Tsiolkovsky rocket equation explained

The classical rocket equation, or ideal rocket equation is a mathematical equation that describes the motion of vehicles that follow the basic principle of a rocket: a device that can apply acceleration to itself using thrust by expelling part of its mass with high velocity and can thereby move due to the conservation of momentum.It is credited to Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, who independently derived it and published it in 1903,^{[1] [2]} although it had been independently derived and published by William Moore in 1810,^[3] and later published in a separate book in 1813.^[4] Robert Goddard also developed it independently in 1912, and Hermann Oberth derived it independently about 1920.

The maximum change of velocity of the vehicle,

\Delta v (with no external forces acting) is:

$$\backslash Delta\; v\; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash ln\; \backslash frac\; =\; I\_\backslash text\; g\_0\; \backslash ln\; \backslash frac,$$where:

v _{e} = I _{sp} g _{0} is the effective exhaust velocity;I _{sp} is the specific impulse in dimension of time;g _{0} is standard gravity;ln is the natural logarithm function;m _{0} is the initial total mass, including propellant, a.k.a. wet mass;m _{f} is the final total mass without propellant, a.k.a. dry mass.

Given the effective exhaust velocity determined by the rocket motor's design, the desired delta-v (e.g., orbital speed or escape velocity), and a given dry mass

m _{f} , the equation can be solved for the required propellant mass m _{0} - m _{f} :$$m\_0\; =\; m\_f\; e^.$$

The necessary wet mass grows exponentially with the desired delta-v.

History

The equation is named after Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky who independently derived it and published it in his 1903 work.^{[5] [2]}

The equation had been derived earlier by the British mathematician William Moore in 1810,^[3] and later published in a separate book in 1813.^[4]

American Robert Goddard independently developed the equation in 1912 when he began his research to improve rocket engines for possible space flight. German engineer Hermann Oberth independently derived the equation about 1920 as he studied the feasibility of space travel.

While the derivation of the rocket equation is a straightforward calculus exercise, Tsiolkovsky is honored as being the first to apply it to the question of whether rockets could achieve speeds necessary for space travel.

Experiment of the Boat by Tsiolkovsky

In order to understand the principle of rocket propulsion, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky proposed the famous experiment of "the boat". A person is in a boat away from the shore without oars. They want to reach this shore. They notice that the boat is loaded with a certain quantity of stones and have the idea of throwing, one by one and as quickly as possible, these stones in the opposite direction to the bank. Effectively, the quantity of movement of the stones thrown in one direction corresponds to an equal quantity of movement for the boat in the other direction (ignoring friction / drag).

Derivation

Most popular derivation

Consider the following system:

In the following derivation, "the rocket" is taken to mean "the rocket and all of its unexpended propellant".

Newton's second law of motion relates external forces (

\vec{F _{i}} ) to the change in linear momentum of the whole system (including rocket and exhaust) as follows:$$\backslash sum\_i\; \backslash vec\; =\; \backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac$$where \vec{P _{1}} is the momentum of the rocket at time t = 0 :$$\backslash vec\; =\; m\; \backslash vec$$and \vec{P _{2}} is the momentum of the rocket and exhausted mass at time t = \Delta t :$$\backslash vec\; =\; \backslash left(m\; -\; \backslash Delta\; m\; \backslash right)\; \backslash left(\backslash vec\; +\; \backslash Delta\; \backslash vec\; \backslash right)\; +\; \backslash Delta\; m\; \backslash vec$$and where, with respect to the observer:\vec{V} is the velocity of the rocket at time t = 0 \vec{V} + \Delta \vec{V} is the velocity of the rocket at time t = \Delta t \vec{ V _{e} } is the velocity of the mass added to the exhaust (and lost by the rocket) during time \Delta t m is the mass of the rocket at time t = 0 \left( m - \Delta m \right) is the mass of the rocket at time t = \Delta t

