XVIII International Chopin Piano Competition explained

The Eighteenth International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition
Date: (preliminary round)
(main stage)
Venue:National Philharmonic, Warsaw
Host:Fryderyk Chopin Institute
Holder Label:Winner
Holder: Bruce Liu
Previous:17th
Main:Chopin Competition
Next:19th

The XVIII International Chopin Piano Competition (Polish: XVIII Międzynarodowy Konkurs Pianistyczny im. Fryderyka Chopina) was held from 2 to 23 October 2021 in Warsaw. Originally scheduled for 2020, the quinquennial competition was twice postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

87 pianists from 18 countries took part in the main stage of the competition, which was divided into three stages with 87, 45 and 23 participants each, and a final with twelve pianists. The first prize was awarded to Bruce Liu of Canada.

Background

The competition was originally scheduled to take place from 2 to 23 October 2020, with the preliminary round to be held from 17 to 28 April.[1] In May 2020, the competition was postponed to the same dates in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This was decided by Poland's Minister of Culture and National Heritage, Piotr Gliński, together with Artur Szklener, director of the Fryderyk Chopin Institute in Warsaw, after additional consultations with Poland's Ministry of Health.[2] In January 2021, Szklener announced that the preliminary round would be postponed to July.[3]

Awards

The jury awarded eight main prizes to the finalists of the competition. The first prize went to Bruce Liu of Canada. The second prize was jointly awarded, ex aequo, to Alexander Gadjiev and Kyohei Sorita, while the third prize went to Martín García García. The fourth prize was shared, ex aequo, by Aimi Kobayashi and Jakub Kuszlik, the fifth prize was awarded to Leonora Armellini, and the sixth prize went to J J Jun Li Bui.[4]

Artur Szklener, director of the Chopin Institute, announced that three pianists had identical scores, leading to very long debates among the jury. The winner of the competition, however, was unambiguously decided.[5]

PrizeWinner
€40,000Bruce Liu Canada
€30,000Alexander Gadjiev Italy Slovenia
€30,000Kyohei Sorita Japan
€20,000Martín García García Spain
4th€15,000Aimi Kobayashi Japan
€15,000Jakub Kuszlik Poland
5th€10,000Leonora Armellini Italy
6th€7,000J J Jun Li Bui Canada
€4,000Eva Gevorgyan Armenia
€4,000Hyuk Lee
€4,000Kamil Pacholec Poland
€4,000Hao Rao China

In addition, three of the four special prizes were awarded.[4]

Special prizeFounderWinner
Best Performance of a Concerto€5,000Warsaw PhilharmonicMartín García García Spain
Best Performance of Mazurkas€5,000Polish RadioJakub Kuszlik Poland
Best Performance of a Polonaise€5,000Fryderyk Chopin Societynot awarded
Best Performance of a Sonata€10,000Krystian ZimermanAlexander Gadjiev Italy Slovenia

Preliminary stage

The preliminary stage was held from 12 to 23 July 2021 in the Chamber Hall of the National Philharmonic in Warsaw. Participants were required to perform the following works:[6]

Ultimately, 151 contestants performed in the preliminary stage, of which the jury admitted 78 to the main stage. They were joined by an additional nine pianists, who qualified to the main stage directly by winning major piano competitions.[7] [8]

