| 4-8-4 (Northern) | |
| Uic/Germany/Italy: | 2′D2′ |
| French/Spanish: | 242 |
| Turkish: | 48 |
| Swiss: | 4/8 |
| Russian: | 2-4-2 |
| Date2: | 1926 |
| Country2: | United States |
| Locomotive2: | NP class A |
| Railway2: | Northern Pacific Railway |
| Designer2: | American Locomotive Company |
| Builder2: | American Locomotive Company |
| Evolvedfrom2: | 4-8-2, 4-6-4 |
| Mainbenefit2: | Deeper firebox than the 4-8-2. |
Under the Whyte notation for the classification of steam locomotives, represents the wheel arrangement of four leading wheels on two axles, eight powered and coupled driving wheels on four axles and four trailing wheels on two axles. The type was first used by the Northern Pacific Railway, and initially named the Northern Pacific, but railfans and railroad employees have shortened the name since its introduction. It is most-commonly known as a Northern.
The wheel arrangement was a progression from the Mountain type and, like the Berkshire and Hudson types, an example of the "Super Power" concept in steam locomotive design that made use of the larger firebox that could be supported by a four-wheel trailing truck, which allowed greater production of steam. The four-wheel leading truck gave stability at speed and the eight driving wheels gave greater adhesion. The type evolved in the United States soon after the Lima Locomotive Works introduced the concept of "Lima Super Power" in 1925, making heavy 2-8-2 and 2-8-4 locomotives. The prototype was built by American Locomotive Company (ALCO) for the Northern Pacific Railway (NP) in 1926, with a very large firebox with a 100square feet grate, designed to burn low quality lignite coal. The four-wheel trailing truck weighed about 15000lb more than two-wheel trucks of the time and could carry an additional 55000lb of engine weight; the difference of 40000lb was available for increased boiler capacity.[1]
The type arrived when nearly all the important steam locomotive design improvements had already been proven, including Superheaters, mechanical stokers, outside valve gear and the Delta trailing truck. One-piece, cast steel bed-frames with integrally cast cylinders gave the strength and rigidity to use Roller bearings. In 1930, the Timken Company used the Timken 1111, a built by ALCO with roller bearings on all axles, to demonstrate the value of their sealed roller bearings. The Timken 1111 was subsequently sold to the NP, where it became NP No. 2626, their sole Class A-1 locomotive.[1]
The stability of the wheel arrangement meant that driving wheels up to 80inches diameter could be used for high speed passenger and fast freight operation. Lateral control devices allowed these locomotives to traverse relatively sharp curves despite their drivers. The increased boiler size possible with this type, together with the high axle loads permitted on mainlines in North America, resulted in the design of some massive locomotives, some of which weighed as much as 450 tons, including the tender. The was suitable for both express passenger and fast freight service, though it was not suited to heavy drag freight trains.[1]
Although locomotives of the wheel arrangement were used in a number of countries, those that were developed outside North America included various design features which set them apart from North American practice. Scaled down examples of the type were exported by two American builders, ALCO and Baldwin Locomotive Works, for lines in Brazil. Most were two-cylinder locomotives, but five classes of three-cylinder s were built:
Since the was first used by the Northern Pacific Railway, the type was named "Northern". Most North American railroads used this name, but some adopted different names.
The Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad (RFP) gave each of its three classes a separate name, the "General" of 1937, the "Governor" of 1938 and the "Statesman" of 1944.
The big-wheeled was at home on heavy passenger trains and quite capable of speeds over 100mph, but freight was the primary revenue source of the railroads; in that service the Northern had limitations. The adhesive weight on a was limited to about 60% of the engine's weight, not including the dead weight of the tender. Henry Bowen, the Chief Mechanical Engineer of the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) from 1928 to 1949, tested the first two CPR K-1a Northerns introduced by his predecessor, then he designed a Selkirk type using the same boiler. The resulting T-1a Selkirk locomotive had the same number of axles as the Northern, but the driving wheels were reduced from 75inchesto(-)63inchesin (to(-)in) in diameter, while the additional pair of driving wheels increased the tractive effort by 27%. In a later variant, Bowen added a booster to the trailing truck, enabling the Selkirk to exert nearly 50% more tractive effort than the similar-sized K-1a Northern.
When it was demonstrated that a three-unit EMD F3 diesel-electric consist that weighed slightly less than the total engine and tender mass of a CPR K-1a Northern could produce nearly three times its tractive effort, high-powered steam locomotives were retired as quickly as finance allowed.
A total of twenty-three locomotives operated in Australia, built to three distinct designs.
In 1929, the ten gauge South Australian Railways 500 class Mountain types of 1926 were equipped with steam boosters in the form of small auxiliary steam engines to increase their power. This necessitated the replacement of their two-wheel trailing trucks with four-wheel bogies. The booster contributed an additional 8000lbf to the tractive effort and permitted an increase in the locomotive's load across the Mount Lofty Ranges to 540 tons. In their new configuration, they were reclassified to 500B class.[2]
In 1943, the first of twelve streamlined South Australian Railways 520 class locomotives were delivered from the Islington Workshops in Adelaide. Although they were large locomotives, they were designed to run on lightly constructed 60lb/yd track, with the engine's weight being spread over eight axles. Their 660NaN0-diameter coupled wheels were specially balanced for 70mph running.[3]
The H class three-cylinder of the Victorian Railways, built in 1941, was designed for heavy passenger work on the line between Melbourne and Adelaide. Nicknamed Heavy Harry, it was the largest steam locomotive built in Australia and, after the NSWGR D57 4-8-2 and the South Australian Railways 500/500B class, the third-most-powerful non-articulated locomotive. It was one of the five Australian classes of three-cylinder locomotives.
