United Kingdom opt-outs from EU legislation explained

The United Kingdom was a member state of the European Union and of its predecessor the European Communities from 1973 until 2020. Since the foundation of the European Communities, it has been an important neighbour, and was a leading member state until its withdrawal from the EU on 31 January 2020 as a result of Brexit, ending 47 years of membership.

In general, the law of the European Union is valid in all of the European Union member states. However, occasionally member states negotiate certain opt-outs from legislation or treaties of the European Union, meaning they do not have to participate in certain policy areas. The United Kingdom had four opt-outs in place before leaving the Unionthe most of any EU member state, making it the least integrated member state.

Opt-outs in place when the UK withdrew from the EU

Schengen Agreement

The Schengen Agreement abolished border controls between member states. The United Kingdom and Ireland received opt-outs from implementing the Schengen acquis when the Treaty of Amsterdam of 1997 incorporated it into the EU treaties, as they were the only EU member states which had not signed the agreement. However, the protocol on the Schengen acquis specified that they could request to opt into participating in Schengen measures on a case-by-case basis if they wished, subject to unanimous approval of the other participating states. The opt-out has been criticised in the United Kingdom for hampering the United Kingdom's capabilities in stopping transnational crime through the inability to access the Schengen Information System.[1] Although the United Kingdom was not part of the Schengen passport-free area,[2] it still used the Schengen Information System, a governmental database used by European countries to store and disseminate information on individuals and property. This allowed the UK to exchange information with countries that are a part of the Schengen agreement, often for the sake of liaising over law enforcement.[3]

The UK formally requested to participate in certain provisions of the Schengen acquis – Title III relating to Police Security and Judicial Cooperation – in 1999, and this was approved by the Council of the European Union on 29 May 2000.[4] The United Kingdom's formal participation in the previously approved areas of cooperation was put into effect by a 2004 Council decision that came into effect on 1 January 2005.[5]

Economic and Monetary Union

All member states, other than Denmark and previously the United Kingdom, have either adopted the euro or are legally bound to do so. The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 included protocols on the UK[6] and Denmark giving them opt-outs with the right to decide if and when they would join the euro.

The Labour government of Tony Blair argued that the UK should join the euro, contingent on approval in a referendum, if five economic tests were met.[7] However, the assessment of those tests in June 2003 concluded that not all were met. The policy of the 2010s coalition government, elected in 2010, was against introducing the euro prior to the 2015 general election.

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

Although not a full opt-out, both the United Kingdom and Poland secured a protocol which clarified how the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, a part of the Treaty of Lisbon, would interact with national law in their countries limiting the extent that European courts would be able to rule on issues related to the Charter if they are brought to courts in Poland or the UK.[8]

The UK was worried that the Charter might be used to alter British labour law, especially as relates to allowing more strikes.[9] The European Scrutiny Committee of the British House of Commons, including members of both the Labour Party and the Conservative Party, has however cast doubts on the provision's text, asserting that the clarification might not be worded strongly and clearly enough to achieve the government's aims.[10] [11] [12]

After the Civic Platform won the 2007 parliamentary election in Poland, it announced that it would not opt-out from the Charter, leaving the UK as the only state not to adopt it.[13]

Area of freedom, security and justice

The United Kingdom had a flexible opt-out from legislation adopted in the area of freedom, security and justice, which includes all matters previously part of the pre-Amsterdam Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) pillar.[14] This allows them to opt-in or out of legislation and legislative initiatives on a case-by-case basis, which they usually do, except on matters related to Schengen.[15] The opt-out from the JHA policy area was originally obtained by both states in a protocol to the Treaty of Amsterdam of 1997, and was retained with the Treaty of Lisbon.[16]

Under Protocol 36 of the Lisbon Treaty, the UK had the option to opt out of all the police and criminal justice legislation adopted prior to the treaty's entry into force which had not been subsequently amended. The decision to opt out had to be made at least six months prior to the aforementioned measures coming under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice on 1 December 2014.[17] [18]

The UK informed the European Council of their decision to exercise their opt-out in July 2013,[19] and as such the impacted legislation ceased to apply to the UK as of 1 December 2014. While the protocol only permitted the UK to either opt-out from all the legislation or none of it, they subsequently opted back into some measures.[20] [21] [22]

Former opt-outs

Social Chapter

The Major ministry secured the United Kingdom an opt-out from the protocol on the Social Chapter of the Maastricht Treaty, which related to social issues and particularly rights in the workplace, before it was signed in 1992.[23] [24] [25] The Blair ministry abolished this opt-out after coming to power in the 1997 general election as part of the text of the Treaty of Amsterdam.[26] [27]

Pre-Brexit referendum renegotiation

See main article: United Kingdom renegotiation of European Union membership, 2015–16. Following the announcement by the government of the United Kingdom that it would hold a referendum on withdrawing from the European Union, an agreement was reached between it and the EU on renegotiated membership terms should the state vote to remain a member. In addition to a number of amendments to EU Regulations which would apply to all states, a legal guarantee would be granted to the UK that would explicitly exempt it from the treaty-stated symbolic goal of creating an "ever closer union" by deepening integration.[28] This guarantee was included in a Decision by the European Council, with the promise that it would be incorporated into the treaties during their next revision.[29] However, following the referendum, in which the UK voted to leave the EU, the agreement was abandoned.[30]

Summary table

Country! rowspan=3
Number of opt‑outsPolicy area
Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)Area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ)Social Chapter
EurozoneGenereal AFSJSchengen AreaCharter of Fundamental Rights
4Opt-outOpt-out
(opt-in)
Opt-out
(opt-in)
Opt-outFormer opt-out

