Transnationality Index Explained

The world's top 10 non-financial multinational corporations by Transnationality Index as calculated by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development in 2008[1]
CompanyHome countryIndustryPercent
XstrataUnited KingdomMining & quarrying93.2
ABB GroupSwitzerland and SwedenEngineering services90.4
NokiaFinlandElectrical & electronic equipment90.3
Pernod RicardFranceFood, beverages and tobacco89.1
WPP GroupUnited KingdomBusiness services 88.9
VodafoneUnited KingdomTelecommunications88.6
LindeGermanyChemicals88.3
Anheuser-Busch InBevBelgiumFood, beverages and tobacco87.9
Anglo AmericanUnited KingdomMining & quarrying87.5
ArcelorMittalLuxembourgMetal and metal products 87.2
The Transnationality Index (TNI) is a means of ranking multinational corporations that is employed by economists and politicians. It is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the following three ratios (where "foreign" means outside of the corporation's home country):[2]

The Transnationality Index was developed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.[3] [4]

Multinational corporations are also ranked by the amount of foreign assets that they own. However, the TNI ranking can differ markedly from this. For example, as of 2000, General Electric was the second largest multinational corporation in terms of foreign asset ownership. However, it ranked only 73rd in the overall TNI, with an index score of 40%. Although the company had large investments outside of the United States, most of its sales, employment, and assets were within the United States. In contrast, Exxon has a TNI of 68% and Vodafone has a TNI of 81%. As of 2001, General Electric ranked 75th, with a TNI of 36.7%. The 14 most transnational corporations originated in small countries (Switzerland, the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada), whereas the largest multinational corporations in terms of foreign asset ownership all had low TNI scores. General Motors, the fourth largest multinational corporation in terms of foreign asset ownership only ranked 83rd (30.7%) in the TNI top 100. IBM ranked 50th (53.7%), Volkswagen ranked 45th (55.7%), and Toyota, the sixth largest multinational corporation in terms of foreign asset ownership, only ranked 82nd (30.9%) on the broader TNI scale.

Peter Dicken, an honorary fellow of the School of Environment and Development at the University of Manchester, argues that TNI data refute the assertions of hyperglobalism. The data, he argues, prove false the claim that multinational corporations are "inexorably, and inevitably, abandoning their ties to their country of origin". If that were the case, we would expect the largest multinational corporations to have the majority of their assets, sales, and employment outside of their countries of origin, and thus the majority of those corporations to have high TNIs. In fact, in the UNCTAD TNI data for the top 100 multinational corporations for 2001, the mean TNI is 52.6%, 57 of the 100 have a TNI greater than 50%, and only a mere 16 have a TNI greater than 75%. Thus, he concludes, measured TNI data provide little evidence for multinational corporations having the proportions of their assets, sales, and employees outside of their home countries that one would expect for truly global firms.[5]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Largest Transnational Corporations . https://web.archive.org/web/20120515063939/http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/World%20Investment%20Report/Largest-TNCs.aspx . 2012-05-15.
  2. Book: International Business. Stuart Wall and Bronwen Rees. 24. Pearson Education. 2004. 9780273685913. registration.
  3. https://web.archive.org/web/20041214130037/http://www.unctad.org/sections/dite_dir/docs/wir98br_gray2_en.pdf
  4. Web site: What do Internationalization Indices Measure?. Centre for International Business Studies, London South Bank University. Grazia Ietto-Gillies and Tannis Seccombe-Hett. 1998-10-08.
  5. Book: Global Shift. Peter Dicken. 221–224. SAGE. 2003. 9780761971504.