Construction of three locomotives commenced at the Newport Workshops in 1939 and three sets of frames were manufactured. Although work was halted due to the outbreak of the Second World War, a shortage of motive power caused by increased wartime traffic resulted in authorisation being given for the completion of class leader H220. The locomotive went into service on 7 February 1941, but remained the sole member of the class because the other two partly-built locomotives were never completed. Since the necessary upgrades to the Adelaide line was deferred, H220 operated only on the line between Melbourne and Albury in New South Wales.[4] [5]
To meet the acute locomotive shortages in Brazil after the Second World War, 27 scaled down American Niágara locomotives were ordered by the Brazilian Portuguese: i=unset|Departamento Nacional de Estradas de Ferro (DNEF) from ALCO in 1946. These locomotives were supplied to the Portuguese: i=unset|[[Augusto Pestana (politician)#Congressman, founder of the Railway Company of Rio Grande do Sul and State Secretary|Viação Férrea do Rio Grande do Sul]] (VFRGS), which then purchased another fifteen directly from ALCO in 1947. They were designated the 1001 class. In 1956 and 1957, some of them were sold to Bolivia. The Baldwin Locomotive Works supplied similar locomotives to the Portuguese: i=unset|Rede Mineira de Viação (RMV no. 601 to 604), the Portuguese: i=unset|Rede de Viação Paraná-Santa Catarina (RVPSC no. 801 to 806) and the Portuguese: i=unset|Noroeste do Brasil (NOB no. 621 to 623).[6]
After his retirement from the French: i=unset|Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) in France, French engineer André Chapelon was appointed as the chief designer of locomotives at the French state-owned sales consortium French: i=unset|Groupement d'exportation de locomotives en Sud-Amérique (GELSA). In 1949, a contract was signed between DNEF and GELSA for the construction of 24 locomotives with a 131NaN1 axle load. The order also included 66 Berkshires. All ninety locomotives were delivered by January 1953.
The 24 class 242F Niágara locomotives were built by Société de Construction des Batignolles . They were two-cylinder simple expansion locomotives, designed to burn poor quality local coal with a low calorific thermal value, with coupled wheels of 600NaN0 diameter and a grate area of 58square feet. They were coupled to big tenders which a coal capacity of 181NaN1. The Belpaire firebox included a combustion chamber and the boiler pressure was a high 18atm. One member of the class was tested on the Reseau Breton line in France before being shipped to Brazil.[7]
The DNEF allocated the locomotives to four of Brazil's state railways. Under Brazilian railway conditions, these modern locomotives were not popular with local railwaymen and were not used as much as had been hoped. Their maximum axle load of 131NaN1 restricted their usefulness, as did their long tenders. In some places the turntables were too short to turn the locomotives and they had to be turned on triangles. In addition, the building specifications had called for a locomotive capable of a maximum speed of 80km/h and the ability to negotiate curves with a minimum radius of 80m (260feet). This last point proved to be a source of contention when it was later discovered that the curves in some places were of less than 50m (160feet) radius. As a consequence, the locomotives were involved in a number of derailments.
In the late 1960s, they were relegated down from first class passenger trains. Some locomotives, allocated to Southern Brazil, were also tried in Bolivia.
Since the Canadian mainlines were generally laid with 115lb/yd rail, Canadian were heavy and weighed in with axle loads up to .
When the Canadian National Railway (CN) introduced its first in 1927, it used the name "Confederation" for the type, to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Canadian Confederation. The CN employed a total of 160 Confederation locomotives.
The Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) experimented with the wheel arrangement in 1928, when two K-1a class locomotives were built in its Angus shops in Montreal, the first locomotives to be built with a one-piece cast-steel frame in Canada. However, since the CPR mainlines were built to high standards, the railway preferred to develop the Hudson type for passenger work since it gave adequate power and was cheaper to maintain, while a ten-coupled type, the Selkirk, was adopted for heavy-duty work. Nevertheless, although the two CPR Northerns remained orphans, they proved their worth continuously for 25 years on overnight passenger trains between Montreal and Toronto. Before their retirement in 1960, they were converted to oil-burners and worked freight trains in the prairie provinces.[9] [10]
In 1936, the German builder Henschel & Son supplied ten gauge locomotives to the Spanish; Castilian: i=unset|Ferrocarriles del Estado (State Railways or FdE) of Chile, designated the Spanish; Castilian: Tipo 100. They were called Spanish; Castilian: Super Montañas (Super Mountains), since they followed the Spanish; Castilian: Tipo 80 Mountain that was introduced six years earlier. They were equipped with mechanical stokers and Vanderbilt tenders and weighed 185 tonnes in working order. On test, they produced 2355ihp at a coal consumption of 34kg/km and a water consumption of 274L per kilometre. The design was not repeated, however, and the FdE returned to the wheel arrangement with its subsequent acquisitions. The Spanish; Castilian: Tipo 100 was used on the line from Almeda to Talca until it was replaced by diesels in 1969. One of them, no. 1009, is preserved in the Santiago Railway Museum.[11]
In 1933, the Beijing–Hankou Railway in China needed new locomotives for their Guangzhou to Shaoguan line, where gradients of around two percent, curves with less than 250m (820feet) radius and low capacity bridges existed. The requirement was therefore for a locomotive with high tractive effort and a low axle load. In 1935 and 1936, 24 600-series locomotives, designed and built in the United Kingdom by Vulcan Foundry, were delivered to the railway. The locomotives represented a significant improvement over previous designs and incorporated a more efficient E-type superheater and duplex steam valve to allow better steaming without enlarging the boiler, while the wheel arrangement allowed better weight distribution.
When the Changsha–Guangzhou Railway was completed in October 1936, the locomotives were transferred to operate over the northern section between Hankou and Changsha on this new mainline, which connected Guangzhou with Tianjin and Beijing.
