| The Woman for Joe | |
| Director: | George More O'Ferrall |
| Producer: | Leslie Parkyn |
| Starring: | Diane Cilento George Baker Jimmy Karoubi David Kossoff |
| Music: | Malcolm Arnold |
| Cinematography: | Georges Périnal |
| Editing: | Alfred Roome |
| Studio: | Group Film Productions |
| Distributor: | J. Arthur Rank Film Distributors |
| Runtime: | 91 minutes |
| Country: | United Kingdom |
| Language: | English |
The Woman for Joe is a 1955 British drama film directed by George More O'Ferrall and starring Diane Cilento, George Baker, Jimmy Karoubi and David Kossoff.[1] The screenplay concerns the owner of a circus sideshow and his prize attraction (a midget), who become romantically involved with the same woman. The film was made at Pinewood Studios.[2] The sets were designed by the art director Maurice Carter.
Midget George Wilson pulls strings to obtain a job in the circus for Mary, a Hungarian lady he's fallen madly in love with. Mary is happy to have the job, singing to the lions, but although she likes George, her feelings for circus owner Joe Harrop are stronger. The jealousy and tensions caused affect the running of the circus.
The Radio Times Guide to Films gave the film 2/5 stars, writing: "A slow and rather disappointing Rank production, this is the old "Hunchback of Notre Dame" chestnut, about fairground owner George Baker who hires a midget, only for him to turn into a Napoleon figure, lusting for power and lusting, too, for Diane Cilento, who's in love with Baker. It's pretty nasty, in fact, with none of the poetry of Victor Hugo's story, let alone Tod Browning's similarly themed masterpiece, Freaks [1932]."[3]
TV Guide wrote, "the highlight of this picture is the elaborate circus set, but this does little to benefit the unfolding of the plot, which is predictable."[4]
AllMovie noted "an excellent showcase for leading lady Diane Cilento (later better known as Mrs. Sean Connery)... What could have been an exercise in tawdriness is redeemed by the colorful camerawork of Georges Perinal."[5]
In British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959 David Quinlan rated the film as "average", writing: "Difficult subject, not too cleverly handled."[6]