Pinaceae Explained

The Pinaceae, or pine family, are conifer trees or shrubs, including many of the well-known conifers of commercial importance such as cedars, firs, hemlocks, piñons, larches, pines and spruces. The family is included in the order Pinales, formerly known as Coniferales. Pinaceae have distinctive cones with woody scales bearing typically two ovules, and are supported as monophyletic by both morphological trait and genetic analysis.[1] They are the largest extant conifer family in species diversity, with between 220 and 250 species (depending on taxonomic opinion) in 11 genera,[2] and the second-largest (after Cupressaceae) in geographical range, found in most of the Northern Hemisphere, with the majority of the species in temperate climates, but ranging from subarctic to tropical. The family often forms the dominant component of boreal, coastal, and montane forests. One species, Pinus merkusii, grows just south of the equator in Southeast Asia. Major centres of diversity are found in the mountains of southwest China, Mexico, central Japan, and California.

Description

Members of the family Pinaceae are trees (rarely shrubs) growing from 2to tall, mostly evergreen (except the deciduous Larix and Pseudolarix), resinous, monoecious, with subopposite or whorled branches, and spirally arranged, linear (needle-like) leaves.[2] The embryos of Pinaceae have three to 24 cotyledons.

The female cones are large and usually woody, 2- long, with numerous spirally arranged scales, and two winged seeds on each scale. The male cones are small, 0.5- long, and fall soon after pollination; pollen dispersal is by wind. Seed dispersal is mostly by wind, but some species have large seeds with reduced wings, and are dispersed by birds. Analysis of Pinaceae cones reveals how selective pressure has shaped the evolution of variable cone size and function throughout the family. Variation in cone size in the family has likely resulted from the variation of seed dispersal mechanisms available in their environments over time. All Pinaceae with seeds weighing less than 90 milligrams are seemingly adapted for wind dispersal. Pines having seeds larger than 100 mg are more likely to have benefited from adaptations that promote animal dispersal, particularly by birds.[3] Pinaceae that persist in areas where tree squirrels are abundant do not seem to have evolved adaptations for bird dispersal.

Boreal conifers have many adaptions for winter. The narrow conical shape of northern conifers, and their downward-drooping limbs help them shed snow, and many of them seasonally alter their biochemistry to make them more resistant to freezing, called "hardening".

Classification

Classification of the subfamilies and genera of Pinaceae has been subject to debate in the past. Pinaceae ecology, morphology, and history have all been used as the basis for methods of analyses of the family. An 1891 publication divided the family into two subfamilies, using the number and position of resin canals in the primary vascular region of the young taproot as the primary consideration. In a 1910 publication, the family was divided into two tribes based on the occurrence and type of long–short shoot dimorphism.

A more recent classification divided the subfamilies and genera based on the consideration of features of ovulate cone anatomy among extant and fossil members of the family. Below is an example of how the morphology has been used to classify Pinaceae. The 11 genera are grouped into four subfamilies, based on the microscopical anatomy and the morphology of the cones, pollen, wood, seeds, and leaves:[4]

Phylogeny

A revised 2018 phylogeny places Cathaya as sister to the pines rather than in the Laricoidae subfamily with Larix and Pseudotsuga.

Multiple molecular studies indicate that in contrast to previous classifications placing it outside the conifers, Gnetophyta may in fact be the sister group to the Pinaceae, with both lineages having diverged during the early-mid Carboniferous. This is known as the "gnepine" hypothesis.[10] [11]

Evolutionary history

Pinaceae is estimated to have diverged from other conifer groups during the late Carboniferous ~313 million years ago.[12] Various possible stem-group relatives have been reported from as early as the Late Permian (Lopingian) The extinct conifer cone genus Schizolepidopsis likely represent stem-group members of the Pinaceae, the first good records of which are in the Middle-Late Triassic, with abundant records during the Jurassic across Eurasia.[13] [14] The oldest crown group (descendant of the last common ancestor of all living species) member of Pinaceae is the cone Eathiestrobus, known from the Upper Jurassic (lower Kimmeridgian, 157.3-154.7 million years ago) of Scotland,[15] which likely belongs to the pinoid grouping of the family.[16] Pinaceae rapidly radiated during the Early Cretaceous. Members of the modern genera Pinus (pines), Picea (spruce) and Cedrus (cedar) first appear during the Early Cretaceous.[17] [18] [19] The extinct Cretaceous genera Pseudoaraucaria and Obirastrobus appear to be members of Abietoideae, while Pityostrobus appears to be non-monophyletic, containing many disparately related members of Pinaceae. While Pinaceae, and indeed all of its subfamilies, substantially predate the break up of the super-continent Pangea, its distribution was limited to the northern Laurasia. During the Cenozoic, Pinaceae had higher rates of species turnover than Southern Hemisphere conifers, thought to be driven by range shifts in response to glacial cycles.[20]

