Totonacan languages explained

Totonacan
Also Known As:Totonac–Tepehua
Region:Mexico
Familycolor:American
Fam1:Totozoquean ?
Protoname:Proto-Totonacan
Glotto:toto1251
Glottorefname:Totonacan
Child1:Tepehua
Child2:Totonac

The Totonacan languages (also known as Totonac–Tepehua languages) are a family of closely related languages spoken by approximately 290,000 Totonac (approx. 280,000) and Tepehua (approx. 10,000) people in the states of Veracruz, Puebla, and Hidalgo in Mexico. At the time of the Spanish conquest Totonacan languages were spoken all along the gulf coast of Mexico.During the colonial period, Totonacan languages were occasionally written and at least one grammar was produced. In the 20th century the number of speakers of most varieties have dwindled as indigenous identity increasingly became stigmatized encouraging speakers to adopt Spanish as their main language.

The Totonacan languages have only recently been compared to other families on the basis of historical-comparative linguistics, though they share numerous areal features with other languages of the Mesoamerican Linguistic Area, such as the Mayan languages and Nahuatl. Recent work suggests a possible genetic link to the Mixe–Zoque language family, although this has yet to be firmly established.

Internal classification

The family is divided into two branches, Totonac and Tepehua. Of the two, Tepehua is generally considered to consist of three languages—Pisaflores, Huehuetla, and Tlachichilco—while the Totonac branch is considerably more diverse. MacKay (1999) divides Totonac into four divisions, based on García Rojas (1978):

, Ethnologue recognizes 12 languages in the Totonacan family, three Tepehua languages and nine Totonac. This classification is the basis of the latest version of the ISO language codes for Totonacan, although some of these classifications are disputed.

LanguageISO codeLocationsNumber of speakers
Huehuetla TepehuaHuehuetla, northeast Hidalgo; Mecapalapa, Puebla3,000 (1982 SIL)
Pisaflores TepehuaPisaflores, Hidalgo; Ixhuatlán de Madero, Veracruz4,000 (1990 census)
Tlachichilco TepehuaTlachichilco, Veracruz3,000 (1990 SIL)
Papantla TotonacAround Papantla, central lowland Veracruz80,000 (1982 SIL)
Coyutla TotonacCoyutla, Veracruz48,000 (2000 WCD)
Highland TotonacAround Zacatlán, Puebla, and Veracruz120,000 (1982 SIL)
Filomeno Mata TotonacThe town of Filomeno Mata, highland Veracruz, adjacent to Highland Totonac 15,000 (2000 WCD)
Xicotepec TotonacIn 30 villages around Xicotepec de Juárez in the Sierra Norte de Puebla and Veracruz3,000 (2000 SIL)
Ozumatlán TotonacOzumatlán, Tepetzintla, Tlapehuala and San Agustín in northern Puebla1,800 (1990 census)
Misantla TotonacYecuatla and Misantla in southern Veracruz500 (1994 SIL)
Upper Necaxa TotonacPatla, Chicontla, Cacahuatlán and San Pedro Tlaloantongo in northeastern Puebla3,400 (2000 INEGI)
Tecpatlán TotonacTecpatlán, northeastern Puebla540 (2000 INEGI)

The Mexican Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas (INALI) recognizes 10 distinct languages or "linguistic variants" in the family, 3 Tepehua and 7 Totonac [1]

Language population (2005 census)
Western Tepehua (also known as Tlachichiloco) 9,200
Northern Tepehua (also known as Pisaflores) 2,800
Southern Tepehua (also known as Huehuetla) 1,800
Southeastern Totonac (also known as Misantla) 490
Coastal (also known as Papantla) 58,200
North Central (also known as Xicotepec) 15,100
South Central (also known as Highland) 114,900
High Central (also known as Filomeno Mata) 8,700
Cerro del Xinolatépetl (also known as Ozumatlán) 1,000
Upper Necaxa 3,300

Coyutla Totonac is grouped with South Central Totonac by INALI while Tecpatlán Totonac is included in the North Central Totonac group. Other recent attempts at classification have suggested that some of these divisions, particularly North Central, Costal, and South Central, and are far too broad and include varieties that might also be classified as separate languages.

A further drawback of the Ethnologue and INALI classifications is the lack of lower-level subgroups beyond the two-way division into Totonac and Tepehua. In the Totonac branch of the family, Misantla is the most distinctive, and the remaining languages form a more closely related group. Divisions amongst the latter group, which might be referred to as "Central Totonac," are unclear, though most researchers agree that there is at least a three-way division between Northern, Southern/Sierra, and Lowland/Coastal varieties. Recent efforts at reconstruction and evidence from lexical similarity further suggest that Southern/Sierra and Lowland group together against Northern, although this is still uncertain, pending more exhaustive investigation. The most recent proposal for the family is as follows:

Lexical comparison also suggests that, for Tepehua, Pisaflores and Huehuetla may be more closely related to each other than either is to Tlalchichilco.

