Poetics (Aristotle) Explained

Aristotle's Poetics (Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: Περὶ ποιητικῆς Peri poietikês; Latin: De Poetica;[1] [2]) is the earliest surviving work of Greek dramatic theory and the first extant philosophical treatise to focus on literary theory.[3] In this text Aristotle offers an account of Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: ποιητική, which refers to poetry and more literally "the poetic art," deriving from the term for "poet; author; maker," Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: ποιητής. Aristotle divides the art of poetry into verse drama (comedy, tragedy, and the satyr play), lyric poetry, and epic. The genres all share the function of mimesis, or imitation of life, but differ in three ways that Aristotle describes:

  1. Differences in music rhythm, harmony, meter, and melody.
  2. Difference of goodness in the characters.
  3. Difference in how the narrative is presented: telling a story or acting it out.

The surviving book of Poetics is primarily concerned with drama; the analysis of tragedy constitutes the core of the discussion.[4] [5]

Although the text is universally acknowledged in the Western critical tradition, "almost every detail about [t]his seminal work has aroused divergent opinions."[6] Of scholarly debates on the Poetics, four have been most prominent. These include the meanings of catharsis and hamartia, the Classical unities, and the question why Aristotle appears to contradict himself between chapters 13 and 14.[7]

Background

Aristotle's work on aesthetics consists of the Poetics, Politics (Bk VIII), and Rhetoric.[8] The Poetics was lost to the Western world for a long time. The text was restored to the West in the Middle Ages and early Renaissance only through a Latin translation of an Arabic version written by Averroes.[9] The accurate Greek-Latin translation made by William of Moerbeke in 1278 was virtually ignored. At some point during antiquity, the original text of the Poetics was divided in two, each "book" written on a separate roll of papyrus. Only the first part—that which focuses on tragedy and epic (as a quasi-dramatic art, given its definition in Ch. 23)—survives. The lost second part addressed comedy.[10] Some scholars speculate that the Tractatus coislinianus summarises the contents of the lost second book.

Overview

The table of contents page of the Poetics found in Modern Library's Basic Works of Aristotle (2001) identifies five basic parts within it.[11]

  1. Preliminary discourse on tragedy, epic poetry, and comedy, as the chief forms of imitative poetry.
  2. Definition of a tragedy, and the rules for its construction. Definition and analysis into qualitative parts.
  3. Rules for the construction of a tragedy: Tragic pleasure, or catharsis experienced by fear and pity should be produced in the spectator. The characters must be four things: good, appropriate, realistic, and consistent. Discovery must occur within the plot. Narratives, stories, structures, and poetics overlap. It is important for the poet to visualize all of the scenes when creating the plot. The poet should incorporate complication and dénouement within the story, as well as combine all of the elements of tragedy. The poet must express thought through the characters' words and actions, while paying close attention to diction and how a character's spoken words express a specific idea. Aristotle believed that all of these different elements had to be present in order for the poetry to be well-done.
  4. Possible criticisms of an epic or tragedy, and the answers to them.
  5. Tragedy as artistically superior to epic poetry: Tragedy has everything that the epic has, even the epic meter being admissible. The reality of presentation is felt in the play as read, as well as in the play as acted. The tragic imitation requires less time for the attainment of its end. If it has more concentrated effect, it is more pleasurable than one with a large admixture of time to dilute it. There is less unity in the imitation of the epic poets (plurality of actions) and this is proved by the fact that an epic poem can supply enough material for several tragedies.
Aristotle also draws a famous distinction between the tragic mode of poetry and the type of history-writing practiced among the Greeks. Whereas history deals with things that took place in the past, tragedy concerns itself with what might occur, or could be imagined to happen. History deals with particulars, whose relation to one another is marked by contingency, accident, or chance. Contrariwise, poetic narratives are determined objects, unified by a plot whose logic binds up the constituent elements by necessity and probability. In this sense, he concluded, such poetry was more philosophical than history was in so far as it approximates to a knowledge of universals.[12]

Synopsis

Aristotle distinguishes between the genres of "poetry" in three ways:

Language, rhythm, and melody, for Aristotle, make up the matter of poetic creation. Where the epic poem makes use of language alone, the playing of the lyre involves rhythm and melody. Some poetic forms include a blending of all materials; for example, Greek tragic drama included a singing chorus, and so music and language were all part of the performance. These points also convey . Recent work, though, argues that translating rhuthmos here as "rhythm" is absurd: melody already has its own inherent musical rhythm, and the Greek can mean what Plato says it means in Laws II, 665a: "(the name of) ordered body movement," or dance. This correctly conveys what dramatic musical creation, the topic of the Poetics, in ancient Greece had: music, dance, and language. Also, the musical instrument cited in Ch. 1 is not the lyre but the kithara, which was played in the drama while the kithara-player was dancing (in the chorus), even if that meant just walking in an appropriate way. Moreover, epic might have had only literary exponents, but as Plato's Ion and Aristotle's Ch. 26 of the Poetics help prove, for Plato and Aristotle at least some epic rhapsodes used all three means of mimesis: language, dance (as pantomimic gesture), and music (if only by chanting the words).[13]