Defense mechanisms

External stresses on plants have the ability to change the structure and composition of forest ecosystems. Common external stress that Pinaceae experience are herbivore and pathogen attack which often leads to tree death.[21] In order to combat these stresses, trees need to adapt or evolve defenses against these stresses. Pinaceae have evolved a myriad of mechanical and chemical defenses, or a combination of the two, in order to protect themselves against antagonists.[22] Pinaceae have the ability to up-regulate a combination of constitutive mechanical and chemical strategies to further their defenses.[23]

Pinaceae defenses are prevalent in the bark of the trees. This part of the tree contributes a complex defensive boundary against external antagonists.[24] Constitutive and induced defenses are both found in the bark.[25] [26]

Constitutive defenses

Constitutive defenses are typically the first line of defenses used against antagonists and can include sclerified cells, lignified periderm cells, and secondary compounds such as phenolics and resins.[27] Constitutive defenses are always expressed and offer immediate protection from invaders but could also be defeated by antagonists that have evolved adaptations to these defense mechanisms. One of the common secondary compounds used by Pinaceae are phenolics or polyphenols. These secondary compounds are preserved in vacuoles of polyphenolic parenchyma cells (PP) in the secondary phloem.[28]

Induced defenses

Induced defense responses need to be activated by certain cues, such as herbivore damage or other biotic signals.

A common induced defense mechanism used by Pinaceae is resins.[29] Resins are also one of the primary defenses used against attack. Resins are short term defenses that are composed of a complex combination of volatile mono- (C10) and sesquiterpenes (C15) and nonvolatile diterpene resin acids (C20). They are produced and stored in specialized secretory areas known as resin ducts, resin blisters, or resin cavities. Resins have the ability to wash away, trap, fend off antagonists, and are also involved in wound sealing. They are an effective defense mechanism because they have toxic and inhibitory effects on invaders, such as insects or pathogens.[30] Resins could have developed as an evolutionary defense against bark beetle attacks. One well researched resin present in Pinaceae is oleoresin. Oleoresin had been found to be a valuable part of the conifer defense mechanism against biotic attacks. They are found in secretory tissues in tree stems, roots, and leaves. Oleoresin is also needed in order to classify conifers.

Active research: methyl jasmonate

The topic of defense mechanisms within family Pinaceae is a very active area of study with numerous studies being conducted. Many of these studies use methyl jasmonate (MJ) as an antagonist.[31] Methyl jasmonate is known to be able to induce defense responses in the stems of multiple Pinaceae species. It has been found that MJ stimulated the activation of PP cells and formation of xylem traumatic resin ducts (TD). These are structures that are involved in the release of phenolics and resins, both forms of defense mechanism.

