Tulle musket explained

Tulle musket should not be confused with Tula musket.

French Common Musket
a.k.a. Fusil de chasse
Origin:Kingdom of France
Type:Musket
Is Ranged:yes
Is Uk:yes
Service:1696–1815
Used By:French Navy, French Army, American Rebels, United States Army, Haitian Army, Native American warriors, Fur trappers, Voyageurs, Mountain men, Pirates, Jacobites
Designer:?
Design Date:Before 1690
Manufacturer:Tulle armory
Production Date:1695–1754
Variants:Tulle Models 1695, 1715, 1717, 1729, 1734, 1746, 1754
Cartridge:Paper cartridge, musket ball undersized to reduce the effects of powder fouling
Caliber:.62-inch, later.69-inch
Barrels:Smoothbore
Action:Flintlock
single-shot
Rate:User dependent; usually 3 to 4 rounds every one minute
Velocity:Variable
Range:100yd
Max Range:Up to 300 yards
Feed:Muzzle-loaded
Sights:Fore-sights

The French-made Tulle musket or Fusil de chasse (fu-zi dee chā-se), originally meaning "gun of the hunt", was a light smoothbore flintlock musket designed for hunting. A later military variant known as the Fusil marine ordinaire, or "common naval musket" was issued to the French marines during the French and Indian War and American War of Independence. French Common Muskets were typically lighter and shorter than the later Charleville muskets also manufactured at Tulle.

Etymology

The name fusil is phonetically pronounced "fusee" in English."[1] The French name Fusil is a corruption of the Italian fucile meaning flint.[2] Also from the name fusil comes the term fusilier. A very similar but cheaper version was the fusil de traite (trade gun).[3] Fusils were a common musket in 18th century Colonial America and were used by the Patriots during the American Revolution.

History

Fusil de chasse

In France, the manufacturing of arms began as a large industry in Saint-Étienne circa 1535.[4] The first armory was set up in 1669. By 1646, arms manufacturing had begun at Tulle nearby.[4] In 1690 an armory was set up there as well. The flintlock was adopted by France for her armies in 1630. Both Tulle and Saint-Étienne furnished flintlocks for the French troops in America.[4] The typical musket in 1690 was about long and had a barrel of about .[4]

The fusil de chasse was designed for hunting. It was an elegant flintlock with a distinctive "cow's foot" shape to the buttstock that softened recoil. This La Peid stock shape is typical of long guns made at Tulle.[5] Generally the muskets made at Tulle were defined by models, but some hunting fusils were made to order. Differences were based on their intended purpose and market.[6] In 1695 and 1696 contracts for muskets from the Tulle factory each called for "five hunting muskets for the Indian Chiefs".[6] These models would later be called a Fusil fin (chief's grade musket). These muskets were to be caliber 28 balls to the pound (approximately .56 caliber), long, "well filed and well polished with fine mountings and a flat lock".[6]

Fusil Marine Ordinaire

In 1696 muskets of this pattern were manufactured at Tulle for the fusiliers marins of the French navy.[7] These had 45-inch barrels with a .69 caliber bore. The barrel was attached to the buttstock with metal pins similar to the Brown Bess instead of the metal bands used on later muskets. Early versions of this musket used a plug bayonet and wooden ramrod. Additional batches of muskets were ordered for the French marine corps in 1716, 1729 and 1734,[8] and remained in service during the French and Indian Wars and American Revolutionary War until it was replaced with the Charleville musket.[9] Components from French muskets of this type have been found at Fort St Joseph, Michigan.[10] [11]

Until about 1718 company commanders such as captains were responsible for ensuring that each soldier or marine had a working firearm, but other than that the captain allowed his soldiers to choose which musket they would use.[4] Often, that meant there was no standard musket in use in a company let alone an army. This was a common failing of all armies of the time.[4] That changed with the Model 1717 fusil which standardized the muskets and ammunition used by the French army.[4] With a socket bayonet attached, it was longer than the British muskets of the time giving French troops an advantage in hand-to-hand combat. At and with a barrel of it allowed troops to fire from three ranks at the same time. The combination of a longer barrel and a front sight to aim the weapon also made it slightly more accurate than British muskets. A few improvements were made with the M1728 model but it was otherwise the same musket. More improvements were made in 1746 when the wooden ramrod was replaced with a metal one.[4] The French muskets shot 18 bullets to the pound which translates to .69-caliber. The fourth and final model, which would eventually be superseded by the Charleville during the 1780s, was issued in 1754 with a shorter, lighter version for officers.[12]

Tulle Fusil de Grenadier

From 1729 to 1734,[13] the French army adopted the Tulle musket to arm their elite grenadiers.[14] These were issued until the end of the French and Indian Wars, due to the scarcity of the new Charleville musket introduced in 1728.[15] Both army and navy muskets from Tulle have been discovered in 18th century French shipwrecks such as the frigate Machault, sunk off the coast of Canada during the Battle of Restigouche in 1760.[16]