!Competitor!Country!Result
Leonora Armellini ItalyTo Stage I
Anfisa Bobylova Ukraine
J J Jun Li Bui CanadaTo Stage I
Łukasz Byrdy Poland
Michelle Candotti ItalyTo Stage I
Luigi Carroccia Italy
Kai-Min ChangTo Stage I
Han Chen
Junhui Chen ChinaTo Stage I
Xuehong Chen ChinaTo Stage I
Zixi Chen ChinaTo Stage I
Hyounglok ChoiTo Stage I
Martina Consonni Italy
Diana Cooper France
Federico Gad Crema ItalyTo Stage I
Aleksandra Hortensja Dąbek PolandTo Stage I
Stephanie Draughon United States
Hsin-Yu Duan
Mateusz Duda Poland
Alberto Ferro ItalyTo Stage I
Yasuko Furumi JapanTo Stage I
Alexander Gadjiev Italy
Slovenia		To Stage I
Martín García García SpainTo Stage I
Eva Gevorgyan
Armenia		To Stage I
Jorge González Buajasan CubaTo Stage I
Joanna Goranko PolandTo Stage I
Chelsea Guo United StatesTo Stage I
Xu Guo China
Eric Guo CanadaTo Stage I
Katharina Hack Germany
Chi Ho Han
Saaya Hara JapanTo Stage I
Yukino Hayashi Japan
Wataru Hisasue Japan
Yifan Hou ChinaTo Stage I
Wei-Ting HsiehTo Stage I
Yun-Chih Hsu
Kaoruko Igarashi JapanTo Stage I
Hana Igawa Japan
Riko Imai JapanTo Stage I
Grigoris Ioannou Greece
Seika Ishida Japan
Junichi Ito JapanTo Stage I
Andrei Ivanou Belarus
Asaki Iwai JapanTo Stage I
San Jittakarn ThailandTo Stage I
Joo-Yeon KaTo Stage I
Yukino Kaihara Japan
Hyelee Kang
Hyelee Kang
Elizabeth Karaulova
Airi Katada Japan
Eylam Keshet Israel
Konstantin Khachikyan
Nikolay KhozyainovTo Stage I
Hyelim Kim
Jun Ho Kim
Su Yeon KimTo Stage I
Yurika Kimura Japan
Aimi Kobayashi JapanTo Stage I
Qi Kong China
Pavle Krstic Bulgaria
Mateusz Krzyżowski PolandTo Stage I
Yukine Kuroki Japan
Jakub Kuszlik PolandTo Stage I
Shushi Kyomasu JapanTo Stage I
Hyuk LeeTo Stage I
Jaeyoon LeeTo Stage I
Xinjie Li China
Ning Yuen Li Hong Kong
Xiaoxuan Li ChinaTo Stage I
Hao Wei Lin
Bruce Liu CanadaTo Stage I
Ziyu Liu China
Julia Łozowska PolandTo Stage I
Xuanyi Mao ChinaTo Stage I
Tomasz Marut PolandTo Stage I
Yupeng Mei ChinaTo Stage I
Asaka Miyoshi Japan
Momoko Mizutani Japan
Arsenii MunTo Stage I
Mayaka Nakagawa Japan
Yui Nakamura Japan
Việt Trung Nguyễn
Poland		To Stage I
Mariko Nogami Japan
Arisa Onoda Japan
Georgijs Osokins LatviaTo Stage I
Anke Pan Germany
Eryk Parchański Poland
Jinhyung ParkTo Stage I
Yeonmin ParkTo Stage I
Jiana Peng ChinaTo Stage I
Leonardo Pierdomenico ItalyTo Stage I
Zuzanna Pietrzak PolandTo Stage I
Agnė Radzevičiūtė Canada
Lithuania
Hao Rao ChinaTo Stage I
Yangyang Ruan ChinaTo Stage I
Kazuya Saito Japan
Cristian Sandrin Romania
Sohgo Sawada JapanTo Stage I
Aristo Sham Hong KongTo Stage I
Meng-Sheng Shen
Kotaro Shigemori Japan
Miyu Shindo JapanTo Stage I
Mana Shoji Japan
Talon Smith United StatesTo Stage I
Kyohei Sorita JapanTo Stage I
Vitaly Starikov
Szu-Yu SuTo Stage I
Hayato Sumino JapanTo Stage I
Aleksandra Świgut PolandTo Stage I
Marcel Tadokoro France
Rikono Takeda JapanTo Stage I
Shunshun Tie ChinaTo Stage I
Mateusz Tomica Poland
Sarah Tuan United StatesTo Stage I
Parker Van Ostrand United States
Mónika Ruth Vida Hungary
Chao Wang ChinaTo Stage I
Zitong Wang ChinaTo Stage I
Bocheng Wang United Kingdom
Chanel Wang United States
Yijia Wang China
Liya Wang China
Zijian Wei ChinaTo Stage I
Jacek Wendler Poland
Marcin Wieczorek PolandTo Stage I
Andrzej Wierciński PolandTo Stage I
Victoria Wong CanadaTo Stage I
Sze Yuen Wong Hong Kong
Maciej Wota Poland
Maiqi Wu China
Yuchong Wu ChinaTo Stage I
Lingfei (Stephan) Xie ChinaTo Stage I
Biguo Xing China
Zi Xu ChinaTo Stage I
Miki Yamagata Japan
Yuanfan Yang United KingdomTo Stage I
Anastasia YaskoTo Stage I
Suah Ye
Shih-Hsien Yeh
Yi Yi China
Hao Zi Yoh Malaysia
Se-Hyeong Yoo
Jessica Yuma Canada
Andrey ZeninTo Stage I
Boao Zhang ChinaTo Stage I
Yilan Zhao ChinaTo Stage I
Kaiwen Zhao China
Ziji Zoé Zhao ChinaTo Stage I
Tianyu Zhou Canada

An additional nine pianists qualified to the main stage directly by winning major piano competitions:

!Competitor!Country!Admission through
Piotr Alexewicz Poland 2020 Polish Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition
Avery Gagliano United States 2020 National Chopin Piano Competition of the USA
Adam Kałduński Poland 2019 Beijing International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition for Young Pianists
2020 Polish Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition
Szymon Nehring Poland 2017 Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition
Evren Ozel United States 2020 National Chopin Piano Competition of the USA
Kamil Pacholec Poland 2019 International Paderewski Piano Competition
Piotr Pawlak Poland 2017 Darmstadt International Chopin Piano Competition
2020 Polish Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition
Yutong Sun China 2018 Santander International Piano Competition
Tomoharu Ushida Japan 2018 Hamamatsu International Piano Competition

Main stage

The main competition from 3 to 20 October consisted of three stages and a final. An inaugural concert was held on 2 October, and the prize-winners' concerts took place from 21 to 23 October.[9]

Stage I was held from 3–7 October 2021 and was contested by 87 participants.[7] Stage II was held from 9–12 October 2021 and was contested by 45 participants.[10] Stage III was held from 14 to 16 October 2021 and was contested by 23 participants.[11] The final was held from 18 to 20 October 2021 and was contested by twelve participants.[12]

Summary

Stage I

The first pianist to perform in Stage I was Xuanyi Mao of China. The letter "M" was drawn with a lottery machine by Piotr Gliński, the Polish Minister of Culture, at a press conference a week earlier.[13]

Polish Radio commentators described Szymon Nehring's playing as "extremely mature", completely different than the previous competition, where he had been a finalist.[14] Jed Distler from Gramophone noted that Georgijs Osokins' performance was "strikingly individual", with an "epic sense of time scale" akin to Emil Gilels.[15] Japanese pianist Sohgo Sawada was called the best performer of the first day's evening session, possessing "disarmingly sincerity" in his performance of the Ballade in G minor.[16] On the second day, the performance of Talon Smith of the United States was unanimously praised by the Polish Radio, and he was described as a "very musical pianist with a great imagination".[17] Distler called Smith one of those youngsters who sound "wise beyond their years", approaching Chopin as "a master pianist with an old soul".[18] On Day 3, commentators highlighted the "Italian dominance" of the day, with Leonora Armellini, who made the greatest impression, particularly in her performance of the Etude in C-sharp minor,[19] and Michelle Candotti.[20] Distler praised Armellini's "liquid sonority" and "flexible phrasing", in complete command of her chosen Fazioli piano.[21] Italian-Slovenian pianist Alexander Gadjiev drew attention on the fourth day. Róża Światczyńska of the Polish Radio remarked: "He is coming here because he has something to say from himself, a very coherent vision of music, and he wants to pass it on to us regardless of how he is judged." Gadjiev's performance of the études was particularly praised.[22] Distler described 17-year-old Yifan Hou as having "power, personality, style, technique, communicative immediacy and natural musicality", noting the "shocking" impact of his "compact, dramatic and kinetically fervent" performance of the first Ballade.[23]

