Geothermobarometry Explained

Geothermobarometry is the methodology for estimating the pressure and temperature history of rocks (metamorphic, igneous or sedimentary). Geothermobarometry is a combination of geobarometry, where the pressure attained (and retained) by a mineral assemblage is estimated, and geothermometry where the temperature attained (and retained) by a mineral assemblage is estimated.

Methodology

Geothermobarometry relies upon understanding the temperature and pressure of the formation of minerals within rocks.[1] There are several methods of measuring the temperature or pressure of mineral formation or re-equilibration relying for example on chemical equilibrium between minerals[2] or by measuring the chemical composition[3] [4] and/or the crystal-chemical state of order of individual minerals or by measuring the residual stresses on solid inclusions[5] or densities in fluid inclusions.[6]

"Classic" (thermodynamic) thermobarometry[7] relies upon the attainment of thermodynamic equilibrium between mineral pairs/assemblages that vary their compositions as a function of temperature and pressure. The distribution of component elements between the mineral assemblages is then analysed using a variety of analytical techniques as for example electron microprobe (EM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), Mass Spectrometry (MS). There are numerous extra factors to consider such as oxygen fugacity and water activity (roughly, the same as concentration) that must be accounted for using the appropriate methodological and analytical approach (e.g. Mössbauer spectroscopy, micro-raman spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy etc...)Geobarometers are typically net-transfer reactions, which are sensitive to pressure but have little change with temperature, such as garnet-plagioclase-muscovite-biotite reaction that involves a significant volume reduction upon high pressure:

\mathsf

Since mineral assemblages at equilibrium are dependent on pressures and temperatures, by measuring the composition of the coexisting minerals, together with using suitable activity models, the P-T conditions experienced by the rock can be determined.

As different equilibrium constants of mineral assemblages would occur as lines with different slopes in the P-T diagram, therefore, by finding the intersection of at least two lines in the P-T diagram, the P-T condition of the specimen can be obtained.

Despite the usefulness of geothermobarometry, special attention should be paid to whether the mineral assemblages represent an equilibrium, any occurrence of retrograde equilibrium in the rock, and appropriateness of calibration of the results.

Elastic thermobarometry is a method of determining the equilibrium pressure and temperature attained by the host mineral and its inclusion on the rock history from the excess pressures exhibited by mineral inclusions trapped inside host minerals. Upon exhumation and cooling, contrasting compressibilities and thermal expansivities induce differential strains (volume mismatches) between a host crystal and its inclusions. These strains can be quantified in situ using Raman spectroscopy or X-ray diffraction. Knowing equations of state and elastic properties of minerals, elastic thermobarometry inverts measured strains to calculate the pressure-temperature conditions under which the stress state was uniform in the host and inclusion. These are commonly interpreted to represent the conditions of inclusion entrapment or the last elastic equilibration of the pair.

Data on the geothermometers and geobarometers is derived from both laboratory studies on synthetic (artificial) mineral assemblages and from natural systems for which other constraints are available.

For example, one of the best known and most widely applicable geothermometers is the garnet-biotite relationship where the relative proportions of Fe and Mg in garnet and biotite change with increasing temperature, so measurement of the compositions of these minerals to give the Fe-Mg distribution between them allows the temperature of crystallization to be calculated, given some assumptions.

Assumptions in thermodynamic thermobarometry

In natural systems, the chemical reactions occur in open systems with unknown geological and chemical histories, and application of geothermobarometers relies on several assumptions that must hold in order for the laboratory data and natural compositions to relate in a valid fashion:

Assumptions in elastic thermobarometry

In natural systems elastic behaviour of minerals can be easily perturbed by high temperature re-equilibration, plastic or brittle deformation, leading to an irreversible change beyond the elastic regime that will prevent reconstructing the "elastic history" of the pair.

Techniques

Some techniques include:

Geothermometers

Note that the Fe-Mg exchange thermometers are empirical (laboratory tested and calibrated) as well as calculated based on a theoretical thermodynamic understanding of the components and phases involved. The Ti-in-biotite thermometer is solely empirical and not well understood thermodynamically.

Geobarometers

Various mineral assemblages rely more upon pressure than temperature; for example reactions which involve a large volume change. At high pressure, specific minerals assume lower volumes (therefore density increases, as the mass does not change) - it is these minerals which are good indicators of paleo-pressure.

Software

Software for "classic" thermobarometry includes:

Software for elastic thermobarometry includes:

Clinopyroxene thermobarometry

See main article: Clinopyroxene thermobarometry. The mineral clinopyroxene is used for temperature and pressure calculations of the magma that produced igneous rock containing this mineral.

