The Bennett Freeze Explained

The Bennett Freeze was a 43-year development ban on 1.5 million acres (610,000 ha) of Navajo lands by the US Federal Government. It was put in place in 1966 in order to promote negotiations over a land dispute between the Navajo and the Hopi and lasted until 2009. It was named for the Commissioner of Indian Affairs at the time, Robert L Bennett, and meant that in the "frozen" area, no development at all could occur. This included fixing roofs, building houses, constructing gas and water lines, and repairing roads.[1]

Creation of the Navajo and Hopi Reservations

The Bennett Freeze has its origins in the treaty of Bear Springs of 1868 that established a reservation for many Navajo. This was the result when the Navajo tribe was at war with the US army. As part of this conflict The Kit Carson Campaign sought to end traditional Navajo way of life through a scorched earth policy.[2] Unable to live on their land, many took Long Walk of the Navajo to internment at Fort Sumner in New Mexico.[3]

In 1868, the Navajo signed a treaty with the US government which established a reservation. The initial boundaries were in part of their traditional land base. Other areas were added to in 1878 and 1880.

In 1882, President Chester A. Arthur created an area of land designated for the Hopi tribe and other tribes the Secretary of the Interior might settle on Hopi lands. It was decided the Hopi allotment would be a rectangle framed by lines of latitude and longitude, exactly one degree by one degree, and it left out the significant Hopi village of Moenkopi. It also included areas used by Navajos.

Despite the legal uncertainties of property ownership in the overlapping portions of Hopi and Navajo land, the two tribes co-existed without incident for many decades to come. The sparsely-populated nature of the land in dispute and the differing traditional ways of life of the two tribes kept resource conflicts to a minimum.

The History of the Bennett Freeze

As a result of a 1966 Hopi-Navajo Land Claims case, the then-Commissioner of Indian Affairs Robert L. Bennett created a development ban for Navajo living in the former Joint Use Area. The intent was to reduce tensions by essentially forcing Navajo families to leave the area. However, Navajo continued to reside in the contested area.[4]

Mineral Rights

The land that makes up the Navajo Reservation contains rich deposits of coal and uranium. Generally considered barren rangeland at the time of its creation, the subterranean mineral richness of the area was not fully known or appreciated when the Navajo Reservation was first allotted by the US government, nor when it established the Hopi Reservation.

In 1919, a mining consortium became interested in the coal potential of the western portion of the Navajo Nation. The uncertain nature of land ownership and the rights associated with it became a major issue for the Hopi, Navajo and private mining interests. Competition for the land continued, especially over large coal-containing areas under Black Mesa.

As part of World War II and the Cold War, uranium was mined on both Navajo land and later in the Joint Use Area.

Joint Use Area

In 1962, the Supreme Court ruled in Healing v. Jones that there should be a "Joint Use Area" for both tribes, but tensions continued. The Freeze was intended to be a temporary measure to make the two tribes negotiate over the land, but an agreement was never reached.[5] Under it, Hopi and Navajo would have to "agree upon any proposed economic activity in the area prior to undertaking that activity". This meant the start of many hardships for the thousands of Navajos and Hopi affected because the freeze essentially halted all economic development in the area. Additionally, there was constant conflict revolving around access to sacred sites.[6]

In 1966 the coal company Peabody Coal started mining on Black Mesa.

Changes in the Joint Use Area

In 1972, Assistant Secretary Interior Harrison Loesch tried to decrease the severity of the situation by "unfreezing" some of the areas. However, because these areas were primarily Hopi and therefore hardly any more Hopi territory was affected by the Freeze, the Hopi essentially had unilateral veto power for proposed projects. Recognizing this problem, the Commissioner of Indian Affairs Morris Thomson gave his office the authority to override any improvement requests that the Hopi had rejected in 1976. The Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Act of 1974 was a further attempt to reduce tensions by forcing Hopis off of lands reserved for Navajos and vice versa. Under this act, 6,000 Navajos had to leave their homes and once again, tensions were not reduced. Some claim that the primary beneficiary of this act were actually coal companies, specifically Peabody Coal, who would gain land access.[7] They also posit that the conflict between the Hopi and Navajo was greatly exaggerated precisely to gain access to these resources.