(Also "agents" in some translations.) Aristotle differentiates between tragedy and comedy throughout the work by distinguishing between the nature of the human characters that populate either form. Aristotle finds that tragedy deals with serious, important, and virtuous people. Comedy, on the other hand, treats of less virtuous people and focuses on human "weaknesses and foibles".[14] Aristotle introduces here the influential tripartite division of characters: superior (βελτίονας) to the audience, inferior (χείρονας), or at the same level (τοιούτους).[15]

One may imitate the agents through use of a narrator throughout, or only occasionally (using direct speech in parts and a narrator in parts, as Homer does), or only through direct speech (without a narrator), using actors to speak the lines directly. This latter is the method of tragedy (and comedy): without use of any narrator.

Having examined briefly the field of "poetry" in general, Aristotle proceeds to his definition of tragedy:

Tragedy is a representation of a serious, complete action which has magnitude, in embellished speech, with each of its elements [used] separately in the [various] parts [of the play] and [represented] by people acting and not by narration, accomplishing by means of pity and terror the catharsis of such emotions.

By "embellished speech", I mean that which has rhythm and melody, i.e. song. By "with its elements separately", I mean that some [parts of it] are accomplished only by means of spoken verses, and others again by means of song.

He then identifies the "parts" of tragedy:

Refers to the "organization of incidents". It should imitate an action that evokes pity and fear. The plot involves a change from bad towards good, or good towards bad. Complex plots have reversals and recognitions. These and suffering (or violence) evoke the tragic emotions. The most tragic plot pushes a good character towards undeserved misfortune because of a mistake (hamartia). Plots revolving around such a mistake are more tragic than plots with two sides and an opposite outcome for the good and the bad. Violent situations are most tragic if they are between friends and family. Threats can be resolved by being done in knowledge, done in ignorance and then discovered, or almost done in ignorance but discovered at the last moment.

Actions should follow logically from the situation created by what has happened before, and from the character of the agent. This goes for recognitions and reversals as well, as even surprises are more satisfying to the audience if they afterwards are seen as a plausible or necessary consequence.

Aristotle defines a tragedy as entertaining by satisfying the moral sense and imitating actions which “excite pity and fear”. The success of a tragedy in calling forth these qualities is revealed through the moral character of the agents, which is revealed through the actions and choices of the agent. In a perfect tragedy, the character will support the plot, which means personal motivations and traits will somehow connect parts of the cause-and-effect chain of actions producing pity and fear.

The main character should be:

Refers to the quality of speech in tragedy. Speeches should reflect character: the moral qualities of those on the stage. The expression of the meaning of the words.

The Chorus should be written as one of the actors. As such, It should be an integral part of the whole: taking a share in the action and contributing to the unity of the plot. It is a factor in the pleasure of the drama.

Refers to the visual apparatus of the play, including set, costumes, and props (anything you can see). Aristotle calls spectacle the "least artistic" element of tragedy, and the For example: if the play has "beautiful" costumes and "bad" acting and "bad" story, there is "something wrong" with it. Even though that "beauty" may save the play it is "not a nice thing".

He offers the earliest-surviving explanation for the origins of tragedy and comedy:

Anyway, arising from an improvisatory beginning (both tragedy and comedy—tragedy from the leaders of the dithyramb, and comedy from the leaders of the phallic processions which even now continue as a custom in many of our cities)...

Influence

The Arabic version of Aristotle's Poetics that influenced the Middle Ages was translated from a Greek manuscript dated to some time prior to the year 700. This manuscript, translated from Greek to Syriac, is independent of the currently-accepted 11th-century source designated Paris 1741. The Syriac-language source used for the Arabic translations departed widely in vocabulary from the original Poetics and it initiated a misinterpretation of Aristotelian thought that continued through the Middle Ages.[17]

The scholars who published significant commentaries on Aristotle's Poetics included Avicenna, Al-Farabi, and Averroes.[18] Many of these interpretations sought to use Aristotelian theory to impose morality on the Arabic poetic tradition. In particular, Averroes added a moral dimension to the Poetics by interpreting tragedy as the art of praise and comedy as the art of blame.[19] Averroes' interpretation of the Poetics was accepted by the West, where it reflected the "prevailing notions of poetry" the 16th century.[19]

Giorgio Valla's 1498 Latin translation of Aristotle's text (the first to be published) was included with the 1508 Aldine printing of the Greek original as part of an anthology of Rhetores graeci. By the early decades of the sixteenth century, vernacular versions of Aristotle's Poetics appeared, culminating in Lodovico Castelvetro's Italian editions of 1570 and 1576.[20] Italian culture produced the great Renaissance commentators on Aristotle's Poetics, and in the baroque period Emanuele Tesauro, with his Cannocchiale aristotelico, re-presented to the world of post-Galilean physics Aristotle's poetic theories as the sole key to approaching the human sciences.[21]

Recent scholarship has challenged whether Aristotle focuses on literary theory per se (given that not one poem exists in the treatise) or whether he focuses instead on dramatic musical theory that only has language as one of the elements.[22]

The lost second book of Aristotle's Poetics is a core plot element in Umberto Eco's novel The Name of the Rose.

