

Intuitively, if integration by parts were permitted, then the latter integral should simplify to

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi(x)\backslash ,H\text{'}(x)\backslash ,dx\; =\; \backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi(x)\backslash ,\backslash delta(x)\backslash ,dx,$$

and indeed, a form of integration by parts is permitted for the Stieltjes integral, and in that case, one does have

$$-\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi\text{'}(x)\backslash ,H(x)\backslash ,\; dx\; =\; \backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi(x)\backslash ,dH(x).$$

In the context of measure theory, the Dirac measure gives rise to distribution by integration. Conversely, equation defines a Daniell integral on the space of all compactly supported continuous functions which, by the Riesz representation theorem, can be represented as the Lebesgue integral of with respect to some Radon measure.

Generally, when the term Dirac delta function is used, it is in the sense of distributions rather than measures, the Dirac measure being among several terms for the corresponding notion in measure theory. Some sources may also use the term Dirac delta distribution.

Generalizations

The delta function can be defined in -dimensional Euclidean space as the measure such that

$$\backslash int\_\; f(\backslash mathbf)\backslash ,\backslash delta(d\backslash mathbf)\; =\; f(\backslash mathbf)$$

for every compactly supported continuous function . As a measure, the -dimensional delta function is the product measure of the 1-dimensional delta functions in each variable separately. Thus, formally, with, one has

The delta function can also be defined in the sense of distributions exactly as above in the one-dimensional case. However, despite widespread use in engineering contexts, should be manipulated with care, since the product of distributions can only be defined under quite narrow circumstances.

The notion of a Dirac measure makes sense on any set. Thus if is a set, is a marked point, and is any sigma algebra of subsets of, then the measure defined on sets by

is the delta measure or unit mass concentrated at .

Another common generalization of the delta function is to a differentiable manifold where most of its properties as a distribution can also be exploited because of the differentiable structure. The delta function on a manifold centered at the point is defined as the following distribution:

for all compactly supported smooth real-valued functions on . A common special case of this construction is a case in which is an open set in the Euclidean space .

On a locally compact Hausdorff space, the Dirac delta measure concentrated at a point is the Radon measure associated with the Daniell integral on compactly supported continuous functions .^[13] At this level of generality, calculus as such is no longer possible, however a variety of techniques from abstract analysis are available. For instance, the mapping

x _{0\mapsto} \delta _{x _{0}} is a continuous embedding of into the space of finite Radon measures on, equipped with its vague topology. Moreover, the convex hull of the image of under this embedding is dense in the space of probability measures on .

Properties

Scaling and symmetry

The delta function satisfies the following scaling property for a non-zero scalar :

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta(\backslash alpha\; x)\backslash ,dx=\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta(u)\backslash ,\backslash frac$$

=\frac

and so

Scaling property proof:$$\backslash int\backslash limits\_^\; dx\backslash \; g(x)\; \backslash delta\; (ax)\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash int\backslash limits\_^\; dx\text{'}\backslash \; g\backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)\; \backslash delta\; (x\text{'})$$where a change of variable is used. If is negative, i.e.,, then$$\backslash int\backslash limits\_^\; dx\backslash \; g(x)\; \backslash delta\; (ax)\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash int\backslash limits\_^\; dx\text{'}\backslash \; g\backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)\; \backslash delta\; (x\text{'})\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash int\backslash limits\_^\; dx\text{'}\backslash \; g\backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)\; \backslash delta\; (x\text{'})\; =\; \backslash fracg(0).$$Thus,

In particular, the delta function is an even distribution (symmetry), in the sense that

$$\backslash delta(-x)\; =\; \backslash delta(x)$$

which is homogeneous of degree .

Algebraic properties

The distributional product of with is equal to zero:

$$x\backslash ,\backslash delta(x)\; =\; 0.$$

More generally,

(x - a) ^{n\delta(x-a)} =0 for all positive integers n .

Conversely, if, where and are distributions, then

$$f(x)\; =\; g(x)\; +c\; \backslash delta(x)$$

for some constant .

Translation

The integral of the time-delayed Dirac delta is^[14]

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; f(t)\; \backslash ,\backslash delta(t-T)\backslash ,dt\; =\; f(T).$$

This is sometimes referred to as the sifting property or the sampling property.^[15] The delta function is said to "sift out" the value of f(t) at t = T.^[16]

It follows that the effect of convolving a function with the time-delayed Dirac delta

\delta _{T(t)} = \delta(t - T) is to time-delay by the same amount:

The sifting property holds under the precise condition that be a tempered distribution (see the discussion of the Fourier transform below). As a special case, for instance, we have the identity (understood in the distribution sense)

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta\; (\backslash xi-x)\; \backslash delta(x-\backslash eta)\; \backslash ,dx\; =\; \backslash delta(\backslash eta-\backslash xi).$$

Composition with a function

More generally, the delta distribution may be composed with a smooth function in such a way that the familiar change of variables formula holds, that

$$\backslash int\_\; \backslash delta\backslash bigl(g(x)\backslash bigr)\; f\backslash bigl(g(x)\backslash bigr)\; \backslash left|g\text{'}(x)\backslash right|\; dx\; =\; \backslash int\_\; \backslash delta(u)\backslash ,f(u)\backslash ,du$$

provided that is a continuously differentiable function with nowhere zero. That is, there is a unique way to assign meaning to the distribution

\delta\circ g so that this identity holds for all compactly supported test functions . Therefore, the domain must be broken up to exclude the point. This distribution satisfies if is nowhere zero, and otherwise if has a real root at, then

$$\backslash delta(g(x))\; =\; \backslash frac$$

.