Following the establishment of the People's Republic of China, the locomotives were designated the China Railways KF class. Some of the locomotives survived in service until the early 1970s. One of them, no. 607, is preserved at the National Railway Museum in the United Kingdom[12] and another is in China at the Beijing Railway Museum.
The 60 T tank engines of Czechoslovak State Railways' 477 class represent the ultimate development of the CKD 4-8-2 tender locomotive, but added a four-wheel trailing truck as part of the conversion to a tank locomotive. One of five classes of three cylinder locomotives known, they were the last steam locomotives delivered to the Czechoslovak State Railways, with the last group built in 1955. Used primarily in local passenger service, they were pulling regularly timetabled trains as late as 1981. Three are preserved, as of 2018 two of them were still operational (013 and 043).[13] [14] [15]
The lone prototype, numbered 242A1, of the French: i=unset|Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français (SNCF) was one of the five known classes of three-cylinder locomotives. It also had the distinction, along with an experimental high pressure locomotive of the New York Central Railroad in the United States, of being one of the two compound . It was rebuilt by Andre Chapelon from the unsuccessful 1932 three-cylinder simple expansion locomotive no. 241.101 of the French: i=unset|[[Chemins de Fer de l'État]] into a compound locomotive. This remarkable locomotive achieved extraordinary power outputs and efficiency in coal and water consumption, but no further examples were built since the SNCF focused on electric traction for its future motive power development.[16]
No. 242A1 was put through trials on many test runs which showed that this locomotive was equal in power output to the existing SNCF electric locomotives at the time. Here, for the first time in Europe, was a steam locomotive with a 201NaN1 axle load which was not only at least as powerful as the most powerful existing high-speed electric locomotive, but which could repeatedly achieve its maximum power without any mechanical trouble. Developing 5300ihp and with 656790NaN0 of peak tractive effort and 462250NaN0 of mean tractive effort; nothing in Europe could match it.
While no. 242A1 was being tested, electrical engineers were designing the locomotives for the 512km (318miles) line between Paris and Lyon, which was to be electrified. An electric locomotive that was to be slightly more powerful than the successful Paris to Orléans 2-D-2 type electric locomotive was being contemplated. When the test results of no. 242A1 became known, however, the design was hurriedly changed to incorporate the maximum capacity possible with a 231NaN1 axle load, resulting in the 1441NaN1 9100 class with a power output of more than 1000hp more than that of the original design.
The performances of the Mistral and other heavy passenger express trains would therefore not have been so outstanding if no. 242A1 had not existed and Andre Chapelon therefore indirectly influenced French electric locomotive design. In addition, no. 242A1 demonstrated the suitability of the Sauvage-Smith system of compounding for French conditions and the designs for future French steam locomotives that were prepared but never produced, were to make use of the Sauvage-Smith compounding system.
In service, no. 242A1 was allocated to the Le Mans depot and, between 1950 and 1960, it hauled express trains over the 411km (255miles) between Le Mans and Brest. It did not remain in service long, however, and was withdrawn and scrapped in 1960.
In 1939, the Deutsche Reichsbahn placed two prototype three-cylinder DRB Class 06 2D2-h3 heavy express locomotives in service, built by Krupp in 1938. Along with the lone 242A1 of the French: i=unset|Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français (SNCF) and the lone Victorian Railways H class in Australia, it was one of the five known classes of three-cylinder locomotives. Due to the outbreak of the Second World War and construction problems, only the two locomotives were produced.
With three 520by cylinders, large 20002NaN2 diameter coupled wheels, a high 280psi boiler pressure and 55800lbf of tractive effort, they were capable of a maximum speed of 140km/h and could haul a 650 tonne train at 120km/h. Many parts, such as the boiler, were standardised with that of the DRG Class 45 heavy freight locomotive. The streamlined Class 06, the only German, was the biggest steam locomotive ever built in Germany. The two locomotives were shedded in Frankfurt and were placed in service on the line to Erfurt. No. 06.002 was bombed and destroyed during the hostilities and no. 06.001 survived until 1951, when it was retired and scrapped.[17]
The boiler of both the 06 and 45 were designed along the lines of Robert Garbe and Richard Paul "Kunibald" Wagner, who held that a combustion chamber or double-expansion compound steam engines were unnecessary when using superheated steam. While the DB railways in the FRG salvaged the Class 45 design by fitting it with a badly-needed mechanical stoker, there was no need for the powerful Class 06 Express locos; when express traffic resumed, DB Class V 200 and DB Class E 10 Diesel-hydraulic and AC electric engines made any investment into pre-World War II steam engines unacceptable for the DB leadership even though Friedrich Witte or Adolph Giesl-Gieslingen proposed many improvements.
In 1946, the Spanish; Castilian: i=unset|[[Ferrocarriles Nacionales de México]] (N de M) placed orders with American Locomotive Company and Baldwin Locomotive Works for sixty Niágara locomotives for use on its principal express passenger services on upgraded lines, but the order was reduced to 32 in favour of diesel-electric locomotives. These QR-1 class locomotives were used mainly on lines north of Mexico City and were nicknamed Spanish; Castilian: La Maquina. All were taken out of service in the late 1960s. Most survived and No. 3028, although not in operating condition, was stored on the deadline at the New Hope and Ivyland Railroad in New Hope, Pennsylvania.