In 1980, the US government tried to intervene again. However, as the government itself admitted in Senate Report 100-462, "the result [of past US actions] has been that the Native Americans living in the Bennett Freeze region reside in conditions that have not changed since 1966 and need to be improved".

In 2005, Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) introduced Senate Bill 1003: Navajo-Hopi Land Settlements of 2005. The bill passed the senate and included provisions such as amendments to the "Joint Use Area" established in 1880.[8]

In 2009, the development ban was lifted by President Obama.[9]

In 2010, Representative Ann Kirkpatrick (D-Arizona) introduced legislation to allocate more funds to the former Bennett Freeze area, but the bill has not passed.[10]

Impact of Bennett Freeze

The ban, which lasted 40 years, affected the lives of nearly 10,000 Navajo people who lived in the affected area. Now, around 20,000 people live in the formerly frozen area.[11] Although the development freeze has been lifted since 2009, people in the area continue to suffer. Only 24% of the houses in the area are habitable, almost 60% do not have electricity, and the majority do not have access to potable running water. The legacy of the Bennett Freeze still looms over the region and deeply affects the day-to-day lives of its residents. In testimony before Congress, Nelson Gorman, Jr., Speaker of the Navajo Nation Council, likened it to "the deplorable conditions approximating those found only in underdeveloped third world countries.[12]

With the advent of the Atomic Age in the 1940s and the subsequent onset of the Cold War, uranium mining on the Navajo Nation began.[13] This has left a legacy of high cancer rates and other adverse health impacts, such as tainted wells and aquifers, that is still affecting the current residents of the area. The mine extracted as much as 1.3 billion gallons of water from the Navajo aquifer annually, and an estimated 45 billion gallons in Black Mesa's life cycle.

References

Notes and References

  1. News: Trying to be rebuild[sic] after 40 frozen years]. Linthicum. Kate . 2009-11-05. Los Angeles Times. en-US. 0458-3035 . 2016-12-16 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200510151200/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2009-nov-05-na-bennett-freeze5-story.html . 2020-05-10 . live.
  2. News: Kit Carson's campaign against the Indians - Jul 07, 1863 - HISTORY.com. HISTORY.com. 2016-12-16.
  3. Book: Native North Americans: An Ethnohistorical Approach. Martin. Josh. McCarty. T.L.. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt. 1990. 251–260.
  4. News: 110-Year-Old Navajo-Hopi Land Dispute Haunts Tribal Relations : Southwest: Standoff has forced hundreds of Native Americans to leave their ancestral homes. Those remaining live in squalor.. RAWSON. WILLIAM F.. 1993-10-17. Los Angeles Times. en-US. 0458-3035. 2016-12-16.
  5. Moore. Josh. 1993. Justice too long delayed on the Navajo Reservation: the 'Bennett' Freeze as a case study in government treatment of Native Americans. Harvard Human Rights Journal. 6.
  6. Web site: S. Rept. 110-462 - A BILL TO REPEAL SECTION 10(F) OF PUBLIC LAW 93-531, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BENNETT FREEZE. www.congress.gov. 2016-12-16.
  7. News: McCain & The Forced Navajo Relocation Law. Daily Kos. 2016-12-16.
  8. Web site: Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Amendments of 2005. McCain. John. May 11, 2005. congress.gov.
  9. Web site: The Navajo Times Online - Obama signs Bennett Freeze repeal. navajotimes.com. 2016-12-16.
  10. Web site: H.R.6525 - Former Bennett Freeze Area Development Act. Kirkpatrick. Ann. congress.gov.
  11. News: The Bennett Freeze's Surreal Nightmare Should Be Ending—But It's Not - Indian Country Media Network. 2012-12-18. Indian Country Media Network. en-US. 2016-12-16.
  12. " (https://archive.org/stream/developmentneeds00unit/developmentneeds00unit_djvu.txt)
  13. Web site: Introduction to Uranium Exposures and Environmental Health on the Navajo Nation. Shuey. Chris. Ong. Jennifer. November 7, 2012. UNM Lecture Series for Diné College.