External links

Notes and References

  1. Gernandt . David S. . Holman . Garth . Campbell . Christopher . Parks . Matthew . Mathews . Sarah . Raubeson . Linda A. . Liston . Aaron . Stockey . Ruth A. . Rothwell . Gar W. . September 2016 . Phylogenetics of extant and fossil Pinaceae: methods for increasing topological stability . Botany . en . 94 . 9 . 863–884 . 10.1139/cjb-2016-0064 . 1916-2790.
  2. Book: Aljos Farjon . 1998 . World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers . . 978-1-900347-54-9.
  3. Craig W. Benkman . 1995 . Wind dispersal capacity of pine seeds and the evolution of different seed dispersal modes in pines . . 73 . 2 . 221–224 . 3545911 . 10.2307/3545911. 1995Oikos..73..221B .
  4. Robert A. Price, Jeanine Olsen-Stojkovich & Jerold M. Lowenstein . 1987 . Relationships among the genera of Pinaceae: an immunological comparison . . 12 . 1 . 91–97 . 2419217 . 10.2307/2419217.
  5. Ran. Jin-Hua. Shen. Ting-Ting. Wu. Hui. Gong. Xun. Wang. Xiao-Quan. 2018-12-01. Phylogeny and evolutionary history of Pinaceae updated by transcriptomic analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. en. 129. 106–116. 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.08.011. 30153503 . 2018MolPE.129..106R . 52110440 . 1055-7903.
  6. Leslie . Andrew B. . Beaulieu . Jeremy . Holman . Garth . Campbell . Christopher S. . Mei . Wenbin . Raubeson . Linda R. . Mathews . Sarah . et al. . 2018 . An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record . American Journal of Botany . 105 . 9 . 1531–1544 . 10.1002/ajb2.1143 . 30157290.
  7. Leslie . Andrew B. . et al. . 2018 . ajb21143-sup-0004-AppendixS4 . American Journal of Botany . 105 . 9 . 1531–1544 . 10.1002/ajb2.1143 . 30157290 .
  8. Stull . Gregory W. . Qu . Xiao-Jian . Parins-Fukuchi . Caroline . Yang . Ying-Ying . Yang . Jun-Bo . Yang . Zhi-Yun . Hu . Yi . Ma . Hong . Soltis . Pamela S. . Soltis . Douglas E. . Li . De-Zhu . Smith . Stephen A. . Yi . Ting-Shuang . et al. . 2021 . Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms . Nature Plants . 7 . 8. 1015–1025 . 10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4. 10.1101/2021.03.13.435279 . 34282286. 232282918 .
  9. Stull . Gregory W. . et al. . 2021 . main.dated.supermatrix.tree.T9.tre . Figshare . 10.6084/m9.figshare.14547354.v1 .
  10. Stull. Gregory W.. Qu. Xiao-Jian. Parins-Fukuchi. Caroline. Yang. Ying-Ying. Yang. Jun-Bo. Yang. Zhi-Yun. Hu. Yi. Ma. Hong. Soltis. Pamela S.. Soltis. Douglas E.. Li. De-Zhu. July 19, 2021. Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms. Nature Plants. en. 7. 8. 1015–1025. 10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4. 34282286 . 236141481 . 2055-0278.
  11. Ran. Jin-Hua. Shen. Ting-Ting. Wang. Ming-Ming. Wang. Xiao-Quan. Phylogenomics resolves the deep phylogeny of seed plants and indicates partial convergent or homoplastic evolution between Gnetales and angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018 . 285. 1881. 20181012. 10.1098/rspb.2018.1012. 6030518. 29925623.
  12. Leslie . Andrew B. . Beaulieu . Jeremy . Holman . Garth . Campbell . Christopher S. . Mei . Wenbin . Raubeson . Linda R. . Mathews . Sarah . 2018 . An overview of extant conifer evolution from the perspective of the fossil record . American Journal of Botany . en . 105 . 9 . 1531–1544 . 10.1002/ajb2.1143 . 30157290 . 52120430 . 1537-2197.
  13. Domogatskaya . Ksenia V. . Herman . Alexei B. . May 2019 . New species of the genus Schizolepidopsis (conifers) from the Albian of the Russian high Arctic and geological history of the genus . Cretaceous Research . en . 97 . 73–93 . 10.1016/j.cretres.2019.01.012. 2019CrRes..97...73D . 134849082 .
  14. Matsunaga . Kelly K. S. . Herendeen . Patrick S. . Herrera . Fabiany . Ichinnorov . Niiden . Crane . Peter R. . Shi . Gongle . 2021-05-10 . Ovulate Cones of Schizolepidopsis ediae sp. nov. Provide Insights into the Evolution of Pinaceae . International Journal of Plant Sciences . 182 . 6 . 490–507 . 10.1086/714281 . 1058-5893 . free.
  15. Rothwell . Gar W. . Mapes . Gene . Stockey . Ruth A. . Hilton . Jason . April 2012 . The seed cone Eathiestrobus gen. nov.: Fossil evidence for a Jurassic origin of Pinaceae . American Journal of Botany . en . 99 . 4 . 708–720 . 10.3732/ajb.1100595 . 22491001.