New Zealand adopted the narrow gauge to minimise railway construction costs and, due to the mountainous terrain, the loading gauge was restricted to a maximum height of 11feet and width of 8feet, making it one of the most restrictive loading gauges in the world. While this undoubtedly reduced the cost of building the two hundred-odd tunnels on the railway system, it posed major problems for locomotive designers which were exacerbated by an axle load limit of 141NaN1.[18]
After the Soviet Union and South Africa, the New Zealand Railways Department (NZR) had the largest fleet of locomotives outside North America, with 71 similar locomotives in the K class, KA class and KB class.[18]
The K class was designed by R.J. Gard to the requirements of Locomotive Superintendent P.R. Angus and was built locally at the Hutt Workshops of the NZR. The first locomotives were delivered during the depths of the Great Depression in 1932. The 47square feet grate and comparatively large boiler was slung low on a narrow frame to keep within the height restrictions, and width restrictions were adhered to with sloped cab sides and the mounting of two single stage air compressors in front of the smokebox.[18] [19]
After the construction of thirty K class locomotives, the NZR developed the design to strengthen the frame and introduced other improvements, such as roller bearings on all axles and ACFI (French: Accessoires pour les Chemins de Fer et l'Industrie) feedwater heaters. Introduced from 1939, they were also built in NZR workshops, most of them with streamlined shrouding to cover the external pipe work of their feedwater heater systems. The first 35 locomotives were designated KA class and worked on the North Island mainlines with the older K class locomotives.[18]
Six more were built, designated KB class, for service on the steeply graded Midland line on the South Island. These locomotives were equipped with trailing truck boosters, which raised their tractive effort by 6000lbf.[18]
On occasion, these recorded speeds up to 75mi/h. The streamlining shrouds of the KA and KB classes were removed in the late 1940s when the ACFI feedwater heaters were replaced with exhaust steam injectors. The last of these locomotives was withdrawn in 1968 due to dieselisation. Seven have been preserved, K class numbers 900, 911 and 917, KA class numbers 935, 942 and 945 and KB class no. 968.[20] [21]
Between 1953 and 1955, the South African Railways (SAR) placed fifty Class 25NC Northern locomotives in service. Designed under the direction of Chief Mechanical Engineer L.C. Grubb, eleven of these locomotives were built by North British Locomotive Company (NBL) and 39 by Henschel & Son. They were tended by Type EW1 tenders which rode on six-wheeled bogies. Two versions of the same locomotive were built, the Class 25NC being the non-condensing version, hence the "NC" suffix to the class number.
Ninety Class 25 condensing locomotives were introduced simultaneously, acquired as a means to deal with the shortage of adequate supplies of suitable locomotive water in the arid Karoo. The design work on the engine's condensing apparatus and the enormous condensing tender was carried out by Henschel, who built one locomotive complete with tender as well as sixty of the condensing tenders, to which they held the patent. The other 89 condensing locomotives and thirty tenders were built by NBL.
The Type CZ condensing tenders were slightly longer than their engines. One-third of the total length of the tender was taken up by the water tank and coal bunker, while the rest was taken up by eight large radiators on each side, cooled by five steam-driven roof-mounted fans. Roller bearings were used throughout on all these locomotives, including the coupling and connecting rods, the crosshead gudgeon pins as well as the three-axle bogies of both the standard and condensing tenders. The leading bogies and coupled wheels had Cannon-type axle boxes. The cylinders and frames were cast in one piece, while the steel cylinders and steam chests were fitted with cast iron liners. The tender frames of both locomotive types were also one-piece steel water-bottom castings. Since they were entirely mounted on roller bearings, very little effort was required to move these big locomotives.
On the condensing locomotives, spent steam was recycled and condensed back to water for repeated use. Since the steam was not expelled up the chimney, the smokebox contained a steam turbine-driven fan beneath the chimney to keep the draught going. Visual evidence of this altered and slightly longer smokebox is the locomotive's banjo-face smokebox front. The condensing system proved extremely efficient and reduced water consumption by as much as 90% by using the same water up to eight times over, which gave the Class 25 a range of 800km (500miles) between water refills. In addition, the hot condensate feedwater resulted in significantly reduced coal consumption.
However, the Class 25 was a complex locomotive that required high maintenance, especially on the turbine blower fans in the smokebox, whose blades needed to be replaced frequently due to damage by solid particles in the exhaust. The equally complex condensing tender also required frequent maintenance. Between 1973 and 1980, partly motivated by the spread of electric and diesel-electric traction, all but three of the locomotives were converted to free-exhausting and non-condensing locomotives and reclassified to Class 25NC. In the process their condensing tenders were also rebuilt to ordinary coal-and-water tenders by removing the condensing radiators and roof fans and replacing it with a massive round-topped water tank. Since the tenders were built on single cast-steel main frames, it was impractical to attempt to shorten them. Locomotives with these rebuilt Type EW2 tenders were soon nicknamed Afrikaans: Worshond (Sausage dog or Dachshund).
The Class 26, popularly known as the Red Devil, was rebuilt from Henschel-built Class 25NC no. 3450 by mechanical engineer David Wardale. The rebuilding took place at the Salt River shops of the SAR in Cape Town and was based on the principles developed by Argentinian mechanical engineer Livio Dante Porta. The primary objectives of the modifications were to improve the combustion and steaming rate to reduce the emission of wasteful black smoke and to overcome the problem of clinkering. This was achieved by the use of a Gas Producer Combustion System (GPCS), which relies on the gasification of coal on a low temperature firebed so that the gases are then fully burnt above the firebed. The GPCS minimises the amount of air being drawn up through the firebed, the main source of air required for combustion being through ancillary air intakes on the firebox sides above the firebed.[22] [23] [24]
The modified locomotive became the only Class 26. Compared to an unmodified Class 25NC, the Red Devil achieved a 28% measured saving on coal and a 30% measured saving on water, measured during freight service, and a 43% increase in drawbar power based on the maximum recorded drawbar power. Its approximate maximum range in full load freight service on 1% to % grades was 700km (400miles) based on its coal capacity, and 230km (140miles) based on its water capacity. The maximum recorded freight load hauled relative to gradient was 900t on 2% grades, and it could haul a 650t passenger train at a constant speed of 1000NaN0 on 1% grades. The Red Devil great power, however, also turned out to be its one weakness. The Class 25NC had already proven to be on the slippery side and the much more powerful Class 26, with essentially still the same dimensions as the Class 25NC, was even worse. It was a poor performer at starting or at low speeds on steep gradients.[22] [23]
Outside North America, the largest fleet of locomotives was the Class P36 of the Russian: Sovetskie Zheleznye Dorogi (SZhD) or Soviet Railways, of which 251 were built by the Kolomna locomotive works between 1949 and 1956. As the last Soviet standard class steam locomotive, the Class P36 shared some common components and design attributes with earlier standard Soviet designs such as the L class Decapod type and LV class Santa Fe type, as well as some common attributes with the P34 class Mallet and P38 class Yellowstone type Mallet. For example, the P36 and LV classes shared the same feedwater heater, made by the Bryansk machine factory. Apart from a trio of fully streamlined Baltic-type locomotives, they were the only semi-streamlined steam locomotives built in Russia.
