| Short Title: | Indian Evidence Act, 1872 |
| Citation: | Act No. 1 of 1872 |
| Territorial Extent: | INDIA |
| Enacted By: | The Governor-General in Council |
| Date Enacted: | 15 March 1872 |
| Date Commenced: | 1 September 1872 |
| Date Repealed: | 1 July 2024 |
| Repealed By: | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam |
| Status: | abrogated |
The Indian Evidence Act, originally passed in India by the Imperial Legislative Council in 1872, during the British Raj, contains a set of rules and allied issues governing admissibility of evidence in the Indian courts of law.
The India Evidence Act was replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam[1] on 1st July 2024.
The enactment and adoption of the Indian Evidence Act was a path-breaking judicial measure introduced in India, which changed the entire system of concepts pertaining to admissibility of evidences in the Indian courts of law. Until then, the rules of evidences were based on the traditional legal systems of different social groups and communities of India and were different for different people depending on caste, community, faith and social position. The Indian Evidence Act introduced a standard set of law applicable to all Indians.
The law is mainly based upon the firm work by Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, who could be called the founding father of this comprehensive piece of legislation.[2] [3]
The Indian Evidence Act, identified as Act no. 1 of 1872,[4] and called the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, has eleven chapters and 167 sections, and came into force on 1 September 1872. At that time, India was a part of the British Empire. Over a period of more than 150 years since its enactment, the Indian Evidence Act has basically retained its original form except certain amendments from time to time.
Amendments:
The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2005
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018 (22 of 2018)
The Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019
When India gained independence on 15 August 1947, the Act continued to be in force throughout the Republic of India and Pakistan.[5] Since the independence of Bangladesh in 26 March 1971, it is in use throughout Bangladesh though some necessary amendments have been made. After 1947, the Act continues in force in India, but it was repealed in Pakistan in 1984 by the Evidence Order 1984 (also known as the "Qanun-e-Shahadat"). It also applies to all judicial proceedings in the court, including the court martial. However, it does not apply on affidavits and arbitration.
This Act is divided into three parts and there are 11 chapters in total under this Act.[4]
In the Evidence Act All the Provisions can be divided into two Categories(1) Taking the Evidence (By Court)(2) Evaluation
Taking Evidence : Parties to a proceeding before a court of law can adduce only admissible evidence. Admissible evidence are either "Fact in issue" or "Relevant Facts"[10] which are not excluded from being adduced by any other provisions of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 3 of the Act defined Fact, Fact in issue and Relevant Facts.
According to section 59 and 60, facts can be proved by two ways, One is Orally and Second is Documentary (includes Electronic Documents), Oral Evidence mostly suggest the Verbal deposition before the Court (and not other wise), and Which includes oral statement regarding materials too, Documentary Evidence suggest the Documents. So The Evidence Regarding Matter which have number of Facts, for which Evidence by way of oral or Documentary produced before the court for its Evaluation for either one fact or facts. Court by going through those Documentary Evidence and Oral Evidence decide that particular fact and all facts are proved or not, or whether the fact or facts can be presumed to be proved?
In Evaluation as above said by looking into the Oral and Documentary Evidence Court decide whether particular fact is proved or not, or facts are proved or not, In Evaluation there are two concepts to prove facts; One is Prove (Prove, Disprove or Not prove) and Other is Presumption[11] (that fact is proved) (may Presume, Shall presume and Conclusive proof) After going to Oral and Documentary Evidence Court see that whether any fact or facts are proved by looking to such evidence or not? If at all no evidence is given or enough evidence is given for the fact its said fact is 'Not proved'; The second Concept for evaluation is "Presumption" In Evidence many Section suggest these presumptions, Where there is said Facts 'may presume', Court is extremely free to believe it or not and may ask to prove the fact, According to section 4 in 'shall presume' court has no discretion and should consider the fact as proved unless it is disproved, Where in any provision it is said that particular fact, or particular fact in particular circumstances must be concluded as "conclusive proof" Court has to regard it as proved and shall not allow parties to adduce evidence to rebut it.[12]
Evidence Act may be divided in four questions.
Question 1 What is the Evidence given of?
Answer 1 of Facts ("Facts In Issue" or "Relevant Facts")
Question 2 How the Evidence of such Facts are Given
Answer 2 The Evidence of Such Facts is Given Either by way of "Oral Evidence" or "Documentary Evidence"
Question 3 On whom does the Burden of proof lie?
Answer 3 "Burden of Proof"(of particular fact) or "Onus of proof" (to prove whole case) lies on the Prosecution incharge
Question 4 What are the Evaluation of the Facts.
Answer 4 The Evaluation is "Prove" or "Presumption"(of prove); The fact is either 'proved','disproved', or 'Not proved'; or there may be presumption that proof of facts "may presume", "shall presume", or "conclusive proof".