It is natural therefore to the composition for continuously differentiable functions by

$$\backslash delta(g(x))\; =\; \backslash sum\_i\; \backslash frac$$

where the sum extends over all roots (i.e., all the different ones) of, which are assumed to be simple. Thus, for example

$$\backslash delta\backslash left(x^2-\backslash alpha^2\backslash right)\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash Big[\backslash delta\backslash left(x+\backslash alpha\backslash right)+\backslash delta\backslash left(x-\backslash alpha\backslash right)\backslash Big].$$

In the integral form, the generalized scaling property may be written as

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; f(x)\; \backslash ,\; \backslash delta(g(x))\; \backslash ,\; dx\; =\; \backslash sum\_\backslash frac$$

.

Indefinite integral

For a constant

a \isin R and a "well-behaved" arbitrary real-valued function,$$\backslash displaystyley(x)\backslash delta(x-a)dx\; =\; y(a)H(x-a)\; +\; c,$$where is the Heaviside step function and is an integration constant.

Properties in n dimensions

The delta distribution in an -dimensional space satisfies the following scaling property instead,$$\backslash delta(\backslash alpha\backslash boldsymbol)\; =\; |\backslash alpha|^\backslash delta(\backslash boldsymbol)\; ~,$$so that is a homogeneous distribution of degree .

Under any reflection or rotation, the delta function is invariant,$$\backslash delta(\backslash rho\; \backslash boldsymbol)\; =\; \backslash delta(\backslash boldsymbol)~.$$

As in the one-variable case, it is possible to define the composition of with a bi-Lipschitz function^[17] uniquely so that the following holds$$\backslash int\_\; \backslash delta(g(\backslash boldsymbol))\backslash ,\; f(g(\backslash boldsymbol))\backslash left|\backslash det\; g\text{'}(\backslash boldsymbol)\backslash right|\; d\backslash boldsymbol\; =\; \backslash int\_\; \backslash delta(\backslash boldsymbol)\; f(\backslash boldsymbol)\backslash ,d\backslash boldsymbol$$for all compactly supported functions .

Using the coarea formula from geometric measure theory, one can also define the composition of the delta function with a submersion from one Euclidean space to another one of different dimension; the result is a type of current. In the special case of a continuously differentiable function such that the gradient of is nowhere zero, the following identity holds$$\backslash int\_\; f(\backslash boldsymbol)\; \backslash ,\; \backslash delta(g(\backslash boldsymbol))\; \backslash ,d\backslash boldsymbol\; =\; \backslash int\_\backslash frac$$

\,d\sigma(\boldsymbol) where the integral on the right is over, the -dimensional surface defined by with respect to the Minkowski content measure. This is known as a simple layer integral.

More generally, if is a smooth hypersurface of, then we can associate to the distribution that integrates any compactly supported smooth function over :$$\backslash delta\_S[g]\; =\; \backslash int\_S\; g(\backslash boldsymbol)\backslash ,d\backslash sigma(\backslash boldsymbol)$$

where is the hypersurface measure associated to . This generalization is associated with the potential theory of simple layer potentials on . If is a domain in with smooth boundary, then is equal to the normal derivative of the indicator function of in the distribution sense,

$$-\backslash int\_g(\backslash boldsymbol)\backslash ,\backslash frac\backslash ,d\backslash boldsymbol=\backslash int\_S\backslash ,g(\backslash boldsymbol)\backslash ,\; d\backslash sigma(\backslash boldsymbol),$$

where is the outward normal. For a proof, see e.g. the article on the surface delta function.

In three dimensions, the delta function is represented in spherical coordinates by:

Fourier transform

The delta function is a tempered distribution, and therefore it has a well-defined Fourier transform. Formally, one finds^[18]

$$\backslash widehat(\backslash xi)=\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; e^\; \backslash ,\backslash delta(x)dx\; =\; 1.$$

Properly speaking, the Fourier transform of a distribution is defined by imposing self-adjointness of the Fourier transform under the duality pairing

\langle ⋅ , ⋅ \rangle of tempered distributions with Schwartz functions. Thus \widehat{\delta} is defined as the unique tempered distribution satisfying

$$\backslash langle\backslash widehat,\backslash varphi\backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash langle\backslash delta,\backslash widehat\backslash rangle$$

for all Schwartz functions . And indeed it follows from this that

\widehat{\delta} =1 .

As a result of this identity, the convolution of the delta function with any other tempered distribution is simply :

$$S*\backslash delta\; =\; S.$$

That is to say that is an identity element for the convolution on tempered distributions, and in fact, the space of compactly supported distributions under convolution is an associative algebra with identity the delta function. This property is fundamental in signal processing, as convolution with a tempered distribution is a linear time-invariant system, and applying the linear time-invariant system measures its impulse response. The impulse response can be computed to any desired degree of accuracy by choosing a suitable approximation for, and once it is known, it characterizes the system completely. See .

The inverse Fourier transform of the tempered distribution is the delta function. Formally, this is expressed as$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; 1\; \backslash cdot\; e^\backslash ,d\backslash xi\; =\; \backslash delta(x)$$and more rigorously, it follows since$$\backslash langle\; 1,\; \backslash widehat\backslash rangle\; =\; f(0)\; =\; \backslash langle\backslash delta,f\backslash rangle$$for all Schwartz functions .

In these terms, the delta function provides a suggestive statement of the orthogonality property of the Fourier kernel on . Formally, one has$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; e^\; \backslash left[e^\{i\; 2\backslash pi\; \backslash xi\_2\; t\}\backslash right]^*\backslash ,dt\; =\; \backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; e^\; \backslash ,dt\; =\; \backslash delta(\backslash xi\_2\; -\; \backslash xi\_1).$$

This is, of course, shorthand for the assertion that the Fourier transform of the tempered distribution$$f(t)\; =\; e^$$is$$\backslash widehat(\backslash xi\_2)\; =\; \backslash delta(\backslash xi\_1-\backslash xi\_2)$$which again follows by imposing self-adjointness of the Fourier transform.

