| The Lottery Man | |
| Director: | Leopold Wharton Theodore Wharton |
| Producer: | F. Ray Comstock Leopold Wharton Theodore Wharton |
| Starring: | Thurlow Bergen |
| Cinematography: | Levi Bacon |
| Editing: | Bess Spencer |
| Distributor: | Whartons Studio |
| Country: | United States |
| Language: | Silent film English intertitles |
The Lottery Man is a 1916 American silent comedy film written by Theodore Wharton and Rida Johnson Young. It was directed by Leopold Wharton and Wharton, and stars Oliver Hardy, Thurlow Bergen and Lottie Alter. It was produced at the Whartons Studio in Ithaca, New York, and distributed by Whartons Studio. The film was released on June 26, 1916. A print of the film exists in the film archive of the Library of Congress.
Jack Wright is a young college man and football hero who after graduating, discovers that his mother has lost the family property, so that he must go to work. He becomes a newspaper reporter and induces the paper to start a lottery with himself as the prize, agreeing to marry the woman who holds the lucky number. Jack then falls in love with his chum, Foxey Peyton's cousin Helen, and repents the lottery plan, but it is too late. Helen, Jack and Foxey all begin buying up papers in the hope that she may get the lucky number and straighten everything out. The drawing is held in front of the City Hall, in the presence of an excited crowd of women. Picture the hero's dismay when a kitchen maid and not his sweetheart, holds the lucky number. True love triumphs when the kitchen maid decides she would rather marry the butler and divide the $100,000 prize money.
Synopsis — (1916) Motion Picture News
Film critic Harvey F. Thew said the film is a "most compact and well-constructed comedy, and the interest is maintained throughout, without resort to slapstick methods or business. In addition, there is some good character drawing, and an atmosphere of healthy, happy outdoor life has been brought into the story".
Lynde Denig of the Moving Picture World said that it lacked much of the humor of the stage comedy from which it was taken, but it is not without redeeming features in the acting of Thurlow Bergen and the situations developed from a first rate farcical plot. It is hardly a picture for audiences accustomed to the niceties of expert studio workmanship, but for those who are not over particular, and who respond to comedy and sentiment in the elementary forms, there should be entertainment in the production.