The velocity of the exhaust

\vec{ V _{e} } in the observer frame is related to the velocity of the exhaust in the rocket frame v _{e} by:$$\backslash vec\; =\; \backslash vec\; -\; \backslash vec$$thus,$$\backslash vec\; =\; \backslash vec\; +\; \backslash vec$$Solving this yields:$$\backslash vec\; -\; \backslash vec\; =\; m\backslash Delta\; \backslash vec\; +\; \backslash vec\; \backslash Delta\; m\; -\; \backslash Delta\; m\; \backslash Delta\; \backslash vec$$If \vec{V} and \vec{ v _{e} } are opposite, \vec{ F _{i} } have the same direction as \vec{V} , \Delta m \Delta \vec{V} are negligible (since dm d\vec{v} → 0 ), and using dm = - \Delta m (since ejecting a positive \Delta m results in a decrease in rocket mass in time),$$\backslash sum\_i\; F\_i\; =\; m\; \backslash frac\; +\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash frac$$

If there are no external forces then $\backslash sum\_i\; F\_i\; =\; 0$ (conservation of linear momentum) and$$-m\backslash frac\; =\; v\_\backslash text\backslash frac$$

Assuming that

v _{e} is constant (known as Tsiolkovsky's hypothesis), so it is not subject to integration, then the above equation may be integrated as follows:$$-\backslash int\_^\; \backslash ,\; dV\; =\; \backslash int\_^\; \backslash frac$$

This then yields$$\backslash Delta\; V\; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash ln\; \backslash frac$$or equivalently$$m\_f\; =\; m\_0\; e^$$ or$$m\_0\; =\; m\_f\; e^$$ or$$m\_0\; -\; m\_f\; =\; m\_f\; \backslash left(e^\; -\; 1\backslash right)$$where

m _{0} is the initial total mass including propellant, m _{f} the final mass, and v _{e} the velocity of the rocket exhaust with respect to the rocket (the specific impulse, or, if measured in time, that multiplied by gravity-on-Earth acceleration). If v _{e} is NOT constant, we might not have rocket equations that are as simple as the above forms. Many rocket dynamics researches were based on the Tsiolkovsky's constant v _{e} hypothesis.

The value

m _{0} - m _{f} is the total working mass of propellant expended.\Delta V (delta v) is the integration over time of the magnitude of the acceleration produced by using the rocket engine (what would be the actual acceleration if external forces were absent). In free space, for the case of acceleration in the direction of the velocity, this is the increase of the speed. In the case of an acceleration in opposite direction (deceleration) it is the decrease of the speed. Of course gravity and drag also accelerate the vehicle, and they can add or subtract to the change in velocity experienced by the vehicle. Hence delta-v may not always be the actual change in speed or velocity of the vehicle.

Other derivations

Impulse-based

The equation can also be derived from the basic integral of acceleration in the form of force (thrust) over mass.By representing the delta-v equation as the following:$$\backslash Delta\; v\; =\; \backslash int^\_\; \backslash frac$$

~ dt

where T is thrust,

m _{0} is the initial (wet) mass and \Delta m is the initial mass minus the final (dry) mass,

and realising that the integral of a resultant force over time is total impulse, assuming thrust is the only force involved,$$\backslash int^\_\; F\; ~\; dt\; =\; J$$

The integral is found to be:$$J\; ~\; \backslash frac$$

Realising that impulse over the change in mass is equivalent to force over propellant mass flow rate (p), which is itself equivalent to exhaust velocity,$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac\; =\; V\_\backslash text$$the integral can be equated to$$\backslash Delta\; v\; =\; V\_\backslash text\; ~\; \backslash ln\backslash left(\backslash right)$$

Acceleration-based

Imagine a rocket at rest in space with no forces exerted on it (Newton's First Law of Motion). From the moment its engine is started (clock set to 0) the rocket expels gas mass at a constant mass flow rate R (kg/s) and at exhaust velocity relative to the rocket v_e (m/s). This creates a constant force F propelling the rocket that is equal to R × v_e. The rocket is subject to a constant force, but its total mass is decreasing steadily because it is expelling gas. According to Newton's Second Law of Motion, its acceleration at any time t is its propelling force F divided by its current mass m:$$~\; a\; =\; \backslash frac\; =\; -\; \backslash frac\; =\; -\; \backslash frac$$