By analytic continuation of the Fourier transform, the Laplace transform of the delta function is found to be$$\backslash int\_^\backslash delta(t-a)\backslash ,e^\; \backslash ,\; dt=e^.$$

Derivatives

The derivative of the Dirac delta distribution, denoted and also called the Dirac delta prime or Dirac delta derivative as described in Laplacian of the indicator, is defined on compactly supported smooth test functions by$$\backslash delta\text{'}[\backslash varphi]\; =\; -\backslash delta[\backslash varphi\text{'}]=-\backslash varphi\text{'}(0).$$

The first equality here is a kind of integration by parts, for if were a true function then$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta\text{'}(x)\backslash varphi(x)\backslash ,dx=\; \backslash delta(x)\backslash varphi(x)|\_^\; -\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta(x)\; \backslash varphi\text{'}(x)\backslash ,dx=\; -\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta(x)\; \backslash varphi\text{'}(x)\backslash ,dx=\; -\backslash varphi\text{'}(0).$$

By mathematical induction, the -th derivative of is defined similarly as the distribution given on test functions by

$$\backslash delta^[\backslash varphi]\; =\; (-1)^k\; \backslash varphi^(0).$$

In particular, is an infinitely differentiable distribution.

The first derivative of the delta function is the distributional limit of the difference quotients:$$\backslash delta\text{'}(x)\; =\; \backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac.$$

More properly, one has$$\backslash delta\text{'}\; =\; \backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac(\backslash tau\_h\backslash delta\; -\; \backslash delta)$$where is the translation operator, defined on functions by, and on a distribution by$$(\backslash tau\_h\; S)[\backslash varphi]\; =\; S[\backslash tau\_\{-h\}\backslash varphi].$$

In the theory of electromagnetism, the first derivative of the delta function represents a point magnetic dipole situated at the origin. Accordingly, it is referred to as a dipole or the doublet function.

The derivative of the delta function satisfies a number of basic properties, including:which can be shown by applying a test function and integrating by parts.

The latter of these properties can also be demonstrated by applying distributional derivative definition, Liebniz 's theorem and linearity of inner product:^[19]

Furthermore, the convolution of with a compactly-supported, smooth function is

$$\backslash delta\text{'}*f\; =\; \backslash delta*f\text{'}\; =\; f\text{'},$$

which follows from the properties of the distributional derivative of a convolution.

Higher dimensions

R ^{n} , the Dirac delta distribution centered at a point is defined by$$\backslash delta\_a[\backslash varphi]=\backslash varphi(a)$$for all \varphi \in C ^{inf ty(U)} _{c} , the space of all smooth functions with compact support on . If \alpha = (\alpha _{1,} \ldots, \alpha _{n)} is any multi-index with |\alpha| = \alpha _{1+ … +\alpha} _{n} and \partial ^{\alpha} denotes the associated mixed partial derivative operator, then the -th derivative of is given by

$$\backslash left\backslash langle\; \backslash partial^\backslash alpha\; \backslash delta\_,\; \backslash ,\; \backslash varphi\; \backslash right\backslash rangle\; =\; (-1)^$$

\left\langle \delta_, \partial^ \varphi \right\rangle = (-1)^ \partial^\alpha \varphi (x) \Big|_ \quad \text \varphi \in C_c^\infty(U).

That is, the -th derivative of is the distribution whose value on any test function is the -th derivative of at (with the appropriate positive or negative sign).

The first partial derivatives of the delta function are thought of as double layers along the coordinate planes. More generally, the normal derivative of a simple layer supported on a surface is a double layer supported on that surface and represents a laminar magnetic monopole. Higher derivatives of the delta function are known in physics as multipoles.

Higher derivatives enter into mathematics naturally as the building blocks for the complete structure of distributions with point support. If is any distribution on supported on the set consisting of a single point, then there is an integer and coefficients such that$$S\; =\; \backslash sum\_$$

\le m

c_\alpha \partial^\alpha\delta_a.

Representations of the delta function

The delta function can be viewed as the limit of a sequence of functions

$$\backslash delta\; (x)\; =\; \backslash lim\_\; \backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x),$$

where is sometimes called a nascent delta function. This limit is meant in a weak sense: either that

for all continuous functions having compact support, or that this limit holds for all smooth functions with compact support. The difference between these two slightly different modes of weak convergence is often subtle: the former is convergence in the vague topology of measures, and the latter is convergence in the sense of distributions.

Approximations to the identity

Typically a nascent delta function can be constructed in the following manner. Let be an absolutely integrable function on of total integral, and define$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x)\; =\; \backslash varepsilon^\; \backslash eta\; \backslash left\; (\backslash frac\; \backslash right).$$

In dimensions, one uses instead the scaling$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x)\; =\; \backslash varepsilon^\; \backslash eta\; \backslash left\; (\backslash frac\; \backslash right).$$

Then a simple change of variables shows that also has integral . One may show that holds for all continuous compactly supported functions, and so converges weakly to in the sense of measures.

The constructed in this way are known as an approximation to the identity. This terminology is because the space of absolutely integrable functions is closed under the operation of convolution of functions: whenever and are in . However, there is no identity in for the convolution product: no element such that for all . Nevertheless, the sequence does approximate such an identity in the sense that

$$f*\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon\; \backslash to\; f\; \backslash quad\; \backslash text\backslash varepsilon\backslash to\; 0.$$

This limit holds in the sense of mean convergence (convergence in). Further conditions on the, for instance that it be a mollifier associated to a compactly supported function,^[20] are needed to ensure pointwise convergence almost everywhere.

If the initial is itself smooth and compactly supported then the sequence is called a mollifier. The standard mollifier is obtained by choosing to be a suitably normalized bump function, for instance

In some situations such as numerical analysis, a piecewise linear approximation to the identity is desirable. This can be obtained by taking to be a hat function. With this choice of, one has

$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x)\; =\; \backslash varepsilon^\backslash max\; \backslash left\; (1-\backslash left|\backslash frac\backslash right|,0\; \backslash right)$$

which are all continuous and compactly supported, although not smooth and so not a mollifier.