From the first stage, 45 pianists were admitted to the second stage, five more than originally prescribed in the competition format. Commentators remarked that some score differences were likely minimal and that it might have been too harsh to eliminate some participants.[24]

Stage II

Compared to the first stage, where the program was largely fixed, participants were allowed a greater deal of freedom in the second stage, which has been described as more of a recital that tests the ability to arrange a program, and thereby the maturity of the pianist.[25] The most praised participants of Day 6 were Kyohei Sorita of Japan, with a "well-structured program", and 17-year-old Hao Rao from China, who possessed "genuinely sincere emotionality".[26] Yuchong Wu of China, who performed all waltzes of Op. 34, was described by Polish Radio commentators as the best performer of the first session of Day 7, and was particularly praised for his performance of the Waltz in A minor.[27] For Distler, Tomoharu Ushida provided the day's "most pleasant surprise", giving a "masterclass in horizontal clarity and the spacing of notes in time".[28] On Day 8, 17-year-old Russian-Armenian pianist Eva Gevorgyan roused interest, Andrzej Sułek from the Polish Radio remarking: "She is growing into a very important figure in this competition. I wonder if this is a pianist who is going for the first prize. A great success of the Chopin Competition is the arrival of an artist of such caliber."[29] On Day 9, Polish Radio commentators highlighted Nikolay Khozyainov's "unusually well-thought-out and intricately constructed repertoire" that he managed to "realize on stage one hundred percent".[30] The last pianist to perform that day was Bruce Liu of Canada, described to be among those "in the starting positions to attack the first place". Marcin Majchrowski of the Polish Radio remarked that he could not hide his emotions after Liu's performance, and that one could feel the "unimaginable tension and silence of listening to something special in the concert hall of the National Philharmonic".[31]

After the second stage, 23 pianists qualified to the third stage, including six from Poland, five from Japan, three from Italy, two each from Canada, Russia, South Korea, and one each from the United States, China, and Spain.[11] The number of participants admitted to the next stage again exceeded the number 20 originally prescribed in the competition format. Jury chairwoman Katarzyna Popowa-Zydroń stated in an interview that all jury members agreed that it was necessary to listen to a larger group of participants.[32]

Stage III

In the third stage, pianists perform a complete set of mazurkas, a piano sonata (excluding the first) or the complete set of Preludes Op. 28, and any other compositions of Chopin to fill the remaining time. On Day 10, Polish Radio commentators highlighted the performance of Miyu Shindo from Japan. Sułek proclaimed her "some kind of Japanese priestess of the god of time", with the "fantastic ability to stop a chord from sounding or a phrase from closing, sounds vibrating, floating in the air like Debussy's, like a drop of watercolor in a glass of water".[33] On Day 11, J J Jun Li Bui was praised for his performance of mazurkas and the Sonata in B minor, Światczyńska calling him a candidate for the Special Prize for the Best Performance of Mazurkas, which is awarded by the Polish Radio.[34] In the evening session, Alexander Gadjiev's individualism was once again highlighted, some wondering why he came to the Chopin competition at all. Światczyńska remarked that he "is of a completely non-competitive type, not falling within the bounds of objective assessment", the question being whether his performance went "beyond the limits of good taste". At the end of the day, Majchrowski praised Eva Gevorgyan, calling her performance "one that will go down in competition history".[35] On Day 12, Nikolay Khozyainov was called "one of the absolute favorites to win the competition", being described as a "mature, conscious pianist, intellectual pianist " with an "interestingly structured, coherent program".[36] The third stage concluded with the performance of Canadian Bruce Liu, noted by Sułek as a pianist with "inexhaustible imagination", performing an "excellent recital".[37]

From the third stage, twelve pianists from ten countries qualified for the final, two more than prescribed in the competition rules.[12] Artur Szklener, director of the Chopin Institute, explained that "the substantive argument was that the participants ranked 10th, 11th and 12th very were close in terms of points. After checking the organizational possibilities with the National Philharmonic Orchestra, the jury came to the conclusion that the best solution would be to allow an increased number of 12 pianists."[38] Sułek commented that the finalists constituted an "unprecented" mosaic of pianists, a "rich gallery of characters, pianistic individualities, among whom there are amazing phenomena".[39] Światczyńska highlighted the "extremely different artistic personalities", noting that the jury's "range of tastes and criteria" was quite wide this year.[40]

Final

The final was held over three days, four pianists presenting one of Chopin's two piano concertos on each day, accompanied by the Warsaw National Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Andrzej Boreyko.

Day 1Kamil Pacholec of Poland was the first to perform. Sułek wondered about his experience with an orchestra, noting that Pacholec tended to follow the orchestra rather imposing certain musical thoughts on it.[41] John Allison, writing for the competition daily Chopin Courier, praised Pacholec's "elegantly poised playing", yet noted that his performance "got weighted down", particularly in the slow movement.[42] Distler called Pacholec's performance "steady" but "smaller-scaled" than his competitors.[43]

Hao Rao of China was the second participant. Przemysław Psikuta of the Polish Radio noted that Rao, like Pacholec before him, seemed to play in a more classical, traditional way, "physical elements dominating over poetry".[41] Allison noted that the middle movement was a particular highlight of Rao's performance, and that he projected it with "fully expressive, bel canto feeling".[42] For Distler, the "effervescent and nimble" Rondo stood out the most.[43]

