Thomson scattering explained

Thomson scattering is the elastic scattering of electromagnetic radiation by a free charged particle, as described by classical electromagnetism. It is the low-energy limit of Compton scattering: the particle's kinetic energy and photon frequency do not change as a result of the scattering.^[1] This limit is valid as long as the photon energy is much smaller than the mass energy of the particle:

\nu\ll mc ^{2/h} , or equivalently, if the wavelength of the light is much greater than the Compton wavelength of the particle (e.g., for electrons, longer wavelengths than hard x-rays).^[2]

Description of the phenomenon

Thomson scattering is a model for the effect of electromagnetic fields on electrons when the field energy

h\nu is much less than the rest mass of the electron m ^{2} _{0 c} . In the model the electric field of the incident wave accelerates the charged particle, causing it, in turn, to emit radiation at the same frequency as the incident wave, and thus the wave is scattered. Thomson scattering is an important phenomenon in plasma physics and was first explained by the physicist J. J. Thomson. As long as the motion of the particle is non-relativistic (i.e. its speed is much less than the speed of light), the main cause of the acceleration of the particle will be due to the electric field component of the incident wave. In a first approximation, the influence of the magnetic field can be neglected.^[2] The particle will move in the direction of the oscillating electric field, resulting in electromagnetic dipole radiation. The moving particle radiates most strongly in a direction perpendicular to its acceleration and that radiation will be polarized along the direction of its motion. Therefore, depending on where an observer is located, the light scattered from a small volume element may appear to be more or less polarized.

The electric fields of the incoming and observed wave (i.e. the outgoing wave) can be divided up into those components lying in the plane of observation (formed by the incoming and observed waves) and those components perpendicular to that plane. Those components lying in the plane are referred to as "radial" and those perpendicular to the plane are "tangential". (It is difficult to make these terms seem natural, but it is standard terminology.)

The diagram on the right depicts the plane of observation. It shows the radial component of the incident electric field, which causes the charged particles at the scattering point to exhibit a radial component of acceleration (i.e., a component tangent to the plane of observation). It can be shown that the amplitude of the observed wave will be proportional to the cosine of χ, the angle between the incident and observed waves. The intensity, which is the square of the amplitude, will then be diminished by a factor of cos²(χ). It can be seen that the tangential components (perpendicular to the plane of the diagram) will not be affected in this way.

The scattering is best described by an emission coefficient which is defined as ε where ε dt dV dΩ dλ is the energy scattered by a volume element

dV in time dt into solid angle dΩ between wavelengths λ and λ+dλ. From the point of view of an observer, there are two emission coefficients, ε_r corresponding to radially polarized light and ε_t corresponding to tangentially polarized light. For unpolarized incident light, these are given by:

where

n is the density of charged particles at the scattering point, I is incident flux (i.e. energy/time/area/wavelength), \chi is the angle between the incident and scattered photons (see figure above) and \sigma _{t} is the Thomson cross section for the charged particle, defined below. The total energy radiated by a volume element dV in time dt between wavelengths λ and λ+dλ is found by integrating the sum of the emission coefficients over all directions (solid angle):$$\backslash int\backslash varepsilon\; \backslash ,\; d\backslash Omega\; =\; \backslash int\_0^\; d\backslash varphi\; \backslash int\_0^\backslash pi\; d\backslash chi\; (\backslash varepsilon\_t\; +\; \backslash varepsilon\_r)\; \backslash sin\; \backslash chi\; =\; I\; \backslash frac\; n\; 2\; \backslash pi\; (2\; +\; 2/3)\; =\; \backslash sigma\_t\; I\; n.$$

The Thomson differential cross section, related to the sum of the emissivity coefficients, is given by$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)^2\; \backslash frac\; 2$$expressed in SI units; q is the charge per particle, m the mass of particle, and

\varepsilon _{0} a constant, the permittivity of free space. (To obtain an expression in cgs units, drop the factor of 4ε₀.) Integrating over the solid angle, we obtain the Thomson cross section$$\backslash sigma\_t\; =\; \backslash frac\; 3\; \backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)^2$$in SI units.