MacKay and Trechsel (2018) provide the following internal classification:

Totonac-Tepehua

Phonology

There is some variation in the sound systems of the different varieties of Totonac and Tepehua, but the following phoneme inventory can be considered a typical Totonacan inventory.

Consonants

LabialAlveolarPalatalVelarUvularGlottal
centrallateral
Nasalpronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/
Plosivepronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/(pronounced as /link/)
pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/
pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/
pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/
This consonant inventory is essentially equivalent to that reconstructed for proto-Totonacan by Arana Osnaya (1953, with the exception of the two back fricatives, pronounced as //x// and pronounced as //h//. Most modern languages phonemically have only one of these, but show some allomorphic variation between the two, with one or the other being considered basic. However, Coatepec Totonac is reported to have both phonemes, and more recent reconstructions of the proto-Totonacan consonant inventory have proposed that both were present in that language. The glottal stop is a marginal phoneme in most of the languages and is posited primarily for morphological reasons. The phonological system is fairly typical of Mesoamerica.

Vowels

Most Totonacan languages have a three-vowel system with each quality making distinctions of length and laryngealization. The following is the "typical" Totonacan vocalic inventory.

Front! colspan="2"
CentralBack
  creaky plaincreaky plaincreaky plain
Closepronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/pronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/
Openpronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/ pronounced as /link/

Tepehua has lost the phonemic laryngealization of vowels and has ejective stops where Totonac has creaky vowels preceded by stops. Some Totonac languages have five-vowel systems, having developed pronounced as //e// and pronounced as //o// phonemes, whereas in others pronounced as /[e]/ and pronounced as /[o]/ are clearly allomorphs of pronounced as //i// and pronounced as //u//, respectively, conditioned by proximity to uvular stops or fricatives.

Grammar

From a typological perspective, the Totonac–Tepehua family presents a fairly consistent profile, and exhibits many features of the Mesoamerican areal type, such as a preference for verb-initial order, head-marking, and extensive use of body part morphemes in metaphorical and locative constructions. The Totonacan languages are highly agglutinative and polysynthetic with nominative/accusative alignment and a flexible constituent order governed by information structure. Syntactic relations between the verb and its arguments are marked by agreement with the subject and one or sometimes two objects. There is no morphological case on nouns and many languages in the family lack prepositions, making use instead of a rich system of causatives, applicatives, and prefixes for body parts and parts of objects. Possession is marked on the possessed noun, the head of the NP. Otherwise, nouns are uninflected, number being an optional category and grammatical gender being absent from the languages. Numerals quantifying nouns bear classificatory prefixes, something that is unusual cross-linguistically as affixal classifiers tend heavily to be suffixes. Totonacan languages are also known for their use of sound symbolism.

Causatives and applicatives

Totonacan languages have a wide assortment of morphemes for increasing the valency of a verb.

Causatives

All Totonacan languages have at least one causative morpheme, a prefix ma:-:

Filomeno Mata Totonac

Pisaflores Tepehua

In many of the languages, the causative prefix is regularly or obligatorily associated with a suffix:

Upper Necaxa Totonac

In some languages like Upper Necaxa, the suffix is analyzed as part of the causative morpheme, but in others it is treated as a separate transitivizer.

Dative/benefactive applicative

One of the most frequently used valency-increasing affixes in the Totonacan languages is the dative or benefactive suffix:

Ozelonacaxtla Totonac

Cerro Xinolatépetl Totonac

Comitative applicative

All the languages of the family have a comitative construction in which both an actor and a co-actor of a verb are specified. For instance, in Huehuetla Tepehua a verb such as tamakahuːn 'stay, be in a place' is intransitive but can take a comitative prefix to form a verb ta̰ːtamakahuːn meaning 'stay with someone', someone being the co-actor:

Huehuetla Tepehua

Similarly, the Papantla Totonac verb muxuː ‘bury something’ is transitive but becomes ditransitive when it takes the comitative prefix:

Papantla Totonac

Instrumental applicative

The third applicative prefix that is shared across the family is analyzed in most of the languages as an instrumental applicative and is used to add an object used as an instrument or a means to a clause:

Olintla Totonac

Misantla Totonac

In some of the languages, the instrumental can also be used for the expression of motives:

Upper Necaxa Totonac

Tlachichilco Tepehua

As seen in the last example, this prefix is ɬi- in Tepehua languages rather than liː- as it is in Totonac, and in Tlachichilco and Huehuetla it is analyzed as a directional ("DIR") rather than an instrumental. The prefix seems to be less frequent in Tepehua than in Totonac.