Kyohei Sorita of Japan followed after an intermission. Majchrowski called his Romance "simply extraordinary", with nuances and an emphasis on the details of the score, and recognized him as the best performer of the day.[41] Allison highlighted Sorita's "developed artistic personality" that secured him a "spacious performance" with "well-managed rubato".[42] In Distler's view, Sorita demonstrated "an altogether higher level of pianistic cultivation" with his "variegated turns of phrase, subtle transitions and wider dynamic range".[43]

Leonora Armellini of Italy concluded the first day. Sułek called her performance the best of the session, rating her a little higher than Sorita in terms of pianistic value.[41] Allison called her performance "satisfying", writing that it felt like "being at a good concert", though noting that her Rondo was not the "most successful of the lot".[42] Distler was captivated by Armellini's "warm and soaring tone, natural musicality, spontaneity and unalloyed joy in just being at the keyboard", noting that she "truly listened to her fellow musicians", though the Rondo's coda "didn't sparkle so brightly as expected".[43]

Day 2J J Jun Li Bui of Canada was the first to perform on the second day of the final. Sułek was disappointed by his performance, expecting an early Chopin-Warsaw style that defined his performance of the Rondo à la mazur in the previous stage. Sułek also highlighted Bui's apparent inexperience with an orchestra, and had the impression that Bui was focused on himself, not communicating well with the conductor and orchestra. Światczyńska praised Bui's "extremely poetic" moments in the Romance.[44] Krzysztof Stefański, writing for the Chopin Courier, found praise for Bui's "warm, round tone" and "impressionist hues above the clarity of his arpeggio".[45] Distler criticized Bui's playing as being too "uniform, machine-like", "ploughing through Chopin's bravura writing like the proverbial horse with blinders".[46]

Alexander Gadjiev of Italy and Slovenia was the first to play the Piano Concerto in F minor. Światczyńska liked his sound and his "ability to operate within wide planes", but criticized his "manneristic pathos and affectation" that "contradict Chopin's expression". Sułek noted that Gadjiev's "wild nature" worked better in solo works, whereas in the concerto it caused the "narrative to become too fragmented".[44] Stefański found that Gadjiev "played with a large sound, as if echoing the pianist's Romantic individualism".[45] Distler found praise for Gadjiev's performance: "He illuminated the opening Maestoso movement's salient points by executing decorative passages in tempo, while demarcating melodies with discreet rubato and sophisticated accentuation. Gadjiev's seamless legato and multi-leveled dynamic control transformed the Larghetto into an aria where the piano's hammers seemed to have replaced by lungs."[46]

Martín García García of Spain followed with the same concerto. Światczyńska was initially concerned with García's fearful appearance, but thought that he surprised many people with a good performance having "beautiful moments". Stefański described García's playing as "bathed in a gentle morning light", continuously displaying "Chopin's sunny side", playing "lightly, with an incredible songfulness and cultured tone".[45] Distler remarked that García' seemed "held back on a leash" compared to his "impetuous, risk-taking solo performances" in the earlier stages of the competition, calling it "lovely by any standard" but with too little adventurousness to rival Gadjiev's "penetrating interpretation".[46] In contrast, three of five music critics for the Polish music magazine Ruch Muzyczny called García's the best concerto performer: Szymon Atys called him his favorite pianist of the competition, Anna Chęćka highlighted his "surprisingly fresh and seductive vision" of the concerto, and Dariusz Marciniszyn remarked that García "enchanted" him completely, bringing forth "hidden melodic and harmonic dependencies" in the Rondo.[47]

Eva Gevorgyan of Russia and Armenia concluded the session. Sułek noted that she "delighted" him, but did not "seduce" him until the second part.[44] Stefański praised her "clear sense of direction", with each broken chord serving "a higher structural goal".[45] For Distler, Gevorgyan was a "performance of eloquence, nobility and substance", evoking memories of "notable Russian luminaries like Emil Gilels and Bella Davidovich".[46]

Day 3Aimi Kobayashi of Japan opened the final day of the competition. Światczyńska remarked that Kobayashi did not seem to have the best day, wondering if the level expectations were becoming psychologically difficult to bear.[48] Allison highlighted the delicacy and intimacy of her performance, though noting that her tempos might not endear her to critics.[49] Distler highlighted Kobayashi's "micro-management and tense finger-orientated pianism".[50] Two of five authors of Ruch Muzyczny called Kobayashi the best performer of a concerto. Marcin Bogucki praised her "romantic vision", though noting a few slip-ups in the finale. Krzysztof Stefański remarked that "time stopped for a moment. Her fingers flew lightly over the keyboard, even when she was building the climaxes, she did not reach for a strong forte. The lunar fragment of Romanza sounded like a wonderful improvisation. It was hard not to fall in love."[47]

Jakub Kuszlik of Poland gave a performance that was assessed by Polish Radio commentators as another "step up". Światczyńska admired his composure and ability to focus, though feeling a certain lack of "poetic expression and color differentiation"[48] Allison called his performance "straightforward", with "impressively fleet passage work", but also noting that he went "under the surface, into the realms of that uniquely Polish spirit of żal".[49] Distler praised Kuszlik's "red-blooded, forward-moving" performance.[50]

Hyuk Lee of South Korea brought the day's only performance of the Concerto in F minor. Allison criticized Lee's tone as being "too brittle", noting that he sounded "less than completely at ease".[49] Stefański wrote that Lee seemed to reject the "romantic character" of the middle Larghetto, though playing the recitative fragments poignantly.[51]

Bruce Liu of Canada was the final performer. Allison praised Liu's performance for "holding poetry and virtuosity in wonderful balance", the "dreaminess of the Romance" sustaining "right to the dying last note".[49] Distler called his performance "effortless, insouciant yet relatively straightforward".[50] Stefański called Liu the "undisputed favorite of critics and the audience", remarking: "He is a complete pianist – he has excellent technique, and he uses it to conjure up the most fascinating timbres on the Fazioli piano. You can write about his perfect brillante, his ability to produce a soft sound without the sustain pedal, his wonderfully rocking rubato, his great control of the dynamics, but also his ability to create form, as in the ever-increasing passages that end the first movement. And sometimes the pianist played in such a way that the critic's pen stood still – helpless, unable to find the right words for what he was hearing."[51]