References

External links

Notes and References

  1. Powell . R. . Holland . T. J. B. . February 2008 . On thermobarometry . Journal of Metamorphic Geology . en . 26 . 2 . 155–179 . 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2007.00756.x . 2008JMetG..26..155P . 0263-4929.
  2. Wood . B.J. . Holland . T.J.B. . Newton . R.C. . Kleppa . O.J. . September 1980 . Thermochemistry of jadeite—diopside pyroxenes . Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta . en . 44 . 9 . 1363–1371 . 10.1016/0016-7037(80)90095-2. 1980GeCoA..44.1363W .
  3. Book: Holland . Heinrich D. . Treatise on geochemistry . Turekian . Karl K. . 2004 . Elsevier/Pergamon . 978-0-08-043751-4 . 1st . Amsterdam Boston.
  4. Book: Treatise on Geochemistry . 2003-12-04 . 978-0-08-043751-4 . en-US.
  5. Kohn . Matthew J. . Mazzucchelli . Mattia L. . Alvaro . Matteo . 2023-05-30 . Elastic Thermobarometry . Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences . en . 51 . 1 . 331–366 . 10.1146/annurev-earth-031621-112720 . 2023AREPS..51..331K . 256443282 . 0084-6597.
  6. Levresse . Gilles . Cervantes-de la Cruz . Karina Elizabeth . Aranda-Gómez . José Jorge . Dávalos-Elizondo . María Guadalupe . Jiménez-Sandoval . Sergio . Rodríguez-Melgarejo . Francisco . Alba-Aldave . Leticia Araceli . January 2016 . CO2 fluid inclusion barometry in mantle xenoliths from central Mexico: A detailed record of magma ascent . Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research . en . 310 . 72–88 . 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.11.012.
  7. Powell . Roger . Holland . Tim . 1994 . Optimal geothermometry and geobarometry . American Mineralogist . 79 . 120–133.
  8. Moulas . Evangelos . Kostopoulos . Dimitrios . Podladchikov . Yury . Chatzitheodoridis . Elias . Schenker . Filippo L. . Zingerman . Konstantin M. . Pomonis . Panagiotis . Tajčmanová . Lucie . 2020-12-15 . Calculating pressure with elastic geobarometry: A comparison of different elastic solutions with application to a calc-silicate gneiss from the Rhodope Metamorphic Province . Lithos . en . 378-379 . 105803 . 10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105803 . 2020Litho.37805803M . 224846463 . 0024-4937.
  9. Elastic geothermobarometry: Corrections for the geometry of the host-inclusion system . 2023-08-01 . Geology . 2018 . 10.1130/g39807.1 . Mazzucchelli . M.L. . Burnley . P. . Angel . R.J. . Morganti . S. . Domeneghetti . M.C. . Nestola . F. . Alvaro . M. . 46 . 3 . 231–234 . 2018Geo....46..231M . free .
  10. Mazzucchelli . M. L. . Reali . A. . Morganti . S. . Angel . R. J. . Alvaro . M. . 2019-12-15 . Elastic geobarometry for anisotropic inclusions in cubic hosts . Lithos . en . 350-351 . 105218 . 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.105218 . 0024-4937. free . 2019Litho.35005218M .
  11. Murri . Mara . Mazzucchelli . Mattia L. . Campomenosi . Nicola . Korsakov . Andrey V. . Prencipe . Mauro . Mihailova . Boriana D. . Scambelluri . Marco . Angel . Ross J. . Alvaro . Matteo . 2018-11-01 . Raman elastic geobarometry for anisotropic mineral inclusions . American Mineralogist . en . 103 . 11 . 1869–1872 . 10.2138/am-2018-6625CCBY . 1945-3027. 11567/919890 . free .
  12. http://www.geol.lsu.edu/henry/Research/biotite/TiInBiotiteGeothermometer.htm Ti-in biotite geothermometer, Henry et al. 2005
  13. Lindsley & Andersen 1983 - A Two-pyroxene Thermometer; Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 88
  14. http://www.rpi.edu/~watsoe/research/Watson_etal_CMP06.pdf Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile, Watson et al. 2006; Contributions to mineralogy and petrology v. 151
  15. Kohn, M.J. and Spear, F.S. (1989): Am. Min. 74:77-84. (Pargasite component)
  16. Kohn, M.J. and Spear, F.S. (1990): Am. Min. 75:89-96. (Tschermakite component)
  17. Hammerstrom, J.M. and Zen, E.-an. (1986): Am. Min. 71:1297-1313.
  18. Hollister, L.S., Grissom, G.C., Peters, E.K., Stowell, H.H. and Sisson, V.B.(1987): Am. Mineral. 72:231-239.