Body-part prefixation

The Totonacan languages exhibit a phenomenon similar to noun incorporation whereby special prefixing combining forms of body-parts may be added to verbs. When these prefixes are added, they generally serve to delimit the verb's locus of affect; that is, they indicate which part of the subject or object is affected by the action.

Huehuetla Tepehua

The prefixes can also be used to specify the shape of an affected object:

Papantla Totonac

It is worthwhile to note that the prefixation does not decrease the valency of the verb, differentiating this process from true noun incorporation as the term is usually understood.

Another important role that bodypart prefixes play in Totonacan languages is in the formulation of expressions of the spatial location of objects, which combine a part-prefix with one of four posture verbs (words for ’sit’, ‘stand’, ‘lie’, and ‘be high’):

Upper Necaxa Totonac

These constructions alternate with expressions using the independent (full) form of the part as a preposition-like element:

Upper Necaxa Totonac

In the last sentence, the independent form of a̰kpuː- is formed by combining this prefix with a base -n which is sometimes (as here) analyzed as a nominalizing suffix. Because words for body parts are inflected for possession, a̰kpuːn has a third-person singular possessive prefix, linking it to Spanish; Castilian: mesa, the object on whose crown the book is located (see the section below on Possessive constructions).

Possessive constructions

Possessive constructions in Totonacan languages are marked on the possessed noun rather than on the possessor noun:

Upper Necaxa Totonac

The person of the possessor is indicated by a prefix and the number of the possessor by a suffix, as shown by the follow paradigm from Upper Necaxa:

plural
kin–kṵ́šḭ kin–kṵ́šḭ–ka̰n
min–kṵ́šḭ min–kṵ́šḭ–ka̰n
ḭš–kṵ́šḭ ḭš–kṵ́šḭ–ka̰n
In several of the languages, kinship terms and words referring to parts of the body and objects are inherently possessed—that is, they are obligatorily marked for a possessor. When an inherently possessed noun is used in a generic expression, a special indefinite possessor prefix (ša- in most of the languages that have it) is used—e.g. Upper Necaxa šapúškṵ .

Numerals

Numerals in Totonacan languages are bound roots that require a classificatory prefix which changes based on the type, shape or measure of object being counted. This is illustrated for one of the languages Upper Necaxa Totonac in the table below:

maktin čoʍ
‘one tortilla’
pḛʔtin pa̰ʔɬma̰
‘one leaf’
ʔentin kḭwḭ
‘one stick’
paːtin ɬa̰mam
‘one pot’
puːlaktin sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘one banana tree’
mustin sḛ́ːʔna'
‘one full bunch of bananas’
kilhmaktin sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘one small bunch of bananas’
heːtin sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘one banana’
maktṵ́ čoʍ
‘two tortillas’
pḛʔtṵ pa̰ʔɬma̰
‘two leaves’
ʔentṵ kḭwḭ
‘two sticks’
paːtṵ ɬa̰mam
‘two pots’
puːlaktuː sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘two banana trees’
mustṵ sḛ́ːʔna'
‘two full bunches of bananas’
kilhmaktṵ sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘two small bunches of bananas’
heːtṵ sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘two bananas’
maktṵtun čoʍ
‘three tortillas’
pḛʔtṵtun pa̰ʔɬma̰
‘three leaves’
ʔentṵtun kḭwḭ
‘three sticks’
paːtṵtun ɬa̰mam
‘three pots’
puːlaktṵtun sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘three banana trees’
mustṵtun sḛ́ːʔna'
‘three full bunches of bananas’
kilhmaktṵtun sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘three small bunches of bananas’
heːtṵtun sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘four bananas’
makta̰ːtḭ čoʍ
‘four tortillas’
pḛʔta̰ːtḭ pa̰ʔɬma̰
‘four leaves’
ʔenta̰ːtḭ kḭwḭ
‘four sticks’
paːta̰ːtḭ ɬa̰mam
‘four pots’
puːtṵtun sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘four banana trees’
mustṵtun sḛ́ːʔna'
‘four full bunches of bananas’
kilhmaktṵtun sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘four small bunches of bananas’
heːtṵtun sḛ́ːʔna̰
‘four bananas’

In total, Upper Necaxa has around 30 classificatory prefixes.

The following table compares the numeral bases of six Totonacan languages.