The Class P36 was one of the best passenger steam locomotive classes built in the Soviet Union. They had boilers with 243.2m2 of heating surface that had a working boiler pressure of 1.5MPa. Russian-designed roller bearings were fitted throughout and the boilers were designed to provide a continuous steaming capacity of 57kg (126lb) per 1abbr=offNaNabbr=off of heating surface in the boiler. With its 575by cylinders and 18502NaN2 diameter coupled wheels, it could easily attain speeds up to 125km/h with passenger trains of up to 800t.
The Class P36 first appeared on the Oktyabrskaya Railway (October Railway) to haul principal express trains between Moscow and Leningrad, but they did not remain on this 650km (400miles) mainline long. Diesels took over after only a few years and the P36 class locomotives were transferred to other lines and depots, such as the Moscow–Kursk and Moscow–Ryazan lines, Kalinin, Krasnoyarsk, Belarusian Railway, Melitopol depot, Kuibyshev and Alexandrov depot.
Later, when electrification and dieselisation expanded, many of the Class P36 locomotives were transferred to work on the Lviv, Far East, Eastern Siberia, and Transbaikal Railways. The last was withdrawn from regular scheduled express passenger train service in 1974. All were staged in full working order and kept in reserve for times of extraordinary demand. At certain intervals, the locomotives were taken out from staging, steamed up and put to work to haul trains to test the condition of the locomotives. In the late 1980s, these strategic reserves of locomotives were disbanded and the Class P36 locomotives were distributed to museums and for preservation. Some that had not seen regular use for more than fifteen years and were in the worst mechanical condition, were scrapped. It was found that the roller bearings suffered most by standing unused. When the computerised new class numbers were introduced by the Russian Ministry of Railways, the Class P36 were designated Class 1000.0001 to 1000.0251. In the 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, a number were sold to private train operators.
The 242F class express passenger locomotives were designed by the Red Nacional de los Ferrocarriles Españoles (RENFE) in 1955 and were remarkably well-proportioned. Developed from a preceding Mountain type, they had improved steam passages and developed 30 to 40 per cent more power at medium cut-offs and high speed. Ten of these locomotives were built by Spanish; Castilian: i=unset|La Maquinista Terrestre y Maritima SA in Barcelona to burn fuel oil. They had Witte type smoke deflectors and were fitted with a double KylChap (Kylälä-Chapelon) blast-pipe, a Worthington feedwater heater and a Spanish; Castilian: Traitement Integral Armand (TIA) water-softening device. To increase the comfort of the locomotive crew, the cabs had wooden floors mounted on springs, and the seats of the driver and fireman were also sprung, a very welcome improvement for long runs on poor tracks. These locomotives were painted in a green livery when turned out from the builder's works at Barcelona and were consequently nicknamed Spanish; Castilian: Los Verdes (The Greens).
The 242F class was the fastest Spanish steam locomotive. When tested on the line from Barcelona to Tarragona across 10.4miles of practically level and straight line between Vilanova i la Geltrú and Sant Vicent, a speed exceeding 84mph was sustained twice, first with a train of 430 tons and then with a train of 480 tons. High-capacity tests took place between Madrid and Ávila when a train weighing 426 tons, including a dynamometer car, was hauled at sustained speeds of 70.3mph up a gradient of (1 in 286), 57.2mph up a gradient of (1 in 95) and 39.1mph up a gradient of (1 in 44.5). The gross horsepower figures recorded with the dynamometer car were 1790, 2350 and 2320 respectively, the calculated horsepower on the rail being 2600, 3400 and 3580. The latter output translates to about 4000ihp.
With these locomotives, there was some concern about water supply. The capacity of the tender was limited at only 6200impgal and, with few watering points in service, the full capacity of the locomotive was not always used for fear of running short of this essential commodity in the semi-arid Spanish landscape. For example, for the 163km (101miles) stretch between Medina del Campo and Burgos that rises 131m (430feet) with an uphill start, three intermediate stops, one slack and some shunting movements to couple extra coaches to the train, the amount of water consumed was about 7300impgal.
All ten locomotives were allocated to the Miranda de Ebro shed to haul principal heavy express trains. In the 1960s, they were a familiar sight at the head of the premier express trains, but in 1971 they were transferred entirely to semi-fast passenger trains and even to the haulage of heavy seasonal fruit trains between Castejón and Alsasua from October to January. One locomotive, no. 242F.2009, is preserved at the Madrid Railway Museum.[25]
In 1938 William Stanier considered a 4-6-4 express passenger locomotive design,[26] together with a 4-8-4 version as a large mixed-traffic locomotive. War intervened and suspended development of express passenger locomotives, but the 4-8-4 design was re-examined in 1942 by Fairburn, the acting CME, as a possible post-war type for fast fitted freights.[27]
While no steam locomotives were known to be this type, an experimental diesel-mechanical locomotive, the British Rail 10100, had this wheel arrangement, but it was scrapped after a gearbox failure caused a loss of interest in the project.