  16. Smith . Selena Y. . Stockey . Ruth A. . Rothwell . Gar W. . Little . Stefan A. . 2017-01-02 . A new species of Pityostrobus (Pinaceae) from the Cretaceous of California: moving towards understanding the Cretaceous radiation of Pinaceae . Journal of Systematic Palaeontology . en . 15 . 1 . 69–81 . 10.1080/14772019.2016.1143885 . 2017JSPal..15...69S . 88292891 . 1477-2019.
  17. Blokhina . N. I. . Afonin . M. . 2007 . Fossil wood Cedrus penzhinaensis sp. nov. (Pinaceae) from the Lower Cretaceous of north-western Kamchatka (Russia) . Acta Paleobotanica . en . 47 . 379–389 . 54653621 .
  18. Ashley A. Klymiuk . Ruth A. Stockey . amp . 2012 . A Lower Cretaceous (Valanginian) seed cone provides the earliest fossil record for Picea (Pinaceae) . . 99 . 6 . 1069–1082 . 10.3732/ajb.1100568 . 22623610 . free.
  19. Patricia E. Ryberg . Gar W. Rothwell . Ruth A. Stockey . Jason Hilton . Gene Mapes . James B. Riding . 2012 . Reconsidering Relationships among Stem and Crown Group Pinaceae: Oldest Record of the Genus Pinus from the Early Cretaceous of Yorkshire, United Kingdom . International Journal of Plant Sciences . 173 . 8 . 917–932 . 10.1086/667228 . 85402168.
  20. Leslie . Andrew B. . Beaulieu . Jeremy M. . Rai . Hardeep S. . Crane . Peter R. . Donoghue . Michael J. . Mathews . Sarah . 2012-10-02 . Hemisphere-scale differences in conifer evolutionary dynamics . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . en . 109 . 40 . 16217–16221 . 10.1073/pnas.1213621109 . free . 0027-8424 . 3479534 . 22988083. 2012PNAS..10916217L .
  21. Cherubini. Paolo. Fontana. Giovanni. Rigling. Daniel. Dobbertin. Matthias. Brang. Peter. Innes. John L.. 2002. Tree-Life History Prior to Death: Two Fungal Root Pathogens Affect Tree-Ring Growth Differently. 3072253. Journal of Ecology. 90. 5. 839–850. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00715.x. free. 2002JEcol..90..839C .
  22. Terpenoid biosynthesis and specialized vascular cells of conifer defense. - Semantic Scholar. 2010. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00910.x. 20074143. 26043965. Zulak. K. G.. Bohlmann. J.. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 52. 1. 86–97. free.
  23. Franceschi. Vincent R.. Krokene. Paal. Christiansen. Erik. Krekling. Trygve. 2005-08-01. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist. en. 167. 2. 353–376. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x. 15998390. 1469-8137. free.
  24. Franceschi, V. R., P. Krokene, T. Krekling, and E. Christiansen. 2000. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distance defense response to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:314-326.
  25. Hudgins. J. W.. Christiansen. E.. Franceschi. V. R.. 2004-03-01. Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective. Tree Physiology. en. 24. 3. 251–264. 10.1093/treephys/24.3.251. 14704135. 0829-318X. free.
  26. Krokene. P.. Nagy. N. E.. Solheim. H.. 2008-01-01. Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiology. en. 28. 1. 29–35. 10.1093/treephys/28.1.29. 17938111. 0829-318X. free.
  27. Sampedro. L.. 2014-09-01. Physiological trade-offs in the complexity of pine tree defensive chemistry. Tree Physiology. en. 34. 9. 915–918. 10.1093/treephys/tpu082. 25261122. 0829-318X. free. 10261/105595. free.
  28. Nagy. N. E.. Krokene. P.. Solheim. H.. 2006-02-01. Anatomical-based defense responses of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stems to two fungal pathogens. Tree Physiology. en. 26. 2. 159–167. 10.1093/treephys/26.2.159. 16356912. 0829-318X. free.
  29. Nagy. Nina E.. Franceschi. Vincent R.. Solheim. Halvor. Krekling. Trygve. Christiansen. Erik. 2000-03-01. Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits. American Journal of Botany. en. 87. 3. 302–313. 10.2307/2656626. 1537-2197. 2656626. 10718991.
  30. Lewinsohn. Efraim. Gijzen. Mark. Croteau. Rodney. 1991-05-01. Defense Mechanisms of Conifers: Differences in Constitutive and Wound-Induced Monoterpene Biosynthesis Among Species. Plant Physiology. en. 96. 1. 44–49. 10.1104/pp.96.1.44. 0032-0889. 16668184. 1080711.
  31. Fäldt. Jenny. Martin. Diane. Miller. Barbara. Rawat. Suman. Bohlmann. Jörg. 2003-01-01. Traumatic resin defense in Norway spruce (Picea abies): Methyl jasmonate-induced terpene synthase gene expression, and cDNA cloning and functional characterization of (+)-3-carene synthase. Plant Molecular Biology. en. 51. 1. 119–133. 10.1023/A:1020714403780. 12602896. 21153303. 0167-4412.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Pinaceae".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.