The Politics of Modelling, Numbers Between Science and Policy explained

The Politics of Modelling, Numbers Between Science and Policy
Pub Date:August 2023
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Isbn:978-0198872412
Editors:Andrea Saltelli
Monica Di Fiore
Pages:272
Language:English
Subjects:Mathematical modelling
Social statistics
Politics

The Politics of Modelling, Numbers Between Science and Policy is a multi-authors book edited by Andrea Saltelli and Monica Di Fiore and published in August 2023 by Oxford University Press.

Synopsis

The Politics of Modelling elaborates and expands on themes of responsible modelling from a manifesto published in the journal Nature in 2020.[1] The text is structured into three main sections: Meeting Models, The Rules, and The Rules in Practice.[2] [3] The combination of theory with policy relevant examples makes the book accessible to modellers, researchers of modelling, and policy makers.[3]

The volume comes with a foreword of Wendy Nelson Espeland and a preface of Daniel Sarewitz, with chapters from Andy Stirling, Wolfgang Drechsler, Philip B. Stark, Ting Xu, Paolo Vineis, Andrea Saltelli, and other scholars.

Reception

The book argues that models live in a “state of exception” provided by their access to a wealth of methodology of analysis, and by their epistemic authority borrowed from mathematics. This state allows models to better defend an appearance of neutrality that is appreciated by policymakers in search of a justification. A review published in the Science notes that the volume incorporated insights from science and technology studies to explore modeling beyond its technical aspects[2] A second review[3] in the Minerva notes the book’s reference to the works of historians Margaret Morrison and Mary S. Morgan in considering models as mediators whereby models are simultaneously a tool, an interpretation, and a representation of the system. The book contrasts the danger of cynicism with suggestions to make models serve society, based on theory, examples, and a call for participatory modelling linked to Post-normal science, sensitivity auditing and the concept of extended peer community.[3] Reviewers also noted[3] that the book ignores other ongoing efforts in enhancing or formalizing modelling practices such as the framework proposed van Voorn,[4] and the Good Modelling Practice handbook developed for water management purposes in the Netherlands.[5] Reviewers pointed to the book's failure to cover the ‘fit-for purpose’[6] movement in modelling. Other points where the book was found to be lacking by critics were the challenge of participatory modelling, related to gaming and power relations such as Arnsteinds’ ladder of participation.[3]

A review in Mathematics Magazine[7] notes the book’s attention to sensitivity analysis: "[The authors] stress the importance of sensitivity analysis, with a highly-illustrative and illuminating example that analyzes the EOQ (economic order quantity) formula."

Links

See also

Related readings

Notes and References

  1. Saltelli . Andrea . etal . Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto . Nature . June 2020 . 582 . 7813 . 482–484 . 10.1038/d41586-020-01812-9. 32581374 . 2020Natur.582..482S . 1885/219031 . free .
  2. ((Nabavi, E.)), ((Razavi, S.)) . Science . The responsibility turnThe Politics of Modelling: Numbers Between Science and Policy Andrea Saltelli and Monica Di Fiore, Eds. Oxford University Press, 2023. 272 pp . 382 . 6672 . 775 . 17 November 2023 . 1095-9203 . 10.1126/science.adl3473. 37972171 . 265221551 .
  3. ((Melsen, L. A.)) . Minerva . The Politics Behind Overinterpreted and Underexplored Models: A Review of Andrea Saltelli and Monica Di Fiore (eds.), The Politics of Modelling – Numbers between Science and Policy . 17 February 2024 . 62 . 141–144 . 1573-1871 . 10.1007/s11024-024-09524-4 . 267700922 . 17 February 2024.
  4. ((Voorn, G. A. K. van)), ((Verburg, R. W.)), ((Kunseler, E.-M.)), ((Vader, J.)), ((Janssen, P. H. M.)) . Environmental Modelling & Software . A checklist for model credibility, salience, and legitimacy to improve information transfer in environmental policy assessments . 83 . 224–236 . 1 September 2016 . 1364-8152 . 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.003. 2016EnvMS..83..224V . 1874/334178 . 8363664 . free .
  5. Book: ((Waveren, H.)), ((Groot, S.)), ((Scholten, H.)), ((Geer, F.)), ((Wösten, H.)), ((Koeze, R.)), ((Noort, J.)) . 1 January 1999 . Good Modelling Practice Handbook . STOWA . 978-90-5773-056-6.
  6. ((Hamilton, S. H.)), ((Pollino, C. A.)), ((Stratford, D. S.)), ((Fu, B.)), ((Jakeman, A. J.)) . Environmental Modelling & Software . Fit-for-purpose environmental modeling: Targeting the intersection of usability, reliability and feasibility . 148 . 105278 . 1 February 2022 . 1364-8152 . 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105278. 2022EnvMS.14805278H . 245155761 .
  7. ((Campbell, P. J.)) . Mathematics Magazine . Reviews: Saltelli, Andrea, and Monica Di Fiore (eds.), The Politics of Modelling: Numbers Between Science and Policy, Oxford University Press . 97 . 2 . 234–235 . Taylor & Francis . 14 March 2024 . 0025-570X . 10.1080/0025570X.2024.2313390.