TepehuaTotonac
Huehuetla Pisaflores TlachichilcoUpper
Necaxa
Papantla Misantla
1 -tam -tam -tawm-tin -tum-tun
2 -t’ui -t’ui -t’ui-tṵ -tṵy-tṵʔ
3 -t’utu -t’utu -t’útu-tṵtún -tṵ́:tu -atún
4 -t’at’ɪ -t’aːt’i -t’áːt’i-táːtḭ -táːtḭ -ta̰ːt
5 -kis -kiːs -kiːs-kitsís -kitsís -kítsis
6 -čašan -čášan -čášan-čašán -čašán -čaːšán
7 -tuhun -tuhún -tuhún-toxón -tuxún -tuhún
8 -ts’ahin -tsahín -tsahín-tsayán -tsayán -tsiyán
9-nahats -naháːtsi -naháːtsi-naxáːtsa -naxáːtsa -naháːtsa
10 -kau -kaw -kaw-kaux -kaw -kaːwi

Sound symbolism

A prominent feature of Totonacan languages is the presence of sound symbolism.[2] The most common (but by no means only) sound-symbolic pattern in Totonacan involves fricative alterations, typically /s/ ~ /š/ ~ /ɬ/ and occasionally /ts/ ~ /č/ ~ /š/ correlated either with increasingly more energetic or forceful action or with the size of an event participant, as in the following examples from Upper Necaxa Totonac:

laŋs ‘hand striking hard’
laŋš ‘blow striking with force’
laŋɬ ‘blow striking with great force’
    spipispipi ‘small person or animal trembling’
špipišpipi ‘person or animal shivering or shaking slightly’
ɬpipiɬpipi ‘person or animal shaking or having convulsions’
Comparative as well as language-internal evidence suggests that the pattern of consonantal alternations may have their origins in affixes indicating grade—s- ‘diminutive‘, š- ‘medium’, ɬ- ‘augmentative’).[3] In general, the productivity of the sound-symbolic alternations is highly variable within and across languages of the family, and many languages preserve for a given stem only one of a set of two or three alternates that can be reconstructed for proto-Totonacan.

Totonacan vocabulary

The following selection of Proto-Totonacan reconstructions and descendants is taken from MacKay and Trechsel (2018),[4] using data from several other studies. The reconstructions and descendants are written in Americanist notation.

TotonacTepehua
Proto-Totonacan
  • ɬk’ak’a
'ash(es)'ɬká̰kɬka̰ka̰nɬka̰kánɬká̰ka̰ɬka̰ka̰ɬkakáʔɬká̰ka̰ɬká̰ka̰ɬk’ák’aɬk’ak’aɬk’ák’a
  • ƛaha-ya
'wins; earns'ɬáaháƛaháɬaxáƛaháƛahayƛaha-ƛaháyƛaháɬaháayɬaháyɬaháay
  • q’aaši
'gourd'qá̰a̰šqa̰a̰šʔa̰a̰šqá̰a̰šiqa̰a̰šḭqa:šíʔqá̰a̰šḭqá̰a̰šḭʔá̰a̰šiʔaašʔaš
  • ¢’uq’-ya
'writes'¢ɔ̰́χ¢o̰qa¢ó̰ʔa¢ɔ́qḁ¢o̰qa¢uqa¢ɔ̰qnán¢ó̰qa¢’ɔ́ʔa¢’oqa¢’oʔa
  • p’ašni
'pig'pá̰šnḭpa̰šnḭpá̰šnḭpá̰šn̥i̥pa̰šnḭpašniʔpá̰šnḭpa̰šniɓá̰šn̥i̥p’ašp’ašni
  • kiɬni
'mouth'kíɬnḭkiɬnḭkíɬnḭkíɬni̥̰kiɬnḭkiɬniʔkíɬnḭkiɬnikíɬn̥i̥kiɬkiɬna
  • čiwiš
'stone'čɪ́wɪščiwiščiwíščíwiščíwiščɪ́wiščíwiščíwiščíʔṵši̥čiiuščíyuš
  • maa-ɬi
'is lying down'má̰a̰ɬma̰a̰maaɬmáa̰hma̰hmáhmáaɬmaaɬmaa

Media

Totonacan-language programming is carried by the CDI's radio station XECTZ-AM, broadcasting from Cuetzalan, Puebla.

External links

Bibliography

Notes and References

  1. Población de 5 años y más hablante de alguna lengua indígena y número de localidades por variante lingüística según sexo. Linguistic Variants of Mexico by Gender, 2000 .
  2. (See,,,,,, and .
  3. (see,, and).
  4. MacKay. Carolyn J.. Trechsel. Frank R.. An alternative reconstruction of Proto-Totonac-Tepehua. International Journal of American Linguistics. January 2018. 84. 51–92. The University of Chicago. 10.1086/694609. 148972240.