Now, the mass of fuel the rocket initially has on board is equal to m₀ – m_f. For the constant mass flow rate R it will therefore take a time T = (m₀ – m_f)/R to burn all this fuel. Integrating both sides of the equation with respect to time from 0 to T (and noting that R = dm/dt allows a substitution on the right) obtains: $$~\; \backslash Delta\; v\; =\; v\_f\; -\; v\_0\; =\; -\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash left[\backslash ln\; m\_f\; -\; \backslash ln\; m\_0\; \backslash right]\; =\; ~\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash ln\backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right).$$

Limit of finite mass "pellet" expulsion

The rocket equation can also be derived as the limiting case of the speed change for a rocket that expels its fuel in the form of

N pellets consecutively, as N \to inf ty , with an effective exhaust speed v _{eff} such that the mechanical energy gained per unit fuel mass is given by $\backslash tfrac\; v\_\backslash text^2$.

In the rocket's center-of-mass frame, if a pellet of mass

m _{p} is ejected at speed u and the remaining mass of the rocket is m , the amount of energy converted to increase the rocket's and pellet's kinetic energy is$$\backslash tfrac\; m\_p\; v\_\backslash text^2\; =\; \backslash tfracm\_p\; u^2\; +\; \backslash tfracm\; (\backslash Delta\; v)^2.$$

Using momentum conservation in the rocket's frame just prior to ejection, $u\; =\; \backslash Delta\; v\; \backslash tfrac$, from which we find $$\backslash Delta\; v\; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash frac.$$

Let

\phi be the initial fuel mass fraction on board and m _{0} the initial fueled-up mass of the rocket. Divide the total mass of fuel \phi m _{0} into N discrete pellets each of mass m _{p} = \phi m _{0/N} . The remaining mass of the rocket after ejecting j pellets is then m = m _{0(1} - j\phi/N) . The overall speed change after ejecting j pellets is the sum^[6] $$\backslash Delta\; v\; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash sum\; ^\_\; \backslash frac$$

Notice that for large

N the last term in the denominator \phi/N\ll 1 and can be neglected to give$$\backslash Delta\; v\; \backslash approx\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash sum^\_\backslash frac\; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash sum\; ^\_\; \backslash frac$$ where $\backslash Delta\; x\; =\; \backslash frac$ and $x\_j\; =\; \backslash frac$.

As

N → inf ty this Riemann sum becomes the definite integral$$\backslash lim\_\backslash Delta\; v\; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash int\_^\; \backslash frac\; =\; v\_\backslash text\backslash ln\; \backslash frac\; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash ln\; \backslash frac,$$ since the final remaining mass of the rocket is m _{f} = m _{0(1-\phi)} .

Special relativity

If special relativity is taken into account, the following equation can be derived for a relativistic rocket,^[7] with

\Delta v again standing for the rocket's final velocity (after expelling all its reaction mass and being reduced to a rest mass of m _{1} ) in the inertial frame of reference where the rocket started at rest (with the rest mass including fuel being m _{0} initially), and c standing for the speed of light in vacuum:$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash left[\backslash frac\{1\; +\; \{\backslash frac\{\backslash Delta\; v\}\{c\}\}\}\{1\; -\; \{\backslash frac\{\backslash Delta\; v\}\{c\}\}\}\backslash right]^$$

Writing $\backslash frac$ as

R allows this equation to be rearranged as$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac$$

Then, using the identity $R^\; =\; \backslash exp\; \backslash left[\backslash frac\{2v\_\backslash text\{e\}\}\{c\}\; \backslash ln\; R\; \backslash right]$ (here "exp" denotes the exponential function; see also Natural logarithm as well as the "power" identity at Logarithmic identities) and the identity $\backslash tanh\; x\; =\; \backslash frac$ (see Hyperbolic function), this is equivalent to$$\backslash Delta\; v\; =\; c\; \backslash tanh\backslash left(\backslash frac\; \backslash ln\; \backslash frac\; \backslash right)$$