Program

Participants were required to select a different program for each stage of the competition. The competition repertoire had to be played from memory and could be performed in any order. Contestants were not allowed to play the same piece again in different stages of the competition, though they could perform pieces they performed in the preliminary round (except the first two etudes) in the main stage. Participants could use any available edition of Chopin's works, though they were recommended to use the Chopin National Edition.[6]

Stage I program
One of One of One of One of
Stage II program
One of One of One of Any other pieces by Chopin to meet the required performing time of 30 to 40 minutes
Stage III program
One of Full set of Any other pieces by Chopin to meet the required performing time of 45 to 55 minutes
Final program
Piano Concerto No. 1, Op. 11
or
Piano Concerto No. 2, Op. 21

In the first stage, pianists most often chose the Étude in G-sharp minor, Op. 25 No. 6, the Ballade No. 4 in F minor (18 pianists each), as well as the Étude in C major, Op. 10 No. 1, and the Nocturne in B major, Op. 62 No. 1 (17 pianists each).[52] No participant at this stage chose the Nocturne in G major, Op. 37 No. 2.

In the second stage, the most played pieces were the Andante spianato et grande polonaise brillante (18 pianists), the Waltz in F major, Op. 34 No. 3 (16 pianists), as well as the Barcarolle in F-sharp major and the Polonaise in A-flat major, Op. 53 (15 pianists each). Scherzo No. 4 was played by only one pianist (Hyounglok Choi), as were the Polonaises, Op. 26 (Federico Gad Crema).[53] From additional pieces supplementing the repertoire program of this stage, pianists most frequently chose the Rondo à la mazur (5 pianists), the Waltz in A minor, Op. 34 No. 2, and the Nocturne in C minor, Op. 48 No. 1 (3 pianists).

In the third stage, most participants selected the Piano Sonata No. 3 (12 pianists), Piano Sonata No. 2 (8 pianists), and the Mazurkas Op. 24 and Mazurkas Op. 56 (5 pianists each).[53] Of the additional pieces supplementing the repertoire program of this stage, the pianists most frequently chose the Fantaisie in F minor and the Polonaise-Fantaisie (3 pianists each).

In the finale, nine pianists decided to perform the Piano Concerto No. 1, and three chose the Piano Concerto No. 2.[53]

Piano selection

Before the start of the competition, each participant was allotted a timeslot of 15 minutes to choose an instrument. Participants could choose between a Yamaha, a Kawai, a Fazioli and two Steinway pianos. Once selected, participants may not change pianos between the rounds.[54] Out of 87 participants of the first round, 43 chose the Steinway ending with serial number 479, 21 the Steinway ending with number 300, nine the Yamaha, eight the Fazioli and six the Kawai.[55]

BrandModelSerial number
S1 Steinway & SonsD-274611479
S2Steinway & SonsD-274612300
YYamahaCFX6524400
FFazioliF2782782230
KKawaiShigeru EX2718001

Results

Yes: percentage of jurors who voted to pass the participant to the next round, excluding recusals

Pts: adjusted average number of points, excluding recusals

Scorings were released after the end of the competition, excluding those from the final.[56]

