The Last Chronicle of Barset explained

The Last Chronicle of Barset
Author:Anthony Trollope
Illustrator:George Housman Thomas
Country:England
Language:English
Series:Chronicles of Barsetshire
Publisher:Smith & Elder (book)
Release Date:1 December 1866 – 6 July 1867 (serial); March (Vol. I) & July (Vol. II) 1867 (book)
Media Type:Print (Serial and Hardback)
Preceded By:The Small House at Allington (1864)

The Last Chronicle of Barset is a novel by English author Anthony Trollope, published in 1867. It is the sixth and final book in the Chronicles of Barsetshire series, preceded by The Small House at Allington. The novel is set in the fictional county of Barsetshire and deploys characters from the earlier novels, whilst concentrating on the personnel associated with the cathedral. The main narrative thread is catalysed by the loss of a cheque which had been in the possession of the Reverend Josiah Crawley, and the subsequent reactions of his friends and enemies. Trollope drew inspiration from his father and mother in the creation of the Rev. and Mrs. Crawley.[1] In his autobiography, Trollope regarded this novel as "the best novel I have written.",[2] although later commentators do not agree with this judgement.[3] The serialisation was illustrated by G H Thomas who was selected by the publisher, though Trollope had wished for Millais who had illustrated The Small House at Allington.[4]

Plot summary

The Reverend Josiah Crawley, the perpetual curate of Hogglestock, has a large family and a small income. He cashes a cheque whose origin is shrouded in mystery. The novel then develops the attitudes and reactions of those around him, some of whom, not least Mrs Proudie, the virago wife of the Bishop of Barchester, conclude that Crawley stole the cheque.

The narrative contains numerous sub-plots. One, which is continued from The Small House at Allington, involves Lily Dale and Johnny Eames and is tenuously connected to the main thread. By contrast, Crawley's daughter, Grace, is courted by Henry Grantly, son of Archdeacon Grantly, which poses problems for the archdeacon, who recoils from her lack of family rank or wealth. Initially he joins the accusatory group led by Mrs Proudie; the bishop does not agree, but succumbs to his wife's familiar dominance.

Almost broken by poverty and trouble, Crawley hardly knows himself if he is guilty or not; fortunately, the mystery is resolved in his favour, just as Major Grantly's determination and Grace Crawley's own merit force the archdeacon to overcome his prejudice against her. As with Lucy Robarts in Framley Parsonage, the objecting parent finally invites the young lady into the family; this new connection also inspires the dean and archdeacon to find a new, more prosperous, post for Grace's impoverished father.

Through death or marriage, this final volume manages to tie up more than one thread from the beginning of the series. One subplot deals with the death of Mrs. Proudie, and the bishop's subsequent grief and collapse. Mrs. Proudie, upon her arrival in Barchester in Barchester Towers, had increased the tribulations of the gentle Mr. Harding, title character of The Warden; he dies in peaceful old age, mourned by his family and the old men he loved and looked after as Warden of Hiram's Hospital.

Context

American scholars like James Kincaid have stated that although Trollope's The Last Chronicle of Barset is a work of fiction, it provides an insight into the Victorian era.[5] Robert Polhemus has argued that Trollope was particularly concerned with the social changes that were emerging.[6] Polhemus believed that such changes, including the changing ethical standards, the loss of morality, the emergence of materialism and the rise of bureaucracy had provoked fear in Trollope, thus influencing him to write the novel. Trollope perceived these changes as dangerous because such factors prevented the growth of individualism. This was of concern to Trollope because without individualism, tradition could not be shaped.

Hannah Rogers has argued that Trollope was also fascinated by the history of moral philosophy,[7] a concept that is concerned with human ethics and the way humans react in certain situations. She draws this conclusion from how Trollope's novel features plots that centre on human morality. The impoverished Reverend Crawley is targeted by the powerful Mrs. Proudie for an alleged theft while wealthy stockbrokers can manipulate their way through unfaithful dealings, taking their customers' money. Scholars such as Geoffrey Harvey have interpreted Trollope's novel as a reflection of the prevailing social concerns of the late Victorian period, such as the loss of ethics as materialism began to emerge.[8]

Writing style influences

Rogers states that Trollope's writing style was influenced by Roman orator Cicero and his concept of honestum in which he dictates "all that is manly, honourable, graceful, honest and decorus". Rogers drew this conclusion from Trollope's acclamation of Cicero[9] for this concept in his novel, The Life of Cicero. In 1877, Trollope wrote to Henry Merivale that "No doubt many a literary artist so conceals his art that readers do not know there is much art".[10] Rogers has argued that Trollope's honest literary style involved "concealing his artistry". She interprets this as writing in a manner that did not utilise his full potential, as doing so would prevent him from creating a plot that was far-fetched and unrealistic. Trollope believed that by doing so, he would create an immediate and familiar text for ordinary readers. Writing in an 'honest' manner allowed his readers to recognise the similarities between themselves and the characters. The point of this, as Rogers argues, is so that his readers do not become immersed into a world of imaginary creatures whose lives do not resemble their own in any way.