Probabilistic considerations

In the context of probability theory, it is natural to impose the additional condition that the initial in an approximation to the identity should be positive, as such a function then represents a probability distribution. Convolution with a probability distribution is sometimes favorable because it does not result in overshoot or undershoot, as the output is a convex combination of the input values, and thus falls between the maximum and minimum of the input function. Taking to be any probability distribution at all, and letting as above will give rise to an approximation to the identity. In general this converges more rapidly to a delta function if, in addition, has mean and has small higher moments. For instance, if is the uniform distribution on also known as the rectangular function, then:

Another example is with the Wigner semicircle distribution

This is continuous and compactly supported, but not a mollifier because it is not smooth.

Semigroups

Nascent delta functions often arise as convolution semigroups.^[21] This amounts to the further constraint that the convolution of with must satisfy$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon\; *\; \backslash eta\_\backslash delta\; =\; \backslash eta\_$$

for all . Convolution semigroups in that form a nascent delta function are always an approximation to the identity in the above sense, however the semigroup condition is quite a strong restriction.

In practice, semigroups approximating the delta function arise as fundamental solutions or Green's functions to physically motivated elliptic or parabolic partial differential equations. In the context of applied mathematics, semigroups arise as the output of a linear time-invariant system. Abstractly, if A is a linear operator acting on functions of x, then a convolution semigroup arises by solving the initial value problem

$$\backslash begin\backslash dfrac\backslash eta(t,x)\; =\; A\backslash eta(t,x),\; \backslash quad\; t>0\; \backslash \backslash [5pt]\backslash displaystyle\backslash lim\_\; \backslash eta(t,x)\; =\; \backslash delta(x)\backslash end$$

in which the limit is as usual understood in the weak sense. Setting gives the associated nascent delta function.

Some examples of physically important convolution semigroups arising from such a fundamental solution include the following.

The heat kernel

The heat kernel, defined by

$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x)\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash mathrm^$$

represents the temperature in an infinite wire at time, if a unit of heat energy is stored at the origin of the wire at time . This semigroup evolves according to the one-dimensional heat equation:

$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash frac.$$

In probability theory, is a normal distribution of variance and mean . It represents the probability density at time of the position of a particle starting at the origin following a standard Brownian motion. In this context, the semigroup condition is then an expression of the Markov property of Brownian motion.

In higher-dimensional Euclidean space, the heat kernel is$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash mathrm^,$$and has the same physical interpretation, Latin: [[mutatis mutandis]]. It also represents a nascent delta function in the sense that in the distribution sense as .

The Poisson kernel

The Poisson kernel$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x)\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash mathrm\backslash left\backslash =\backslash frac\; \backslash frac=\backslash frac\backslash int\_^\backslash mathrm^\backslash ,d\backslash xi$$

is the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation in the upper half-plane. It represents the electrostatic potential in a semi-infinite plate whose potential along the edge is held at fixed at the delta function. The Poisson kernel is also closely related to the Cauchy distribution and Epanechnikov and Gaussian kernel functions.^[22] This semigroup evolves according to the equation$$\backslash frac\; =\; -\backslash left\; (-\backslash frac\; \backslash right)^u(t,x)$$

where the operator is rigorously defined as the Fourier multiplier$$\backslash mathcal\backslash left[\backslash left(-\backslash frac\{\backslash partial^2\}\{\backslash partial\; x^2\}\; \backslash right)^\{\backslash frac\{1\}\{2\}\}f\backslash right](\backslash xi)\; =\; |2\backslash pi\backslash xi|\backslash mathcalf(\backslash xi).$$

Oscillatory integrals

In areas of physics such as wave propagation and wave mechanics, the equations involved are hyperbolic and so may have more singular solutions. As a result, the nascent delta functions that arise as fundamental solutions of the associated Cauchy problems are generally oscillatory integrals. An example, which comes from a solution of the Euler–Tricomi equation of transonic gas dynamics, is the rescaled Airy function$$\backslash varepsilon^\backslash operatorname\backslash left\; (x\backslash varepsilon^\; \backslash right).$$

Although using the Fourier transform, it is easy to see that this generates a semigroup in some sense—it is not absolutely integrable and so cannot define a semigroup in the above strong sense. Many nascent delta functions constructed as oscillatory integrals only converge in the sense of distributions (an example is the Dirichlet kernel below), rather than in the sense of measures.

Another example is the Cauchy problem for the wave equation in :

The solution represents the displacement from equilibrium of an infinite elastic string, with an initial disturbance at the origin.

Other approximations to the identity of this kind include the sinc function (used widely in electronics and telecommunications)$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x)=\backslash frac\backslash sin\backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)=\backslash frac\backslash int\_^\; \backslash cos(kx)\backslash ,dk$$

and the Bessel function$$\backslash eta\_\backslash varepsilon(x)\; =\; \backslash fracJ\_\; \backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right).$$

Plane wave decomposition

One approach to the study of a linear partial differential equation$$L[u]=f,$$

where is a differential operator on, is to seek first a fundamental solution, which is a solution of the equation$$L[u]=\backslash delta.$$

When is particularly simple, this problem can often be resolved using the Fourier transform directly (as in the case of the Poisson kernel and heat kernel already mentioned). For more complicated operators, it is sometimes easier first to consider an equation of the form$$L[u]=h$$

where is a plane wave function, meaning that it has the form$$h\; =\; h(x\backslash cdot\backslash xi)$$

for some vector . Such an equation can be resolved (if the coefficients of are analytic functions) by the Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem or (if the coefficients of are constant) by quadrature. So, if the delta function can be decomposed into plane waves, then one can in principle solve linear partial differential equations.