Competitor! rowspan="2"
CountryStage IStage IIStage IIIFinal
Result
data-sort-value="Liu, Bruce" Bruce Liu CanadaF23.00 23.03 23.22
data-sort-value="Gadjiev, Alexander" Alexander Gadjiev Italy
Slovenia		K22.66 21.41 21.75
data-sort-value="Sorita, Kyohei" Kyohei Sorita JapanS120.40 21.50 21.57
data-sort-value="García, Martín García" Martín García García SpainF19.91 20.14 21.09
data-sort-value="Kuszlik, Jakub" Jakub Kuszlik PolandS121.67 21.20 22.00
data-sort-value="Kobayashi, Aimi" Aimi Kobayashi JapanS121.43 20.47 22.36
data-sort-value="Armellini, Leonora" Leonora Armellini ItalyF21.05 20.60 20.55
data-sort-value="Bui, J J Jun Li" J J Jun Li Bui CanadaK21.49 22.91 21.31
data-sort-value="Gevorgyan, Eva" Eva Gevorgyan
Armenia		S121.66 20.04 21.40
data-sort-value="Pacholec, Kamil" Kamil Pacholec PolandS119.92 20.04 20.43
data-sort-value="Rao, Hao" Hao Rao ChinaS121.69 20.28 20.22
data-sort-value="Lee, Hyuk" Hyuk LeeK19.48 19.91 20.20
data-sort-value="Kim, Su Yeon" Su Yeon KimS120.44 19.82 19.73
data-sort-value="Alexewicz, Piotr" Piotr Alexewicz PolandS120.69 20.74 20.22
data-sort-value="Shindo, Miyu" Miyu Shindo JapanS119.98 19.72 20.15
data-sort-value="Khozyainov, Nikolay" Nikolay KhozyainovS219.34 20.08 19.57
data-sort-value="Nehring, Szymon" Szymon Nehring PolandS120.33 21.47 20.09
data-sort-value="Candotti, Michelle" Michelle Candotti ItalyS119.24 20.37 19.22
data-sort-value="Sumino, Hayato" Hayato Sumino JapanS219.75 20.30 19.07
data-sort-value="Gagliano, Avery" Avery Gagliano United StatesS219.33 19.60 19.06
data-sort-value="Wierciński, Andrzej" Andrzej Wierciński PolandS219.48 19.50 19.35
data-sort-value="Furumi, Yasuko" Yasuko Furumi JapanS119.57 19.21 19.21
data-sort-value="Krzyżowski, Mateusz" Mateusz Krzyżowski PolandS119.47 19.25 18.84
data-sort-value="Chen, Xuehong" Xuehong Chen ChinaS120.87 18.84
data-sort-value="Wu, Yuchong" Yuchong Wu ChinaS221.06 19.66
data-sort-value="Ferro, Alberto" Alberto Ferro ItalyS218.80 19.00
data-sort-value="Ozel, Evren" Evren Ozel United StatesS118.80 18.76
data-sort-value="Sun, Yutong" Yutong Sun ChinaS119.44 19.31
data-sort-value="Kyomasu, Shushi" Shushi Kyomasu JapanY19.63 18.70
data-sort-value="Ushida, Tomoharu" Tomoharu Ushida JapanY19.40 18.33
data-sort-value="Nguyễn, Việt Trung" Việt Trung NguyễnS119.57 18.55
data-sort-value="Chang, Kai-Min" Kai-Min ChangS219.64 18.73
data-sort-value="Smith, Talon" Talon Smith United StatesS219.07 18.38
data-sort-value="Osokins, Georgijs" Georgijs Osokins LatviaY19.56 18.42
data-sort-value="Hsieh, Wei-Ting" Wei-Ting HsiehS118.78 18.48
data-sort-value="Kałduński, Adam" Adam Kałduński PolandS120.13 18.27
data-sort-value="Choi, Hyounglok" Hyounglok ChoiS118.84 18.14
data-sort-value="Xie, Lingfei (Stephan)" Lingfei (Stephan) Xie ChinaS219.45 17.77
data-sort-value="Sawada, Sohgo" Sohgo Sawada JapanK18.48 17.76
data-sort-value="Xu, Zi" Zi Xu ChinaS120.62 17.99
data-sort-value="Crema, Federico Gad" Federico Gad Crema ItalyF18.95 17.58
data-sort-value="Sham, Aristo" Aristo Sham Hong KongS219.20 18.04
data-sort-value="Su, Szu-Yu" Szu-Yu SuS119.00 17.63
data-sort-value="Mun, Arsenii" Arsenii MunY18.25 16.89
data-sort-value="Wieczorek, Marcin" Marcin Wieczorek PolandS118.99
data-sort-value="Tie, Shunshun" Shunshun Tie ChinaS218.53
data-sort-value="Li, Xiaoxuan" Xiaoxuan Li ChinaS218.44
data-sort-value="Imai, Riko" Riko Imai JapanS218.28
data-sort-value="Tuan, Sarah" Sarah Tuan United StatesS218.08
data-sort-value="Pietrzak, Zuzanna" Zuzanna Pietrzak PolandS118.06
data-sort-value="Peng, Jiana" Jiana Peng ChinaS118.44
data-sort-value="Wang, Chao" Chao Wang ChinaY19.04
data-sort-value="Guo, Eric" Eric Guo CanadaS118.67
data-sort-value="Pawlak, Piotr" Piotr Pawlak PolandS118.34
data-sort-value="Mao, Xuanyi" Xuanyi Mao ChinaS218.31
data-sort-value="Guo, Chelsea" Chelsea Guo United StatesF18.20
data-sort-value="Wong, Victoria" Victoria Wong CanadaS118.44
data-sort-value="Chen, Zixi" Zixi Chen ChinaS118.29
data-sort-value="Igarashi, Kaoruko" Kaoruko Igarashi JapanS117.70
data-sort-value="Hou, Yifan" Yifan Hou ChinaS117.69
data-sort-value="Wei, Zijian" Zijian Wei ChinaS217.45
data-sort-value="Wang, Zitong" Zitong Wang ChinaS117.94
data-sort-value="Zhang, Boao" Boao Zhang ChinaK17.67
data-sort-value="Iwai, Asaki" Asaki Iwai JapanS218.27
data-sort-value="Mei, Yupeng" Yupeng Mei ChinaY18.14
data-sort-value="Lee, Jaeyoon" Jaeyoon LeeS117.81
data-sort-value="Park, Yeonmin" Yeonmin ParkS117.80
data-sort-value="González Buajasan, Jorge" Jorge González Buajasan CubaY17.80
data-sort-value="Yang, Yuanfan" Yuanfan Yang United KingdomS217.72
data-sort-value="Łozowska, Julia" Julia Łozowska PolandS118.14
data-sort-value="Goranko, Joanna" Joanna Goranko PolandS117.86
data-sort-value="Ito, Junichi" Junichi Ito JapanF17.47
data-sort-value="Park, Jinhyung" Jinhyung ParkY17.19
data-sort-value="Zenin, Andrey" Andrey ZeninK16.88
data-sort-value="Świgut, Aleksandra" Aleksandra Świgut PolandF17.39
data-sort-value="Chen, Junhui" Junhui Chen ChinaS217.40
data-sort-value="Takeda, Rikono" Rikono Takeda JapanS217.00
data-sort-value="Zhao, Yilan" Yilan Zhao ChinaS117.44
data-sort-value="Ka, Joo-Yeon" Joo-Yeon KaY17.21
data-sort-value="Ruan, Yangyang" Yangyang Ruan ChinaS116.87
data-sort-value="Pierdomenico, Leonardo" Leonardo Pierdomenico ItalyS116.81
data-sort-value="Marut, Tomasz" Tomasz Marut PolandS117.13
data-sort-value="Zhao, Ziji Zoé" Ziji Zoé Zhao ChinaF17.13
data-sort-value="Jittakarn, San" San Jittakarn ThailandS116.63
data-sort-value="Hara, Saaya" Saaya Hara JapanS116.50
data-sort-value="Dąbek, Aleksandra Hortensja" Aleksandra Hortensja Dąbek PolandS216.38
data-sort-value="Yasko, Anastasia" Anastasia YaskoS114.16