The American was a heavy locomotive, with nearly all examples in the United States having axle loads of more than 30ST. On railroads with rail of 130to, axle loads of more than 36ST were permitted. Exceptionally heavy 4-8-4s were therefore introduced on the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe (Santa Fe), Chicago and North Western (CNW), Chesapeake and Ohio (C&O), Milwaukee Road (MILW), Northern Pacific (NP), Norfolk and Western (N&W), Spokane, Portland and Seattle (SP&S) and Western Maryland (WM) railroads. The Santa Fe Class 2900 had the heaviest axle load of all at 38.75ST as well as being the heaviest 4-8-4s ever built, weighing 974850lb total. The lightest 4-8-4s in the United States were the six H-10 class locomotives of the Toledo, Peoria and Western (TPW), with an axle load of 23ST.[28] [29]
Some 4-8-4s were used on exceptionally long runs.
Several of the earlier locomotive models were modified or rebuilt during their service lives.
Some Northern locomotives were also rebuilt from older engines. Between 1945 and 1947, the Reading Railroad rebuilt thirty of their heavy I-10 class Consolidations to booster-fitted Northern locomotives with 700NaN0 diameter driving wheels. An additional ring was added at the smokebox end of the boiler, which increased the length of the boiler tubes from 13feet to 20feet, and a larger smokebox was installed which increased the distance between the tube plate and the chimney centre line from 34inches to 111inches. Steam pressure was raised from 220to. Four syphons were fitted, three in the firebox proper and one in the combustion chamber. A twelve-wheeled tender was attached, weighing 167 tons in working order, with a capacity of 23.5 tons of coal and 19000USgal of water. A new cast-steel frame was used, with the cylinders cast integral and roller bearings on all axles. They were reclassified to T1 and numbered 2100 to 2129. Two of these locomotives, preserved for hauling special trains, were still in use in 1963.[37]
The Northerns were workhorses that went without much public recognition, with a few exceptions. The Class GS-4 Golden State locomotives of Southern Pacific (SP), of which 36 were built by Lima Locomotive Works in 1941 and 1942, were semi-streamlined and were given a striking livery with a broad orange valence over the wheels below a narrow red band that came halfway up the cab windows. The locomotives headed the Coast Daylight train on the railroad's Coast Line between Los Angeles and San Francisco. The television program The Adventures of Superman was introduced with a shot of an SP GS-4 as the announcer declared that Superman was "more powerful than a locomotive." One of them, Southern Pacific 4449, has been restored and is in operating condition.[38]
Even after the demise of steam, the Northern type has been in the spotlight of publicity and, along with Union Pacific 844 of the Union Pacific FEF Series and Norfolk and Western 611 of the Norfolk and Western Class J series, among other Northerns, have been the favoured type to provide mainline excursions in the United States. The former is the only steam locomotive of a Class I railroad never to have been retired.[39]
Most North American s were built by ALCO, Lima and the Baldwin Locomotive Works, while Canadian National Railway's fleet was built by Montreal Locomotive Works. Only the Canadian Pacific Railway, the Norfolk and Western Railway, the St. Louis Southwestern Railway (Cotton Belt) and the Reading Railroad built or rebuilt their own.[40] The Missouri Pacific rebuilt one class of their s from their class BK-63 2-8-4s.
The Northern type was used by 37 railroads in the Americas, including 31 railroads in the United States, three in Canada, one in Mexico and two in Brazil. In all, there were fewer than 1,200 locomotives of this type in North America, compared to the approximately 2,500 Mountain types and 6,800 Pacific types. By far the largest fleet was owned by the CN and its subsidiary, the Grand Trunk Western Railroad, with altogether 203 locomotives.[1] [40]
| Railroad (Quantity, Nickname) | Class | Road numbers | Builder | Build year | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Pacific Railway (48 "Northerns") | A | 2600–2611 | 1926 | All scrapped by 1957. | ||
| A-1 | 2626 | Alco | 1930 | ex-Timken 1111. Scrapped 1957, but SP&S 700 is well known for looking very identical to the class. | ||
| A-2 | 2650–2659 | 1934 | Scrapped 1957, but SP&S 700 is well known for looking very identical to the class. | |||
| A-3 | 2660–2667 | Baldwin | 1938 | Scrapped 1957, but SP&S 700 is well known for looking very identical to the class. | ||
| A-4 | 2670–2677 | Baldwin | 1941 | Scrapped 1957, but SP&S 700 is well known for looking very identical to the class. | ||
| A-5 | 2680–2689 | Baldwin | 1943 | Scrapped 1957, but SP&S 700 is well known for looking very identical to the class. | ||
| Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (65 "Heavy Mountains") | 3751 | 3751–3764 | Baldwin | 1927–1929 | 3751 is used as an excursion loco, 3759 preserved in Kingman, AZ. | |
| 3765 | 3765–3775 | Baldwin | 1938 | 3768 preserved. | ||
| 3776 | 3776–3785 | Baldwin | 1941 | All scrapped between 1953 and 1959 | ||
| 2900–2929 | Baldwin | 1943–1944 | 2903, 2912, 2913, 2921, 2925 and 2926 preserved, with 2926 restored to operating condition and will be used as an excursion locomotive. | |||
| Canadian National Railways (160 “Confederations", later "Northerns") | U-2-a | 6100–6119 | 1927 | All Scrapped between 1953 and 1955. | ||
| U-2-b | 6120–6139 | 1927 | All Scrapped between 1955 and 1958. | |||
| U-2-c | 6140–6159 | MLW | 1929 | 6153 preserved, remainder scrapped between 1955 and 1956. | ||
| U-2-d | 6160–6164 | MLW | 1936 | All scrapped between 1956 and 1957. | ||
| U-2-e | 6165–6179 | MLW | 1940 | 6167 preserved, remainder scrapped by 1957. | ||
| U-2-f | 6180–6189 | CLC | 1940 | All scrapped by 1958. | ||
| U-2-g | 6200–6234 | MLW | 1943 | 6200, 6213 and 6218 preserved, remainder scrapped between 1958 and 1959. | ||
| U-2-h | 6235–6264 | MLW | 1944 | All Scrapped by 1959. | ||
| U-4-a | 6400-6404 | MLW | 1936 | Streamlined, 6400 preserved, remainder scrapped by 1959. | ||
| Canadian National subsidiary, Grand Trunk Western (43 "Confederations", later "Northerns") | U-3-a | 6300–6311 | Alco | 1927 | All Scrapped by 1959. | |
| U-3-b | 6312–6336 | Alco | 1942–1943 | 6323 and 6325 preserved. | ||
| U-4-b | 6405–6410 | 1938 | Streamlined, all scrapped by 1959. | |||
| Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad (55 "Poconos") | Q-1 | 1501–1505 | Alco | 1927 | All scrapped between 1947 and 1949. | |
| Q-2 | 1601–1620 | Alco | 1929 | All scrapped between 1950 and 1953. | ||
| Q-3 | 1621–1630 | Alco | 1932 | All scrapped between 1953 and 1955. | ||
| Q-4 | 1631–1650 | Alco | 1934 | All scrapped between 1955 and 1959. | ||
| Canadian Pacific Railway (2 "Northerns") | K1a | 3100–3101 | 1928 | Both retired 1955 and are preserved. | ||
| Chicago and North Western Railway (35 "Northerns") | H | 3001–3035 | Baldwin | 1929 | 24 rebuilt to H-1, all later scrapped. | |
| Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad (85 "Northerns") | R-67 | 5000–5064 | Alco | 1929–1930 | All scrapped between 1947 and 1953. | |
| R-67 | 5100–5119 | Alco | 1944, 1946 | All scrapped between 1949 and 1955. | ||
| Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad (19 "Westerns")[41] | M-64 | 1700–1713 | Baldwin | 1929 | All scrapped between 1951 and 1956. | |
| M-68 | 1800–1804 | Baldwin | 1938 | All scrapped between 1952 and 1954. | ||
| Great Northern Railway (20 "Northerns") | 2550–2555 | Baldwin | 1929 | All scrapped between 1956 and 1963. | ||
| 2575–2588 | Baldwin | 1930 | First 4-8-4s built with 80" driving wheels. 2584 preserved at the Havre depot in Havre, Montana, remainder scrapped between 1955 and 1963. | |||
| Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad (36 "Northerns") | 5600–5607 | Baldwin | 1930 | All scrapped by 1955. | ||
| 5608–5635 | CB&Q | 1936–1940 | Six converted to oil burning O-5b class while in revenue service by the CB&Q. 5614, 5629, 5631 and 5633 preserved. | |||
| Milwaukee Road (52 "Northerns") | S1 | 9700 | Baldwin | 1930 | Renumbered 250 in 1938, retired 1954 and scrapped. | |
| S1 | 251 | MILW | 1938 | Retired 1954 and scrapped. | ||
| S2 | 201–240 | Baldwin | 1937, 1940 | Scrapped between 1948 and 1954. | ||
| 260–269 | Alco | 1943 | 261 used as an excursion locomotive, 265 preserved at the Illinois Railway Museum, remainder scrapped between 1954 and 1959. | |||
| Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway (25 "Dixies") | J-2 | 565–569 | Alco | 1930 | Scrapped by 1952. | |
| J-3 | 570–589 | Alco | 1942 | 576 preserved and under restoration by the Nashville Steam Preservation Society in Centennial Park in Nashville, Tennessee; and the only surviving 4-8-4 that worked for Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railroad, remainder scrapped between 1952 and 1955. | ||
| St. Louis Southwestern Railway aka "Cotton Belt" (20 "Northerns") | 800–809 | Baldwin | 1930 | All Scrapped by 1953. | ||
| 810–819 | SSW | 1937, 1942–1943 | 819 is the youngest and only surviving Class L1 Northern and under restoration at the Arkansas Railroad Museum in Pine Bluff, Arkansas. | |||
| Southern Pacific (70 "Golden States" or "General Service") | 4400–4409 | Baldwin | 1930 | All Scrapped between 1953 and 1959. | ||
| 4410–4415 | Lima | 1936 | All Scrapped between 1955 and 1958. | |||
| 4416–4429 | Lima | 1937 | All Scrapped by 1957. | |||
| 4430–4457 | Lima | 1941 | 4449 preserved and is the only surviving GS-4 and the only surviving Daylight painted steam locomotive. It is used as an excursion loco. | |||
| 4458–4459 | Lima | 1942 | Essentially 2 experimental GS-4 locomotives fit with roller bearings. Scrapped by 1958. | |||
| 4460–4469 | Lima | 1943 | 4460 is the oldest and only surviving GS-6 and the last GS Class 4-8-4 built today displayed at the Museum of Transportation in Kirkwood next to St. Louis, Missouri. | |||