Such a decomposition of the delta function into plane waves was part of a general technique first introduced essentially by Johann Radon, and then developed in this form by Fritz John (1955). Choose so that is an even integer, and for a real number, put$$g(s)\; =\; \backslash operatorname\backslash left[\backslash frac\{-s^k\backslash log(-is)\}\{k!(2\backslash pi\; i)^n\}\backslash right]=\backslash begin\backslash frac$$

^k

&n \text\\[5pt]-\frac

^k\log

s

&n \text\end

Then is obtained by applying a power of the Laplacian to the integral with respect to the unit sphere measure of for in the unit sphere :$$\backslash delta(x)\; =\; \backslash Delta\_x^\; \backslash int\_\; g(x\backslash cdot\backslash xi)\backslash ,d\backslash omega\_\backslash xi.$$

The Laplacian here is interpreted as a weak derivative, so that this equation is taken to mean that, for any test function,$$\backslash varphi(x)\; =\; \backslash int\_\backslash varphi(y)\backslash ,dy\backslash ,\backslash Delta\_x^\; \backslash int\_\; g((x-y)\backslash cdot\backslash xi)\backslash ,d\backslash omega\_\backslash xi.$$

The result follows from the formula for the Newtonian potential (the fundamental solution of Poisson's equation). This is essentially a form of the inversion formula for the Radon transform because it recovers the value of from its integrals over hyperplanes. For instance, if is odd and, then the integral on the right hand side is

where is the Radon transform of :$$R\backslash varphi(\backslash xi,p)\; =\; \backslash int\_\; f(x)\backslash ,d^x.$$

An alternative equivalent expression of the plane wave decomposition is:

Fourier kernels

See also: Convergence of Fourier series. In the study of Fourier series, a major question consists of determining whether and in what sense the Fourier series associated with a periodic function converges to the function. The -th partial sum of the Fourier series of a function of period is defined by convolution (on the interval) with the Dirichlet kernel:$$D\_N(x)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^N\; e^\; =\; \backslash frac.$$Thus,$$s\_N(f)(x)\; =\; D\_N*f(x)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^N\; a\_n\; e^$$where$$a\_n\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash int\_^\backslash pi\; f(y)e^\backslash ,dy.$$A fundamental result of elementary Fourier series states that the Dirichlet kernel restricted to the interval  tends to a multiple of the delta function as . This is interpreted in the distribution sense, that$$s\_N(f)(0)\; =\; \backslash int\_^\; D\_N(x)f(x)\backslash ,dx\; \backslash to\; 2\backslash pi\; f(0)$$for every compactly supported function . Thus, formally one has$$\backslash delta(x)\; =\; \backslash frac1\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; e^$$on the interval .

Despite this, the result does not hold for all compactly supported functions: that is does not converge weakly in the sense of measures. The lack of convergence of the Fourier series has led to the introduction of a variety of summability methods to produce convergence. The method of Cesàro summation leads to the Fejér kernel

$$F\_N(x)\; =\; \backslash frac1N\backslash sum\_^\; D\_n(x)\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)^2.$$

The Fejér kernels tend to the delta function in a stronger sense that^[23]

$$\backslash int\_^\; F\_N(x)f(x)\backslash ,dx\; \backslash to\; 2\backslash pi\; f(0)$$

for every compactly supported function . The implication is that the Fourier series of any continuous function is Cesàro summable to the value of the function at every point.

Hilbert space theory

The Dirac delta distribution is a densely defined unbounded linear functional on the Hilbert space L² of square-integrable functions. Indeed, smooth compactly supported functions are dense in, and the action of the delta distribution on such functions is well-defined. In many applications, it is possible to identify subspaces of and to give a stronger topology on which the delta function defines a bounded linear functional.

Sobolev spaces

The Sobolev embedding theorem for Sobolev spaces on the real line implies that any square-integrable function such that

is automatically continuous, and satisfies in particular

Thus is a bounded linear functional on the Sobolev space . Equivalently is an element of the continuous dual space of . More generally, in dimensions, one has provided .

Spaces of holomorphic functions

In complex analysis, the delta function enters via Cauchy's integral formula, which asserts that if is a domain in the complex plane with smooth boundary, then

$$f(z)\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash oint\_\; \backslash frac,\backslash quad\; z\backslash in\; D$$

for all holomorphic functions in that are continuous on the closure of . As a result, the delta function is represented in this class of holomorphic functions by the Cauchy integral:

$$\backslash delta\_z[f]\; =\; f(z)\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash oint\_\; \backslash frac.$$

Moreover, let be the Hardy space consisting of the closure in of all holomorphic functions in continuous up to the boundary of . Then functions in uniquely extend to holomorphic functions in, and the Cauchy integral formula continues to hold. In particular for, the delta function is a continuous linear functional on . This is a special case of the situation in several complex variables in which, for smooth domains, the Szegő kernel plays the role of the Cauchy integral.

Resolutions of the identity

Given a complete orthonormal basis set of functions in a separable Hilbert space, for example, the normalized eigenvectors of a compact self-adjoint operator, any vector can be expressed as$$f\; =\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash alpha\_n\; \backslash varphi\_n.$$The coefficients are found as$$\backslash alpha\_n\; =\; \backslash langle\; \backslash varphi\_n,\; f\; \backslash rangle,$$which may be represented by the notation:$$\backslash alpha\_n\; =\; \backslash varphi\_n^\backslash dagger\; f,$$a form of the bra–ket notation of Dirac.^[24] Adopting this notation, the expansion of takes the dyadic form:

$$f\; =\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi\_n\; \backslash left\; (\backslash varphi\_n^\backslash dagger\; f\; \backslash right).$$

