In algebraic topology, the Betti numbers are used to distinguish topological spaces based on the connectivity of n-dimensional simplicial complexes. For the most reasonable finite-dimensional spaces (such as compact manifolds, finite simplicial complexes or CW complexes), the sequence of Betti numbers is 0 from some point onward (Betti numbers vanish above the dimension of a space), and they are all finite.
The nth Betti number represents the rank of the nth homology group, denoted Hn, which tells us the maximum number of cuts that can be made before separating a surface into two pieces or 0-cycles, 1-cycles, etc.[1] For example, if
Hn(X)\cong0
bn(X)=0
Hn(X)\congZ
bn(X)=1
Hn(X)\congZ ⊕ Z
bn(X)=2
Hn(X)\congZ ⊕ Z ⊕ Z
bn(X)=3
Hn(X)\congZk ⊕ Z/(2)
Z/(2)
bn(X)=k
The term "Betti numbers" was coined by Henri Poincaré after Enrico Betti. The modern formulation is due to Emmy Noether. Betti numbers are used today in fields such as simplicial homology, computer science and digital images.
Informally, the kth Betti number refers to the number of k-dimensional holes on a topological surface. A "k-dimensional hole" is a k-dimensional cycle that is not a boundary of a (k+1)-dimensional object.
The first few Betti numbers have the following definitions for 0-dimensional, 1-dimensional, and 2-dimensional simplicial complexes:
Thus, for example, a torus has one connected surface component so b0 = 1, two "circular" holes (one equatorial and one meridional) so b1 = 2, and a single cavity enclosed within the surface so b2 = 1.
Another interpretation of bk is the maximum number of k-dimensional curves that can be removed while the object remains connected. For example, the torus remains connected after removing two 1-dimensional curves (equatorial and meridional) so b1 = 2.[2]
The two-dimensional Betti numbers are easier to understand because we can see the world in 0, 1, 2, and 3-dimensions.
For a non-negative integer k, the kth Betti number bk(X) of the space X is defined as the rank (number of linearly independent generators) of the abelian group Hk(X), the kth homology group of X. The kth homology group is
Hk=\ker\deltak/\operatorname{Im}\deltak+1
\deltak
More generally, given a field F one can define bk(X, F), the kth Betti number with coefficients in F, as the vector space dimension of Hk(X, F).
The Poincaré polynomial of a surface is defined to be the generating function of its Betti numbers. For example, the Betti numbers of the torus are 1, 2, and 1; thus its Poincaré polynomial is
1+2x+x2
Given a topological space which has a finitely generated homology, the Poincaré polynomial is defined as the generating function of its Betti numbers, via the polynomial where the coefficient of
xn
bn
Consider a topological graph G in which the set of vertices is V, the set of edges is E, and the set of connected components is C. As explained in the page on graph homology, its homology groups are given by:
Hk(G)=\begin{cases}Z|C|&k=0\\ Z|E|+|C|-|V|&k=1\\ \{0\}&otherwise \end{cases}
This may be proved straightforwardly by mathematical induction on the number of edges. A new edge either increments the number of 1-cycles or decrements the number of connected components.
Therefore, the "zero-th" Betti number b0(G) equals |C|, which is simply the number of connected components.[3]
The first Betti number b1(G) equals |E| + |C| - |V|. It is also called the cyclomatic number—a term introduced by Gustav Kirchhoff before Betti's paper.[4] See cyclomatic complexity for an application to software engineering.
All other Betti numbers are 0.
Consider a simplicial complex with 0-simplices: a, b, c, and d, 1-simplices: E, F, G, H and I, and the only 2-simplex is J, which is the shaded region in the figure. There is one connected component in this figure (b0); one hole, which is the unshaded region (b1); and no "voids" or "cavities" (b2).