Both the French and the British had versions of the officer's fusil, which were generally of higher quality than those issued to enlisted troops. The British fucils were based on the Brown Bess musket. The French officer's fusil was fitted for a sling and the stock was shorter than the barrel to fit a socket bayonet. At 20 gauge (.62-caliber) the fusil was also used as a fowling gun (early predecessor of the shotgun).[2] The officers' model weighed about and was in length. All officers, including generals, carried an officer's model fusil.[4]

Fusil de traite

In New France, the Indians allied to the French carried French fusils. These were either Fusils de chasse or de traite. Higher quality muskets, sometimes with custom engraving, were gifted to Indian chiefs who often decorated these prized weapons with brass tacks.[17] Flintlock English and French trade guns of this type were used by the Indians as recently as the mid-19th century.[18] At the Battle of the Monongahela, British General Edward Braddock led his troops directly into an ambush by native American and French troops in July 1755. Braddock was killed, no doubt, by a .62 caliber ball fired from a French fusil.[17] The smoothbore Tulle musket was carried by most, if not all, the Indians who attacked Braddock at the Monongahela River.[17]

Native warriors took very good care of their muskets and strongly preferred the French fusils over guns made elsewhere.[17] Although the fusil de traite was designed as a less-expensive trade gun, many Indians knew the difference and preferred the fusil de chasse.[3] While there were a number of different models of fusils sent to the Americas, the light musket de chasse was designed for those who hunted for a living.[19] So many were needed that the factory at Saint-Étienne had to handle the extra demand.[19] Most of these were shipped to New France where trading was the main activity between Native Americans and the French.[19] Both varieties were made with either iron or brass fittings and most were .62 caliber.[19] Both were marked "Tulle" (earlier spelling was "Tvlle") on the lock plate.[3] This makes archaeological finds harder to tell apart over two centuries later.[3] Many of the reproductions made today are marked "Tulle".[3]

Cost

The various flintlocks produced at Tulle had the following costs in 1750:

See also

Notes and References

  1. Stuart Reid, The Flintlock Musket: Brown Bess and Charleville 1715–1865 (Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Osprey Publishing, 2016), p. 78
  2. Don Troiani; James L. Kochan; et al., Don Troiani's Soldiers in America, 1754–1865 (Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 1998), p. 36
  3. Web site: A Fusil by any other name – French era guns . The French in Wisconsin . 7 August 2016 . 14 August 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160814215617/http://frenchinwisconsin.com/2012/02/a-fusil-by-any-other-name-french-era-guns/ . dead .
  4. Charles Winthrop Sawyer, Firearms in American History; 1600–1800 (Norwood, MA: Plimpton Press, 1910), pp. 23–27
  5. Web site: French Arms . The Rifle Shoppe, Inc . 8 August 2016.
  6. Russel Bouchard, The Fusil de Tulle in New France, 1691–1741" (Alexandria Bay, NY; Bloomfield, ON: Museum Restoration Service, 1998), pp. 22, 26
  7. http://1704.deerfield.history.museum/popups/artifacts.do?shortName=musket Tulle Musket
  8. https://collections.royalarmouries.org/publication/ral-publication-17734 Studies on Tulle musket
  9. https://books.google.com/books?id=I3kq9F06yw0C&dq=tulle%20musket&pg=PA316 American shoulder arms
  10. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5337&context=masters_theses Scholar Works
  11. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/cdd/1989-n44-cdd0568/1015556ar.pdf Les troupes de la marine
  12. http://librecours.eu.free.fr/spip/IMG/pdf/les_troupes_de_la_marine_1774-1816.pdf Libre cours
  13. http://classiques.uqac.ca/contemporains/bouchard_russel_aurore/fusils_de_tulle/fusils_de_tulle_figures.html Tulle fusils
  14. https://scott-duff.com/in-my-back-yard-tulle-fusil-de-grenadier/ In my back yard: grenadier musket
  15. https://scott-duff.com/in-my-back-yard-tulle-fusil-de-grenadier/ Grenadier's musket
  16. https://sha.org/assets/documents/Weaponry%20of%20the%20Machault.pdf Weaponry from Machault
  17. David L. Preston, Braddock's Defeat: The Battle of the Monongahela and the Road to Revolution (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), p. 151
  18. https://web.archive.org/web/20210604190417/https://truewestmagazine.com/weapons-of-the-indian-wars/ Weapons of the Indian Wars
  19. Web site: Flintlock Fun! – Shooting the French Fusil de Chasse . 8 August 2015 . GunsAmerica . 7 August 2016.
  20. Russel Bouchard, Les armes à feu en Nouvelle-France (Sillery, Quebec City, QC: Les Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 1999), p. 81
  21. Web site: Monetary Values in 1650 – 1750 in New France Compared to Today . Gerry Lalonde . RootsWeb . 8 August 2016.