Letting denote the identity operator on the Hilbert space, the expression

$$I\; =\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi\_n\; \backslash varphi\_n^\backslash dagger,$$

is called a resolution of the identity. When the Hilbert space is the space of square-integrable functions on a domain, the quantity:

$$\backslash varphi\_n\; \backslash varphi\_n^\backslash dagger,$$

is an integral operator, and the expression for can be rewritten

$$f(x)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash int\_D\backslash ,\; \backslash left(\backslash varphi\_n\; (x)\; \backslash varphi\_n^*(\backslash xi)\backslash right)\; f(\backslash xi)\; \backslash ,\; d\; \backslash xi.$$

The right-hand side converges to in the sense. It need not hold in a pointwise sense, even when is a continuous function. Nevertheless, it is common to abuse notation and write

$$f(x)\; =\; \backslash int\; \backslash ,\; \backslash delta(x-\backslash xi)\; f\; (\backslash xi)\backslash ,\; d\backslash xi,$$

resulting in the representation of the delta function:

$$\backslash delta(x-\backslash xi)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash varphi\_n\; (x)\; \backslash varphi\_n^*(\backslash xi).$$

With a suitable rigged Hilbert space where contains all compactly supported smooth functions, this summation may converge in, depending on the properties of the basis . In most cases of practical interest, the orthonormal basis comes from an integral or differential operator, in which case the series converges in the distribution sense.

Infinitesimal delta functions

Cauchy used an infinitesimal to write down a unit impulse, infinitely tall and narrow Dirac-type delta function satisfying $\backslash int\; F(x)\backslash delta\_\backslash alpha(x)\; \backslash ,dx\; =\; F(0)$ in a number of articles in 1827. Cauchy defined an infinitesimal in Cours d'Analyse (1827) in terms of a sequence tending to zero. Namely, such a null sequence becomes an infinitesimal in Cauchy's and Lazare Carnot's terminology.

Non-standard analysis allows one to rigorously treat infinitesimals. The article by contains a bibliography on modern Dirac delta functions in the context of an infinitesimal-enriched continuum provided by the hyperreals. Here the Dirac delta can be given by an actual function, having the property that for every real function one has $\backslash int\; F(x)\backslash delta\_\backslash alpha(x)\; \backslash ,\; dx\; =\; F(0)$ as anticipated by Fourier and Cauchy.

Dirac comb

See main article: Dirac comb. A so-called uniform "pulse train" of Dirac delta measures, which is known as a Dirac comb, or as the Sha distribution, creates a sampling function, often used in digital signal processing (DSP) and discrete time signal analysis. The Dirac comb is given as the infinite sum, whose limit is understood in the distribution sense,

$$\backslash operatorname(x)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; \backslash delta(x-n),$$

which is a sequence of point masses at each of the integers.

Up to an overall normalizing constant, the Dirac comb is equal to its own Fourier transform. This is significant because if is any Schwartz function, then the periodization of is given by the convolution$$(f\; *\; \backslash operatorname)(x)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; f(x-n).$$In particular,$$(f*\backslash operatorname)^\backslash wedge\; =\; \backslash widehat\backslash widehat\; =\; \backslash widehat\backslash operatorname$$is precisely the Poisson summation formula.More generally, this formula remains to be true if is a tempered distribution of rapid descent or, equivalently, if

\widehat{f} is a slowly growing, ordinary function within the space of tempered distributions.

Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem

The Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem, important in quantum mechanics, relates the delta function to the distribution, the Cauchy principal value of the function, defined by

$$\backslash left\backslash langle\backslash operatorname\backslash frac,\; \backslash varphi\backslash right\backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash lim\_\backslash int\_$$

>\varepsilon

\frac\,dx.

Sokhotsky's formula states that

$$\backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac\; =\; \backslash operatorname\backslash frac\; \backslash mp\; i\backslash pi\backslash delta(x),$$

Here the limit is understood in the distribution sense, that for all compactly supported smooth functions,

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash lim\_\backslash frac\backslash ,dx=\backslash mp\; i\backslash pi\; f(0)+\backslash lim\_\backslash int\_$$

>\varepsilon

\frac\,dx.

Relationship to the Kronecker delta

The Kronecker delta is the quantity defined by

for all integers, . This function then satisfies the following analog of the sifting property: if (for in the set of all integers) is any doubly infinite sequence, then

$$\backslash sum\_^\backslash infty\; a\_i\; \backslash delta\_=a\_k.$$

Similarly, for any real or complex valued continuous function on, the Dirac delta satisfies the sifting property

$$\backslash int\_^\backslash infty\; f(x)\backslash delta(x-x\_0)\backslash ,dx=f(x\_0).$$

This exhibits the Kronecker delta function as a discrete analog of the Dirac delta function.

Applications

Probability theory

In probability theory and statistics, the Dirac delta function is often used to represent a discrete distribution, or a partially discrete, partially continuous distribution, using a probability density function (which is normally used to represent absolutely continuous distributions). For example, the probability density function of a discrete distribution consisting of points, with corresponding probabilities, can be written as

$$f(x)\; =\; \backslash sum\_^n\; p\_i\; \backslash delta(x-x\_i).$$

As another example, consider a distribution in which 6/10 of the time returns a standard normal distribution, and 4/10 of the time returns exactly the value 3.5 (i.e. a partly continuous, partly discrete mixture distribution). The density function of this distribution can be written as

$$f(x)\; =\; 0.6\; \backslash ,\; \backslash frac\; e^\; +\; 0.4\; \backslash ,\; \backslash delta(x-3.5).$$

The delta function is also used to represent the resulting probability density function of a random variable that is transformed by continuously differentiable function. If is a continuous differentiable function, then the density of can be written as

$$f\_Y(y)\; =\; \backslash int\_^\; f\_X(x)\; \backslash delta(y-g(x))\; \backslash ,dx.$$

The delta function is also used in a completely different way to represent the local time of a diffusion process (like Brownian motion). The local time of a stochastic process is given by$$\backslash ell(x,t)\; =\; \backslash int\_0^t\; \backslash delta(x-B(s))\backslash ,ds$$and represents the amount of time that the process spends at the point in the range of the process. More precisely, in one dimension this integral can be written$$\backslash ell(x,t)\; =\; \backslash lim\_\backslash frac\backslash int\_0^t\; \backslash mathbf\_(B(s))\backslash ,ds$$where

1 _{[x-\varepsilon,x+\varepsilon]} is the indicator function of the interval [x - \varepsilon,x + \varepsilon].