Jury

There were three juries corresponding to each phase of the competition. The qualifying committee screened more than 500 video applications and admitted 164 candidates into the preliminary round. Of these, the preliminary round jury admitted 78 participants to the main stage, joined by nine pianists who qualified directly. The main competition jury narrowed the field of candidates further through three competition stages, culminating in a final with twelve pianists.[6]

In all stages except the final, jurors gave candidates two assessments: a simple YES or NO on whether to accept the candidate into the next stage of the competition, and an integer score from 1 to 25 (25 being the highest). A YES required the juror to give at least 17 points for the preliminaries and 18, 19, and 20 points for Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III, respectively. When calculating the average score, scores were bounded within 3 points (preceding Stage II) or 2 points (Stage II and III) of the true average; for example, if the true average were 14.35 in Stage I, all scores lower than 12 would be adjusted to 11.35 and all scores higher than 17 would be adjusted to 17.35, and the average would then be calculated again. Based on these two assessments, but without the participants' names, the jury made the decision on admitting candidates to the next stage.[57] [58]

In the final, Jurors assessed candidates on a scale from 1 to 10, while the highest score of 10 was allowed to be given only once. Jurors were to take the candidate's performances in the preceding stages into account. As in the main stages, the score average was adjusted with a permitted difference of 2 points.[58]

Jury members were compelled to recuse themselves from assessing a former or current student.[6]

Qualifying committee

The qualifying committee consisted of:[59]

Preliminary round jury

The preliminary round jury consisted of:[60]

Competition jury

The main competition jury consists of numerous pianists, many of whom were participants and prize-winners in previous editions of the Chopin Competition.[61]

Nelson Freire and Martha Argerich withdrew prior to the start of the competition and were replaced by Arthur Moreira Lima.[62]

Controversy

Contestants from Taiwan were initially labeled as "PRC Taiwan" in a participant list that was published in March 2020 on the competition website. It was then later revised to "China Taiwan".[63] However, after Taiwan's Representative Office in Warsaw lodged a protest, it was again revised to "Chinese Taipei", according to Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which cited that the designation issue was a result of political interference from Beijing, and that "Chinese Taipei", while not the designation Taiwan would prefer, would be "acceptable".[64]

Broadcasting

In Poland, the competition was broadcast on national channel TVP1 and on Polskie Radio Program II. All performances were also livestreamed on YouTube, and included, for the first time, a 4K broadcast and a virtual reality (VR) broadcast. In New York, London, Paris, Budapest, Moscow, Jerusalem, Seoul and Tokyo, the Adam Mickiewicz Institute collaborated with the Chopin Institute to create "listener's zones", where the competition was streamed in specially arranged spaces.[65]

