Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp. explained

Litigants:Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
Arguedate:January 20
Argueyear:1966
Decidedate:March 7
Decideyear:1966
Fullname:Dora Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corporation et al.
Usvol:383
Uspage:363
Parallelcitations:86 S. Ct. 854; 15 L. Ed. 2d 807; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2989
Prior:342 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1965)
Holding:The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not require dismissal of cases where the record shows grave fraud charges based on reasonable beliefs growing out of careful investigation.
Majority:Black
Joinmajority:Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, and White
Concurrence:Harlan
Notparticipating:Fortas and Warren

Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 383 U.S. 363 (1966), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure did not require courts to summarily dismiss fraud cases when the complaints were based on a thorough examination.