Quantum mechanics

The delta function is expedient in quantum mechanics. The wave function of a particle gives the probability amplitude of finding a particle within a given region of space. Wave functions are assumed to be elements of the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions, and the total probability of finding a particle within a given interval is the integral of the magnitude of the wave function squared over the interval. A set of wave functions is orthonormal if

$$\backslash langle\backslash varphi\_n\; \backslash mid\; \backslash varphi\_m\backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash delta\_,$$

where is the Kronecker delta. A set of orthonormal wave functions is complete in the space of square-integrable functions if any wave function can be expressed as a linear combination of the with complex coefficients:

$$\backslash psi\; =\; \backslash sum\; c\_n\; \backslash varphi\_n,$$

where . Complete orthonormal systems of wave functions appear naturally as the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian (of a bound system) in quantum mechanics that measures the energy levels, which are called the eigenvalues. The set of eigenvalues, in this case, is known as the spectrum of the Hamiltonian. In bra–ket notation this equality implies the resolution of the identity:

$$I\; =\; \backslash sum\; |\backslash varphi\_n\backslash rangle\backslash langle\backslash varphi\_n|.$$

Here the eigenvalues are assumed to be discrete, but the set of eigenvalues of an observable can also be continuous. An example is the position operator, . The spectrum of the position (in one dimension) is the entire real line and is called a continuous spectrum. However, unlike the Hamiltonian, the position operator lacks proper eigenfunctions. The conventional way to overcome this shortcoming is to widen the class of available functions by allowing distributions as well, i.e., to replace the Hilbert space with a rigged Hilbert space. In this context, the position operator has a complete set of "generalized eigenfunctions", labeled by the points of the real line, given by

$$\backslash varphi\_y(x)\; =\; \backslash delta(x-y).$$

The eigenfunctions of the position operator are called the eigenstates and are denoted by .

Similar considerations apply to the eigenstates of the momentum operator, or indeed any other (unbounded) self-adjoint operator on the Hilbert space, provided the spectrum of is continuous and there are no degenerate eigenvalues. In that case, there is a set of real numbers (the spectrum) and a collection of distributions with such that

$$P\backslash varphi\_y\; =\; y\backslash varphi\_y.$$

That is, are the generalized eigenvectors of . If they form an "orthonormal basis" in the distribution sense, that is:

$$\backslash langle\; \backslash varphi\_y,\backslash varphi\_\backslash rangle\; =\; \backslash delta(y-y\text{'}),$$

then for any test function,

$$\backslash psi(x)\; =\; \backslash int\_\backslash Omega\; c(y)\; \backslash varphi\_y(x)\; \backslash ,\; dy$$

where . That is, there is a resolution of the identity

$$I\; =\; \backslash int\_\backslash Omega\; |\backslash varphi\_y\backslash rangle\backslash ,\; \backslash langle\backslash varphi\_y|\backslash ,dy$$

where the operator-valued integral is again understood in the weak sense. If the spectrum of has both continuous and discrete parts, then the resolution of the identity involves a summation over the discrete spectrum and an integral over the continuous spectrum.

The delta function also has many more specialized applications in quantum mechanics, such as the delta potential models for a single and double potential well.

Structural mechanics

The delta function can be used in structural mechanics to describe transient loads or point loads acting on structures. The governing equation of a simple mass–spring system excited by a sudden force impulse at time can be written

$$m\; \backslash frac\; +\; k\; \backslash xi\; =\; I\; \backslash delta(t),$$

where is the mass, is the deflection, and is the spring constant.

As another example, the equation governing the static deflection of a slender beam is, according to Euler–Bernoulli theory,

$$EI\; \backslash frac\; =\; q(x),$$

where is the bending stiffness of the beam, is the deflection, is the spatial coordinate, and is the load distribution. If a beam is loaded by a point force at, the load distribution is written

$$q(x)\; =\; F\; \backslash delta(x-x\_0).$$

As the integration of the delta function results in the Heaviside step function, it follows that the static deflection of a slender beam subject to multiple point loads is described by a set of piecewise polynomials.

Also, a point moment acting on a beam can be described by delta functions. Consider two opposing point forces at a distance apart. They then produce a moment acting on the beam. Now, let the distance approach the limit zero, while is kept constant. The load distribution, assuming a clockwise moment acting at, is written

Point moments can thus be represented by the derivative of the delta function. Integration of the beam equation again results in piecewise polynomial deflection.

See also

• Atom (measure theory)
• Laplacian of the indicator

Notes

References

• .
• .
  • .
• .
• .
• .
  • .
  • .
• .
• .
• .
• .
• .
• .
• Book: Hazewinkel . Michiel . Encyclopaedia of Mathematics (set) . 1995 . Springer Science & Business Media . 978-1-55608-010-4 . en.
• Book: Hazewinkel, Michiel. Michiel Hazewinkel. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=_YPtCAAAQBAJ|}} Encyclopaedia of mathematics]. 2011. Springer. 978-90-481-4896-7. 751862625. 10.
• .
• .
• .
• .
• .
• .
• .
  • .
• .
• .
• .
• Book: Rudin . Walter . Walter Rudin . Real and complex analysis . 1966 . McGraw-Hill . New York . 0-07-100276-6 . 3rd . 1987 . Peter R. . Devine.
• .
• .
  • .
• .
• .
• .
• .

