UAS groups of the United States Armed Forces explained
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) classifies unmanned aerial systems (UAS) into "Groups" according to their size and capability, a joint system that replaced the service branches' separate categorization schemes in 2011.[1] [2] [3]
The "Group" system has five categories, whose capabilities increase with the number.[4]
UAS Group | Maximum weight (lb) (MGTOW) | Nominal operating altitude (ft) | Speed (kn) | Representative UAS |
---|
Group 1 | 0–20 | | 100 | RQ-11 Raven, WASP, Puma |
Group 2 | 21–55 | | < 250 | ScanEagle, Flexrotor, SIC5, PDW C100 |
Group 3 | < 1,320 | < FL 180 | Shield AI V-BAT, RQ-7B Shadow, RQ-21 Blackjack, Navmar RQ-23 Tigershark, Arcturus-UAV Jump 20, Arcturus T-20, SIC25, Resolute ISR Resolute Eagle, Vanilla Unmanned |
Group 4 | > 1,320 | Any airspeed | MQ-8B Fire Scout, MQ-1A/B Predator, MQ-1C Gray Eagle |
Group 5 | > FL 180 | MQ-9 Reaper, RQ-4 Global Hawk, MQ-4C Triton | |
Earlier categorization schemes
Tier Systems
From about 2004 to 2011, U.S. military planners used various "Tier Systems" to designate the various individual aircraft elements in an overall plan for integrated operations.[5] The Tiers do not refer to specific models of aircraft, but rather roles the aircraft would fill. The U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marine Corps, and U.S. Army each have their own tier system.
U.S. Air Force tiers
- Tier N/A: Small/Micro UAV. Role filled by BATMAV (Wasp Block III).[6]
- Tier I: Low altitude, long endurance. Role filled by the Gnat 750.[7]
- Tier II: Medium altitude, long endurance (MALE). Role currently filled by the Predator and MQ-9 Reaper.
- Tier II+: High altitude, long endurance conventional UAV (or HALE UAV). Altitude: 60,000 to 65000feet, less than 300kn airspeed, 3000-3NaN-3 radius, 24‑hour time-on-station capability. Complementary to the Tier III- aircraft. Role currently filled by the RQ-4 Global Hawk.
- Tier III-: High altitude, long endurance low-observable UAV. Same parameters as, and complementary to, the Tier II+ aircraft. The RQ-3 DarkStar was originally intended to fulfill this role before it was "terminated".[8] [9] Role now filled by RQ-170 Sentinel.
U.S. Marine Corps tiers
- Tier N/A: Micro UAV. Wasp III fills this role, driven largely by the desire for commonality with the USAF BATMAV.[10] [11]
- Tier I: Role currently filled by the Dragon Eye but all ongoing and future procurement for the Dragon Eye program is going now to the RQ-11B Raven B.
- Tier II: Role currently filled by the Scan Eagle and the AAI RQ-7 Shadow.
- Tier III: For two decades, the role of medium range tactical UAV was filled by the Pioneer UAV. In July 2007, the Marine Corps announced its intention to retire the aging Pioneer fleet and transition to the RQ-7 Shadow tactical unmanned aircraft system by AAI Corporation. The first Marine Shadow systems have already been delivered, and training for their respective Marine Corps units is underway.[12] [13]
Role currently filled by the AAI RQ-7 Shadow, although USMC planners do not view this aircraft as meeting future Tier III requirements.[14]
U.S. Army tiers
Future Combat Systems (Cancelled)
See main article: FCS/BCT unmanned aerial vehicles. UAS were grouped in four classes under the Future Combat Systems, which was the Army's principal modernization program from 2003 to early 2009:
- Class I: For small units. Role to be filled by all new UAV with some similarity to Micro Air Vehicle.
- Class II: For companies (cancelled).[15]
- Class III: For battalions (cancelled).
- Class IV: For brigades. Role to be filled by the RQ-8A/B / MQ-8B Fire Scout.
Notes and References
- Department of Defense. Unmanned Aircraft System Airspace Integration Plan. PDF. 2015-08-06. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20160121155841/http://www.acq.osd.mil/sts/docs/DoD_UAS_Airspace_Integ_Plan_v2_(signed).pdf. 2016-01-21.
- U.S. Army . "U.S. Army Roadmap for UAS 2010-2035". PDF. 2015-08-06.
- Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Joint Unmanned Aircraft Systems Minimum Training Standards. PDF. 2015-08-06. https://web.archive.org/web/20150906200342/http://www.dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/3255_01.pdf. 2015-09-06. dead.
- Department of Defense . Unmanned Aircraft System Airspace Integration Plan . PDF . 2015-08-06 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20160121155841/http://www.acq.osd.mil/sts/docs/DoD_UAS_Airspace_Integ_Plan_v2_(signed).pdf . 2016-01-21 .
- Office of the United States Secretary of Defense . UAV Roadmap 2005–2030 . PDF. 2007-08-24 .
- http://www.fbo.gov/servlet/Documents/R/1610757
- Web site: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. January 12, 2012. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20120111195444/http://www.vectorsite.net/twuav.html. January 11, 2012.
- http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/cc/uav.html Comparison of USAF Tier II, II+ and III- systems
- http://www.edwards.af.mil/articles98/docs_html/splash/may98/cover/Tier.htm USAF Tier system
- https://www.mcwl.usmc.mil/mcp/Initiatives/Technology%20Investigation/41-MCP-%20WASP%2010%20Jul%2006.pdf
- Web site: AeroVironment, Inc.: AV Press: United States Marine Corps Awards AeroVironment $19.3 Million BATMAV Contract for Wasp III Micro Unmanned Aircraft Systems. March 19, 2015. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20081208071024/http://www.avinc.com/pr_detail.asp?ID=68. December 8, 2008.
- Web site: MCCDC, MCSC - Coordinated UAV Endorsement Brief. August 8, 2008. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20080625111732/https://www.mccdc.usmc.mil/OpsDiv/CEAB/Jun%2005%20CEAB/JUN%2005%20Briefs/20%20-%20Coordinated%20UAV%20Endorsement%20Brief.ppt. June 25, 2008.
- Web site: Navy League of the United States - Citizens in Support of the Sea Services. August 8, 2008. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20120207192835/http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/jul06-18.php. February 7, 2012.
- http://www.marines.com/operating-forces/equipment/aircraft/rq-7-shadow USMC RQ-7 Shadow Homepage
- Web site: Defense Tech: FCS Watch Archives. August 24, 2007. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20070811223149/http://www.defensetech.org/archives/cat_fcs_watch.html. August 11, 2007.