The Spoils of War (symposium) explained

"The Spoils of War—World War II and Its Aftermath: The Loss, Reappearance, and Recovery of Cultural Property" was an international symposium held in New York City in 1995 to discuss the artworks, cultural property, and historic sites damaged, lost, and plundered as a result of World War II.[1] The three-day event was sponsored by the Bard Graduate Center for Studies in the Decorative Arts to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the end of the war.[2] The conference was organized by Elizabeth Simpson, an archaeologist and professor at the Bard Graduate Center.

Worldwide interest in the subject was generated by announcements in 1991 of the location of objects confiscated by Soviet Trophy Brigades from German territory at the end of the war.[3] The unification of Germany in 1990 and dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 were followed by a number of goodwill agreements between Germany and the countries of the former USSR, as well as the opening of official negotiations on repatriation. It was this spirit of openness and cooperation that made the New York symposium possible. This initial gathering of concerned parties would be followed by a series of conferences, initiatives, agreements, and repatriations that continue into the present.

New York conference and proceedings

The program featured 48 notable speakers—government officials, diplomats, journalists, art historians, archaeologists, lawyers, and independent researchers—from Poland, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Australia, England, and the United States. The combined testimony laid bare another horrifying dimension to the anguish of human suffering wrought by the Second World War.

The symposium was the first to address the issue in a public forum, and led to numerous initiatives on provenance research by the governments involved as well as museums, libraries, and art dealers internationally. As a result, the art world was changed irrevocably. Acquisitions policies were revised in museums in Europe and the United States, and organizations were restructured to facilitate the identification of artistic and cultural objects that had been stolen or transferred illegally during and after the war.[4] Processes were established in several countries to allow families to claim their missing property;[5] such claims have resulted in many works being restored to the heirs and descendants of the rightful owners.[6]

The conference proceedings were published in a comprehensive volume edited by Elizabeth Simpson (Harry N. Abrams, 1997).[7] The book includes 17 treaties, conventions, and other official documents relating to the protection and return of cultural property. These begin with the "Lieber Code" of 1863 and the "Hague Convention of 1907," and continue with the treaties following World War I, the "Hague Convention and Protocol of 1954" for the protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict,[8] the "1970 UNESCO Convention" on the prevention of illicit import, export, and transfer of ownership of cultural property,[9] and the UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects of 1995.[10]

Losses resulting from World War II

Elizabeth Simpson and lawyer Jeanette Greenfield, author of The Return of Cultural Treasures,[11] provided introductory comments on the subject, along with Lynn Nicholas, author of The Rape of Europa,[12] who discussed the massive displacement of art and cultural property that occurred during World War II. Individual countries detailed the damage to their national patrimony, as well as losses suffered by individuals. A talk on Jewish ceremonial art and private property was given by Vivian Mann, then Chair of Judaica at The Jewish Museum, New York. These reports were followed by a series of contributions on laws, directives, and conventions in place at the beginning of World War II, directives in force in Germany during the war, and laws enacted by the Allies to counter German appropriations. These and all the conference presentations are published in the proceedings.

The "Monuments Men"

A group of the so-called "Monuments Men" (which in fact included several women) detailed their firsthand accounts of the work of the art-specialist officers of the Western Allies.[13] Members of the Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives Section of the Office of Military Government, United States, recounted the discovery of looted art and bullion stashed in German mines, bunkers, castles, and churches, along with the redistribution and repatriation of these finds through the Munich and Wiesbaden Collecting Points. Of the veteran officers speaking the New York conference—James S. Plaut (d. 1996), Walter I. Farmer (d. 1997), Edith A. Standen (d. 1998), Craig Hugh Smyth (d. 2006), S. Lane Faison (d. 2006), and Bernard Taper (d. 2016)—none survives today.

Reappearance and recovery

Other repatriations occurred at the end of the war, effected by the US State Department, the USSR, and other countries. Case studies include fascinating discussions of the Quedlinburg Church Treasures, the Soviet Secret Repositories,[14] and the "Treasure of Priam," which was excavated by Heinrich Schliemann at Troy in 1873, shipped out of Turkey illegally by Schliemann, ended up in Berlin, transferred to Moscow by the Soviet Trophy Brigades after the fall of Berlin, held in secret in the Pushkin Museum, and finally brought out of the secret repository and exhibited in the museum in 1996.[15] Despite claims to ownership of the Trojan treasures by Turkey, Germany, and Greece, the objects remain in Moscow with the issue unresolved.