Core terms

Editions – commentaries – translations

Sources

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Aristotelis Opera. August Immanuel. Bekker. August Immanuel Bekker. 1837. XI.
  2. Book: Dukore, Bernard F.. Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski. Florence, Ky.. Heinle & Heinle. 1974. 0-03-091152-4. 31.
  3. Book: Aristotle . Aristotle: Poetics, with Tractatus Coislinianus, Reconstruction of Poetics II, and the Fragments of the On the Poets . 1987 . Hackett . London . Janko . Richard.
  4. Aristotle Poetics 1447a13 (1987, 1).
  5. Battin . M. Pabst . 1974 . Aristotle's Definition of Tragedy in the Poetics . The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism . 33 . 2 . 155–170 . 10.2307/429084 . 429084 . 0021-8529.
  6. Book: Carlson, Marvin A. . Theories of the Theatre: A Historical and Critical Survey from the Greeks to the Present . Cornell University Press . 1993 . 978-0-8014-8154-3 . 16.
  7. John. Moles. Notes on Aristotle, Poetics 13 and 14. The Classical Quarterly. 1979. 29. 1. 77–94. 10.1017/S0009838800035187 . 638607 . 170390939 .
    • Sheila. Murnaghan. Sucking the Juice without Biting the Rind: Aristotle and Tragic Mimēsis. New Literary History. Autumn 1995. 26. 4. 755–773. 10.1353/nlh.1995.0058 . 20057317 . 261472745 .
  8. Book: Garver, Eugene . Aristotle's Rhetoric: An Art of Character. 3. 0-226-28424-7. 1994 . University of Chicago Press.
  9. Book: Habib, M.A.R.. A History of Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to the Present. 2005. Wiley-Blackwell. 0-631-23200-1. 60.
  10. Book: Watson, Walter . The Lost Second Book of Aristotle's "Poetics" . 2015-03-23 . University of Chicago Press . 978-0-226-27411-9 . en.
  11. Book: The Basic Works of Aristotle. Aristotle. Richard. McKeon. Modern Library. 2001. Poetics. Ingrid. Bywater. 1453–87.
  12. Silvia. Carli. Poetry is more philosophical than history: Aristotle on mimesis and form. The Review of Metaphysics. December 2010. 64. 2. 303–336. 29765376 . Esp. pp. 303–304, 312–313.
  13. Book: Scott, Gregory L . Aristotle on Dramatic Musical Composition . Existenceps Press . 10 October 2018 . 978-0-9997049-3-6.
  14. Book: Halliwell, Stephen . Aristotle's Poetics. 270. 0-226-31394-8. 1986. University of Chicago Press.
  15. Book: Sifakis, Gregory Michael. 2001. Aristotle on the function of tragic poetry. Crete University Press. 978-960-524-132-2. 50.
    • Aristotle, Poetics 1448a, English, original Greek
    • Book: Northrop Frye, Herman. Anatomy of Criticism. New Jersey. Princeton University Press. 1957. Northrop Frye. Anatomy of Criticism.
  16. Fendt . Gene . Aristotle on Dramatic Musical Composition. By Gregory Scott (Review) . Ancient Philosophy . Philosophy Documentation Center . 39 . 1 . 2019 . 0740-2007 . 10.5840/ancientphil201939117 . 248–252. 171990673 .
  17. Book: Hardison, O. B. Jr.. Averroes . Medieval Literary Criticism: Translations and Interpretations. New York. Ungar. 1987. 81.
  18. Book: Ezzaher, Lahcen E.. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition. 978-1-135-81606-3. Theresa . Enos . 2013 . Arabic Rhetoric. Routledge .
  19. Book: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. 3. 54. 0-521-30008-8. George Alexander . Kennedy. Glyn P. . Norton . 1999. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Book: Minor, Vernon Hyde. Baroque Visual Rhetoric. 2016. 13. University of Toronto Press. 978-1-4426-4879-1.
  21. Book: Eco, Umberto. On literature. 978-0-15-100812-4. Harcourt. 2004. 236.
  22. Destrée. Pierre. Aristotle on the Power of Music in Tragedy. Greek & Roman Musical Studies. 4. 2. 2016. 231–252 . 10.1163/22129758-12341277 .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Poetics (Aristotle)".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.