| Litigants: | Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States |
| Arguedate: | March 11 |
| Argueyear: | 1953 |
| Decidedate: | May 24 |
| Decideyear: | 1953 |
| Fullname: | Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States |
| Usvol: | 345 |
| Uspage: | 594 |
| Parallelcitations: | 73 S. Ct. 872; 97 L. Ed. 2d 1277; 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2716 |
| Prior: | 105 F. Supp. 670 (E.D. La. 1952); probable jurisdiction noted, 73 S. Ct. 173 (1952). |
| Majority: | Clark |
| Joinmajority: | Vinson, Reed, Frankfurter, Jackson |
| Dissent: | Burton |
| Joindissent: | Black, Douglas, Minton |
| Lawsapplied: | Sherman Antitrust Act |
Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 (1953), is an antitrust law decision by the United States Supreme Court.[1] In a 5–4 decision it held that a tie-in sale of morning and evening newspaper advertising space does not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, because there was no market dominance in the tying product.[2]