The Crest of the Peacock explained

The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics
Author:George Gheverghese Joseph
Language:English
Subject:History of mathematics
Publisher:Princeton University Press
Pub Date:1991
Pages:592
Isbn:9780691135267

The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics is a book authored by George Gheverghese Joseph, and was first published by Princeton University Press in 1991. The book was brought out as a response to view of the history of mathematics epitomized by Morris Kline's statement that, comparing to what the Greeks achieved, "the mathematics of Egyptians and Babylonians is the scrawling of children just learning to write, as opposed to great literature",[1] criticised by Joseph as "Eurocentric".[2] The third edition of the book was released in 2011.[3]

The book is divided into 11 chapters. Chapter 1 provides a lengthy justification for the book. Chapter 2 is devoted to a discussion of the mathematics of Native Americans and Chapter 3 to the mathematics of ancient Egyptians. The next two chapters consider the mathematics of Mesopotamia, then there are two chapters on Chinese mathematics, three chapters on Indian mathematics, and the final chapter discusses Islamic mathematics.

Plagiarism

C. K. Raju accused Joseph and Dennis Almerida of plagiarism [4] of his decade long scholastic work [5] that began in 1998 for the Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture funded by the Indian Academy of Sciences concerning Indian mathematics and its possible knowledge transfer. An ethics investigation of the research team of George Gheverghese Joseph and Dennis Almeida led to the dismissal of Dennis Almeida by University of Exeter [6] and the University of Manchester posting an erratum and acknowledgement of C.K. Raju's work.[7]

G. G. Joseph denies the charges.[8] [9]

Reviews

Notes and References

  1. Joseph (1991), p. 177 misquotes Kline by replacing "Babylonians" by "Mesopotamians".The actual quote from Kline is "Compared with the accomplishments of their immediate successors, the Greeks, the mathematics of the Egyptians and Babylonians is the scrawling of children just learning to write as opposed to great literature." Book: Morris Kline. Mathematics: A Cultural Approach. 1962. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.. 14., Mathematics for Liberal Arts (1967), re-published as Mathematics for the Nonmathematician (1985), p. 14.
  2. Clemency Montelle. Book Review. Notices of the AMS. December 2013. 1459–1463. 5 March 2016.
  3. Book: The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics Third Edition . 24 October 2010 . Princeton University . 9780691135267 . 5 March 2016.
  4. Web site: Summary table of plagiarism by Joseph and Almeida .
  5. C.K. Raju. (2007). Cultural Foundations of Mathematics. Pearson Longman.
  6. Web site: Prof Raju's charge of plagiarism found correct .
  7. Web site: Indians predated Newton 'discovery' by 250 years.
  8. "Indian claims Brit study on calculus was plagiarised" Times of India/ Hindustan Times (Aug 20, 2007)
  9. Web site: 2007-08-25 . Hindustan Times Correction .