The important feature is that the cross section is independent of light frequency. The cross section is proportional by a simple numerical factor to the square of the classical radius of a point particle of mass m and charge q, namely^[2] $$\backslash sigma\_t\; =\; \backslash frac\; 3\; r\_e^2$$

Alternatively, this can be expressed in terms of

λ _{c} , the Compton wavelength, and the fine structure constant:$$\backslash sigma\_t\; =\; \backslash frac\; 3\; \backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)^2$$

For an electron, the Thomson cross-section is numerically given by:^[3] $$\backslash sigma\_t\; =\backslash frac\; 3\; \backslash left(\backslash frac\backslash right)^2\; =\; 6.652\; 458\; 7321(60)\backslash times\; 10^\; \backslash text^2\; \backslash approx\; 66.5\; \backslash text^2\; =\; 0.665\; \backslash text$$

Examples of Thomson scattering

The cosmic microwave background contains a small linearly-polarized component attributed to Thomson scattering. That polarized component mapping out the so-called E-modes was first detected by DASI in 2002.

The solar K-corona is the result of the Thomson scattering of solar radiation from solar coronal electrons. The ESA and NASA SOHO mission and the NASA STEREO mission generate three-dimensional images of the electron density around the Sun by measuring this K-corona from three separate satellites.

In tokamaks, corona of ICF targets and other experimental fusion devices, the electron temperatures and densities in the plasma can be measured with high accuracy by detecting the effect of Thomson scattering of a high-intensity laser beam. An upgraded Thomson scattering system in the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator uses to emit multiple pulses in quick succession. The intervals within each burst can range from 2 ms to 33.3 ms, permitting up to twelve consecutive measurements. Synchronization with plasma events is made possible by a newly added trigger system that facilitates real-time analysis of transient plasma events.^[4]

In the Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect, where the photon energy is much less than the electron rest mass, the inverse-Compton scattering can be approximated as Thomson scattering in the rest frame of the electron.^[5]

Models for X-ray crystallography are based on Thomson scattering.

See also

• Compton scattering
• Kapitsa–Dirac effect
• Klein–Nishina formula

Further reading

• Book: Billings, Donald E.. A guide to the solar corona. 1966. Academic Press. New York. 66026261.
• Johnson W.R. . Nielsen J. . Cheng K.T. . 2012 . Thomson scattering in the average-atom approximation . Physical Review . 3 . 036410 . 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036410 . 23031036 . 86. 1207.0178 . 2012PhRvE..86c6410J . 10413904 .

External links

• Thomson scattering notes
• Thomson scattering: principle and measurements

Notes and References

1. Experimental observation of relativistic nonlinear Thomson scattering . Nature . 396 . 6712 . December 17, 1998 . 653–655 . Szu-yuan . Chen . Anatoly . Maksimchuk . Donald . Umstadter. physics/9810036 . 1998Natur.396..653C . 10.1038/25303 . 16080209 .
2. Froula, Dustin H. Plasma scattering of electromagnetic radiation. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier, 2011.
3. Web site: National Institute of Standards and Technology . 3 February 2015.
4. Damm . H. . Pasch . E. . Dinklage . A. . Baldzuhn . J.. 3. First results from an event synchronized—high repetition Thomson scattering system at Wendelstein 7-X . Journal of Instrumentation . 2019 . 14 . 9 . C09037 . 10.1088/1748-0221/14/09/C09037 . 1907.00492 . 2019JInst..14C9037D . 195767387 .
5. Birkinshaw . Mark . The Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect . Physics Reports . 1999 . 310 . 2–3 . 97–195 . 10.1016/s0370-1573(98)00080-5 . astro-ph/9808050 . 1999PhR...310...97B . 1983/5d24f14a-26e0-44d3-8496-5843b108fec5 . 119330362 . 4 November 2021 .