This means that the rank of
H0
H1
H2
The Betti number sequence for this figure is 1, 1, 0, 0, ...; the Poincaré polynomial is
1+x
The homology groups of the projective plane P are:[5]
Hk(P)=\begin{cases}Z&k=0\ Z2&k=1\ \{0\}&otherwise\end{cases}
Here, Z2 is the cyclic group of order 2. The 0-th Betti number is again 1. However, the 1-st Betti number is 0. This is because H1(P) is a finite group - it does not have any infinite component. The finite component of the group is called the torsion coefficient of P. The (rational) Betti numbers bk(X) do not take into account any torsion in the homology groups, but they are very useful basic topological invariants. In the most intuitive terms, they allow one to count the number of holes of different dimensions.
For a finite CW-complex K we have
\chi(K)=
infty(-1) | |
\sum | |
i=0 |
ibi(K,F),
where
\chi(K)
For any two spaces X and Y we have
PX x =PXPY,
where
PX
PX(z)=b0(X)+b1(X)z+
2 | |
b | |
2(X)z |
+ … ,
If X is n-dimensional manifold, there is symmetry interchanging
k
n-k
k
bk(X)=bn-k(X),
under conditions (a closed and oriented manifold); see Poincaré duality.
The dependence on the field F is only through its characteristic. If the homology groups are torsion-free, the Betti numbers are independent of F. The connection of p-torsion and the Betti number for characteristic p, for p a prime number, is given in detail by the universal coefficient theorem (based on Tor functors, but in a simple case).
the Poincaré polynomial is
1+x
the Poincaré polynomial is
(1+x)3=1+3x+3x2+x3
the Poincaré polynomial is
(1+x)n
It is possible for spaces that are infinite-dimensional in an essential way to have an infinite sequence of non-zero Betti numbers. An example is the infinite-dimensional complex projective space, with sequence 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, ... that is periodic, with period length 2.In this case the Poincaré function is not a polynomial but rather an infinite series
1+x2+x4+...b
which, being a geometric series, can be expressed as the rational function
1 | |
1-x2 |
.
More generally, any sequence that is periodic can be expressed as a sum of geometric series, generalizing the above. For example
a,b,c,a,b,c,...,
\left(a+bx+cx2\right)/\left(1-x3\right)
and more generally linear recursive sequences are exactly the sequences generated by rational functions; thus the Poincaré series is expressible as a rational function if and only if the sequence of Betti numbers is a linear recursive sequence.
The Poincaré polynomials of the compact simple Lie groups are:
\begin{align} PSU(n+1)(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x5\right) … \left(1+x2n+1\right)\\ PSO(2n+1)(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x7\right) … \left(1+x4n-1\right)\\ PSp(n)(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x7\right) … \left(1+x4n-1\right)\\ PSO(2n)(x)&=\left(1+x2n-1\right)\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x7\right) … \left(1+x4n-5\right)\\
P | |
G2 |
(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x11\right)\\
P | |
F4 |
(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x11\right)\left(1+x15\right)\left(1+x23\right)\\
P | |
E6 |
(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x9\right)\left(1+x11\right)\left(1+x15\right)\left(1+x17\right)\left(1+x23\right)\\
P | |
E7 |
(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x11\right)\left(1+x15\right)\left(1+x19\right)\left(1+x23\right)\left(1+x27\right)\left(1+x35\right)\\
P | |
E8 |
(x)&=\left(1+x3\right)\left(1+x15\right)\left(1+x23\right)\left(1+x27\right)\left(1+x35\right)\left(1+x39\right)\left(1+x47\right)\left(1+x59\right) \end{align}
In geometric situations when
X
There is an alternate reading, namely that the Betti numbers give the dimensions of spaces of harmonic forms. This requires the use of some of the results of Hodge theory on the Hodge Laplacian.
Ni
bi(X)-bi-1(X)+ … \leNi-Ni-1+ … .
Edward Witten gave an explanation of these inequalities by using the Morse function to modify the exterior derivative in the de Rham complex.