Terms of the equation

Delta-v

See main article: article and Delta-v. Delta-v (literally "change in velocity"), symbolised as Δv and pronounced delta-vee, as used in spacecraft flight dynamics, is a measure of the impulse that is needed to perform a maneuver such as launching from, or landing on a planet or moon, or an in-space orbital maneuver. It is a scalar that has the units of speed. As used in this context, it is not the same as the physical change in velocity of the vehicle.

Delta-v is produced by reaction engines, such as rocket engines, is proportional to the thrust per unit mass and burn time, and is used to determine the mass of propellant required for the given manoeuvre through the rocket equation.

For multiple manoeuvres, delta-v sums linearly.

For interplanetary missions delta-v is often plotted on a porkchop plot which displays the required mission delta-v as a function of launch date.

Mass fraction

See main article: article and Propellant mass fraction. In aerospace engineering, the propellant mass fraction is the portion of a vehicle's mass which does not reach the destination, usually used as a measure of the vehicle's performance. In other words, the propellant mass fraction is the ratio between the propellant mass and the initial mass of the vehicle. In a spacecraft, the destination is usually an orbit, while for aircraft it is their landing location. A higher mass fraction represents less weight in a design. Another related measure is the payload fraction, which is the fraction of initial weight that is payload.

Effective exhaust velocity

See main article: article. The effective exhaust velocity is often specified as a specific impulse and they are related to each other by:$$v\_\backslash text\; =\; g\_0\; I\_\backslash text,$$where

I _{sp} is the specific impulse in seconds,v _{e} is the specific impulse measured in m/s, which is the same as the effective exhaust velocity measured in m/s (or ft/s if g is in ft/s²),g _{0} is the standard gravity, 9.80665m/s² (in Imperial units 32.174ft/s²).

Applicability

The rocket equation captures the essentials of rocket flight physics in a single short equation. It also holds true for rocket-like reaction vehicles whenever the effective exhaust velocity is constant, and can be summed or integrated when the effective exhaust velocity varies. The rocket equation only accounts for the reaction force from the rocket engine; it does not include other forces that may act on a rocket, such as aerodynamic or gravitational forces. As such, when using it to calculate the propellant requirement for launch from (or powered descent to) a planet with an atmosphere, the effects of these forces must be included in the delta-V requirement (see Examples below). In what has been called "the tyranny of the rocket equation", there is a limit to the amount of payload that the rocket can carry, as higher amounts of propellant increment the overall weight, and thus also increase the fuel consumption.^[8] The equation does not apply to non-rocket systems such as aerobraking, gun launches, space elevators, launch loops, tether propulsion or light sails.

The rocket equation can be applied to orbital maneuvers in order to determine how much propellant is needed to change to a particular new orbit, or to find the new orbit as the result of a particular propellant burn. When applying to orbital maneuvers, one assumes an impulsive maneuver, in which the propellant is discharged and delta-v applied instantaneously. This assumption is relatively accurate for short-duration burns such as for mid-course corrections and orbital insertion maneuvers. As the burn duration increases, the result is less accurate due to the effect of gravity on the vehicle over the duration of the maneuver. For low-thrust, long duration propulsion, such as electric propulsion, more complicated analysis based on the propagation of the spacecraft's state vector and the integration of thrust are used to predict orbital motion.

Examples

Assume an exhaust velocity of 4500m/s and a

\Delta v of 9700m/s (Earth to LEO, including \Delta v to overcome gravity and aerodynamic drag).

• Single-stage-to-orbit rocket:

1- e ^{-9.7/4.5} = 0.884, therefore 88.4% of the initial total mass has to be propellant. The remaining 11.6% is for the engines, the tank, and the payload.