Notes and References

  1. Web site: 2020-03-11. Poland sets date for Frederic Chopin piano competition. Monika. Scislowska. 2021-07-25. Associated Press.
  2. Web site: 2020-05-03. The 18th Fryderyk Chopin International Piano Competition postponed till 2021. chopin2020.pl. 26 July 2021.
  3. Web site: 2021-01-18. 18th Chopin Competition – the new dates of the preliminary round. 2021-07-25. chopin2020.pl.
  4. Web site: Awards. 2021-10-20. chopin2020.pl.
  5. Web site: Konkurs Chopinowski. "Trzech pianistów miało identyczną punktację". 2021-10-21. 2021-10-22. pl. Polskie Radio. 22 October 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211022135254/https://www.polskieradio.pl/8/404/Artykul/2830843. dead.
  6. Book: Rules of The Eighteenth International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition. Fryderyk Chopin Institute. 25 July 2021. 21 June 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20220621194533/https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/media.chopin2020.pl/c38344d9c15a43779f60bfde310cdb08.pdf. dead.
  7. Web site: 87 pianists qualified to the 18th Fryderyk Chopin International Piano Competition!. 2021-07-25. chopin2020.pl.
  8. Web site: Jacek. Marczyński. Konkurs Chopinowski: Wyraźna dominacja Azji. 2021-07-26. Rzeczpospolita. pl.
  9. Web site: Calendar. 2021-07-25. chopin2020.pl.
  10. Web site: Stage I results announced!. 2021-10-07. chopin2020.pl.
  11. Web site: 23 pianists have qualified to Stage 3!. 2021-10-12. chopin2020.pl.
  12. Web site: We know the names of 12 finalists of the 18th Chopin Competition. 2021-10-16. 2021-10-16. chopin2020.pl.
  13. Bogula. Ewa. 'M' for music. Chopin Courier. 2. 3. Warsaw. Fryderyk Chopin Institute. 20 October 2021. 5 October 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211005134119/https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/media.chopin2020.pl/d0ef9ad84dd54b97bc33532741cad1ee.pdf. dead.
  14. Web site: Dzień 1. "Szymon Nehring gra z niejednoznacznością i wieloznacznością". 2021-10-03. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  15. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition: welcome to our daily blog. 2021-10-04. 2021-10-10. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  16. Web site: Dzień 1. "Sohgo Sawada był numerem jeden sesji wieczornej". 2021-10-03. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  17. Web site: Dzień 2. "Występ Talona Smitha przyprawił mnie o ciarki". 2021-10-04. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  18. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition: day two. 2021-10-05. 2021-10-10. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  19. Web site: Dzień 3. "Leonora Armellini wróciła w wielkim stylu". 2021-10-05. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  20. Web site: Dzień 3. "To był włoski dzień". 2021-10-05. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  21. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition, day three: settling in. 2021-10-06. 2021-10-10. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  22. Web site: Dzień 4. "Gadijev kreuje muzykę tu i teraz". 2021-10-06. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  23. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition, day four: highs, and a major discovery. 2021-10-07. 2021-10-10. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  24. Web site: Dwójkowi eksperci zgadzają się z wynikami I etapu, choć nie bez zastrzeżeń. 2021-10-08. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  25. Web site: Dzień 6. "II etap to zdecydowanie większe wyzwanie". 2021-10-09. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  26. Web site: Dzień 6. "To był pojedynek na Barkarolę i Poloneza op. 22". 2021-10-09. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  27. Web site: Dzień 7. "Andrzej Wierciński wypadł zdecydowanie lepiej w tym etapie". 2021-10-10. 2021-10-10. pl. Polskie Radio.
  28. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition, day eight: 'What's in a name?'. 2021-10-12. 2021-10-12. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  29. Web site: Dzień 8. "Na Evę Gevoryan nie sposób nie zwrócić uwagi". 2021-10-11. 2021-10-12. pl. Polskie Radio.
  30. Web site: Dzień 9. "Część poranna ułożyła się w formie crescendo". 2021-10-12. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  31. Web site: Dzień 9. "Bruce Liu cały czas tańczy". 2021-10-12. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  32. Web site: II etap XVIII Konkursu Chopinowskiego. "Ballady i scherza powinny być obowiązkowe". 2021-10-13. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  33. Web site: Dzień 10. "Widać wyraźnie wagę tego etapu". 2021-10-14. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  34. Web site: Dzień 11. "J J Jun Li Bui to kandydat do nagrody Polskiego Radia za mazurki". 2021-10-15. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  35. Web site: Dzień 11. "Zastanawiam się, po co Alexander Gadjiev w ogóle tu przyjechał". 2021-10-15. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  36. Web site: Dzień 12. "Nikolay Khozyainov należy do absolutnych faworytów konkursu". 2021-10-16. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  37. Web site: Dzień 12. "Hyuk Lee to nieoszlifowany diament". 2021-10-16. 2021-10-16. pl. Polskie Radio.
  38. Web site: "To bardzo konsekwentne działanie". Szklener o wynikach III etapu XVIII Konkursu Chopinowskiego. 2021-10-17. 2021-10-20. pl. Polskie Radio.
  39. Web site: "Zupełnie nowe interpretacje". III etap XVIII Konkursu Chopinowskiego. 2021-10-17. 2021-10-20. pl. Polskie Radio.
  40. Web site: "To skrajnie różne osobowości". Światczyńska o finalistach XVIII Konkursu Chopinowskiego. 2021-10-17. 2021-10-20. pl. Polskie Radio.
  41. Web site: 1. dzień finałów. "Koncert e-moll uważany jest za ten szczęśliwszy". 2021-10-18. 2021-10-20. pl. Polskie Radio.
  42. Allison. John. With a critical ear. Chopin Courier. 16. 3. Warsaw. Fryderyk Chopin Institute.
  43. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition: the Final Round, Part One. 2021-10-19. 2021-10-20. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  44. Web site: Drugi dzień finałów. "U Evy Gevorgyan wreszcie usłyszałam koncert Chopina". 2021-10-19. 2021-10-21. pl. Polskie Radio.
  45. Stefański. Krzysztof. The Orchestra's Mirror. Chopin Courier. 17. 4. Warsaw. Fryderyk Chopin Institute.
  46. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition: the Final continues. 2021-10-20. 2021-10-21. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  47. Web site:
    1. Chopin2020 KWESTIONARIUSZ (finał)
    . 2021-10-21. 2021-10-24. pl. Ruch Muzyczny.
  48. Web site: Trzeci dzień finałów: Aimi Kobayashi krępował niewidzialny gorset. 2021-10-20. 2021-10-22. pl. Polskie Radio.
  49. Allison. John. With a critical ear. Chopin Courier. 18. 6. Warsaw. Fryderyk Chopin Institute.
  50. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition: final reflections. 2021-10-21. 2021-10-22. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  51. Web site:
    1. Chopin2020 RELATIONS (final)
    . 2021-10-19. 2021-10-24. pl. Ruch Muzyczny.
  52. Web site: And the winners are... Ballade in F minor, Op. 52 and Etude in G sharp minor Op. 25 No. 6!. 2021-10-07. 2021-10-20. chopin2020.pl.
  53. Web site: Now playing, or the repertoire choices of the participants. 2021-10-18. 2021-10-20. chopin2020.pl.
  54. Komarnicki. Krzysztof. A crucial decision. Chopin Courier. 2. 2. Warsaw. Fryderyk Chopin Institute. 20 October 2021. 5 October 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211005134119/https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/media.chopin2020.pl/d0ef9ad84dd54b97bc33532741cad1ee.pdf. dead.
  55. Web site: The Chopin Piano Competition, October 17: which piano to choose?. 2021-10-18. 2021-10-20. Jed. Distler. Gramophone.
  56. Web site: 18th Chopin Competition - jurors' scoring. 2021-11-04. 2021-11-05. chopin2020.pl.
  57. Book: Fryderyk Chopin Institute. Rules of the preliminary round Jury.
  58. Book: Fryderyk Chopin Institute. Rules of the Competition Jury.
  59. Web site: Qualifying Committee. 2021-07-25. chopin2020.pl.
  60. Web site: Preliminary round Jury. 2021-07-25. chopin2020.pl.
  61. Web site: Competition Jury. 2021-09-30. chopin2020.pl.
  62. Web site: Arthur Moreira-Lima will replace Nelson Freire and Martha Argerich in the Jury of the Competition. 2021-09-23. 2021-09-30. chopin2020.pl.
  63. Web site: 波蘭蕭邦鋼琴大賽矮化台灣 外交部抗議促更正(Chopin Competition to name Taiwan as China Taiwan, Taiwan Foreign Ministry ask for revision). 11 March 2020 . zh-tw.
  64. Web site: Chopin Competition revises Taiwan's designation to 'Chinese Taipei'.
  65. Web site: XVIII Konkurs Chopinowski się odbędzie. 2021-07-25. prestoportal.pl. pl.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "XVIII International Chopin Piano Competition".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.