2002 Trinidad and Tobago general election explained

Election Name:2002 Trinidad and Tobago general election
Country:Trinidad and Tobago
Type:parliamentary
Previous Election:2001 Trinidad and Tobago general election
Previous Year:2001
Next Election:2007 Trinidad and Tobago general election
Next Year:2007
Majority Seats:19
Turnout:69.6 (3.5 pp)
Leader1:Patrick Manning
Leader Since1:19 December 1986
Party1:People's National Movement
Leaders Seat1:San Fernando East
Last Election1:18 seats, 46.5%
Seats1:
Seat Change1: 2
Popular Vote1:308,762
Percentage1:50.9%
Swing1: 4.4 pp
Leader2:Basdeo Panday
Leader Since2:30 April 1989
Party2:United National Congress
Leaders Seat2:Couva North
Last Election2:18 seats, 49.9%
Seat Change2: 2
Popular Vote2:284,391
Percentage2:46.9%
Swing2: 3.0 pp
Prime Minister
Posttitle:Subsequent Prime Minister
Before Election:Patrick Manning
Before Party:People's National Movement
After Election:Patrick Manning
After Party:People's National Movement

Early general elections were held in Trinidad and Tobago on 7 October 2002,[1] after People's National Movement leader Patrick Manning had failed to secure a majority in the hung parliament produced by the 2001 elections.[2] This time the PNM was able to secure a majority, winning 20 of the 36 seats. Voter turnout was 69.6%.[3]

Background

From 1995–2000, the two major political parties in Trinidad and Tobago, the United National Congress and the People's National Movement competed for political power. Both parties had the same number of representatives in Parliament, however a coalition formed between the UNC and the two-seat National Alliance for Reconstruction allowed the UNC majority status. The 2000 general elections further solidified the UNC's presence in government, as they won a majority of seats. In 2001, early general elections were triggered by a sudden defection of four Representatives from the UNC. In the subsequent elections both the UNC and the PNM won 18 seats in the House of Representatives. With a second lack of majority, both UNC leader Basdeo Panday and PNM leader Patrick Manning agreed to respect the decision of President A. N. R. Robinson, who both parties asked to select a new Prime Minister. Despite the UNC having received 49.9% of the vote to the PNM's 46.5%, Robinson, commending his "moral and spiritual values",[4] selected Manning as Prime Minister. However, without a majority of House of Representative Seats, and faced with a hung parliament, Manning was forced to call for new elections the following year.

Campaign

The lack of political stability in the Trinidad and Tobago government led to a tense election climate. Accusations of ballot box tampering were levied against PNM campaign managers and other political agents. In April 2002 reports indicated that Franklyn Khan, the Minister of Works and Transport and PNM party chairman, along with Eric Williams, the Minister of Energy and Energy Industries, received bribes from a local PNM councilman. Although the reports have not been validated, Khan resigned from his cabinet post in May of the following year.

However, the PNM was not the only political party to face controversy during the nine months between elections. With political control only guaranteed for a short while, the newly established PNM government quickly used political resources to sway the public and taint the reputation of the UNC. Under directives from Manning, several Commissions of Inquiry were established to investigate allegations of UNC corporate and political corruption, bribery, and voter padding.[5] The main focus of PNM investigations was the development of the Piarco Airport. Manning tasked his Commissions to inquire after the nature of contract acquisition and development of the airport, as well as allegations of corruption and fraud by several high-ranking members of the UNC.[4] While the investigations did lead to several instances of corruption and bribery, the Commissions better served the PNM by "severely tarnishing the image of the UNC".[4]

Capitalizing on theatrical and public investigations into UNC misdeeds, and emphasizing a dynamic effort to increase transparency and end corruption, the PNM were able to frame themselves as the party "you can trust" and handily carried the October elections.[6]

Aftermath

The reaction of the government to the process of the 2002 election was irresolute. Historically, elections inflamed otherwise tranquil race relations within Trinidad and Tobago. Immediate reactions to the stymied election were disparate investigations of voter fraud across municipalities.[7] Manning increased the number of parliamentary seats from 36 to 41 in order to prevent any future ties,[8] and also appointed his wife as minister of Education.[9]

Notes and References

  1. [Dieter Nohlen]
  2. Nohlen, p631
  3. Nohlen, p641
  4. Web site: Ghosts of scandals past. Trinidad and Tobago Newsday. 1 November 2009. 7 April 2017.
  5. Premdas. Ralph R.. 2004-01-14. Elections, Identity and Ethnic Conflict in the Caribbean. Pouvoirs dans la Caraïbe. Revue du CRPLC. en. 14. 17–61. 10.4000/plc.246. 1279-8657. free.
  6. Web site: When is the election?. The Trinidad Guardian. 1 July 2007. 7 April 2017. 8 April 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170408082708/http://legacy.guardian.co.tt/archives/2007-07-01/dana.html. dead.
  7. Web site: Mayor Atherly walks free. The Trinidad Guardian. 7 March 2006. 7 April 2017. 8 April 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170408082551/http://legacy.guardian.co.tt/archives/2006-03-07/news11.html. dead.
  8. Web site: The Political Culture of Democracy in Trinidad & Tobago: 2010. Kirton. Raymond Mark. June 2010.
  9. Web site: Trinidad and Tobago 2002. Freedom House. 7 April 2017. 8 April 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170408082603/https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2002/trinidad-and-tobago. dead.