Tita Vendia vase explained

The Tita Vendia vase is a ceramic impasto pithos[1] (wine container[2] made around 620-600 BC,[3] most likely in Rome[4]). The pithos, which exists only as an incomplete set of sherds,[5] carries one of two earliest known inscriptions in Latin language (the Vendia inscription) and is usually, but not unanimously, interpreted as the earliest instance of a bipartite female Latin name with praenomen and gentilicum.[1]

The sherds of the vase were found by Raniero Mengarelli and deposited in the collection of Museo di Villa Giulia. The exact location of the find is unknown but it probably occurred in Cerveteri (ancient Caere).[6] The vase belongs to a type found in Southern Etruria. In its original form, based on the collection of sherds found, it was likely to have been approximately 35 centimetres tall and 45 centimetres wide.[1] The letters, 15 to 25 millimetres tall, had been scratched near the bottom.[1] They were inscribed by a right handed artisan, using reversed letter S, and with letters instead of normal (instead of fecit; according to Baccum, this rules out Faliscan origin of the vase).[1] The inscription reads:

[1]

The lacuna between and is ten to twelve letters wide.[1] Only part of it has been reliably filled by interpreters. The missing part probably contained the name of the second potter; the first potter is unanimously identified as Mamarcos or Mamarce.[7] With the lacuna partially filled the inscription is expanded into:

[2]

The most common English interpretation of this text is:

I am the urn of Tita Vendia. Mamarcos … had me made.[2] [8]

In this interpretation, archaic is used where we would expect normative Latin ego, since Latin had not yet developed a separate symbol for the voiced velar pronounced as /link/; the personal name uses archaic genitive declension (as in pater familiās) which is omitted in, most likely due to a writing error.[2] There are also alternative interpretations:

References

Notes and References

  1. Baccum, p. 583.
  2. Baldi, p. 126.),
  3. [Philip Baldi|Baldi]
  4. [Philip Baldi|Baldi]
  5. See photograph in Blanck, p. 24.
  6. Caerean origin is taken for granted, for example, by Vogt-Spira, p. 38.
  7. Baccum, p. 584.
  8. Clarkson and Horrocks, p. 29.
  9. Watkins, p. 129.