External links

• • • KhanAcademy.org video lesson
• The Dirac Delta function, a tutorial on the Dirac delta function.
• Video Lectures – Lecture 23, a lecture by Arthur Mattuck.
• The Dirac delta measure is a hyperfunction
• We show the existence of a unique solution and analyze a finite element approximation when the source term is a Dirac delta measure
• Non-Lebesgue measures on R. Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure, Dirac delta measure.

Notes and References

1. Book: Zhao, Ji-Cheng. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=blZYGDREpk8C|page=174}} Methods for Phase Diagram Determination]. 2011-05-05. Elsevier. 978-0-08-054996-5. en.
2. Book: Fourier, JB . The Analytical Theory of Heat . Joseph Fourier . 1822 . [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=-N8EAAAAYAAJ|page=408}}] . English translation by Alexander Freeman, 1878 . The University Press., cf. and pp. 546–551. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=TDQJAAAAIAAJ|page=525}} Original French text].
3. Book: Komatsu, Hikosaburo . Microlocal Analysis and Complex Fourier Analysis . . Keiko Fujita . Fourier's hyperfunctions and Heaviside's pseudodifferential operators . 978-981-238-161-3 . 2002 . World Scientific . . [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=8GwKzEemrIcC|page=200}}].
4. Book: Tyn . Myint-U. . Lokenath . Debnath. Lokenath Debnath . [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=Zbz5_UvERIIC}} Linear Partial Differential Equations for Scientists And Engineers]. 978-0-8176-4393-5 . 4th . 2007 . [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=Zbz5_UvERIIC|page=4}}] . Springer.
5. Book: [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=WbZcqdvCEfwC}} Integral Transforms And Their Applications ]. Lokenath . Debnath . Dambaru . Bhatta . 978-1-58488-575-7 . 2007 . 2nd . . [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=WbZcqdvCEfwC|page=2}}].
6. Book: Grattan-Guinness, Ivor . [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=_GgioErrbW8C}} Convolutions in French Mathematics, 1800–1840: From the Calculus and Mechanics to Mathematical Analysis and Mathematical Physics, Volume 2 ]. 978-3-7643-2238-0 . 2009 . Birkhäuser . Ivor Grattan-Guinness. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=_GgioErrbW8C|page=653}} 653].
7. See, for example, Book: Cauchy, Augustin-Louis (1789-1857) Auteur du texte. Oeuvres complètes d'Augustin Cauchy. Série 1, tome 1 / publiées sous la direction scientifique de l'Académie des sciences et sous les auspices de M. le ministre de l'Instruction publique.... 1882–1974. EN. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k90181x/f387 . Des intégrales doubles qui se présentent sous une forme indéterminèe.
8. Book: [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=Od5BxTEN0VsC}} Fundamentals of Applied Functional Analysis: Distributions, Sobolev Spaces ]. Dragiša . Mitrović . Darko . Žubrinić . [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=Od5BxTEN0VsC|page=62}} 62] . 978-0-582-24694-2 . 1998 . CRC Press.
9. Book: Topics in Mathematical Analysis: A Volume Dedicated to the Memory of A.L. Cauchy . . Manfred . Kracht . Erwin . Kreyszig. Erwin Kreyszig . 553] . 978-9971-5-0666-7 . Themistocles M. Rassias . 1989 . World Scientific . On singular integral operators and generalizations.
10. A more complete historical account can be found in .
11. January 1927 . The physical interpretation of the quantum dynamics . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character . en . 113 . 765 . 621–641 . 10.1098/rspa.1927.0012 . 1927RSPSA.113..621D . 0950-1207. Dirac . P. A. M. . 122855515 . free .
12. See also for a different interpretation. Other conventions for the assigning the value of the Heaviside function at zero exist, and some of these are not consistent with what follows.
13. Book: Krantz. Steven G.. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=X_BKmVphIcsC&q }} Geometric Integration Theory]. Parks. Harold R.. 2008-12-15. Springer Science & Business Media. 978-0-8176-4679-0. en.
14. Book: Rottwitt. Karsten. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=G1jSBQAAQBAJ}} Nonlinear Optics: Principles and Applications]. Tidemand-Lichtenberg. Peter. 2014-12-11. CRC Press. 978-1-4665-6583-8. en. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=G1jSBQAAQBAJ|page=276}}] 276.
15. Book: Karris, Steven T.. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=f0RdM1zv_dkC}} Signals and Systems with MATLAB Applications]. 2003. Orchard Publications. 978-0-9709511-6-8. en. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=f0RdM1zv_dkC&pg=SA1-PA15 }} 15].
16. Book: Roden, Martin S.. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=YEKeBQAAQBAJ}} Introduction to Communication Theory]. 2014-05-17. Elsevier. 978-1-4831-4556-3. en. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=YEKeBQAAQBAJ|page=40}}].
17. Further refinement is possible, namely to submersions, although these require a more involved change of variables formula.
18. The numerical factors depend on the conventions for the Fourier transform.
19. Web site: Gugo82's comment on the distributional derivative of Dirac's delta. 12 September 2010. matematicamente.it.
20. More generally, one only needs to have an integrable radially symmetric decreasing rearrangement.
21. Book: Milovanović. Gradimir V.. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=4U-5BQAAQBAJ}} Analytic Number Theory, Approximation Theory, and Special Functions: In Honor of Hari M. Srivastava]. Rassias. Michael Th. 2014-07-08. Springer. 978-1-4939-0258-3. en. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=4U-5BQAAQBAJ|page=748 }} 748].
22. Book: Mader, Heidy M.. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=e5Y_RRPxdyYC}} Statistics in Volcanology]. 2006. Geological Society of London. 978-1-86239-208-3. en. Heidy Mader. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=e5Y_RRPxdyYC|page=81}} 81].
23. In the terminology of, the Fejér kernel is a Dirac sequence, whereas the Dirichlet kernel is not.
24. The development of this section in bra–ket notation is found in