However, author Henry James criticised Trollope's writing style in this novel, finding it "rather stale".[11] James argued that Trollope overused his 'honest' writing style, causing it to lose its uniqueness and become "copiously watered". James concluded that while Trollope was not the most articulate writer, he was one of the most reliable writers as his stories accurately reflected the Victorian age.

Critical analysis

Power

Academic professor Kincaid has argued that power is illustrated throughout the novel. Power is held by wealthy individuals and the church, reflecting Victorian society where there was a heavy emphasis placed on God and religion. Throughout the play, the lives of lower-class individuals such as the poverty-stricken Josiah Crawley are dictated by the Church and the wealthy who hold the power within society. Ellen Moody points out that the power dynamics of society are immediately established in the opening chapter.[12] She argues that the power of the rich is displayed through how the wealthy stockbrokers can constantly commit fraudulent actions and yet Crawley is regarded as suspicious for allegedly stealing $20. From this, Moody has interpreted the power dynamics as a reflection of one's status in society. She claims that Crawley's low status and impoverished living conditions have subjected him to a life dictated by the wealthy.

Miguel Perez takes note of how there are different forms of power within the novel. Doctor Grantly holds power in the sense that he is the archdeacon, manages multiple businesses and holds the position as the vicar of Plumstead. On the other hand, Reverend Crawley, who is not as wealthy as Grantly and struggles to feed his family, is powerful in the way that he is well educated and intelligent. Perez argues that while Grantly and Crawley's characters contrast each other greatly, both possess some sort of power whether it be wealth or knowledge.

Pride

Gordon Hirsch and Louella Hirsch present the argument that pride is predominantly revealed through Reverend Crawley's character.[13] Both scholars argue that Crawley's refusal to admit that he is somewhat responsible for his suffering stems from his pride. While the wealthy, such as Mrs. Proudie is responsible for placing Crawley on trial for a crime he did not commit, Crawley does not attempt to improve his situation. He resigns from his job and "would do nothing. He would not eat, nor would he even sit at table or say the accustomed grace". The Hirsch academics argue that Crawley constantly blames those surrounding him, unable to see his self-inflicted suffering due to the pride he holds for himself. Furthermore, David Mazurowski states that Crawley is a prideful self martyr, someone who intentionally inflicts suffering on themselves to satisfy a mental need.[14] In this case, Mazurowski believes that Crawley's mental need is the desire to be perceived as heroic and noble for being able to withstand the allegations against him.

Moody notes that Lily Dale's pride strongly resembles Crawley's behaviour of prideful self martyr. Moody states that the only difference is that Lily's prideful behaviour does not result in self-inflicted suffering. Instead, Lily's pride emerges when she chooses the path of an unmarried life despite her mother's pleas and Mrs. Thorne's criticism of her choice to not marry. Lily tells Johnny Eames, "I will not have myself planted out in the middle, for people to look at," which Moody interprets as Lily rejecting the concept of marriage. Perez admires Lily's pride, interpreting it as a positive characteristic as he believes it demonstrates that Lily is not influenced by the societal expectations of marriage.[15]

Feminism

Kincaid has argued that this last novel differentiates itself from the rest of the series in the role that women play. Kincaid points out that Mrs. Crawley is depicted as the one who acts as her husband's rational side. She urges him to recognise the pointless nature of sulking, telling him to "be a man and bear it". Mrs. Dale and Lily are aware of Crawley's innocence and even more, recognise the stubbornness of men, declaring that "A jury of men will not". Mrs. Proudie has no legitimate role in the Church but she does influence the actions of her husband, the Bishop of Barchester. She is confident in her ability to persuade her husband through sexual means when disagreements arise. Furthermore, Kincaid has noted the power dynamics of this couple as when alone, Mrs. Proudie calls her husband Tom yet he still acknowledges her as Mrs. Proudie. From this, Kincaid has interpreted Trollope's novel as a reflection of his society whereby feminism was beginning to emerge.

However, Moody disagrees with Kincaid's argument of Trollope inserting feminism in his novel, arguing that he is "profoundly against regarding women as having value individually". She comes to this judgment after noting how the female characters are either wives or mothers who possess some sort of usefulness and virtue. Moreover, Moody concludes that Trollope had written Lily Dale as a character who found peace and comfort in a small house with her uncle and mother. Were Trollope a true feminist, Moody argues that Lily Dale would have been illustrated to have found happiness through traveling or finding a new job.

Connection to Trollope’s other novels

While The Last Chronicle of Barset can be read as a stand-alone novel, this text is part of the Chronicles of Barsetshire series. This series has six novels that centre on the lives of the people in a small cathedral town situated in the fictional Barsetshire. The series revolves around the relationship between the rich and the poor and the sociopolitical laws of the Barsetshire society. The first novel, The Warden (1855) centres on the moral dilemmas of Reverend Septimus Harding and he appears again in the second novel, Barchester Towers.

Moody takes note of Lily Dale's character development from The Small House at Allington (1864) to The Last Chronicle of Barset (1867). In the prior novel, Trollope had shown Lily Dale as publicly humiliated and treated as an object. However, in the last novel, Lily firmly states to Johnny Eames, upon the occasion of his final marriage proposal, "I will not have myself planted out in the middle, for people to look at. What there is left would die soon." Moody suggests that this newfound confidence is evidence of her growth from a timid teenager to a prideful woman.

