Author: | Ted Hegemann |
Ted the Caver | |
Genre: | Creepypasta |
Publication Type: | Electronic |
Pub Date: | 2001 |
Published In: | Self-published Angelfire website |
Language: | English |
"Ted the Caver" is a short horror story by Ted Hegemann, self-published on an Angelfire website in 2001. It is presented as the online diary of a man who excavates an unexplored cave with his friends. As he unearths the passage further, the entries become increasingly unsettling.
The story was widely shared on the early internet, where message boards constantly debated its authenticity. Some users thought it was true by virtue of the many images and technical details, insofar as the cave in the story was able to be identified. After several years, the author revealed that "Ted the Caver" was based on his real caving experiences but he had added numerous creative embellishments.
An early internet horror story, "Ted the Caver" is sometimes considered the first creepypasta and popularized several of the subgenre's tropes. An independent film titled Living Dark: The Story of Ted the Caver (2013) loosely adapted the story. Another full length independent film was uploaded in chapters to YouTube by the channel Alex Archives that adapts the story nearly beat for beat.
"Ted the Caver" is presented as the online diary of a recreational caver. At the beginning, the narrator refuses to disclose any actual names or locations for the apparent safety of his readers. He and his friend, "B", decide to go caving and find a small hole within the local "Mystery Cave". He finds that the hole leads to a tight passage before opening up further in; excited that it may be an unexplored passage, the pair spend days tirelessly excavating it.
As the explorers move further into the cave, strange hieroglyphs and winds are encountered. In a final blog post, Ted writes that he and his companions are going to bring a gun into the cave after experiencing a series of nightmares and hallucinations, as well as an encounter with what could be presumed as a supernatural being. The blog has not been updated since this post.
The earliest internet horror stories, such as "the black-eyed children", consisted only of text and had to be posted to bulletin board systems or Usenet newsgroups. The rise of free website-building services in the late 1990s meant that anybody could create their own websites and incorporate non-textual elements such as images, animations and hyperlinks.[1]
"Ted the Caver" was self-published as a series of blogs on a free Angelfire website.[2] [3] The first entry is dated 23 March 2001,[4] and the final entry is dated 19 May 2001. The author was later revealed to be an American man named Ted Hegemann; "B" was his friend, Brad.[5] It is considered by some to be the first creepypasta, Internet slang for a kind of horror story which is widely circulated online.[6]
"Ted the Caver" was widely shared on the early internet, where message boards constantly debated its authenticity. The Daily Dot
Some users argued that it was genuine by virtue of its many images and details, to the extent that a group of cavers were able to identify "Mystery Cave" as an actual cave in the U.S. state of Utah. Another short story, Thomas Lera's "The Fear of Darkness", was controversially shared by some users as a completed version of "Ted the Caver". Its ending explained elements of the story which were left as a mystery in the original. However, "The Fear of Darkness" was merely a fan-made version. After several years, Hegemann resurfaced online and revealed that while "Ted the Caver" was based on his actual caving experiences, he had added many fictional aspects to it.
In Twenty-First Century Digital Gothic (2019), Joseph Crawford, a lecturer at the University of Exeter's English department, argued that "Ted the Caver" was significant because it was one of the first internet horror stories to use hyperlinks and real-time updates as narrative techniques. These techniques are distinctly digital and cannot be replicated in print. In using them, "Ted the Caver" takes the horror trope of "found document" or "found footage" stories and modifies them for a digital context.[8]
While "Ted the Caver" follows the traditional structure of these stories, the irregular real-time updates gave readers the impression that they were witnessing the events unfold as they happened; in print works, the events described have already concluded. Crawford added that "the final entry only became 'final' retroactively after its readers had given up hope of a new entry ever appearing", exploiting the fact that readers did not know when the website would receive a new update. Many later online horror works, such as Marble Hornets ("Entry #26", 2010), also use live updates to create tension and anticipation and imply that a terrible fate had befallen the authors.
"Ted the Caver" has a rudimentary website design. Rather than embedding images in the text, it linked to thema then-common practice which reduced load times on the slower connection speedswhich Crawford thought gave the reader a sense of apprehension over what would appear. While none of the story's images are disturbing, this technique would be used more consciously in later horror stories such as "The Grifter" (2009). Since the blogs link to the next entry, it makes it impossible to know when the story ends until the final hyperlink ends up directing the reader to the same page, implying that Ted had been killed by the entity.
Bloody Disgusting
Romano observed that some elements of "Ted the Caver" would become creepypasta tropes. He cited the unsettling setting inhabited by a supernatural entity, the "obsessed narrator" who nevertheless continues to return to the danger, and an ambiguous ending implying the danger's continued existence.
David L. Hunt directed Living Dark: The Story of Ted the Caver (2013), an independent horror film loosely based on the creepypasta. Chris Cleveland and Matthew Alan play two estranged brothers who, following their father's funeral, reunite to explore a cave which may hold the answers to his death.[9] [10] [11]
Originally produced in 2008, Living Dark made its way around film festivals. The rights were eventually sold to New Films International, which released the film for theatres and video on demand on 2 October 2015.[12] [13] The film received little attention. Reviewing Living Dark in 2020, Screen Rant thought that although it was a "solid" horror film, it could not convey the source material's psychological tension and had an ineffectual twist. H.C. believed that, despite its low budget, the film retained the original's atmosphere.