• Two-stage-to-orbit

suppose that the first stage should provide a

\Delta v of 5000m/s; 1- e ^{-5.0/4.5} = 0.671, therefore 67.1% of the initial total mass has to be propellant to the first stage. The remaining mass is 32.9%. After disposing of the first stage, a mass remains equal to this 32.9%, minus the mass of the tank and engines of the first stage. Assume that this is 8% of the initial total mass, then 24.9% remains. The second stage should provide a \Delta v of 4700m/s; 1- e ^{-4.7/4.5} = 0.648, therefore 64.8% of the remaining mass has to be propellant, which is 16.2% of the original total mass, and 8.7% remains for the tank and engines of the second stage, the payload, and in the case of a space shuttle, also the orbiter. Thus together 16.7% of the original launch mass is available for all engines, the tanks, and payload.

Stages

In the case of sequentially thrusting rocket stages, the equation applies for each stage, where for each stage the initial mass in the equation is the total mass of the rocket after discarding the previous stage, and the final mass in the equation is the total mass of the rocket just before discarding the stage concerned. For each stage the specific impulse may be different.

For example, if 80% of the mass of a rocket is the fuel of the first stage, and 10% is the dry mass of the first stage, and 10% is the remaining rocket, then

With three similar, subsequently smaller stages with the same

v _{e} for each stage, gives:

$$\backslash Delta\; v\; \backslash \; =\; 3\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash ln\; 5\; \backslash \; =\; 4.83\; v\_\backslash text$$

and the payload is 10% × 10% × 10% = 0.1% of the initial mass.

A comparable SSTO rocket, also with a 0.1% payload, could have a mass of 11.1% for fuel tanks and engines, and 88.8% for fuel. This would give

$$\backslash Delta\; v\; \backslash \; =\; v\_\backslash text\; \backslash ln(100/11.2)\; \backslash \; =\; 2.19\; v\_\backslash text.$$

If the motor of a new stage is ignited before the previous stage has been discarded and the simultaneously working motors have a different specific impulse (as is often the case with solid rocket boosters and a liquid-fuel stage), the situation is more complicated.

See also

• Delta-v budget
• Jeep problem
• Mass ratio
• Oberth effect - applying delta-v in a gravity well increases the final velocity
• Relativistic rocket
• Reversibility of orbits
• Robert H. Goddard - added terms for gravity and drag in vertical flight
• Spacecraft propulsion
• Stigler’s law of eponymy

External links

• How to derive the rocket equation
• Relativity Calculator – Learn Tsiolkovsky's rocket equations
• Tsiolkovsky's rocket equations plot and calculator in WolframAlpha

Notes and References

1. К. Ціолковскій, Изслѣдованіе мировыхъ пространствъ реактивными приборами, 1903 (available online here in a RARed PDF)
2. Web site: Tsiolkovsky. K.. Reactive Flying Machines.
3. Moore. William. 1810. On the Motion of Rockets both in Nonresisting and Resisting Mediums. Journal of Natural Philosophy, Chemistry & the Arts. 27. 276–285.
4. Book: Moore, William. A Treatise on the Motion of Rockets: to which is added, an Essay on Naval Gunnery, in theory and practice, etc. 1813. G. & S. Robinson. en.
5. К. Ціолковскій, Изслѣдованіе мировыхъ пространствъ реактивными приборами, 1903 (available online here in a RARed PDF)
6. Blanco . Philip . A discrete, energetic approach to rocket propulsion. Physics Education . November 2019 . 54. 6 . 065001 . 10.1088/1361-6552/ab315b. 2019PhyEd..54f5001B . 202130640 .
7. Forward, Robert L. "A Transparent Derivation of the Relativistic Rocket Equation" (see the right side of equation 15 on the last page, with R as the ratio of initial to final mass and w as the exhaust velocity, corresponding to v_e in the notation of this article)
8. Web site: The Tyranny of the Rocket Equation. . en. 2016-04-18. https://web.archive.org/web/20220306084046/https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition30/tryanny.html. 2022-03-06.