Current issues and cooperative efforts

The conference concluded with a series of presentations on current and proposed efforts to mitigate the losses suffered. Lyndel Prott, then Chief of the International Standards Section of the Cultural Heritage Division of UNESCO, offered a list of "Principles for the Resolution of Disputes Concerning Cultural Heritage Displaced during the Second World War":

  1. Cultural objects that have been taken from territory occupied during or immediately after hostilities in the Second World War by any belligerent will be returned to the country from which they have been taken.
  2. Where there have been successive displacements, the objects will be returned to the territory where they were located at the outbreak of hostilities in 1939.
  3. Principle 1 will apply whether transfers of the cultural objects concerned have taken the form of open looting or plunder, or of transactions apparently legal in form, even when they purport to have been voluntarily effected.
  4. Cultural property taken from an occupied territory shall never be detained as war reparations.
  5. Where cultural objects displaced during or immediately after hostilities in the Second World War have passed into the hands of third parties, the state that is responsible for their removal from the country where they were located in 1939 shall reacquire them for return to the state from which they were taken, by repurchase, indemnity or other appropriate means.
  6. No time limits can be set.
  7. Cultural objects being repatriated are to be accompanied by the relevant scientific documentation where available.
  8. Restitution by replacement is an available remedy where unique cultural objects have been destroyed.

Press coverage and controversy

The "Spoils of War" symposium was covered extensively in the international press, including articles carried by the Associated Press[16] and in The New York Times,[17] New York Newsday,[18] The Wall Street Journal,[19] The Christian Science Monitor,[20] The Observer,[21] The Washington Post,[22] The Philadelphia Inquirer,[23] The Art Newspaper,[24] Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,[25] Süddeutsche Zeitung,[26] Die Zeit,[27] and Pravda.[28] The Forward published a critique that appeared at the time of the symposium; at issue was whether or not the conference gave sufficient weight to Jewish wartime losses, since these losses were detailed within the greater context of the Second World War and the damages experienced by the peoples of the many nations involved.[29]

This issue sparked a second conference in Washington, DC, in 1998. Sponsored by the United States Department of State and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, the "Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets"[30] assembled participants from the New York symposium along with others to discuss Jewish losses in particular, including artworks, books, and archives, as well as insurance claims and other types of assets. This resulted in a further set of "Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art,"[31] outlined by organizer Stuart E. Eizenstat, as well as "Declarations of the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance, and Research."[32]

The New York conference has remained influential, however, due to its broader scope—dealing as it did with losses that occurred throughout Europe, inflicted not only by the Germans but also by the Soviets and western Allies, and affecting all those peoples who suffered as a result of the Second World War.[33] The volume of conference proceedings was reviewed widely by publications in the United States and Europe, as well as The Jerusalem Post,[34] Yeni Yüzyıl,[35] ITAR-TASS,[36] and others. As the only all-inclusive treatment of the subject, it is cited frequently, considered one of the most important books on World War II and its aftermath—and the loss, reappearance, and recovery of cultural property relating to the war.

