The Playhouse to Be Let explained

The Playhouse to be Let is a Restoration stage play, a dramatic anthology of short pieces by Sir William Davenant that was acted in August 1663 at the theatre at Lincoln's Inn Fields, and first published in the 1673 collected edition of Davenant's works. The Playhouse to Be Let is noteworthy for providing the first English translation of a play by Molière.[1]

Form and content

Regarding this anthology, the early critic Gerard Langbaine wrote, "I know not under what Species to place this Play, it consisting of several Pieces of different Kinds handsomely tackt together...."[2] Davenant exploited the standard five-Act structure of drama in his era to link five separate short plays, both newly written and previously existent:

The material in Act I provides a detailed view of a theatre manager interacting with actors, that throws light upon the theatrical conditions of Davenant's day.[3] The anthology's blend of serious and comic works has caused critics to wonder about authorial intent, and even authorial identity.

Authorship

Davenant's authorship of the material in Acts III and IV is not disputed. French scholar André de Mandach attributed the rest of the work to Colonel Henry Howard.[4] Henry Howard was one of four playwriting brothers; Sir Robert Howard, Edward Howard, and James Howard being his siblings. The Playhouse to Be Let was in fact attributed to Col. Howard during the eighteenth century.

Mandach argues that Davenant, as a practitioner of heroic drama, was unlikely to have ridiculed it. His argument has in general not persuaded other critics. In the play itself, Davenant writes that "burlesque discovers laughter not in the objects of its hatred, but rather in the objects of its affections."

Influence

The playlet in Act V of The Playhouse to Be Let has been called "the earliest burlesque dramatic piece in the English language."[5] Davenant's comedy had a direct influence on The Rehearsal, the famous 1671 satire by the Duke of Buckingham and his collaborators.[6]

Notes and References

  1. John Wilcox, The Relation of Molière to Restoration Comedy, New York, Columbia University Press, 1938; pp. 127-8.
  2. Gerard Langbaine, An Account of the English Dramatick Poets, London, 1691, pp. 99-100; quoted in Wilcox.
  3. Dane Fransworth Smith, Plays about the Theatre in England from The Reheasral in 1671 to the Licensing Act in 1737, London, Oxford University Press, 1936; pp. 7 and ff.
  4. André de Mandach, "The First Translator of Molière: Sir William Davenant or Colonel Henry Howard," Modern Language Notes, Vol. 66 No. 8 (December 1951), pp. 513-18.
  5. James Maidment and W. H, Logan, eds., The Dramatic Works of Sir William Davenant, Vol. 4, Edinburgh, William Paterson, 1873; p. 6.
  6. Robert D. Hume and Harold Love, eds., Plays, Poems, and Miscellaneous Writings Associated with George Villiers, Second Duke of Buckingham, 2 Volumes, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007; Vol. 1, pp. 341-2.