Mazurowski points to Reverend Crawley's personality, arguing that Crawley's personality as being both prideful and a self-pitying martyr has altered slightly across three novels - 'Framley Parsonage (1860), 'The Small House at Allington(1862) and The Last Chronicle of Barset (1867). In Trollope's Framley Parsonage, Mazurowski takes note of Crawley's prideful behaviour as Crawley often mocked his close friend Arabin by insulting his horse and refusing to feast with him. Mazurowski argues that Crawley's prideful behaviour intensifies in The Last Chronicle of Barset as Crawley becomes prideful to the point where he refuses to see his own self-inflicted suffering.

Adaptations

Visual form

Other than its written form, The Last Chronicles of Barset has also been transformed into visual illustrations. The visual illustration was designed by George Housman Thomas and was published in 1867 alongside the novel. Titled The Last Chronicle of Barset With Illustrations, the black and white copy features certain events from the novel.[16] For certain illustrations, Thomas had drawn inspiration from John Everett Millais, a Victorian illustrator. Millias had provided multiple illustrations of The Crawley Family in Trollope's fourth novel in the series, Framley Parsonage. Gordon Ray states that these illustrations serve to vividly complement the novel as they provide an understanding of Trollope's intentions with each character.[17] While Trollope did not draw the illustrations himself, Ray stated that each sketch was tailored to Trollope's own personal desire as Trollope believed that "the author can select the subjects better than the artist - having all the feelings of the story at his fingers' end."

Series

The novel has also been converted into a film series directed by Stephen Harrison. Released in 1959 by the British Broadcasting Corporation, the series had six episodes released over the span of three months before coming to an end. The actors in this series include Hugh Burden as Mr. Crawley, Maureen Pryor as Mrs. Crawley and Olga Lindo as Mrs. Proudie.

Radio drama

The text has been transformed into a number of radio dramas. The first was released in 1998. Directed by Cherry Cookson and dramatised by Martin Wade, the play was created following the previous success of a dramatisation of The Small House at Allington.[18] Another radio version directed by Marion Nancarrow and dramatised by Nick Waburton was released on BBC Radio in 2011.[19] On the Goodreads website, the radio drama currently has a rating of 4.3 stars.[20]

Audiobooks

A number of Audiobook versions have also been created and are currently on Audible.com. One is voiced by Timothy West.[21]

Characters

Clergy

Non-clerical male characters

Female characters

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Last Chronicle of Barset, The. 2020-11-24. Trollope Society. en-GB.
  2. Book: Trollope, A. An Autobiography. 2014. Cambridge University Press. 978-1-108-07047-8. Cambridge Library Collection - Literary Studies. Cambridge.
  3. Michael Sadleir: Trollope a commentary, OUP, 1927 R 1961
  4. Sadleir, p273
  5. Web site: Four: The Barsetshire Chronicle (1847-1867). 2020-11-24. www.victorianweb.org.
  6. Book: Polhemus, R.. The Changing World of Anthony Trollope. University of California Press. 1968.
  7. Rogers. L, H.. 1999. Moral Dilemmas and Cases of Conscience: Trollope's Morality in The Warden and The Last Chronicle of Barset. Theses: Honours .
  8. Harvey. G.M. 1976. The Form of the Story: Trollope's The Last Chronicle of Barset. Texas Studies in Literature and Language . 18. 1. 82–97 . 40754429.
  9. Book: Trollope, A. The Life of Cicero. Project Gutenberg. 1882. 1–4.
  10. Book: Tracy, R. Trollope's Later Novels. University of California Press. 1978. 1–3.
  11. Web site: Henry James on Anthony Trollope - The Trollope Society USA. 2020-11-24. www.trollopeusa.org.
  12. Web site: The Modernity of the Last Chronicle of Barset. 2020-11-24. www.victorianweb.org.
  13. Hirsch, G.. Hirsch, L.. 2006. Trollope's The Last Chronicle of Barset: Memory, Depression and Cognitive Science.. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal. 39, 1. 165–179.
  14. Mazurowski. M, D.. 1990. Anthony Trollope's Barsetshire Heroes. 3–5, 60–62.
  15. Perez. P, A, M.. 1999. The Un-Trollopian Trollope: Some Notes on the Barsetshire Novels. Alicante Journal of English Studies. 127–142.
  16. Web site: Annotated Illustrations of Trollope's Fiction: Last Chronicle of Barset 1867. 2020-11-24. www.jimandellen.org.
  17. Ray. N.G.. 1986. Trollope at Full Length.. University of Pennsylvania Press. 31. 313–340.
  18. Web site: The Chronicles of Barset (1995-98). 2020-11-24. Trollope Society. en-GB.
  19. Web site: The Barchester Chronicles.
  20. Web site: The Barchester Chronicles. 2020-11-24. www.goodreads.com.
  21. Book: Audible.com Unlock a listen for every moment. en.
  22. Book: Trollope, Anthony. The Last Chronicle of Barset. 1866. From Project Gutenberg