Red Bluff Diversion Dam Explained

Red Bluff Diversion Dam
Coordinates:40.1536°N -122.2025°W
Country:United States
Location:Tehama County, California
Purpose:Irrigation
Status:Decommissioned
Construction Began:1962
Opening:1964
Cost:$3,465,155
Owner:U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Dam Type:Concrete gravity
Dam Crosses:Sacramento River
Dam Height Foundation:52feet
Dam Length:5985feet
Dam Elevation Crest:256feet[1]
Dam Volume:9630yd3
Res Name:Lake Red Bluff
Res Capacity Total:4170acre feet
Res Catchment:8900mi2[2]

Red Bluff Diversion Dam is a disused irrigation diversion dam on the Sacramento River in Tehama County, California, United States, southeast of the city of Red Bluff. Until 2013, the dam provided irrigation water for two canals that serve 150000acres of farmland on the west side of the Sacramento Valley. The dam and canals are part of the Sacramento Canals Unit of the Central Valley Project, operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. In 2013, the dam was decommissioned and the river allowed to flow freely through the site in order to protect migrating fish. A pumping plant constructed a short distance upstream now supplies water to the canal system.

Specifications

The dam is a concrete gated weir design, 5985feet long, with a structural height of 52feet. Eleven fixed wheel gates, each 60feet wide and 18feet high, control the outflow of water to the Sacramento River. The concrete piers between the gates are 8feet in width. The entire structure contains about 9600yd3 of concrete.[3] Lake Red Bluff, formed by the dam when the gates are lowered, had a maximum depth of 13feet,[4] a normal storage of 3920acre feet, and a maximum storage of 4170acre feet.[3] The original design of the dam included two fish ladders, one on each end of the dam; a third was added in 1984 in the middle of the dam.[5]

A diversion headworks and settling basin on the south bank of the Sacramento River originally provided a gravity flow of water to two aqueducts, the Tehama-Colusa Canal and Corning Canal. The headworks consist of six 11.5x radial gates with a capacity of 3100cuft/s.[5] This water is now lifted directly from the Sacramento River via a pumping plant constructed as part of the Red Bluff Fish Passage Improvement Project. The pumping plant has a capacity of 2000cuft/s, with potential future expansion to 2500cuft/s.[6]

The Tehama Colusa Canal, larger of the two canals, is 110.9miles long, with a capacity of 2530cuft/s. The Corning Canal is 21miles long and can carry 500cuft/s. Together, the canals irrigate 150000acres[6] in Tehama, Glenn, Colusa and Yolo Counties, of which 105000acres lacked sufficient water before the project was built. Six additional pumping plants are required at various points to maintain water flow in the two canals. Water is also provided to 20000acres of wildlife preserves in the Sacramento Valley.[7] The total crop value is $250 million, with total benefits of $1 billion per year to the regional economy.[8]

Construction history

Although the Central Valley Project was initially authorized in 1935, the Sacramento Canals Division was not authorized until September 29, 1950 by President Harry Truman. The contract for construction of Red Bluff Diversion Dam was awarded in 1962 to Vinnell Corporation, for a total of $3,465,155. Work on the dam began in 1962 and was completed on August 9, 1964, more than 4 months ahead of schedule.[9] The Corning Canal had been completed by 1959, but the much larger Tehama Colusa Canal was not completed until 1980.[9]

Environmental impact

While the dam is relatively small, it has historically blocked passage of salmon, steelhead and sturgeon runs on the Sacramento River with resulting detrimental impact on these fish populations. This occurred both due to improper construction of the fish ladders on the dam, and turbulence caused by water diversion which disorient migrating fish. A fish screen was installed between 1969 and 1971 to prevent fish from entering the canal headworks,[7] and a new fish ladder was later constructed at a cost of $17 million. Starting in 1987, the dam gates were left open between December 1 and April 1 to help the winter Chinook salmon run. However, this did not have an appreciable impact on fish populations; in 1991, the winter Chinook count hit a record low of 191, down from 118,000 in 1969.[9] The spring Chinook salmon run has not been as severely impacted by dam operations.[10] By 2008, the dam gates were open in all months except for the primary irrigation season of mid-May to mid-September, but the migrating fish count remained low.[6] In 2009, the National Marine Fisheries Service mandated that the dam gates be opened year round, allowing the river to flow freely. A new pumping plant and fish screen was constructed upstream to divert water into the Tehama-Colusa and Corning Canals. These works effectively made the Red Bluff dam obsolete.[11]

In 2013, the Bureau of Reclamation awarded E.C. Smith Inc. a contract of $3.28 million to decommission the dam. While the dam is not planned to be removed, its gates are permanently locked in the open position.[12] The decommissioning has been controversial, as it resulted in the loss of Lake Red Bluff, the reservoir originally formed behind the dam and a popular recreation spot in the area. The total cost of restoring fish populations above Red Bluff Dam has reached about $180 million.[13]

See also

Notes and References

  1. retired. 231312. Red Bluff Diversion Dam. 1981-01-19. 2016-02-14.
  2. Web site: Red Bluff Diversion Dam. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 2009-06-04. 2017-02-10. https://web.archive.org/web/20160326122323/http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Facility.jsp?fac_Name=Red+Bluff+Diversion+Dam&groupName=Hydraulics+%26+Hydrology. 2016-03-26.
  3. Web site: National Performance of Dams Program. Stanford University. 2017-02-10.
  4. Web site: Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Water Management Technical Report: Shasta Lake Water Resources Investigation, California. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Nov 2011. 2017-02-10.
  5. Web site: Description of Alternatives. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Red Bluff Diversion Dam Fish Passage Improvement Project EIS/EIR. 2017-02-10.
  6. Web site: Fish Passage Improvement Project at the Red Bluff Diversion Dam. Tehama Colusa Canal Authority. Sep 2012. 2017-02-11.
  7. Web site: Sacramento Canals Unit Project. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 2011-04-21. 2017-02-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20160506095507/http://www.usbr.gov/projects/Project.jsp?proj_Name=Sacramento+Canals+Unit+Project. 2016-05-06.
  8. Web site: Sacramento River - Red Bluff Fish Passage Improvement Project. U.S. Department of the Interior. 2017-02-11.
  9. Web site: Sacramento River Division - Central Valley Project. Stene, Eric A.. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 1994. https://web.archive.org/web/20161009162007/http://www.usbr.gov/projects//ImageServer?imgName=Doc_1303395363655.pdf. 2016-10-09.
  10. Web site: Chapter 5 - Basic Biology, Life History, and Baseline for Winter-run and Spring-run Chinook Salmon and Coho Salmon. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. CVP Operations Criteria and Plan - Biological Assessment. Aug 2008. 2017-02-11.
  11. Web site: Red Bluff Diversion Dam Fish Passage Improvement - Sacramento Valley Region. Sacramento River Watershed Program. 2017-02-11.
  12. Web site: Reclamation Awards Contract to Decommission Red Bluff Diversion Dam on the Sacramento River. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 2013-09-27. 2017-02-11.
  13. News: Red Bluff Diversion Dam to be permanently decommissioned for salmon's benefit. Record Searchlight. Duda, Clay. 2013-09-27. 2017-02-11.