  19. Johnson, and Rutherford (1989): Geology 17: 837-841.
  20. Holland . T. J. B. . Powell . R. . 2004-10-08 . An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest: AN INTERNALLY CONSISTENT THERMODYNAMIC DATA SET . Journal of Metamorphic Geology . en . 16 . 3 . 309–343 . 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1998.00140.x.
  21. Powell . R . Holland . T. . Worley . B. . June 1998 . Calculating phase diagrams involving solid solutions via non-linear equations, with examples using THERMOCALC . Journal of Metamorphic Geology . en . 16 . 4 . 577–588 . 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1998.00157.x . 1998JMetG..16..577P . 129301254 . 0263-4929.
  22. Connolly . J. a. D. . 1990-06-01 . Multivariable phase diagrams; an algorithm based on generalized thermodynamics . American Journal of Science . en . 290 . 6 . 666–718 . 10.2475/ajs.290.6.666. 1990AmJS..290..666C .
  23. Connolly . J.A.D. . July 2005 . Computation of phase equilibria by linear programming: A tool for geodynamic modeling and its application to subduction zone decarbonation . Earth and Planetary Science Letters . en . 236 . 1–2 . 524–541 . 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.04.033. 2005E&PSL.236..524C .
  24. Connolly . James A. D. . Galvez . Matthieu E. . 2018-11-01 . Electrolytic fluid speciation by Gibbs energy minimization and implications for subduction zone mass transfer . Earth and Planetary Science Letters . en . 501 . 90–102 . 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.024 . 2018E&PSL.501...90C . 134999977 . 0012-821X.
  25. Connolly . J. A. D. . Petrini . K. . September 2002 . An automated strategy for calculation of phase diagram sections and retrieval of rock properties as a function of physical conditions . Journal of Metamorphic Geology . en . 20 . 7 . 697–708 . 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2002.00398.x . 2002JMetG..20..697C . 73603565 . 0263-4929.
  26. Connolly . J. A. D. . Kerrick . D. M. . 1987-01-01 . An algorithm and computer program for calculating composition phase diagrams . Calphad . en . 11 . 1 . 1–55 . 10.1016/0364-5916(87)90018-6 . 0364-5916.
  27. Lanari . Pierre . Vidal . Olivier . De Andrade . Vincent . Dubacq . Benoît . Lewin . Eric . Grosch . Eugene G. . Schwartz . Stéphane . 2014-01-01 . XMapTools: A MATLAB©-based program for electron microprobe X-ray image processing and geothermobarometry . Computers & Geosciences . en . 62 . 227–240 . 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.08.010 . 0098-3004.
  28. EntraPT: An online platform for elastic geothermobarometry . 2023-08-01 . American Mineralogist . 2021 . 10.2138/am-2021-7693ccbyncnd . Mazzucchelli . Mattia Luca . Angel . Ross John . Alvaro . Matteo . 106 . 5 . 830–837 . 2021AmMin.106..830M . free .
  29. Angel . Ross J. . Murri . Mara . Mihailova . Boriana . Alvaro . Matteo . 2019-02-01 . Stress, strain and Raman shifts . Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials . en . 234 . 2 . 129–140 . 10.1515/zkri-2018-2112 . 105926659 . 2196-7105.
  30. Angel . Ross J. . Alvaro . Matteo . Gonzalez-Platas . Javier . 2014-05-01 . EosFit7c and a Fortran module (library) for equation of state calculations . Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials . de . 229 . 5 . 405–419 . 10.1515/zkri-2013-1711 . 56434995 . 2196-7105.
  31. Gonzalez-Platas . J. . Alvaro . M. . Nestola . F. . Angel . R. . 2016-08-01 . EosFit7-GUI: a new graphical user interface for equation of state calculations, analyses and teaching . Journal of Applied Crystallography . en . 49 . 4 . 1377–1382 . 10.1107/S1600576716008050 . 1600-5767.
  32. Angel . Ross J. . Mazzucchelli . Mattia L. . Alvaro . Matteo . Nestola . Fabrizio . 2017-09-01 . EosFit-Pinc: A simple GUI for host-inclusion elastic thermobarometry . American Mineralogist . en . 102 . 9 . 1957–1960 . 10.2138/am-2017-6190 . 2017AmMin.102.1957A . 1945-3027.