Tamarack, Minnesota Explained

Tamarack, Minnesota
Settlement Type:City
Subdivision Type:Country
Subdivision Name:United States
Subdivision Type1:State
Subdivision Name1:Minnesota
Subdivision Type2:County
Subdivision Name2:Aitkin
Established Title:Settled
Established Date:1874
Established Title1:Incorporated
Established Date1:July 26, 1921[1]
Unit Pref:Imperial
Area Footnotes:[2]
Area Total Km2:9.07
Area Land Km2:9.07
Area Water Km2:0.00
Area Total Sq Mi:3.50
Area Land Sq Mi:3.50
Area Water Sq Mi:0.00
Population As Of:2020
Population Total:57
Population Density Km2:6.84
Population Density Sq Mi:17.71
Timezone:Central (CST)
Utc Offset:-6
Timezone Dst:CDT
Utc Offset Dst:-5
Elevation Ft:1266
Coordinates:46.6533°N -93.1333°W
Postal Code Type:ZIP code
Postal Code:55787
Area Code:218
Blank Name:FIPS code
Blank Info:27-64156[3]
Blank1 Name:GNIS feature ID
Blank1 Info:2396028

Tamarack is a city in Aitkin County, Minnesota, United States. The population was 94 at the 2010 census.[4] Tamarack is located along Minnesota State Highway 210 at the junction with Aitkin County Roads 6 and 16. Other routes include Main Street.

History

Tamarack was first settled circa 1874. The post office began in 1898. Tamarack was incorporated in 1921. The community was established when the Northern Pacific Railway laid track from Duluth to Brainerd.[5]

Geography

According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 3.58sqmi, all land.[6]

Demographics

2010 census

As of the census[7] of 2010, there were 94 people, 40 households, and 23 families living in the city. The population density was 26.3PD/sqmi. There were 49 housing units at an average density of 13.7/sqmi. The racial makeup of the city was 97.9% White, 1.1% Native American, and 1.1% from two or more races.

There were 40 households, of which 27.5% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 45.0% were married couples living together, 2.5% had a female householder with no husband present, 10.0% had a male householder with no wife present, and 42.5% were non-families. 37.5% of all households were made up of individuals, and 15% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.35 and the average family size was 2.83.

The median age in the city was 36.4 years. 27.7% of residents were under the age of 18; 4.3% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 28.7% were from 25 to 44; 23.4% were from 45 to 64; and 16% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 53.2% male and 46.8% female.

2000 census

As of the census of 2000, there were 59 people, 30 households, and 18 families living in the city. The population density was 16.4/mi2. There were 48 housing units at an average density of 13.3/mi2. The racial makeup of the city was 93.22% White, 1.69% African American, and 5.08% from two or more races. 29.8% were of Norwegian, 21.1% Finnish, 19.3% Irish, 8.8% Polish, 8.8% Swedish, 7.0% German and 5.3% Scottish ancestry according to Census 2000.

There were 30 households, out of which 23.3% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 43.3% were married couples living together, 13.3% had a female householder with no husband present, and 40.0% were non-families. 40.0% of all households were made up of individuals, and 16.7% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 1.97 and the average family size was 2.56.

In the city, the population was spread out, with 20.3% under the age of 18, 3.4% from 18 to 24, 22.0% from 25 to 44, 33.9% from 45 to 64, and 20.3% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 49 years. For every 100 females, there were 110.7 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 113.6 males.

The median income for a household in the city was $20,625, and the median income for a family was $21,875. Males had a median income of $22,083 versus $7,083 for females. The per capita income for the city was $35,197. There were 8.7% of families and 10.6% of the population living below the poverty line, including no under eighteens and 13.6% of those over 64.

Economy

In 2020, highly valuable nickel, copper and cobalt occurrences were discovered near Tamarack. Environmental groups have expressed concerns over the potential pollution of the Kettle River headwaters, and the Mississippi watershed. The Environmental Protection Agency considers hardrock mining the top polluting industry in the US, and there is a long history of toxic emission problems at such operations around the world.[8] [9] Exploratory drilling occurred near Tamarack occurred in 2022.[10]

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Guide to Tamarack Minnesota.
  2. Web site: 2020 U.S. Gazetteer Files. United States Census Bureau. July 24, 2022.
  3. Web site: U.S. Census website. United States Census Bureau. 2008-01-31.
  4. Web site: 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File. American FactFinder. U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census. 23 April 2011.
  5. Book: Upham, Warren. Minnesota Place Names: A Geographical Encyclopedia. 2001. Minnesota Historical Society Press. 978-0-87351-396-8. 18.
  6. Web site: US Gazetteer files 2010. United States Census Bureau. 2012-11-13. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20120702145235/http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt. 2012-07-02.
  7. Web site: U.S. Census website. United States Census Bureau. 2012-11-13.
  8. Web site: Seitz . Greg . 3 July 2020 . Mining exploration near headwaters streams causes pollution concerns . St. Croix 360 . 30 August 2022.
  9. https://www.slrconsulting.com/projects/tamarack-north-project-pea-update-cftf-design Tamarack North Project PEA Update – CFTF Design
  10. News: This Remote Mine Could Foretell the U.S. Electric Car Industry's Future . Ana . Swanson . 30 August 2022 . . 30 August 2022.