    See also

    External links

    Notes and References

    1. Web site: 9th Report of 2006/07, HL Paper 49. Parliament of the United Kingdom. 2 March 2007. Schengen Information System II (SIS II), House of Lords European Union Committee (Sub-Committee F). dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20071109150418/http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/lords_press_notices/pn020207euf.cfm. 9 November 2007. 24 October 2007. dmy-all.
    2. Web site: Schengen Area. ec.europa.eu. European Commission. 14 May 2016.
    3. Web site: Schengen Information System. ec.europa.eu. European Commission. 14 May 2016.
    4. Council Decision (2000/365/EC) of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 131, 1 June 2000, p. 43)
    5. Council Decision (2004/926/EC) of 22 December 2004 on the putting into effect of parts of the Schengen acquis by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (OJ L 395, 31 December 2004, p. 70)
    6. Web site: Volume: 587, Part: 120 (12 Mar 1998: Column 391, Baroness Williams of Crosby). Parliament of the United Kingdom. 12 March 1998. House of Lords Hansard. 13 October 2007.
    7. News: Staff writer. Euro poll question revealed. 11 December 2003. 17 October 2007. BBC News.
    8. Web site: MEP debate forthcoming crucial Lisbon summit and new Treaty of Lisbon. European Parliament. 10 October 2007. Press Service. 13 October 2007.
    9. News: Williams. Liza. Should a referendum be held on EU treaty?. 9 October 2007. 13 October 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20071020052848/http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/views/liverpool-debate/2007/10/09/should-a-referendum-be-held-on-eu-treaty-64375-19922428/ . 20 October 2007. Liverpool Daily Post.
    10. News: Branigan. Tania. MPs point to flaws in Brown's 'red line' EU treaty safeguards. 10 October 2007. The Guardian. 13 October 2007. UK.
    11. News: Wintour. Patrick. Opt-outs may cause problems, MPs warn Brown. 12 October 2007. The Guardian. 13 October 2007. UK.
    12. Web site: European Union Intergovernmental Conference. European Scrutiny Committee. 2 October 2007. European Scrutiny – Thirty-Fifth Report. British House of Commons. 14 October 2007.
    13. News: Staff writer. Poland's new government will adopt EU rights charter: official. 22 October 2007. 22 October 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20071217093946/http://www.eubusiness.com/news_live/1193005021.93 . 17 December 2007. EUbusiness.
    14. See Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice (page 295 of the PDF)
    15. News: Charter, David. Will the British ever be given a chance to vote on their future in Europe?. 13 October 2007. The Times. 13 October 2007. Elliott, Francis. UK. amp.
    16. Web site: UK Government opt-in decisions in the Area ofFreedom, Security and Justice. Miller. Vaughne. 2011-10-19. Government of the United Kingdom. 2014-05-26.
    17. 2014-12-01. List of Union acts adopted before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters which cease to apply to the United Kingdom as from 1 December 2014 pursuant to Article 10(4), second sentence, of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions. Official Journal of the European Union. C. 17. 2019-01-05. 430.
    18. 2014-12-01. List of Union acts adopted before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters which have been amended by an act applicable to the United Kingdom adopted after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and which therefore remain applicable to the United Kingdom as amended or replaced. Official Journal of the European Union. C. 23. 2019-01-05. 430.
    19. Web site: Decision pursuant to Article 10(5) of Protocol 36 to The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. July 2014. Government of the United Kingdom. 2014-11-20.
    20. 2014-12-01. 2014/858/EU: Commission Decision of 1 December 2014 on the notification by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish to participate in acts of the Union in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters adopted before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and which are not part of the Schengen acquis. Official Journal of the European Union. L. 6. 2019-01-05. 345.
    21. 2014-12-01. 2014/857/EU: Council Decision of 1 December 2014 concerning the notification of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of its wish to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which are contained in acts of the Union in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and amending Decisions 2000/365/EC and 2004/926/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. L. 1. 2019-01-05. 345.
    22. Web site: The UK's 2014 Jurisdiction Decision in EU Police and Criminal Justice Proposals. Miller. Vaughne. 20 March 2012. European Parliament Information Office in the United Kingdom. 2013-02-09.
    23. News: Dale. Reginald. THINKING AHEAD/Commentary : Is Blair Leading a Continental Drift?. 6 May 1997. New York Times. 13 October 2007.
    24. Web site: 1997 . What the Social Chapter Means for Britain . 2022-06-03 . BBC Politics 97.
    25. Web site: Williams . Rhys . 20 July 1993 . Treaty Tightrope: The Social Chapter: what it is and why Conservatives hate it . 2022-06-03 . The Independent . en.
    26. Web site: Vol. 8 Memo Series (Page 6). Johnson. Ailish. 2005. Social Policy: State of the European Union. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20080227172557/http://www.princeton.edu/~smeunier/Johnson%20Memo.pdf. 27 February 2008. 13 October 2007. dmy-all.
    27. Web site: Agreement on Social Policy. Eurofound. 2014-05-26.
    28. News: Britain should stay in the European Union. 2016-02-22. Washington Post. 2016-03-15.
    29. Web site: European Council meeting (18 and 19 February 2016) – Conclusions. 2016-02-19. European Council. 2016-03-15.
    30. Web site: Prime Minister's Office . 27 June 2016 . PM Commons statement on the result of the EU referendum . 28 June 2016 . Gov.uk.