| SSW #801-802, #804-805, #807-809 SP #4479-4481 | Baldwin | 1930 | Scrapped. | |||
| SSW #813, #813, #817-818 SP #4488 (SSW #813), 4485-4487 (815-818) | SSW's Pine Bluff Shops | 1930 | Scrapped. | |||
| Southern Pacific subsidiary, Texas and New Orleans Railroad (4 "Golden States") | 700–703 | Baldwin | 1930 | Scrapped. | ||
| Timken Roller Bearing Company (demonstrator) | A-1 | Alco | 1930 | to NP 2626. | ||
| Wabash Railroad (25 "Northerns") | O-1 | 2900–2924 | Baldwin | 1930–1931 | Scrapped. | |
| Lehigh Valley Railroad (37 "Wyomings") | T-1a | 5100–5110 | Baldwin | 1931–1932 | Scrapped. | |
| T-2a | 5200–5210 | Alco | 1931–1932 | Scrapped. | ||
| T-2b | 5211–5220 | Alco | 1943 | Scrapped. | ||
| T-3 | 5125–5129 | Baldwin | 1934–1935 | Scrapped. | ||
| New York Central Railroad (28 "Niagaras") | HS-1a | 800 | Alco | 1931 | Experimental prototype. Deemed a failure and spent the rest of its career as a switcher locomotive. Scrapped 1955. | |
| S-1a | 6000 | Alco | 1945 | Scrapped. | ||
| S-1b | 6001–6025 | Alco | 1945–1946 | Scrapped. | ||
| S-2a | 5500 | Alco | 1946 | Fit wit poppet valves. Scrapped. | ||
| Chesapeake and Ohio Railway (12 "Greenbriers") | J-3 | 600–606 | Lima | 1935, 1942 | Named after Virginia statesmen. All Scrapped between 1950 and 1955. | |
| J-3-A | 610–614 | Lima | 1948 | No. 614 preserved and is the last commercially built passenger steam locomotive in the U.S. and is currently the world's most advanced steam locomotive. It is now at the C&O Railway Heritage Center in Clifton Forge, Virginia in the paint scheme for the cancelled Greenbrier Presidential Express. Remainder scrapped between 1952 and 1958. | ||
| Ontario Northland Railway (5 "Northerns") | 1100 | 1100–1104 | CLC | 1936 | All scrapped between 1947 and 1959. | |
| Atlantic Coast Line Railroad (12 "1800s") | 1800–1811 | Baldwin | 1938 | All scrapped between 1953 and 1959. | ||
| Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad (27, names by class below) | Generals | 551–555 | Baldwin | 1937 | All scrapped by 1949. | |
| Governors | 601–612 | Baldwin | 1938, 1942 | All scrapped by 1950. | ||
| Statesmen | 613–622 | Baldwin | 1944–1945 | All scrapped between 1951 and 1959. | ||
| Toledo, Peoria and Western Railway (6 "Northerns") | H-10 | 80–85 | ALCO | 1937 | All Scrapped between 1947 and 1953. | |
| Union Pacific Railroad (45 "Northerns" or "Four-Eight-Fours"/"FEFs") | FEF-1 | 800–819 | Alco | 1937 | 814 preserved in Council Bluffs, Iowa. | |
| FEF-2 | 820–834 | Alco | 1939 | 833 preserved in Ogden, Utah. | ||
| FEF-3 | 835–844 | Alco | 1944 | 838 stored in Cheyenne, Wyoming, 844 is the oldest operating steam engine on a Class One Railroad and is used as an excursion locomotive. | ||
| Wisconsin Central Railway (4 "Northerns") | O-20 | 5000–5003 | Lima | 1938 | All Scrapped between 1949 and 1953. | |
| Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway (3 "Northerns") | 700–702 | BLW | 1938 | NP A-3 class; 700 survives and is used as an excursion loco. | ||
| Missouri Pacific Railroad (40 "Northerns") | (ex-BK-63) | 2101–2125 | MP | 1940–1942 | Rebuilt from 2-8-4 class BK-63. All scrapped between 1945 and 1959. | |
| N-73 | 2201–2215 | Baldwin | 1943 | Scrapped between 1953 and 1958. Wartime restrictions prohibited the MP from designing their own Northern. This class was based on the D&RGW "1800s" design. | ||
| Norfolk and Western Railway (14 "J"s) | 600–613 | 1941–1950 | 611 has been restored and returned to revenue service for excursions in the summer of 2015 and is the only survivor.[42] [43] | |||
| Central of Georgia Railway (8 "Big Apples") | K | 451–458 | Lima | 1943 | Scrapped by 1953. | |
| Delaware and Hudson Railway (15 "Northerns") | K-62 | 300–314 | Alco | 1943 | Scrapped between 1949 and 1955. | |
| St. Louis – San Francisco Railway (25 "Northerns") | 4500-4524 | Baldwin | 1942–1943 | 4500, 4501, 4516 and 4524 preserved. | ||
| Western Pacific Railroad (6 "Northerns") | GS-64 | 481–486 | Lima | 1943 | Built to SP GS-6 specifications due to WPB restrictions. | |
| Reading Railroad (30 "Northerns") | 2100–2129 | RDG | 1945–1947 | 2100, 2101, 2102, and 2124 preserved. Converted from Class I-10sa 2-8-0 locomotives. | ||
| Ferrocarriles Nacionales de México (32 "Niágaras") | QR-1 | 3025–3056 | Alco (16), Baldwin (16) | 1946 | 3027, 3028, 3030, 3031, 3033, 3034, 3035, 3036, 3038, 3039, 3040 and 3056 preserved. Most sat in scrap lines through the 1960s. | |
| Western Maryland Railway (12 "Potomacs") | J-1 | 1401–1412 | Baldwin | 1947 | Scrapped by 1957. |
In many countries, the was a late development of the steam locomotive, close to the time of steam's demise. Many more were therefore preserved than other older wheel arrangements, either plinthed or in museums, with several being kept in running condition. Some of the more notable preserved Northerns worldwide are listed here by country of origin.