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Esterow, Milton. "Current Issues and Cooperative Efforts: Introduction." In The Spoils of War—World War II and Its Aftermath: The Loss, Reappearance, and Recovery of Cultural Property. Edited by Elizabeth Simpson, 215. New York: Harry N. Abrams in association with the Bard Graduate Center, 1997.
  2. January 19–21, 1995.
  3. Akinsha, Konstantin, and Grigorii Kozlov. "Spoils of War: The Soviet Union's Hidden Art Treasures." ARTnews, April 1991.
  4. Web site: Standards & Practices | Association of Art Museum Directors . Aamd.org . 2016-08-07.
  5. Web site: Welcome to . Lootedart.com . 2016-08-04.
  6. For artworks returned to the Rosenberg family, for instance, as well as those not yet recovered, see "In Pursuit of Nazi Loot Still at Large," The New York Times, November 1, 2018.
  7. Simpson, Elizabeth, ed. The Spoils of War--World War II and Its Aftermath: The Loss, Reappearance, and Recovery of Cultural Property. New York: Harry N. Abrams in association with the Bard Graduate Center, 1997. History Book Club, Book-of-the-Month Club, Book-of-the-Month Club International, Quality Paperback Book Club.
  8. Web site: Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention . Portal.unesco.org . 2016-08-04.
  9. Web site: Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property . Portal.unesco.org . 2016-08-04.
  10. Web site: Cultural Property - 1995 Convention - Unidroit - International Institute for the Unification of Private Law - Institut International pour l'Unification du droit privè . Unidroit . 2016-08-04.
  11. Greenfield, Jeanette. The Return of Cultural Treasures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  12. Nicholas, Lynn. The Rape of Europa: The Fate of Europe's Treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.
  13. Web site: Official Site . The Monuments Men . 2016-08-04.
  14. Akinsha, Konstantin, Grigorii Kozlov, and Sylvia Hochfield. Beautiful Loot: The Soviet Plunder of Europe's Art Treasures, New York: Random House, 1995.
  15. Tolstikov, Vladimir, and Mikhail Treister. The Gold of Troy: Searching for Homer’s Fabled City. Moscow and New York: Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation and the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, in association with Harry N. Abrams, 1996.
  16. "Seized Art." Associated Press, January 23, 1995.
  17. Blumenthal, Ralph. "Revelations and Agonizing on Soviet Seizure of Artwork." The New York Times, January 23, 1995. Also "Russia's Hidden Attic: Returning the Spoils of World War II." The New York Times, February 1, 1995.
  18. Wallach, Amei. "Russia, Art and the Spoils of War." New York Newsday, January 24, 1995.
  19. Leivick, Laura. "Return Art Stolen during Wars, Now." The Wall Street Journal, February 16, 1995.
  20. Foster, Catherine. "Stolen Art As War Booty: Hostages or Harbingers of Peace?" Christian Science Monitor, February 8, 1995.
  21. Watson, Peter. "Russia Told To Return Looted Treasures." The Observer, January 22, 1995.
  22. Lewis, Jo Ann. "The Art Sleuths Who Struck Gold: Two Muscovites Uncover Treasures Hitler Stole and the Russians Looted." The Washington Post, January 20, 1995.
  23. Klein, Julia. "Plunder of War." The Philadelphia Inquirer, January 25, 1995.
  24. Kaufman, Jason. "International Symposium Considers Questions surrounding WWII Loot: Officials from All Over Europe, Including Russia, To Attend." The Art Newspaper, January 1995.
  25. "Letzte Kriegsgefangene: Die Rückgabe von Kulturgütern." Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, January 25, 1995. Also "Die letzten Kriegsgefangenen: Die New Yorker Debatte über Kulturschätze, die im Weltkrieg verschwanden und geraubt wurden und wieder aufgetaucht sind." Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, January 27, 1995.
  26. "Bloβe Abfolge alter Argumente: Eine New Yorker Tagung über die Rückgabe der im Zweiten Weltkrieg erbeuteten Kunst." Süddeutsche Zeitung, January 24, 1995.
  27. "Krieg im Frieden? Die Konferenz über Beutekunst in New York." Die Zeit, January 27, 1995.
  28. "The Cold War behind Museum Shades: How Russian Art Experts Are Surrendering Masterpieces Which Ended Up in Russia after the Victory over Germany in 1945." Pravda, March 19, 1995.
  29. Cembalest, Robin. "Leaving Jews Out of the Picture at Bard: Restitution Conference Omits Holocaust Claims." The Forward, January 20, 1995. In fact, as the symposium archives show, The Forward had been informed that 18 Jewish organizations were contacted during the planning of the conference and invited to participate. Jewish cultural losses as a result of the war were highlighted throughout the proceedings, and Dr. Vivian Mann, then Chair of Judaica at The Jewish Museum, New York, gave a talk on Jewish claims specifically. See Vivian Mann, "Jewish Ceremonial Art and Private Property," in Elizabeth Simpson, ed., The Spoils of War, 84-87.
  30. Web site: The Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets . Fcit.usf.edu . 2016-08-04.
  31. Web site: Washington Conference Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art . State.gov . 1998-12-03 . 2016-08-04.
  32. Web site: The Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets . Fcit.usf.edu . 2016-08-04.
  33. See "Boris Wants This Book." Publishers Weekly, April 14, 1997.
  34. Henry, Marilyn. "The Fine Art of Plundering." The Jerusalem Post International Edition, July 19, 1997.
  35. Üster, Celal. "The Devil Took It and Spirited It Away..." Yeni Yüzyıl, July 17, 1997.
  36. Berezhkov, Alexei. "A Book on the Problem of the Return of Trophy Artworks Published in the USA." ITAR-TASS, April 23, 1997. Also "Displaced Art: Should the Spoils of War Be Returned?" ITAR-TASS, June 14-20, 1997.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "The Spoils of War (symposium)".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.